NASA Refutes Kim Kardashian’s Assertions Questioning the Moon Landing

October 31, 2025

NASA rejects Kim Kardashian's claim over Moon landing — NASA's acting administrator has hit back at Kim Kardashian's claims that the Moon landing did not happen

When a Reality TV Aside Reignites a Space Debate: Moon Landings, Misinformation, and the Return to Luna

It began, oddly enough, in the kind of place where celebrity and confession collide: a glossy living room on reality TV. A throwaway line — a skeptical aside about the most photographed event of the 20th century — ricocheted out of a streaming episode and landed in a familiar, uncomfortable orbit. The claim that the 1969 Moon landing “didn’t happen,” voiced on camera by a household name, reopened a conversation that historians, engineers and astronauts have been trying to close for decades.

What followed was the kind of public moment that feels both small and seismic. NASA’s leadership felt compelled to reply. In a crisp social-media message, the agency’s acting administrator pointed to the simple, stubborn record: humans have set foot on the Moon — six times — and a new era of lunar exploration is underway. It was a reminder that, in an age of instant amplification, even an offhand celebrity remark can force institutions to reassert facts that some people find inconvenient.

Why the Moon Still Matters

When Neil Armstrong slid down the ladder of the Eagle and planted that first footprint on July 20, 1969, it wasn’t just one nation’s triumph — it became part of the shared story of humanity. Between Apollo 11 and Apollo 17, astronauts of the United States completed six crewed landings: Apollo 11 (1969), 12 (1969), 14 (1971), 15 (1971), 16 (1972) and 17 (1972). Twelve people have walked on the lunar surface, collecting rocks, deploying science packages and forever expanding what we know about the natural satellite that hangs over our nights.

Those numbers are tidy, verifiable and backed by three decades of archival footage, telemetry, lunar samples and independent observations from other nations’ observatories and probes. Yet conspiracy theories about the Moon — and about science more broadly — have proved stubborn, continually adapting to new media and new audiences.

From a TV couch to the control room: a modern echo

How does a throwaway remark on a reality series become ritual fodder for late-night think pieces and government replies? Because we live in a moment when celebrity platforms reach billions, and social platforms condense complex ideas into soundbites. A single line can be clipped, looped, memed and shared until it takes on a life of its own.

“When I heard it, I felt that old, weary tug between truth and entertainment,” said Ana Morales, a teacher from Miami who watches both space launches and reality shows. “If someone famous says something, it doesn’t matter if it’s wild — people listen. My students quote influencers more than textbooks.”

The effect is perhaps inevitable. More than four billion people now use social media around the world; ideas — good and bad — move with unprecedented speed. But speed doesn’t equal accuracy. And when popular culture questions consensus science, institutions that preserve and interpret knowledge are forced back into public-facing roles.

NASA’s Answer: Facts, Pride, and a New Mission

NASA’s response was simple and direct: yes, we have been there — six times — and the agency is preparing to go back. The Artemis program, now central to the agency’s public identity, is built to return humans to the lunar surface in a sustained way, and to establish a foothold that can support scientific exploration and future missions beyond the Moon.

Artemis is more than nostalgia for Apollo. It represents a shift from a sprint — the hurried geopolitics of the Cold War — to an effort that aspires to be international, sustainable and science-driven. NASA describes Artemis as a program that will land the first woman and first person of color on the Moon, and to work with partners around the world to build a lunar economy and infrastructure.

“We won the last space race, and we’re building to win this chapter by working with allies, scientists and private partners,” one NASA official told me, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss program strategy. “This is about exploration and inclusion, not trophies.”

Old controversies, new platforms

To be clear, skepticism about the Moon landings isn’t new. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin has been the target of conspiracy theorists for decades: in 2002 he famously punched a man who had accused him of faking the Apollo 11 mission during a public event. That flash of human anger — an astronaut confronting a persistent and personal denial of his experience — feeds into the drama and the mythology.

“There’s an emotional kernel to these debates that facts alone don’t touch,” said Dr. Leila Hassan, a historian of science. “People invest identity, distrust and grievances into these stories. Sometimes a conspiracy becomes a way to express broader doubts about institutions, elites or expertise.”

When a celebrity repeats or amplifies those doubts, the effect is magnified. Fans may take the remark at face value, not because they’ve investigated the evidence, but because trust flows along social lines: from influencer to follower, from personality to tribe.

What the public response looks like on the ground

At the Kennedy Space Center, just north of Cape Canaveral, staff and tourists go about their routines under the same sky that once hosted Saturn V rockets. The gift shop sells patches and model rockets; school buses unload field trips like a steady tide. Yet beneath the cheer — the rainbow of T‑shirts and toddler-sized astronaut helmets — there’s a quiet urgency.

“We’re part museum and part classroom,” said Jenna Park, who leads tours at the center. “People come because the Moon is part of our story. We don’t want fact to be a private commodity. We want it to be shared so that the next generation knows what’s possible.”

A retired launch technician, sipping coffee outside the visitor complex, summed up the tension with a grin: “You can argue about a million things, but if you’ve handled that telemetry, if you’ve worked those hoses, you know what happened. That’s not something you can fake in a soundstage.”

Small numbers, big consequences

Conspiracy believers tend to be a minority, but their visibility can be outsized. Surveys across time have found that a persistent sliver of the public doubts the Moon landings, a reminder that scientific literacy and trust in institutions vary widely. For policy-makers and educators, those fractions matter: they shape support for funding, they inform curricula, and they determine which stories get told in public life.

So what do we do when entertainment and misinformation intersect? How do societies square the allure of celebrity with the need for shared facts? There are no easy answers, but a few paths stand out: robust science communication, better media literacy in schools, and responsible platform policies that limit the spread of demonstrably false claims.

A personal note and a question for you

Walking beneath the gantries at Cape Canaveral, you can still smell the salt and the old rocket fuel — the atmosphere carries a tiny, electric nostalgia. The Moon belongs to all of us in one sense: its cratered face is the same no matter who watches from Earth. But the story we tell about how we first reached it depends on shared witnesses and verifiable evidence.

So I’ll ask you, the reader: when a celebrity contradicts history, do you chalk it up to ignorance, performance, or something darker? And what responsibility do we all bear — as viewers, as voters, as parents — to nurture a public square where expertise is respected and wonder is not distorted?

