Nov 08(Jowhar)-Dowladda Soomaaliya ayaa diiday warbixin ay faafisay warbaahinta Sweden oo sheegaysay in xafiiska Wasiirka 1aad ee xukumada uu Dowladda Sweden la galay heshiis qarsoodi ah oo Soomaaliya dib loogu soo celinayo dad dambiyo ka soo galay Sweden oo Soomaali ah.
Three scientists receive Nobel Prize in Physics for landmark discovery
A quiet thunder in the lab: how three physicists nudged the world toward a quantum tomorrow
On a gray morning in Stockholm, where the Baltic water glints like brushed steel, the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences announced what felt like both the end of a long experiment and the opening of a new chapter: John Clarke, Michel Devoret and John Martinis have been awarded the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics for “the discovery of macroscopic quantum mechanical tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electric circuit.”
It’s an achievement that reads like a blend of thought experiment and hard wiring — the kind of discovery you expect to find in chalk-stained notebooks and late-night lab benches rather than in ordinary life. And yet its implications are already threading into the fabric of our daily future: stronger quantum sensors, more secure communications, and the tantalizing, sometimes terrifying promise of quantum computers.
A scene from the lab
Imagine a corridor lit by fluorescent tubes, the hum of cryogenic refrigerators, and a tangle of coaxial cables glinting like the arteries of a modern cathedral. That’s the landscape of circuit quantum electrodynamics and superconducting qubits — where these laureates spent decades turning abstract quantum quirks into phenomena you can measure in a lab.
“We felt, early on, that the unusual could be coaxed into the ordinary,” says Michel Devoret in a voice that suggests both mischief and method. “That a circuit could behave like a tiny atom, showing discrete energy jumps, was thrilling. But what kept us going was the idea that we could build technologies from those jumps.”
John Clarke, who has made a career of measuring the almost immeasurable, remembers the first time he and students saw signatures of macroscopic tunnelling in their instruments. “It’s like hearing a whisper from the quantum world,” he says. “You know something fundamental is happening, and for a moment you feel like a medium translating between two realities.”
Why this matters: from tunnelling to technologies
The prize citation may sound esoteric — macroscopic quantum tunnelling and energy quantisation in an electric circuit — but underneath it sits a practical engine. When circuits show quantised energy levels and can tunnel between states on a scale large enough to manipulate, they become the building blocks of quantum technologies.
Experts say that these principles are foundational to superconducting qubits, one of the leading architectures in the race to build scalable quantum computers. While a useful quantum computer that outperforms classical machines on broad, useful tasks is not yet here, progress has accelerated: error rates have dropped, coherence times have improved, and companies and national labs are investing billions.
“This isn’t just about bragging rights,” says Dr. Amina Koroma, a quantum information scientist in Geneva. “These experiments turned what were once philosophical curiosities into devices that could measure gravity waves, detect tiny magnetic fields in the brain, and eventually break — or protect — encryption. The societal implications are enormous.”
Numbers that ground the dream
To put the scale in perspective: the Nobel physics prize this year carries a total award of 11 million Swedish crowns (around €1.04m, roughly $1.1m), to be shared among the three winners. Nobel laureates enter a lineage dating back to 1901, with physics names like Einstein, Marie Curie and Niels Bohr — figures who reshaped how humanity understands reality.
Last year’s prize, awarded to John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton for breakthroughs in machine learning, served as a reminder of how fundamental research can unexpectedly reshape economies, politics and public life — and how scientists often wrestle with the ethical fallout of their breakthroughs. Quantum technologies are likely to present the same tangled promise and peril.
Voices from the community
In a small café near a Cambridge lab, a graduate student who has been living off instant coffee and 3 a.m. code told me, “This prize is validation. Not just for the three of them, but for the hundred-thousand small choices that the lab community makes. It’s for the students who keep showing up.” Her eyes lit up at the thought of what comes next.
A Swedish Academy official, speaking from Stockholm, framed the award in national and cultural terms. “The Nobel Prize has always been about the curiosity that drives mankind,” she said. “From Alfred Nobel’s will to today, physics holds a special place in that story. It’s fitting that this year’s prize goes to research that sits squarely between the conceptual and the utilitarian.”
Even outside the ivory towers, the news rippled. A small start-up founder in Tel Aviv, whose company develops quantum-safe encryption, responded by texting, “We need a new generation of engineers. This recognition brings attention — and hopefully funding — to the field.” A municipal official in San Francisco mused, “If quantum sensors become affordable, imagine the environmental monitoring we could do.”
Local color: Nobel week and Swedish ritual
Each December 10 in Stockholm, the laureates will step into a ritual that few other professions enjoy: the Nobel ceremony in the blue-hued, torch-lit Stockholm Concert Hall, followed by a banquet in the city hall’s ornate Red Hall. The prize money, the medals, the speeches — they are theater and reckoning at once.
Outside the ceremony halls, the city hums with festive precision: reindeer dishes in restaurant windows, the smell of cinnamon buns (kanelbullar) in the air, and a sense of history bundled with a slightly modern edge. For scientists, the ceremony is both a coronation and a call to responsibility.
Looking outward: the geopolitics and ethics of quantum
There is a global scramble underway. Nations pour resources into quantum research because the technology promises secure communications, superior sensors for navigation and defense, and computational power that could transform materials science and pharmaceuticals. That raises inevitable questions: Who controls these technologies? How do we protect privacy when encryption can be broken? How do we keep an open international scientific community while competing for strategic advantage?
