Displaced Gazans Return to Ruined Homes as Israeli Forces Withdraw

0
13
Gazans trek to ruined homes as Israeli forces pull back
Displaced Palestinians walk along the coastal road near Wadi Gaza in central Gaza, travelling north

A Road Home Through the Rubble: Gaza’s Fragile Return

The sun knifed through a dusty sky as thousands of people moved like a river across Gaza’s coastal plain, pulling suitcases, pushing bicycles laden with the few belongings they had salvaged, and carrying blanket-wrapped bundles of memories.

After two years of relentless conflict, a ceasefire—part of a U.S.-brokered plan—gave Palestinians permission to step back into the places they had fled. For many it was an act of pilgrimage as much as of return: a slow, solemn procession toward the ruins of lives interrupted.

On the road to Gaza City

Along the main coastal artery north, families walked in long columns toward Gaza City, which until days earlier had been under intense Israeli military operations. The air smelled of dust and char. Satellite dishes hung crooked on splintered rooftops. Children whose earliest memories are tents and checkpoints held hands with elders who spoke of orchards and weddings now only visible in photos.

“When I saw my street, I didn’t know whether to laugh or cry,” said Layla Mansour, 34, who had spent the past year in a tent camp outside Khan Younis. “Our house is still standing, but the doors are blown off. My neighbors’ walls have gaping holes. You come back to your home and it is wearing the wounds you carry inside.”

In Khan Younis, which bore the brunt of earlier offensives, people picked their way through skeletons of buildings. Ahmed al-Karmi, a man in his fifties, pushed a bicycle with bundles of firewood lashed to the frame. “We need wood to cook. The winter is coming. This is what we could find from under the beams,” he said, thumb rubbing the calluses of a lifetime of hard work. “Everything else is gone.”

Terms on paper, uncertainty on the ground

The ceasefire arrangement—announced and activated at midday local time—set out a phased pullback. Under the first stage of the plan, Israeli forces have 24 hours to withdraw from positions inside urban areas, though they will retain control of more than half of the territory.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the nation the Israeli presence would remain until Hamas was disarmed. “If this is achieved the easy way then that will be good, and if not then it will be achieved the hard way,” he said in a televised address, underscoring the fragile, conditional nature of the pause.

The deal binds Hamas to release the remaining hostages in stages. Once Israeli forces have pulled back, the armed group has 72 hours to free the 20 living hostages believed to be in Gaza; in exchange, Israel will release 250 Palestinians serving long sentences plus 1,700 detainees taken during the course of the war.

What the agreement means in practical terms

  • 24 hours for Israeli troops to withdraw from many urban positions
  • 72 hours for Hamas to release the remaining living hostages
  • Expected release by Israel of 250 long-term Palestinian prisoners and 1,700 detainees captured during the war
  • Hundreds of aid trucks per day envisaged to enter Gaza carrying food, fuel and medical supplies

“We’ve prepared routes and are ready to coordinate humanitarian deliveries at scale,” said an aid worker who has been operating in Gaza for months. “But logistics alone cannot fix the trauma and the infrastructure gaps. What people need is dignity—homes, schools, hospitals functioning again.”

Faces of relief, faces of doubt

In Tel Aviv’s Hostages Square, people celebrated the prospect of returning loved ones. In Gaza, joy and relief threaded uneasily with exhaustion and grief. The war that began in October 2023—punctuated by a brutal Hamas-led attack that killed roughly 1,200 Israelis and saw 251 people taken hostage—has left huge scars on both societies.

Across Gaza, official tallies and hospital registries point to a staggering human cost: more than 67,000 Palestinians killed over the course of the conflict, according to the figures reported during the ceasefire announcement. Those numbers translate into streets without fathers, classrooms without teachers, and communities learning to grieve in stages.

“Two years is a long time to live in a tent,” said Mahdi Saqla, 40, as he picked through concrete fragments where his living room once stood. “We have been moving from place to place. To step on the ground where our house stood—that is a strange joy. But we left with nothing. The children have no winter clothes.”

Security, reconstruction, and the unknown

Even as residents returned, the Israeli military cautioned civilians to stay away from areas still under its control. “Keep to the agreement and ensure your safety,” said an Israeli military spokesperson, urging restraint and cooperation as forces repositioned.

The Hamas-run interior ministry announced it would deploy security forces to areas from which Israeli troops withdraw. Whether armed militants will reappear on the streets in significant numbers is a central sticking point; Israeli authorities say any resurgence would be seen as provocation and could fracture the fragile truce.

What comes next: prizes, pitfalls, and politics

For many observers, the agreement represents the closest thing to a pause in two years of cyclical violence. Yet the roadmap ahead is riddled with unresolved questions: who will govern the devastated zones of Gaza; how will rebuilding be funded and managed; and what will disarmament actually look like in practice?

There is also a human bargaining table of painful trade-offs. Hamas insists on the release of some of the most prominent Palestinian prisoners; Israel has demanded guarantees of disarmament. Both sides have not yet published full lists of detainees to be exchanged, and that opacity breeds suspicion.

“Negotiations in war-time are never symmetrical,” said Dr. Miriam Aloni, a regional analyst specializing in conflict resolution. “There will be spoilers, missteps, and the politics of memory will shape how this ceasefire is viewed. A document on paper is not peace until people feel safe enough to sleep in their own homes.”

The global stage and a presidential visit

Part of the wider diplomatic choreography involves high-stakes visits. The architect of the framework—whose plan contains 20 discrete points—has signaled plans to travel to the region for what could be a signing ceremony in Egypt, and Israeli authorities are preparing for his arrival. These displays of pageantry matter politically, but for the people walking home across rubble, they are distant reverberations.

“We do not need a ceremony,” said Fatima Abu Salem, a teacher returning to her neighborhood. “We need an open clinic, a functioning water pump, a school bell that rings in a proper classroom. That is how you measure peace.”

Questions that linger

As the world watches the first fragile hours of this ceasefire, ask yourself: when does a pause in fighting become the beginning of repair? How do societies rebuild trust after mass displacement, heavy losses, and deep political fractures? And what obligations do outside powers have to ensure reconstruction is not just bricks and mortar but a return of rights and dignity?

The answers will not be etched in a single document or guaranteed by passing convoys of aid. They will be tested in the coming weeks—by whether hostages are released, whether families can return safely, whether basic services restart, and whether negotiators can transform a fragile pause into lasting relief.

For now, Gaza’s returnees pick through what remains of their lives, carrying with them the human burden of a generation that has known little but tents, checkpoints, and the hum of distant bombs. They walk north toward a city that looks like a memory. They walk forward anyway—because to go back, even into rubble, is to insist that life continues.