These are not rhetorical indulgences. The way we respond will shape not only our memory of Apollo, but the future of exploration itself. If Artemis and other international efforts succeed, there will be new footprints, new samples and new data. Those will be harder to deny. But until then, we live in a world where a line on a TV show can send us all back to the basics: checking sources, asking for evidence, and remembering why the Moon captured our imaginations in the first place.

Russian strike in Ukraine injures 11, including four children

hanad

October 31, 2025

4 children among 11 injured in Russian attack in Ukraine — A view of the aftermath of a Russian air strike on a residential neighborhood in the city of Sloviansk yesterday

Nightfall over Sumy: A City on the Edge of Two Worlds

The night in Sumy should have been ordinary — the streetlights humming, samovars cooling in kitchens, and the quiet shuffle of slippers against linoleum. Instead, a series of explosions ripped through sleep like a rude alarm clock, leaving apartment facades pocked with shrapnel and a small city sitting once again in the uneasy place where war brushes up against daily life.

Ukraine’s emergency services reported that 11 people were wounded in the assault, among them four children. Multi-storey residential buildings, private homes, and infrastructure were struck. The blast that shook the railway depot, according to Governor Ihor Kalchenko, destroyed several carriages and left service buildings scarred — a stark reminder that even transport hubs on a regional line can become front‑line targets.

“We felt the house move,” said Olena, a teacher in Sumy, her voice thick with a mixture of adrenaline and fatigue. “My son ran out in his socks. We stood on the stairwell and just listened to the sirens. How long do you live like this, waiting to count the missing?”

Borderlands and the Slow Grinding of Conflict

Sumy lies in a strip of northeastern Ukraine that brushes the Russian border — a place where geography and geopolitics fold into the quotidian. Here, the risk of cross-border strikes is not an abstraction; it is the shape of the week. Drones and missiles, the new tools of a conflict that oscillates between open frontlines and high-tech skirmishes, have made infrastructure a strategic target. The calculus is cruel: damage the rails, and you choke movement; strike heating plants, and you threaten winter warmth.

“When the depot is hit, it’s not just a broken train carriage,” said Maksym, a rail worker who refused to give his full name. “It’s people who can’t get to work, medicines that might not arrive on time, and children stuck at home. It sneaks into everything.”

Across the Border: Heat and Fear in Oryol

On the other side of the border, the ripple effects of the same conflict were felt in a different key. In Oryol — a Russian city with onion-domed churches, birch-lined boulevards, and Soviet-era blocks — officials announced restrictions on heat and hot water after what they described as a Ukrainian drone strike on a pipeline at a local power plant.

“It will be necessary to limit the heat and hot water supply to buildings in the Sovetsky, Zheleznodorozhny and Severny districts,” wrote Andrey Klychkov, the governor of the Oryol region, on social media. For many residents, the announcement landed like a second blow: winter is not some distant season, but a looming threat to comfort and health.

Anna, a pensioner who has lived in Oryol all her life, said, “We share stories of past winters — candles, old kettles on stoves. But now the cold comes with a new fear. Will we have enough heat? Will the pipes be fixed? What happens if the power goes?”

Kindergartens, Carriages, and the Weaponization of Everyday Life

The conflict’s reach has been thorough. Russia’s defense ministry claimed that its forces shot down 130 Ukrainian drones overnight, mostly over western regions and near Moscow and Yaroslavl. Local officials reported damage to infrastructure near Vladimir and a temporary closure of a kindergarten in Yaroslavl — around 280km northeast of Moscow — after a nearby strike.

It’s a brutal arithmetic: a kindergarten closed, a train carriage destroyed, a pipeline breached — each act reverberates beyond immediate physical damage. Schools shutter, supply chains wobble, hospital corridors stretch, and the fragile social fabric of civilian life gets torn in places that are hard to stitch back together.

What This Moment Tells Us

Look beyond the headlines and you see patterns that worry humanitarians and strategists alike. Attacks on energy and transport infrastructure are rising in intensity and frequency in this theatre. Whether intended to degrade military logistics or to pressure societies into political concessions, the result is the same: civilians bear the cost.

Consider the practical: in colder months, losing heat is not an inconvenience but a health risk. Elderly people with chronic conditions, infants, and those with compromised immune systems are disproportionately at risk when heating and hot water are curtailed. That is why statements from local officials — practical, prosaic, and sometimes painfully frank — often sound like pleas.

“Infrastructure isn’t a military target if it serves civilians,” said Dr. Iryna Petrov, an international humanitarian analyst based in Kyiv. “When power, railways, and water systems are hit, you don’t just degrade capability; you erode the threshold of normal life that keeps a society functioning.”

On the Ground: Shades of Resilience and Fear

Walk Sumy’s streets and you will see both the scars and the living pulse. Shopkeepers sweep glass away and set out fruit bowls. A grandmother sits with a thermos of tea at a corner table, as if to say: we will not be driven from our routines. But the resilience is threaded with exhaustion. Children speak of “the boom” like a weather report, and parents tuck emergency backpacks under beds on habit.

“We joke to keep from crying,” Olena, the teacher, said with a forced laugh. “We tell the kids stories about bed bugs and monsters — anything to put it off. But after the siren, no one jokes. You count who is here and who isn’t. You check phones for messages. That is how we measure the night.”

Questions for the Reader

What would you do if your water ran cold and stayed that way through winter? If trains you rely on to move goods or people were suddenly unreliable? If a preschool down the street closed because of a strike? These are not hypothetical exercises for many in Sumy, Oryol, and neighboring regions; they are the small, intimate dilemmas of survival during conflict.

And globally, how do we reconcile the increasing sophistication of remote warfare — drones, cyberattacks, precision strikes — with the ancient rules meant to protect non-combatants? Is there an ethical line we imagine inviolable that modern warfare is testing?

Looking Ahead: Winter, Politics, and the Human Ledger

Politically, the escalation of strikes on energy infrastructure aligns with a chilling reality: when diplomacy stalls, the tools of coercion multiply. Peace talks have hit dead ends in recent weeks, and both sides appear to be ratcheting pressure in the most immediate way they can — by targeting the arteries that sustain civilian life.