“Scientific recognition is also a political signal,” remarks Professor Luis Herrera, a historian of science. “By honoring work that underpins quantum technologies, the Nobel Committee is spotlighting a field at the crossroads of innovation, security and public life.”
What should we expect next?
For readers watching the horizon, here are a few things to keep in mind:
- Quantum technologies move from the lab to the market slowly but steadily; practical, wide-use quantum computers remain a medium-term prospect.
- Quantum cryptography and quantum sensors are already finding niche, then broader, applications—from secure communication links to medical imaging enhancements.
- Governments and private investors will likely amplify funding; the challenge will be to balance rapid development with ethical frameworks and international cooperation.
So, what do you think? Should breakthroughs like this be raced, regulated, or shared openly? The question is not academic — it will shape whether quantum technologies become a force for shared progress or a new frontier of inequality.
Closing: a prize that celebrates curiosity — and responsibility
There is an old phrase in physics: “Nature is subtle, but not malicious.” The Nobel Prize this year honors three people who taught instruments to ask nature its quietest questions and then listened. As the laureates prepare for December’s ceremony and a world waits for the next wave of quantum-enabled tools, we should carry both wonder and caution.
These discoveries do more than decorate CVs. They invite a society-wide conversation: about the kinds of futures we choose to build, who gets to build them, and how we make sure the next quantum leap serves everyone. If curiosity started this story, responsibility must write the sequel.
United States, Qatar and Turkey Join Third Day of Gaza Peace Talks
In the Sinai Heat, a Fragile Thread of Diplomacy
Sharm El-Sheikh has always been a city of contrasts—a glittering Red Sea resort where coral gardens lure divers and palm-fringed promenades hum with tourists. This week the neon and the lull of waves have been swallowed by armored cars and the clipped footsteps of emissaries. Here, beneath an indifferent sun, negotiators from Israel and Hamas are meeting indirectly, while international figures shuffle in and out of a hotel ballroom that feels, at times, like the last operating theater before collapse.
It is hard to describe the odd intimacy of diplomacy under duress: the hush of carpets, the perfume of Egyptian coffee, and the whispered insistence that the world may still be steered away from a deeper abyss. “We came because there is nowhere else left to try,” said a senior Gulf official as he stepped out of the plenary room, his voice low but resolute. “People are tired of losing time while lives are lost.”
The Players—An Unlikely Cast
The list of attendees reads like a who’s who of the region’s power brokers and back-channel architects. Qatar’s prime minister—one of Doha’s most visible diplomats—joins Turkey’s intelligence chief, and representatives dispatched by the United States, including a special envoy, are in town to shepherd the talks. Two figures closely associated with the U.S. plan have travelled to the Sinai: a senior American aide and a former presidential adviser whose fingerprints are on the outline that brought the sides to this table.
“This is not a script for peace, it’s a scaffolding,” said an American diplomat familiar with the negotiations. “The scaffolding can hold a building, but it cannot build it for you.”
What’s on the Table
The talks are based on a multi-point framework proposed by U.S. policymakers last month. At its core are demands and offers that have been recycled through a decade of failed ceasefires and painfully slow exchanges.
- Immediate and sustained ceasefire
- Release of hostages held in Gaza
- Disarmament of Hamas’s military wings over time
- A phased Israeli withdrawal from parts of Gaza
- Mechanisms and guarantees for implementation
Each of these items carries its own landmines. Who verifies disarmament? What constitutes “phased” withdrawal? And what guarantees can be credibly offered for a deal to stick? “Guarantees are the currency of this moment,” said a seasoned Egyptian mediator. “Without them, you have only words.”
Ghosts of October and the Weight of Memory
The talks happen against the backdrop of the second anniversary of 7 October, a date seared into collective memory. For Israelis, that day is the darkest in recent history: an unprecedented attack that left more than 1,200 people dead—mostly civilians, official tallies say—and 251 hostages taken into Gaza, of whom dozens remain missing or have been declared dead by the Israeli military.
“Every year we gather and feel the same void,” said Miriam Halabi, a mother from the northern Negev who lost a cousin in the attack. “Talks are fine. But our family’s grief isn’t a bargaining chip.”
On Gaza’s side, the devastation is almost beyond comprehension. Local health authorities in Gaza report at least 67,160 people killed during the Israeli military campaign—figures that the United Nations considers credible. Aid agencies warn of a UN-declared famine, flattened neighborhoods, and hospitals pushed to the edge.
“I have seen cities die slowly,” said Samir, a medic who worked in one of Gaza’s largest hospitals and asked that only his first name be used. “You know when the ambulances stop coming because the roads are rubble? That is when you understand what ‘collapse’ actually looks like.”
Voices in the Room and on the Streets
In Sharm El-Sheikh, negotiators debate maps, timetables, and sequencing—small, exacting movements of troops and prisoners that can determine life or death for hundreds. A Palestinian source close to the Hamas negotiating team said their delegates were focused on initial Israeli maps showing troop withdrawals and on the hostage-prisoner exchange mechanism.
“We need to know who pulls back, when, and how the hostages come home,” said Khalil, a negotiator who requested anonymity. “Promises on paper mean nothing unless there are boots off the ground and people back at family tables.”
Outside the conference halls, the din of global protest is impossible to miss. Last weekend, hundreds of thousands of demonstrators poured into streets from Rome to Dublin, Madrid to London, demanding an immediate end to the war and, in some places, recognition of a Palestinian state. Tens of thousands in Britain defied government appeals to stay away, lighting candles and chanting names. In the Netherlands, activists urged their government to formally recognize Palestinian statehood.