Practically, winter will be a test. Repairs to pipelines and rail depots take time, funds, and security guarantees. Humanitarian agencies watch with concern; local councils scramble to stock blankets and generators. But the long-term toll — on mental health, on education interrupted, on supply chains rerouted — will linger long after the woodsmoke dissipates.

“This is not just another round of claims and counterclaims,” Dr. Petrov added. “It’s an assault on the ordinary that keeps societies intact. And when ordinary fails, the consequences are measured in lost years and opportunities.”

Closing: The Human Shape of Headlines

War writes itself into the small things: the kettle left on the stove, the emptied bench, the child who learned to sleep with noise, the rail worker who counts carriages like fingers. Sumy and Oryol aren’t just coordinates on a map; they are places where people measure time in seasons and where the coming winter now has a new, sharper edge.

As you read this from wherever you are — a café with heat or a window watching rain — consider the kind of world we choose to protect. What is expendable, and what is not? The answers will say as much about us as any diplomatic communiqué. And for the families counting the wounded and the cities counting the costs, those answers aren’t academic; they are urgently, painfully real.

Prince Andrew loses royal titles, ordered to vacate royal residence

hanad

October 31, 2025

UK's Prince Andrew stripped of titles, forced out of home — Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor (file pic)

A Royal Severing: What It Feels Like When a Prince Becomes Andrew Mountbatten Windsor

There are moments when centuries of ceremony and the slow thrum of tradition shudder like glass under a thrown stone. On a crisp morning in Windsor, that stone landed with the force of a headline: Britain’s King Charles has stripped his younger brother, Prince Andrew, of his royal title and told him to leave the Royal Lodge on the Windsor Estate.

It reads like the end of an era—or at least the end of a particular chapter in a once-untouchable life. Andrew, who turns 66 this year, is the second son of the late Queen Elizabeth II and has spent much of his adult life framed by royal privilege. Now, Buckingham Palace says, he will be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, surrender the lease to the thirty-room Royal Lodge and relocate to private accommodation in eastern England.

The palace line and the public rupture

The official statement was spare but searing. “These censures are deemed necessary,” the palace said, “notwithstanding the fact that he continues to deny the allegations against him.” It added that Charles and the wider family—Prince William among them—stand behind the decision and that the monarch’s sympathies remain with victims and survivors of abuse.

“This is not punishment for a man but a statement for survivors,” said a palace aide, speaking on condition of anonymity. “It’s an institutional move to demonstrate where we stand.”

That line—the monarchy lining itself up, visibly, with those who have been harmed—has weight. The palace has wrestled with reputation before, but few interventions have been so unmistakably public: a title removed, a house reclaimed, a family name recalibrated.

Windsor: a town of tourists, tea shops and whispered reckonings

Walk the narrow streets near the castle and you’ll see the incongruity of it all. Tourists clutch guidebooks beside pubs that still serve roast beef, while estate workers walk dogs beneath ancient trees. At a window table in a local tea shop, Sarah Bennett, who has lived in Windsor for decades, shook her head.

“We grew up on the stories of princes and pageantry,” she told me, stirring her tea. “But this—this is different. It’s intimate, awful. It makes you think about how much we assume about people behind the gates.”

Outside the wrought-iron gates of Royal Lodge, a small cluster of residents and reporters lingered like moths. One neighbor, a retired teacher who asked to be called Michael, summed it up bluntly: “He’s paid a price for associations and behavior many of us found troubling. Whether it’s enough—that’s another question.”

The weight of the allegations

The historical context matters. Andrew’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein— the financier who died in a U.S. jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges—has long dragged its shadow across royal corridors. In 2022, Andrew settled a civil claim brought by Virginia Giuffre, who accused him of sexual assault. The settlement, and the painful public scrutiny that surrounded it, rattled a family that must balance private loyalties with public accountability.

“This is about trust,” said Dr. Hannah Lewis, a criminologist with experience in survivor advocacy. “Institutions—especially ones like the monarchy—are judged not just by the gravity of what occurred, but by how they respond. Removing a title is symbolic, yes, but symbols matter. They signal boundaries.”

The palace explicitly framed the move as such a boundary: a clear act of alignment with survivors. “Their Majesties wish to make clear that their thoughts and utmost sympathies have been, and will remain with, the victims and survivors of any and all forms of abuse,” Buckingham Palace said. The family of Virginia Giuffre responded with a statement praising the decision and calling it a vindication of perseverance.

Money, mansions and questions of stewardship

What fed the latest decision were not only the allegations but a storm of scrutiny over Andrew’s finances and his use of royal premises. British newspapers recently reported that he had not paid rent on Royal Lodge for years—decades, in some accounts—while bankrolling at least £7.5 million in renovations. A parliamentary committee even questioned whether it was appropriate for him to continue living in the estate’s prized house.

“It’s a question of stewardship,” said Olivia Carter, a governance expert. “Public resources, even those tied to tradition, are expected to be used responsibly. When public servants—or symbolic figures—appear to benefit without accountability, the public’s tolerance thins quickly.”

Whether the decision will settle matters is another story. Legal wrangling, reputational fallout and private grief all swirl alongside a nation’s appetite for clarity. For many, the picture is not clean-cut: the palace has opted for distance rather than a legal verdict. Andrew continues to deny the allegations against him.

What this moment reveals about power and scandal

Look beyond the particulars and you find larger questions: Who is answerable when power is inherited rather than earned? How do institutions balance loyalty to individuals with duty to society? And how should societies reckon with the people who are accused of grave wrongdoing when those people occupy symbolic roles?

“We are in an era where institutions cannot hide behind their age anymore,” Dr. Lewis said. “Social media, investigative journalism, and survivor networks have shifted the axis of accountability. This is not about individual humiliation; it’s about collective standards.”

The palace move is also a reminder of how private pain becomes public spectacle. A family that has appeared unassailable—its rituals and residences watched by millions—now faces a domestic reckoning that is also a national conversation.

The human layer beneath the headlines

At its heart, this is a human story: a brother stripped of title, neighbors whispering over garden fences, survivors seeking recognition, a monarch making a painful, political calculation. It invites questions that are both local and universal. How do we treat those in power who fall short? Where do we place compassion—toward survivors, toward a family, toward the nation?