“People are not shouting because they love slogans,” said Aisha Khan, a London-based organizer. “They’re shouting because they are helpless and angry and grieving for people they’ve never met.”
Allegations, Accountability, and the Broader Compass
Amid the bargaining, one uncomfortable fact remains: a UN inquiry has accused Israel of actions in Gaza that could amount to genocide, while rights groups have charged Hamas with war crimes in the October attack. Both sides reject the allegations, but the charges underscore the geopolitical and ethical stakes—this is not only a negotiation about troop movements, but a clutch of unresolved legal and moral questions that will haunt any agreement.
“If there is no accountability, then the next round of violence will have a familiar soundtrack,” said Prof. Lena Hartmann, an international law scholar. “Agreements must be coupled with mechanisms to investigate, to prosecute, and to learn.”
What Success Would Look Like—and What Failure Could Mean
For many in the room, success is a quiet, almost domestic thing: families reunited, children allowed to return to school, water and electricity flowing into neighborhoods where they have been interrupted for years. For negotiators, it is a sequence—a ceasefire, hostages released, a monitored withdrawal, reconstruction funds unlocked.
“Imagine a child who hasn’t seen a playground in two years,” said a UN humanitarian worker. “Peace looks like that child on a swing, not in a hospital bed.”
Failure, by contrast, could reopen the gates to deeper conflict—not just another round of strikes and counterstrikes but a broader regional destabilization that pulls in actors from beyond the region. “This moment is porous,” said an analyst in Tel Aviv. “If these talks collapse, the ripple effects could be catastrophic.”
Questions for the Reader—and for Ourselves
What does justice look like after such trauma? Can third-party guarantees, backed by states with competing interests, truly hold a deal together? And perhaps most humanly: what is the price one is willing to accept to bring loved ones home?
These are not rhetorical stunts. They are the practical dilemmas that negotiators wrestle with in air-conditioned rooms while families outside measure years in anniversaries and empty chairs. “You cannot hurry grief,” said an Israeli father of a hostage. “But at some point the world must hurry to fix what it helped break.”
When the delegations adjourn and the lights go out in the Sharm hotels, the hotel staff will sweep away the coffee cups and the sticky name tags. The maps will be folded. Negotiators will board planes. And back in Gaza and Israel, people will wake to the ordinary cruelties of the present day. Whether those ordinary days become safer, less hungry, less bereft depends on decisions made in the sand-scented corridors of a Sinai resort—and on whether the international community can turn promises into protection.
Will this be a turning point, or another narrowly averted tragedy? The answer will not only shape lives in a small strip of land by the Mediterranean. It will tell us whether diplomacy—torn, compromised, imperfect—can still hold a candle against the darkness.
Ilham Cumar “Trump waxaa uu ceeb ku yahay dadka Mareykanka, waa cunsuri beenlow ah.”
Nov 08(Jowhar)-Xildhibaanad Ilhaan Omar oo ka tirsan Aqalka Wakiillada ee dalka Mareykanka ayaa si kulul uga jawaabtay hadal uu u jeediyey Madaxweynaha Mareykanka Donald Trump, kaasi oo uu ku sheegay in xisbiga Dimuqraadiga uu yahay “hoggaan la’aan sida Soomaaliya”, isla markaana ay tahay in Ilhaan Omar “dib loogu celiyo Soomaaliya.”
German mayor found stabbed in apartment, police launch investigation
A Quiet Town Shaken: The Day Herdecke Stood Still
On an ordinary autumn Tuesday, the small town of Herdecke—nestled in the green folds of Germany’s Ruhr and sandwiched between Hagen and Dortmund—felt anything but ordinary.
At just before 1pm, the hush that usually settles over its winding streets and half-timbered houses was broken by the sudden, sharp roar of a rescue helicopter. Neighbors opened their windows and stepped onto stoops, trying to piece together a story that sounded, at first, like a bad dream.
Iris Stalzer, 57, the newly elected mayor who won a run-off on 28 September, was found at her home with life-threatening stab wounds. She was urgently airlifted to hospital. The news arrived in waves: disbelief, fear, and an aching, public plea for information and calm.
The Facts So Far
Herdecke, a town of roughly 23,000 people, has long been known for its riverside promenades and quiet civic life. Stalzer—a lifelong resident, a labour law attorney by profession, a mother of two teenagers—was due to formally take office on 1 November.
Local police and prosecutors issued a short statement saying they were “investigating in all directions,” and that, at present, “there are no indications of a politically motivated act.” Officials added that a family connection was presumed and that the victims’ children were being interviewed as part of inquiries.
National figures reacted with shock. Germany’s chancellor called the attack an “abhorrent act,” while the leader of Stalzer’s parliamentary group in Berlin confirmed that she had been stabbed. But beyond soundbites and statements, Herdecke residents found themselves confronted with deeper questions about safety, politics, and the fragility of ordinary life.
Neighbors and Witnesses: Voices from the Street
“She walked her dog here every morning,” said Sabine Müller, who runs the bakery on Marktstraße. “You never imagine something like this happening to someone who knows every corner of this town. It’s like a trust has been broken.”
Another neighbor, an elderly man who asked not to be named, paused outside his gate. “There’s fear, yes. But mostly there’s sorrow. Iris didn’t come as some outsider—she’s our neighbour. We want to know what happened, but we want her to get better more than anything.”
A teacher at a nearby school, watching children cluster in small, uncertain groups, said, “The kids ask if the mayor is okay. They don’t understand what ‘investigating in all directions’ means. They just know something scary touched their town.”