“If you look at it purely legally, this might be a closure,” said a legal analyst I spoke with. “But emotionally, for victims and for the community, closure is messy and nonlinear.”

So what will become of Andrew Mountbatten Windsor? He will move. He will live outside the official residences. The title is rescinded but not the bloodline, the history, the conflicting memories. In Windsor, life goes on: the castle bells will toll, the tourists will take photos, and the town will continue to calibrate what royal life means when the scaffolding of privilege is publicly questioned.

And for readers across the world: what do you think this moment says about accountability, about institutions, about the ways we balance heritage with justice? The question is not just British. It is global, timeless—and, somehow, painfully contemporary.

Israel launches deadly cross-border incursion into southern Lebanon

hanad

October 31, 2025

Israel carries out deadly incursion in south Lebanon — Smoke rises following an Israeli airstrike on the outskirts of the southern Lebanese village of Ej Jarmaq

Dawn in Blida: A Quiet Village Fractured by Gunfire

Before dawn, Blida lay half-asleep beneath a pale sky, its battered houses still bearing the scars of last year’s war — gables missing, shuttered windows boarded with plywood, a few stubborn strings of laundry snapping in the cool wind.

Then the shooting came. A municipal building that for years had felt like a refuge for sleepy clerks and local paperwork became, in a matter of hours, the scene of a life extinguished and a village jolted awake.

An employee, Ibrahim Salameh, was found dead where he had slept on duty. Blankets and a thin mattress were stained; a pair of glasses lay among scattered papers and a half-smoked cigarette. The scene — doors riddled with bullet holes, windows blown out — read like a catalogue of a community that has learned how quickly normal life can be stolen.

Voices from the Street

“We heard them all night,” said a woman at the small bakery just off the main square, her flour-dusted fingers pausing mid-knead. “At first we thought it was rockets. Then we saw the lights, and we knew. Ibrahim used to come here for tea. He was on duty, he shouldn’t have been here — not like that.”

“They took the building in the dark,” the village mayor told a reporter, his face lined by more winters than his hair suggested. “He was sleeping here because there was no electricity at his home. We demand answers.” His voice carried the double weight of communal grief and the rawness of a population that has seen sovereignty traded for zones of influence.

What Happened — Two Perspectives

The Israeli military confirmed it carried out an operation in southern Lebanon, saying troops had been targeting what they described as Hezbollah infrastructure when soldiers encountered a “suspect” inside the municipal building and opened fire. “An immediate threat against the troops was identified,” a brief statement read, adding the incident was under review and accusing Hezbollah of using civilian structures for militant activity.

Lebanese officials saw the strike differently. President Aoun — speaking from the presidential palace — ordered the Lebanese army to “confront any Israeli incursion into liberated southern territory,” a stern instruction that framed the raid as an attack on national sovereignty. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam described the action as “a flagrant aggression against Lebanese state institutions and sovereignty.”

On the ground, ordinary people did not speak in diplomatic phrases. “Ibrahim was not a fighter,” a neighbor said, wiping her eyes. “He was an employee, like my brother or many men in this village. We want the truth, and we want our lives back.”

Key Facts at a Glance

Lebanon and Hezbollah reached a ceasefire with Israel in November 2024 after two months of open war that followed the outbreak of fighting in October 2023.
Despite the ceasefire, Israel maintains troops in five sectors of southern Lebanon and has continued regular air strikes, citing threats from Hezbollah.
The UN rights commission reported that 111 civilians have been killed in Lebanon since the ceasefire took effect.
US and international diplomats have been pressing Lebanese authorities to bring weapons under state control, a contentious issue tied to Hezbollah’s strength and Iran’s influence in the region.

The Wider Context: Why Blida Still Matters

Blida is not merely a tragic footnote. It sits on a fault line where local lives meet international strategy. The ceasefire of November 2024 stopped a full-scale conflagration, but it did not erase the daily, grinding interactions of surveillance, raids, and air strikes that continue to puncture life along the Blue Line.

“A ceasefire on paper is not the same as security on the ground,” said Dr. Leila Mansour, a Beirut-based conflict analyst. “When one side retains forces in key points across the border and the other keeps an armed non-state actor embedded in communities, the tinder remains. Small incursions can flare into broader confrontations.”

Hezbollah, which launched cross-border strikes into Israel after the Gaza war erupted in October 2023, emerged from last year’s fighting notably weakened, according to analysts — but not dismantled. Washington has intensified pressure on Lebanese authorities to disarm the Iran-backed group, and at a recent meeting of ceasefire monitors in Naqoura, the US envoy welcomed a “decision to bring all weapons under state control by the end of the year,” urging the Lebanese army to implement its plan.

On the Ground: The Human Cost

Walk through Blida and you feel the arithmetic of war in every cracked wall and abandoned café. Olive trees that once shaded generations stand with trunks scorched by shelling. A boy in a soccer jersey scuffs a makeshift ball along a rubble-strewn lane; an elder sits by an improvised shrine of photographs and candles, praying softly in a rhythm that has long outlived certainty.

“We live by the rhythms of the land — harvest, weddings, funerals,” the baker told me, wiping his hands on his apron. “Now every dawn we wake to sirens or the thud of helicopters. The young ones ask if the world will ever be normal again.”

Such scenes are mirrored across dozens of villages that bore the brunt of last year’s fighting. The municipal building where Ibrahim slept had served as a small anchor for civil life — permits stamped, births recorded, elections run. The use of a civilian facility as an alleged militant hideout, whether true or not, underscores the tragic entanglement of civilians and combatants in asymmetric warfare.

Where Do We Go From Here?

Every incursion, every raid, every retaliatory strike chips away at fragile steps toward stability. The Lebanese army has been ordered to respond to incursions, but it also stands between a government stretched thin and a populace exhausted by loss. The United States and other international actors press for weapons to be centralized under state control, but implementing such a plan in a polarized, politicized environment is easier said than done.

Consider three uncomfortable questions this raid forces us to face:

What protects civil servants and civilians when the structures of governance become targets or collateral?
Can a national army realistically absorb and control all armed groups without provoking new violence?
How many more lives will be lost before the international community moves from statements of concern to enforceable measures that protect people, not just borders?

Closing: A Village Reminds Us of the Stakes

At dusk, Blida tries to stitch itself back together. Neighbors share tea; a radio crackles with a melancholy song; a man mends a shutter that bears the arc of a bullet. Mourning becomes community work — a way of refusing to let a loss be the last word.

“We are not statistics,” the mayor said quietly as the light fell. “We are mothers and fathers, bakers and clerks. We want life, not headlines.”

As global readers, what do we owe to places like Blida? Perhaps, at the very least, the focused attention to see faces rather than maps, to press for accountability rather than acquiesce to inevitability, and to remember that every geopolitical calculus has a human ledger. When the morning paper lists another “raid” or “strike,” will we pause — and ask who was sleeping in that room, and why the rest of the world let it happen?

Who’s driving Sudan’s devastating war? Main armed groups and leaders

hanad

October 31, 2025

Who are the actors in Sudan's devastating war? — Children walk past a Sudanese army parade in the streets Gedaref in eastern Sudan (file image)

Smoke Over the Nile: Sudan’s Invisible War and the Foreign Hands That Tighten It

When I arrived in Khartoum — the city where the Blue and White Nile meet and where the dust always seems to taste faintly of iron — the skyline was broken by more than just unfinished apartments and telephone wires. Thin columns of smoke rose from neighbourhoods that had once been full of children’s cries and the smells of fresh bread. Street vendors who used to sell steamy cups of black tea spoke in whispers. A doctor at a makeshift clinic told me, “You get used to the sound of distant booming. You don’t get used to the silence after the ambulances stop coming.”

This is Sudan in the third year of a conflict that began between two men who once stood shoulder to shoulder.

The Two Generals, One Country Torn

General Abdel Fattah al-Burhan and Mohamed Hamdan Daglo — known to many as Hemedti — were once partners in a military transition that followed the 2019 ouster of Omar al-Bashir. In October 2021 they formalized power in a coup, and by April 2023 their partnership had cracked into open warfare. The fighting has killed tens of thousands, forced nearly 12 million people from their homes, and pushed Sudan into a humanitarian abyss that reverberates across the Sahel and Red Sea coasts.

Today, the army nominally governs from Port Sudan on the Red Sea, with a new prime minister, Kamil Idris, installed in May 2025. The Rapid Support Forces (RSF), whose lineage traces back to the Janjaweed militias — horse and camel-mounted fighters accused of atrocities in Darfur two decades ago — have carved out their own administration in Nyala and now control much of western Sudan.

Lines on the Map, Threads from Afar

What started as a power struggle between two military leaders has become a patchwork of battle lines fed by accusations of foreign meddling. Each side accuses the other of importing weapons, mercenaries, and the technical means to strike from afar. The United Nations has repeatedly urged nations to “refrain from external interference,” but the calls have had the brittle ring of a plea thrown into a storm.

Who is accused of what?

Egypt: Cairo treats General Burhan as Sudan’s legitimate authority and has hosted him. Khartoum’s RSF has accused Egypt of providing direct military support — a claim Egypt denies.
United Arab Emirates: The army accuses Abu Dhabi of supplying the RSF with drones and even mercenaries. The UAE has denied interference despite UN and open-source reports suggesting otherwise.
Libya and Khalifa Haftar: Forces aligned with eastern Libyan strongman Haftar are accused of backing RSF offensives; Haftar denies these charges.
Chad: The army claims that Chad has been a conduit for supplies to the RSF — a charge that has splintered local politics in N’Djamena, which denies the allegations.
Turkey: Ankara has shown support for the army and, according to several outlets, supplied drones used against the RSF.
Iran: Diplomatic ties with Khartoum were restored in October 2023; the RSF has accused Iran of arming Burhan’s forces.
Russia: Long-standing military ties under the Bashir era and recent cooperation agreements keep Moscow in the background, with past talk of a Red Sea base that reverberates across regional security calculations.
Kenya: Weapons reportedly labelled “Made in Kenya” were found in RSF caches — an accusation Nairobi says is misleading. Kenya also hosted the RSF’s political wing at a founding meeting.

Voices from the Ground

“They fire at night,” said Mariam, a mother of four from Omdurman who now sleeps in a neighbour’s garage. “Not because our streets are military, but because they want the sky.” Her voice is weary, but precise. The fear she describes is not only for bullets but for the fragile infrastructure that pushes water into taps and keeps hospital lights on.

A humanitarian worker who has worked in Darfur and Khartoum for years told me, “The war used to be about farms and oil; now it’s about the drones and the supply chains. Whoever gets the advanced technology decides the tempo.” This worker asked to remain anonymous for safety reasons.

From Cairo, an analyst close to Egyptian policy said bluntly, “Egypt sees stability in Sudan as a matter of national security — Burhan is their guarantor.” In contrast, a diplomat in Abu Dhabi told me, “The UAE has strategic interests in the Red Sea, but we do not operate mercenaries in Sudan.” Both statements were made with the careful cadence of those who balance public posture with private posture.

Humanitarian Numbers and the Slow Burn

The scale of the crisis is not abstract. UN agencies and independent monitors estimate nearly 12 million people displaced within and outside the country. Hospitals are broken, wheat imports are threatened, and the Red Sea — a choke point for global shipping — hums with a new volatility as external powers maneuver for influence.

“This isn’t just a civil war,” said Professor Fatima El-Sayed, a political scientist who studies the Horn of Africa. “It’s a geopolitical contest remade by drones, deep pockets, and proxy logistics. When external actors arm, fund, and diplomatically prostrate themselves to local militias, they make the violence last longer, and they make it deadlier.”

What’s at Stake Beyond Sudan’s Borders?

The war in Sudan ripples beyond Khartoum’s burnt markets. It touches migration routes to Europe, destabilises neighbouring Chad and Libya, and threatens shipping lanes that feed the world. In the context of a resurgent great-power jockeying in Africa, Sudan is a mirror for wider competition: access to ports on the Red Sea, influence in the Horn of Africa, and the shadow economy of commodity trafficking.