Politics, Community, and the Question of Motive
Stalzer represents the Social Democrats (SPD), the centre-left party that is part of Germany’s current governing coalition. She beat a candidate from the centre-right Christian Democrats in the run-off, a victory that would have seen her step into the mayoral office after a lifetime of local engagement.
Investigators have been careful to emphasize there is no clear sign this was an attack driven by political motives. Still, the optics of a mayor-elect—someone who symbolizes local governance and civic life—being violently attacked reverberate beyond Herdecke. In an era when attacks on politicians and public servants around the world have been rising in visibility, even an apparently private, family-linked incident raises alarm bells.
“We cannot jump to political conclusions,” said Dr. Helmut Kröger, a criminologist at a university in the Ruhr area. “But we must also understand the symbolic weight of violence against public figures. Even if the immediate motive is personal, the impact ripples outward—eroding confidence in public safety and, sometimes, feeding wider narratives about polarisation and threat.”
What the Police Have Said
A police spokesperson at the scene described investigators working “methodically,” interviewing family members and neighbors, and canvassing CCTV and witness accounts. “At this stage, the priority is medical—supporting the victim—and then establishing a clear timeline,” the spokesperson said. “We are treating all leads seriously.”
Beyond the Headlines: Human Stories and Local Color
Herdecke’s narrow streets and riverside cafes mask a town that thrives on ritual. Sunday markets, amateur choral groups, and long-standing volunteer fire brigades form the skeletal muscle of civic life. Iris Stalzer was part of that muscle: a lawyer known for handling labour disputes, a woman who had spent decades wrestling with tenants, employers and colleagues, bringing a practical, local sensibility to politics.
“She argued for fair work conditions,” recalled Martina Fischer, who volunteers at the town community center. “Not in some loud way—quietly, persistently. That’s how she won people over.”
In the nearby Konditorei, regulars lingered over coffee and shared fragments—memories of Stalzer helping at a school event, her handshake at the annual May festival, the small debates she stood for at town hall. “She was one of us,” said the baker. “And when one of us is hurt, it’s like the whole family is bruised.”
What This Means for Germany—and for Us
How do small towns process this kind of violence? And how should a democratic society respond when a public servant is hurt in their own home?
There are practical answers—better support for politicians and officials, more resources for local policing, improved mental health services for families in crisis. There are also deeper, harder conversations about community cohesion and the pressures that can build behind closed doors.
“We must resist sensationalism,” Dr. Kröger added. “Often, the fastest route to healing is accurate information, clear support for victims, and a community willing to sit with uncomfortable truths rather than rush to simple explanations.”
A Small List for a Tangible Response
- Immediate medical care and privacy for the family and children involved.
- Transparent, careful investigation led by local and regional authorities.
- Community support services—counselling for residents and increased local outreach.
- A respectful, measured national conversation about safety for local officials and the need to protect civic life.
Questions for the Reader—and for Our Communities
What is the price of public service in small towns? How do we balance the public’s right to know with the family’s need for privacy? And, perhaps most urgently: how do we rebuild a sense of safety without rushing to conclusions?
In Herdecke, flowers have already appeared where people first learned the news: a loaf of bread at the bakery, a candle at the gate. These small offerings are not political statements; they are human ones—hope, grief, solidarity—gestures that remind us democracy is more than institutions. It is the quiet work of people who show up for one another.
As the investigation continues and as Stalzer fights to recover, Herdecke will have to do what towns everywhere must do in the wake of shock: hold fast to facts, care for one another, and refuse to let fear write the first draft of the story.
Will you, dear reader, sit with that unease for a moment and consider what safety and civic life mean in your own neighborhood? How would you respond if a public servant you knew was harmed? These are not rhetorical questions—we live under the same sky, and the health of one community affects the health of all.
Pope Leo to embark on November pilgrimage to Turkey and Lebanon
A pilgrimage at a crossroads: Why the pope’s trip to Iznik and Beirut matters
There is a peculiar hush in Iznik these days, as if the town’s famous tiles — cobalt blues and arabesque vines baked into clay centuries ago — are holding their breath. Traders sweep dust from doorways, a cafe owner stacks extra chairs, and an elderly priest polishes the brass candlesticks in a small church that looks out over the lake where Byzantium once moored its vessels.
Come late November, a 70‑year‑old American pope will walk those streets. He will travel first to Turkey for a deeply symbolic pilgrimage to Iznik, the modern name for ancient Nicaea, and then move on to Lebanon, a nation whose fragile mosaic of communities has been tested by years of economic collapse and regional tensions.
Vatican officials confirmed the six‑day journey in a brief notice — Iznik from November 27–30, Lebanon from November 30–December 2 — but the calendar belies the gravity. This is not merely a pastoral itinerary. It is a gesture toward history and hope: a nod to the 1,700th anniversary of the Council of Nicaea and a signal to a Mediterranean region still searching for peace.
Why Nicaea still echoes in churches and politics
In 325 AD, Emperor Constantine summoned bishops from across an empire to hammer out fundamental questions of belief. The Council of Nicaea produced what we now call the Nicene Creed, a compact statement that sought to unify Christian doctrine at a time of doctrinal tumult.
“The Creed was about order,” says Dr. Leyla Aydin, a Turkish historian who studies late antiquity. “But it was also a political act. Constantine wanted a stable empire and saw religious unity as part of that project.”
Today the Nicene formula — “one God in three persons” — remains the theological backbone for many Christian denominations, from Orthodox liturgies in the East to Roman Catholic mass and Protestant worship in the West. A papal pilgrimage to the site is therefore more than ceremonial. It is an invitation to remember common roots amid centuries of schism.