Are we watching the future of interstate conflict — fought with outsourced fighters, remotely piloted aircraft, and deniable supply chains? Or is Sudan a tragic outlier, where local ambition meets reckless international appetite? The answer matters not only to policymakers but to the millions whose daily reality is fear, hunger, and the impossible task of rebuilding lives between intermittent truces.

Where to from Here?

There are no easy answers. The UN’s calls for restraint ring hollow without enforceable mechanisms. Local ceasefires can hold for days, sometimes weeks, but the underlying rivalry — a collision of two military machines and their patrons — endures. If anything, the international community’s failure to coordinate a clear, consistent response has been an accelerant.

“We need a regional compact,” said an African Union negotiator. “Not speeches. Not press releases. A real plan that ties reconstruction funding to disarmament and reconciles security needs with civilian governance.” Whether such a compact will emerge, or be powerful enough to tie the hands of external actors, is uncertain.

For now, the streets of Sudan wait. Markets will reopen. People will plant their small plots again. But the scars of this war — the bodies, the uprooted communities, the fractured trust — will take a long time to stitch together. And every time a foreign weapon arrives, every convoy that crosses a dusty border, the possibility of peace slips a little further away.

How willing is the world to defend the idea that borders should not be battlefields for others’ ambitions? And how long can ordinary people — those who knead bread, tend camels, teach children their letters — keep living under the shadow of foreign strings pulled far away?

Caribbean battered by Hurricane Melissa as death toll nears 50

hanad

October 31, 2025

Nearly 50 dead as Hurricane Melissa thrashes Caribbean — Residents rest amid debris of a damaged house after the passage of Hurricane Melissa in Boca de Dos Rios village, Santiago de Cuba

When the Sea Stayed and the Rain Kept Coming: The Wake of Hurricane Melissa

There are mornings when the island air smells like salt and coffee; there are mornings now when it smells like mud. Hurricane Melissa has left a ledger of loss across the northern Caribbean, and the numbers are more than statistics — they map out lives altered in an instant. Official tallies place the confirmed death toll at 49. But each figure is a neighbor, a child, a farmer — and for many communities, the accounting is still unfinished.

Haiti, spared a direct hit but not the storm’s mood, reported the heaviest toll: at least 30 dead and roughly 20 still missing after relentless rains turned rivers into roaring beasts. In Petit-Goavé, a southern town, one river overran its banks and swallowed whole families; local officials say 23 people — including 10 children — perished there. “The water arrived like a wall,” recounted Marie Toussaint, 42, whose cousin is among the missing. “We could hear shouts and then nothing.”

Jamaica, stunned by an unprecedented landfall, counted at least 19 fatalities and braced for more. Melissa struck southwestern Jamaica as a Category 5 storm — the most powerful hurricane to make landfall on the island in recorded memory — and left a landscape of torn roofs, downed power lines and fields scattered with debris. “It’s like a hand just swept across the parish,” said Corporal Deon Clarke of the Jamaica Defence Force, who has been coordinating rescue teams. “We’re still finding homes that are gone.”

On the Ground: Scents, Sounds and the Work of Rescue

In Montego Bay, supermarket entrances were ringed by anxious lines; pumps were dry or offline. “There is no petrol in most stations,” said Chevelle Fitzgerald, a visitor who’d been trying to reach the capital. “The roads were blocked with trees — it took six hours where it usually takes two.”

Seventy percent of Jamaican electricity customers were still without power days after the storm, Energy Minister Daryl Vaz reported. Ambulances and army personnel have had to tuck through paths cleared on foot to reach isolated pockets of the country. Satellite images show swathes of defoliated areas and neighborhoods reduced to skeletal frames — a visual silence that implies months of rebuilding ahead.

Across Cuba’s eastern provinces, authorities evacuated some 735,000 people — an extraordinary logistical feat that likely saved many lives. Yet preliminary reports indicated 241 communities remained isolated, communications down and up to 140,000 residents affected. “We were moved to a school with blankets and faces I’d only seen in the market,” said Rosa Elena, a teacher from Santiago de Cuba. “We’ll go back, but we don’t know if what we left will be standing.”

Numbers That Tell a Story

Some figures are blunt instruments: AccuWeather calculated damage and economic loss across the western Caribbean at between $48 billion and $52 billion. The forecaster also described Melissa as the third most intense hurricane observed in the Caribbean and one of the slowest-moving storms — a speed that multiplied the rainfall and the damage.

At 3 a.m. Irish time on the day after landfall, Melissa was a Category 2 storm roughly 264 km west of Bermuda, with sustained winds of about 161 km/h, according to the U.S. National Hurricane Center. Bermuda braced but breathed relatively easy as authorities closed causeways and suspended schools and ferries “out of an abundance of caution.”

In the Bahamas, warnings were lifted but officials resisted a full “all clear,” cautious about returning islanders to homes still under threat of unseen damage. U.S. search-and-rescue teams were dispatched to Jamaica to bolster recovery operations, and international pledges of aid began to trickle in — the U.K., for instance, announced an additional £5 million in emergency funding and supplies targeted at shelter and lighting for families without power.

Voices from the Rubble

Alone in a neighbourhood in St. Elizabeth, a 77-year-old man named Alfred Hines waded through mud and splintered boards, barefoot and bewildered. “One minute the water was up to my waist, then my neck,” he said, hands still trembling. “I thought I’d be gone.”

First responders tell similar stories of small rescues that felt like miracles: children pulled from roofs, elders ferried to temporary shelters in church halls, families reunited at a relief station by a bowl of hot soup. “We can’t replace a home in a day,” said Lieutenant Miriam Powell, a relief coordinator in Kingston. “But we can bring a blanket, wire a radio, tell someone they’re not alone.”

Climate, Preparedness and the Larger Reckoning

Melissa’s path is also a stark chapter in the larger story of warming oceans. Scientists long ago warned that higher sea surface temperatures would give storms more fuel, increasing both intensity and the prevalence of slow-moving systems that dump extraordinary amounts of rain. Caribbean leaders, already battered by successive storms, have amplified calls for financial support and climate reparations from high-emitting nations.

In 2023 the United Nations set up a fund to help developing countries access fast, reliable financing when disasters hit. But pledges have lagged and donations have not met targets — a gap the region is feeling now in the form of delayed reconstruction and strained emergency services. “We need predictable funding windows,” said Dr. Ana Morales, a climate adaptation specialist. “Right now, many countries are forced into a cycle of short-term relief rather than long-term resilience.”