Iznik: tiles, fishermen, and the weight of 1,700 years
Walk through Iznik’s narrow lanes and the past presses close. Ceramic workshops hum, seagulls argue over the catch by the lake, and the smell of strong, black Turkish tea drifts from a tiny shop where men play backgammon. “This town carries a story,” says Mustafa, a tile maker who has owned a kiln for three decades. “People come to touch the past. It is part of our life.”
For the pope, a visit here is both pilgrimage and public theology. It is a reminder that religious identity can be a bridge as well as a boundary. Local Orthodox priests and Muslim leaders alike have signaled a willingness to engage. “We ought to use such moments to renew conversation,” says Father Anton, a priest from Bursa who plans to attend the anniversary events.
From ancient councils to modern battlegrounds: the Lebanon stop
From the gentle shoreline of Iznik the papal entourage will head south to Beirut, where the air carries different histories: cedar trees, the chaabi songs spilling from taverns, and alleys that still bear the scars of wars. Lebanon is a small country that feels large because its politics and identities ripple well beyond its borders.
The pope’s visit to Lebanon is expected to emphasize peace — and practical steps toward it. Officials have repeatedly pointed to the government’s stated commitment to disarming non‑state actors, a reference particularly aimed at Hezbollah, the Iran‑backed Shia movement that remains both a political party and an armed force in Lebanon.
“We need to speak about human dignity — and also about the instruments that secure that dignity,” said a Lebanese civil‑society activist, Rana Khalil, when I met her in a community center in Tripoli. “Disarmament is not just a line in a diplomatic brief. It is about whether children can play in a field without fear.”
Despite a ceasefire that took effect in November 2024, the border between southern Lebanon and Israel remains tense. Israeli forces maintain positions in strategic areas and conduct periodic strikes, saying they target Hezbollah infrastructure. The presence of those forces — and the lived memory of conflict — shapes what a papal appeal for peace will mean on the ground.
Voices from the neighborhood
At a tiny bakery in Beirut, a Maronite customer named Joseph leaned over his coffee to share a confession: “We want normal life. We miss electricity that comes regularly and shops that do not close at three in the afternoon because of security fears.”
For many Lebanese Christians, the pope’s visit is personal. Lebanon hosts a significant Christian population — historically large and diverse, with Maronites forming a distinct and influential community. “The pope is like family,” says Sister Mariam, who runs a youth shelter in Achrafieh. “When he comes, he brings attention to our pains and our prayers.”
What this pilgrimage might mean beyond ceremonies
There are practical threads to unspool. The papacy, possessing moral authority and global visibility, can elevate diplomatic efforts, support interfaith dialogue and direct international attention — and assistance — to struggling places. Lebanon is in dire need of both: a fragile banking system, mass emigration, and basic services that have deteriorated, leaving many households precarious.
“Symbolic acts have consequences when matched with policy,” says Dr. Amal Haddad, an international relations scholar based in Beirut. “A papal visit can catalyze donors or pressure regional actors, but only if it is leveraged into sustained engagement.”
So ask yourself: what is the weight of a gesture in a world where hearts and headlines often move faster than aid packages? Can a few days of prayer, speeches, and community encounters change trajectories that have taken years to form?
Beyond the photographs: a call to reflection
Pictures will surely circulate: the pope standing beneath Byzantine arches, greeting parishioners in Beirut, meeting political leaders in formal halls. But the deeper work unfolds in quieter moments — the conversations in a kitchen, the handshake in a refugee camp, the insistence that long memory does not have to become perpetuity of conflict.
As the world watches, the trip asks us to imagine how rituals and reconciliation can be tools of realpolitik and human care alike. It asks whether ancient creeds still have the power to shape modern compassion.
And for those of us who are not on the flight manifest, the pilgrimage invites a personal question: what narratives from our own communities deserve a renewal of attention and care? The pope’s itinerary may be compact, but its echoes could reach farther — if we choose to listen.
German mayor stabbed in small town; Merz denounces barbaric attack
In the Quiet of Herdecke: A Town Stunned by Violence
On an otherwise ordinary afternoon in Herdecke — a riverside town tucked into the green edges of Germany’s Ruhr region — a small community found itself shoved into the raw, unsettling glare of violence.
Iris Stalzer, 57, who had just been elected mayor of the town on Sept. 28, was seriously wounded in a stabbing near her home shortly after noon. The news arrived like a cold wind: terse lines from public broadcasters, a handful of social media posts amplified by alarm, then statements from political leaders calling the incident “heinous” and demanding answers.
“We fear for her life,” wrote Friedrich Merz, a prominent conservative leader, on X, urging a swift and thorough investigation. Matthias Miersch, the SPD parliamentary group leader, expressed shock: “A few minutes ago, the newly elected mayor Iris Stalzer was stabbed in Herdecke. Our thoughts are with her and we hope she survives this terrible crime.”
A town’s hush
Herdecke is not a place where headlines like this are routine. With winding cobbled streets, small cafés that pour thick coffee into porcelain cups, and the soft clatter of commuters who work in the nearby urban centers of the Ruhr, it feels removed from the sharper edges of big-city crime. The town, home to roughly a few dozen thousand people, has always leaned on neighborliness as a kind of safety net.
“You hear about things in Dortmund or Essen and you think, ‘that’s there, not here,’” said Lena, 42, who runs the bakery opposite the town square. “Today it feels like the invisible wall is gone.”