What Comes Next?

As relief flights and aid convoys arrive, the immediate logistics — food, water, temporary shelter, power restoration — are urgent. But recovery will stretch beyond roofs and roads. Farmers need seeds and fertilizer; children need schoolbooks and stability; mental health services will be vital for communities that watched their lives wash away.

Immediate priorities: search-and-rescue, water and sanitation, power restoration.
Short-term needs: shelter kits, medical care, distribution of fuel and food.
Long-term tasks: rebuilding resilient infrastructure, debt relief, and climate adaptation funding.

International donations, however, can’t be the entire answer. Robust, locally led rebuilding — with building codes that consider rising seas and stronger winds; solar microgrids that replace fragile transmission lines; community-based flood defenses — will determine whether the Caribbean simply recovers, or finally becomes more resilient.

Looking at the Horizon

On streets strewn with palm fronds and corrugated iron, there’s a stubbornness that will not be catalogued by any list of needs. Children still play where there’s a patch of dry ground, elders sit under makeshift tarps and trade news, and volunteers map out the next push for relief. “We’ll put it back together,” said a woman setting up a community kitchen in Jamaica’s west. “It will take time, but people here know how to fight.”

So what does the world owe these communities? Immediate aid, yes. But also the conviction to treat Melissa not as an isolated calamity but as a warning. Will global systems choose to finance transformation over mere repair? Will conversations about emissions translate into hard cash for adaptation and debt relief? The answers will shape not just how quickly lives are rebuilt, but whether the next storm finds the same vulnerable shoreline waiting.

Until then, islands will sweep their beaches by hand, count their losses, and plan — stubbornly, lovingly — for tomorrow. And the rest of us, watching from far-flung coasts, might ask ourselves: when weather crosses borders, what does solidarity look like?

Trump limits refugee admissions to historic low of 7,500

hanad

October 31, 2025

Trump sets refugee ceiling at record-low 7,500 — In the 2024 fiscal year, more than 100,000 refugees resettled in the United States, the most in three decades (file image)

A Cap at the Door: America’s Refugee Ceiling Shrinks to 7,500

When a president sets a number, it does more than count heads—it signals values. On a late-September paper that will shape the lives of thousands, the U.S. announced a refugee admissions ceiling of 7,500 for the 2026 fiscal year. It is the lowest ceiling in modern American history, and it arrives wrapped in a reshaped moral argument about who deserves protection and why.

The document, dated September 30, makes clear this is not a neutral bureaucratic tweak. It directs much of Washington’s resettlement attention toward South Africa’s white Afrikaner minority—people who, according to the White House determination, are facing persecution in their homeland. That claim is already a flashpoint.

From Pause to Priorities: The Policy Pivot

When the administration took office, it froze all refugee admissions, a sweeping pause justified as a national-interest reassessment. Weeks into that moratorium, Washington quietly began carving out exceptions: Afrikaners were singled out for potential resettlement. By early September, just 138 South Africans had entered the United States under these early efforts—an initial trickle that hints at more significant shifts in policy intent than size.

The exclamation point, however, is the ceiling itself. To put it in perspective: the previous administration admitted roughly 100,000 refugees in fiscal year 2024. The new ceiling represents not merely a slowdown; it is a dramatic reimagining of America’s role in global protection.

What the Move Signals

This is about more than numbers. Washington has also moved oversight for refugee support programs from the State Department to the Department of Health and Human Services. That bureaucratic handoff is symbolic: the effort reframes resettlement from a foreign-policy instrument to a domestic welfare program, with implications for which cases get prioritized and how decisions are made.

“It’s a shift from diplomacy to domestic administration,” said a former senior State Department official who asked not to be named. “That changes how refugee status gets understood—are they a foreign policy responsibility or a domestic care obligation?”

Voices on the Ground: Fear, Doubt, and Hope

In the dusty towns of the Western Cape and the sprawling farmlands of the Free State, people are talking—quietly, urgently. At a church hall in a small Afrikaner community, a table of men and women sip coffee and pass around a laminated sheet with instructions on applying for U.S. admission.

“We’re not asking for much,” said Pieter van der Merwe, a third-generation sheep farmer. His hands, callused from years of repairing fences, trembled when he spoke. “We want a place where our children can walk to school without fear. If America offers that, we will go.”

Across Johannesburg, in the cramped offices of a refugee NGO, the tone is different—skeptical, guarded. “This feels like selection by politics,” said Lindiwe Mokoena, a caseworker who has represented asylum seekers from several countries. “Refugee protections are meant to be blind to a person’s political usefulness. When you pick groups by ethnicity or perceived politics, you hollow out the concept of asylum.”

South African officials have rejected allegations of systematic race-based persecution. A government spokesperson told local media, “There is no state-sponsored campaign against any minority. Problems on the ground—crime, inequality—are being addressed through the law and policy.”

Inside the Strategy: Who Qualifies?

The determination does allow for “other victims of illegal or unjust discrimination” to be considered, and internal planning documents circulating earlier this year suggested even broader ambitions: prioritizing Europeans who claim persecution for expressing certain views, including opposition to mass migration or support for populist parties.

That language raises questions about the expansion of refugee definitions beyond classic persecution—race, religion, or political opinion—toward contested grounds such as ideological expression. At the United Nations General Assembly that followed, administration officials urged other nations to rethink post-war asylum protections, a move that would echo far beyond U.S. borders.

What This Could Mean

Smaller global resettlement pipeline: fewer slots mean more people left waiting in refugee camps or urban limbo.
Selective protection: groups with political resonance in Washington could be privileged over those in acute need.
Shifting international norms: if other countries follow suit, the post-World War II asylum framework could be weakened.

Economics and Empathy: The Counterarguments

Advocates argue it’s not just moral but practical folly to shrink resettlement. Refugees often plug labor shortages in fields ranging from agriculture to health care. “Dismantling this program is not putting America first,” said Gideon Maltz, CEO of the Tent Partnership for Refugees, in a statement that underscored how refugee workers have helped fill critical gaps in many communities.