Residents gathered in small clusters outside the Rathaus as evening fell, voices low, eyes on their phones. A sense of protective exhaustion settled over the town: shock, worry, then the practical questions — who did this and why? — and the heavier one: how safe is civic life if local leaders are vulnerable on their own streets?
What we know — and what remains unclear
Details remained sparse in the hours after the attack. Local police did not issue an immediate statement and did not answer media calls, a silence that left room for speculation. Reports in German tabloid Bild said Ms. Stalzer was found in her apartment with stab wounds to the back and stomach, discovered by her 15-year-old adoptive son. Bild also reported that the boy told investigators his mother had been attacked by several men on the street; local authorities reportedly took the teenager in for questioning. These accounts have not been confirmed by police spokespeople.
“We must be cautious with unverified details,” a municipal official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told me. “The family needs privacy. Our first priority is the well-being of Iris and her loved ones.”
Medical updates were not forthcoming. When a public life is suddenly interrupted by trauma, silence becomes both a protection and a frustration: it shields the wounded and their families, but it also leaves a town to fill in the gaps with rumor and fear.
Local voices, global questions
Across Germany and beyond, attacks on elected officials — though rare — echo loudly because they cut at a tender point in democratic life: the idea that people should be able to step forward to lead without fearing for their safety. The image of a mayor, a neighbor, a familiar face who just days before had been elected to steer local priorities, suddenly the victim of a violent act, forces a community to reckon with vulnerability.
“This isn’t just about one town or one politician,” said Dr. Katrin Vogel, a criminologist at a university in the Ruhr region. “Local officeholders are often reachable and visible — that accessibility is crucial for democratic legitimacy. But it also creates risk. We have to find ways to protect civic life without closing it off.”
Statistically, Germany remains one of the safer countries in Europe in terms of violent crime rates. Homicides and public violent attacks are relatively uncommon compared with many other parts of the world. Yet even isolated incidents land disproportionately as symbols, prompting national debate about political tensions, mental health, and social fragmentation.
Echoes in the street
Neighbors I spoke with described Iris Stalzer as someone who walked to market, attended local events, and had a reputation for practical, empathetic politics. “She came to the youth soccer matches,” recalled Thomas, 68, a retired teacher. “She’d stand at the back and clap. You wouldn’t expect something like this in Herdecke.”
Another resident, Jutta, who volunteers at the town’s cultural center, paused before speaking. “We have had heated debates — over development, school funding — but never this,” she said. “Politics should be about dialogue, with warm drinks afterward sometimes. This hits us in the gut.”
Beyond the headlines: democracy under pressure?
What should a town do when its sense of safety is fractured? There are immediate answers — calls for a transparent investigation, support for the victim and her family, mental health resources for traumatized residents — and longer-term questions about protecting public servants without turning streets and council offices into fortresses.
Security experts stress that measures must be proportional and preserve the public’s ability to engage with officials. “You can’t lock democracy away,” said an independent security consultant who works with municipal governments. “What’s needed are risk assessments, clear protocols, and community-level prevention — early warning, conflict mediation, and better support for officials who receive threats.”
That is also a social task: to rebuild trust, to assert that disagreements belong in the open and that violence must remain an unacceptable outlier.
What readers might consider
How would you feel if someone in your town — a teacher, a grocery owner, an elected official — were attacked coming home? What trade-offs would you accept between accessibility and security? These are not abstract questions when a small place like Herdecke faces an act that reverberates far beyond its boundaries.
For now, the town waits. Officials promise a thorough inquiry. Political leaders demand swift answers. Neighbors have set aside their daily routines to check on one another. And the most immediate wish — private and universal — is for Iris Stalzer’s recovery.
“We’re all holding our breath,” said Lena at the bakery, hands folded around a warm mug. “We want her back. We want to be able to meet in the square again without fear.”
As this story unfolds, it will test the resilience of a small town and, in its own way, remind us how fragile the ordinary can be — and how fiercely communities can defend it when it is threatened.
Death toll in Indonesia school collapse climbs to 54
When a School’s Walls Fell Silent: A Nightmarish Afternoon on Java
They came together each afternoon the way generations of students have at pesantrens across Indonesia—hands raised in prayer, the rhythmic murmur of verses folding into the soft light of late afternoon. Then, in a single, appalling instant, concrete groaned and gave way. A multi-storey boarding school on Java collapsed during the Asr prayer last week, and in the days that followed the island’s quiet rhythms were shattered by a search-and-rescue operation that recovered 54 dead and left at least 13 people unaccounted for.
The National Search and Rescue Agency, Basarnas, confirmed the grim toll. “We have retrieved 54 victims, including five body parts,” Yudhi Bramantyo, Basarnas’ operations director, told reporters, his voice low with a fatigue that had lain on every rescue worker’s face. “We hope we can conclude recovery today and return the bodies to the families.”
The rubble tells a story
The scene looked like something from a warped photograph: twisted metal, concrete slabs stacked at impossible angles, shoes and notebooks scattered among the dust. For rescuers who have spent exhausting hours digging through the debris, it was a test of endurance and technique. Workers pried with hands, listened for breath with rudimentary devices, and at times used heavy machinery after families gave their consent—an anguished calculus once the 72‑hour “golden period” for survival had passed.
“We had to make a decision,” said Rahmat, a neighborhood volunteer who came to the site with a shovel and never left for three days. “There was no way we could keep hoping forever. The parents asked us to dig with excavators. They wanted closure.”
The deputy head of the national disaster agency, Budi Irawan, said the collapse was the deadliest disaster in Indonesia this year. “We are deeply saddened,” he said, pausing between words. “Our priority now is to identify victims and support the families left behind.”
Names, faces, and a rush to bury
Across the neighborhoods that surround many pesantrens, lives are lived within sight of the school bell and the call to prayer. These boarding schools—often called pesantren—are more than classrooms. They are communities: dormitories where teenagers share stories under bare bulbs, courtyards where elderly teachers sip tea and discuss scripture, kitchens where cooks serve rice and sambal. The sudden loss of so many students sent shockwaves through that tightly knit fabric.
“We bury our dead fast,” a mother who had come to the site told me, wiping dust from her eyes. “Islam teaches us to return them to the earth quickly. But how do you hurry when you don’t even know who is still under there?”
Families waited for identification, for paper certificates and DNA tests, and for the small mercy of a proper funeral. For many Muslim families in Indonesia, the obligation to wash and prepare the body—ghusl—cannot be postponed. “The community wants to do this right,” said Imam Hadi, who had been counseling relatives at the site. “They want to read the prayers, to bury them with love.”
The human echoes behind the numbers
Numbers have a way of flattening people into statistics: 54 dead, 13 missing. But each figure is a life—a boy who loved football on the dusty field, a student who kept a worn copy of the Koran tucked under his pillow, a teacher who had promised to watch over the dormitory that evening. “He told us he’d return after prayer to check lights,” said Lina, a cousin of one missing student. “We are waiting.”
Why did the school collapse?
Investigators are sifting through the concrete carcass to find answers. Early indications point toward substandard construction, according to several engineers reviewing the scene. Multiple eyewitnesses reported cracks and odd noises in the days before the collapse—signs that, in hindsight, were tragically prescient.
“When buildings fail, the causes are often structural: poor materials, inadequate reinforcement, or modifications that overload a design,” said Dr. Agus Santoso, a structural engineer at Bandung Technical University. “In Indonesia we face a confluence of pressures—rapid urbanization, a construction boom, and sometimes corners cut to save costs.”
Such issues are not new. Lax enforcement of building codes has long been a concern in Indonesia, a nation that sits along the Pacific Ring of Fire and has major seismic, volcanic, and flood risks. The climate of urgency around development has sometimes outpaced the institutions tasked with ensuring safety. That has led to tragic echoes: just last September a building hosting a prayer recital in West Java collapsed, killing at least three people and injuring dozens.
Community, resilience, accountability
At the rescue site, volunteers stacked bowls of rice, brought thermoses of sweet coffee, and whispered prayers for those still missing. There were scenes of quiet heroism—teenagers who had been in the school pulling blankets over strangers and officials who sat with the grieving and refused to offer platitudes.
“This is not just a local problem,” said a human-rights lawyer who had come to offer assistance to families. “It’s a governance problem. There needs to be accountability when lives are put at risk. We must ask who signed the permits, who inspected the work, and who allowed modifications that compromised safety.”
Calls for reform are rising across Indonesia. Citizens are asking for better oversight, for stricter standards in the construction industry, and for transparency when public buildings—especially schools and places of worship—are built. Internationally, this taps into wider debates about how fast-developing countries balance growth with safety and whom development serves when corners are cut.
Questions for readers and leaders
As you read this, think of the institutions in your own community: Who is responsible for the safety of public buildings? How quickly are concerns heard and acted upon? When does the price of a cheap material become measured in human life?
Will Indonesia’s latest tragedy prompt meaningful change? Will communities that have lost so much find the strength—and the legal mechanisms—to demand accountability and safer standards? Those are the heavy questions now being asked at the edge of a makeshift memorial where candles flicker and the air still smells of dust and incense.
After the dust: what might come next
The immediate work—recovering bodies, identifying victims, and offering support—will continue. So too will the longer, harder task of policy and oversight reform. Rescue workers and investigators will comb through engineering reports, and families will continue their grieving. Many will call for reforms; some will see action. The truth is, change takes sustained pressure, empathy, and political will.
For now, communities gather. They share food, tell stories of the departed, and pray. They place small mementos on piles of flowers and recite verses that bind sorrow into something that might, with time, become a form of hope.
When a school’s walls fall, the damage is not measured only in collapsed concrete—but in the ruptures to memory, routine, and trust. Indonesia’s mourning is a reminder to all of us that human life depends not only on faith and community, but on the mundane, essential rigor of a properly built wall.
New French prime minister steps down hours after cabinet announced
The Day French Politics Tilted: A Cabinet Named, a Prime Minister Gone
It began like a political movie with an abrupt, breathless cut: a freshly minted cabinet unveiled after weeks of talks, ministers posed for photographs under palace lights — and then, within hours, the man who assembled it had handed in his resignation. For citizens watching from cafés, trains and market stalls across France, the scene felt less like drama scripted for television than the wobbly choreography of a republic in motion.
Sébastien Lecornu, a close ally of President Emmanuel Macron, resigned this morning, barely a day after he presented his new government. The Élysée confirmed it had accepted his resignation. Across Paris and beyond, the reaction was immediate: stock prices tumbled, the euro dipped, and talk of political instability spilled into everyday conversations from Brittany to Marseille.
Shockwaves and small, telling scenes
At a boulangerie near the Assemblée Nationale a vendor shrugged. “You can’t keep changing the coach mid-match,” she said, dusting croissants with a practiced hand. “We’re tired of the uncertainty. It affects business, families.” Down the street, a city council worker muttered, “We still don’t know who will sign the next orders. It’s chaos for planning.”
These are the micro-moments that put human warmth and frustration around a headline. They are the way policy uncertainties — whether over budgets, public services, or treaties — become stories that matter at kitchen tables.
Why it unraveled so fast
The speed of Lecornu’s departure stunned many political observers, though the forces that pushed him out have been building for months. France’s political landscape has been fractured since President Macron’s 2022 re-election, with no single party able to command a clear majority in a fragmented parliament.
Last year’s snap election — intended by the president to restore stability — instead produced an even more scattered legislature, with more factions, fewer reliable coalitions, and a lower tolerance for compromise. That environment left any new prime minister walking a tightrope of competing demands.
According to aides and political scientists I spoke with, Lecornu’s cabinet choices were the immediate trigger. In trying to balance rival pressures, the line-up angered critics on both the left and the right: some judged it too conservative, others not conservative enough. In a parliament where every vote counts and every coalition is fragile, that is a perilous place to start.
Voices from the corridors of power and the streets
“We tried to build a government that could govern in a parliament that no longer believes in grand majorities,” a government insider told me, asking to remain anonymous. “But you can’t please everyone when the arithmetic itself is in flux.”
An opposition spokesman was blunt. “It’s not surprising. The president’s gamble with the snap election failed. The people elected a fragmented Assembly and now we see the consequences: repeated instability.”
Not everyone saw only failure. A local mayor in the Loire admitted, “Change is painful, but perhaps this rupture will force parties to talk seriously about coalitions rather than short-term headline grabs.”
Markets, morale, and the global ripple
The immediate fallout was visible in markets: stocks slid and the euro weakened on the news. Investors hate uncertainty, and political churn at the heart of Europe’s fifth-largest economy is not a comfort to global markets already jittery from slow growth in parts of the eurozone.
But beyond graphs and trading floors, there are policy consequences that touch everyday life: budget planning delayed, social programs put on hold, and businesses postponing hires or investments. When a government can’t settle on ministers or priorities, project timelines stretch and confidence frays.
- Public administration: appointments and directives may be delayed as interim leaders hold the reins.
- Markets: short-term volatility often follows major political shifts in large economies.
- Diplomacy: foreign counterparts wait to see who speaks for Paris on trade, defense and climate policy.
What the resignation means for Macron — and for France
Mr. Macron now faces choices that will define the coming months: appoint another prime minister and try again to form a working government, seek fresh elections, or pursue an alternative course. Each option carries risks and opportunities. A new appointment could buy time, but would it solve the deeper problem of a fragmented Assembly? New elections might clarify mandates — or further fragment them.
Political analysts point to a larger European pattern: several democracies have seen the rise of fragmented parliaments and coalition fatigue. Italy, Israel and others have faced similar dilemmas in recent years. The question is not only who governs, but how we govern in an era where old party loyalties are shifting and voters are more impatient for tangible results than for ideological purity.
Looking past this moment
If there is a silver lining, it is the political conversation this turmoil forces. What kinds of compromises will be acceptable to a society grappling with economic challenges, climate demands, immigration questions, and a restless electorate? Will political leaders be able to pivot from tactical survival to strategic governance?
“This is an opportunity to rebuild politics around coalition-building and honest compromise,” a Paris-based political scientist said. “But it requires leaders who see beyond short-term wins and who can sell that difficult truth to voters.”
That’s a tall order in an age of social media soundbites and polarized commentary. Yet, amid the outraged editorials and market bulletins, everyday people keep asking practical questions: Who will run our hospitals and schools? Who will sign the infrastructure contracts? When will we get clarity for our businesses?
What to watch next
In the coming days, watch for three things: the president’s next move on a new prime minister, any parliamentary maneuvers to form a working coalition, and signals from global markets on confidence in France’s stability. Each will tell us whether this crisis is a blip or a deeper realignment of French politics.
And as you read the headlines, take a moment to imagine how these high-level decisions land in neighborhoods. Politics is not only about power; it’s about the way power shapes daily life — the opening hours of local clinics, the timetable for school budgets, the certainty needed for someone to sign a lease or hire a worker.
So what do you think? Is France looking at a reset that could lead to stronger, more plural governance — or is this the prelude to prolonged instability that could ripple across Europe? The answer will emerge in messy, human ways, and for now, the country — like the rest of us — waits, watches, and wonders.
Madaxweyne Xasan oo Xamze iyo Xoosh amray in mudo 30 cisho ah lagu dhiso Jubaland cusub
Nov 07(Jowhar)-Madaxweyne Xasan Sh ayaa Raisul Wasaare Xamze iyo Wasiirka Arimaha Gudaha u gudbiyay xiliga, qorshaha iyo doorashada Jubaland.
Inside the EU’s anti-coercion ‘bazooka’: what it is and how it works
A New Kind of Standoff: When Tariffs Meet Diplomacy
On a crisp morning in Brussels, beneath the glass facades where the European Union’s policy machinery...
Prince Harry Decries Newspaper’s Conduct as ‘Deeply Troubling’
A courtroom, a king’s son, and a decades-long shadow over Britain’s tabloids
The morning air outside London’s High Court carried that peculiar mix of damp...
Trump Says Global Security Hinges on U.S. Controlling Greenland
Why a Vast, Icy Island Keeps Superpowers Dreaming — and Why That Matters to You
On a blustery morning in Nuuk, the capital's seaside slope...
Irish national detained in Russia over alleged phone messages
When an anniversary turns into an international plea: a Galway woman’s fight to bring her husband home
On a wind-swept evening in Claregalway, where the...
Tariff threats could ignite the most serious transatlantic crisis yet
When a Far Northern Ice Sheet Became the Latest Riddle of Global Power
It began, improbably, like a provocation you might swipe past on your...