Data supports the point: refugees are more likely to enter labor markets quickly and to start businesses at higher rates than native-born Americans—trends that have been well-documented in U.S. economic studies. In rural towns facing aging workforces, new arrivals can mean the difference between a shuttered school and a thriving one.

Global Ripples: A Test for the International Order

What happens in Washington rarely stays in Washington. The administration’s push at the UN to roll back asylum protections is a live experiment in how far national policies can reshape international norms. If other governments take the cue, asylum could become more transactional and less protective.

That matters not only for those fleeing war and persecution today, but for tomorrow’s crises—climate displacement, state collapse, mass unrest. The global system of asylum was designed after the Second World War to be a safety net for the most vulnerable. If countries begin to pick and choose whose vulnerability counts, how will the world respond when the next large-scale displacement event arrives?

Questions to Sit With

As you read this, consider: Are refugee policies best run as a matter of national security, international obligation, or domestic administration? Who decides which stories of suffering are worthy of rescue? And in an era when politics shape compassion, can we hold a global standard that treats human need, not political convenience, as the measure of who gets help?

Final Scene: The Human Aftermath

Back in that church hall, the table of applicants folded their papers into neat stacks. They laughed, nervously, about afrikaner radio programs and recipes for potjiekos—a cultural thread that will tug at them wherever they go. “I don’t know whether America will accept us, but if it does, we will bring our songs,” said Mariska, a teacher who keeps a worn hymnal in her bag. “You always take what you can carry: the language, the recipes, the small kindnesses.”

Policy documents and ceilings may decide how many feet cross a border—but they cannot remove the human impulse to seek safety. As this new chapter in refugee policy unfolds, the real test will be whether numbers on a page can accommodate the messy, stubborn dignity of the people they are meant to serve.

Five More Suspects Detained in Ongoing Investigation of Louvre Heist

hanad

October 31, 2025

Paris authorities urged to issue reward for stolen jewels — French police officers seal off the entrance to the Louvre Museum after a jewellery heist yesterday

The Louvre Heist: A Daylight Theft, a Fractured Crown and a Break in the Chase

Paris in autumn often feels like a film set — leaves falling, cafés steaming, tourists threading the galleries of the Louvre beneath the glass pyramid. On 19 October, that cinematic calm was punctured by something that read like a caper movie: a four-man team used a furniture lift and cutting tools to reach a first-floor gallery, snatch a trove of imperial jewellery and vanish within seven minutes.

This week French investigators announced what they called a breakthrough: five more people have been detained, including a prime suspect whose DNA was found at the scene. Prosecutor Laure Beccuau, who has overseen the probe, did not close the book — “It’s too early,” she said — but she offered a rare glint of progress. “We had him in our sights,” she told reporters, a simple line that carried the heavy relief of a case finally pivoting from bewilderment to momentum.

What we know so far

Dozens of detectives combed thousands of hours of footage and analyzed some 150 DNA and fingerprint traces after the brazen daylight robbery that stunned the museum world and captured imaginations across the globe.

Authorities have been certain that four people carried out the actual break-in; two allegedly forced entry into the gallery while two others waited outside. The thieves fled with an estimated cache of jewellery valued at roughly €88 million — including pieces once worn by French imperial women, jewellery as much museum artefact as glittering wealth.

So far, none of the missing pieces have been recovered. During the getaway, the gang dropped a crown studded with diamonds and emeralds that once belonged to Empress Eugénie; prosecutors said the crown was crushed while it was extracted from its display case but may be restorable. Eight other items were taken, including a diadem set with nearly 2,000 diamonds and an emerald-and-diamond necklace once given by Napoleon I to his wife, Empress Marie-Louise.

Arrests, names and the trail of evidence

The five recent detentions took place in and around Paris, with several arrests concentrated in Seine-Saint-Denis — the diverse, densely populated department northeast of the capital. Two individuals arrested Saturday were charged yesterday with theft and criminal conspiracy after “partially admitting to the charges,” prosecutors said.

One of those charged is a 34-year-old man of Algerian origin identified through DNA left on one of the scooters used during the escape; he was detained at Paris Charles de Gaulle airport as he prepared to board a flight to Algeria. The other is a 39-year-old unlicensed taxi driver from Aubervilliers, a suburb where minivan traffic mingles with bustling markets. Both are now in pre-trial detention and were reportedly known to police for past thefts.

“We’re following lines of inquiry that criss-cross the city,” an investigator told me on condition of anonymity. “There’s no single thread yet, but patterns show — scooters, a moving lift, surgical speed. This wasn’t an impulsive smash-and-grab. It was planned.”

Inside the gallery: the audacity of daylight

What makes this theft so striking is its brazenness. The thieves operated in broad daylight, some wearing balaclavas and high-visibility vests. They used a rented furniture elevator to access the upper floor and cutting tools to breach a display — a method more mechanical than cinematic but no less dramatic in its consequences.

Witnesses who frequented the museum described a surreal scene: “It was like watching actors, except nobody was applauding,” said Claire, a guide who works regular evening shifts. “People were confused first. Then someone shouted. The security doors closed like a stage curtain.”

How the jewels link past and present

The stolen pieces are not mere ornaments; they are objects that carry France’s layered history. The diadem with almost 2,000 diamonds, the necklace from Napoleon I, the crown of Empress Eugénie — each item threads through stories of monarchy, empire and the pageantry that once defined Europe’s courts.

Empress Eugénie’s crown: diamond and emerald studded; dropped during the escape and damaged.
Emerald-and-diamond necklace: reportedly gifted by Napoleon I to Empress Marie-Louise.
A diadem with nearly 2,000 diamonds: a dazzling, irreplaceable piece of imperial regalia.

To museums, such items are rare and irreplaceable. To thieves, their value on illicit markets can be intoxicating. “You’re not just stealing jewellery,” said Amélie Durand, a conservator who has worked with historic jewels. “You’re stealing a physical link to a nation’s cultural memory. The loss, whether temporary or permanent, is enormous.”

Seine-Saint-Denis and the social backdrop

This theft also refracts broader social realities. Seine-Saint-Denis — often referred to simply as “93” by locals — is a place of contrasts: vibrant immigrant communities, youthful energy, cultural innovation, and persistent economic challenges. It is not helpful to reduce an area to headlines, but the location of arrests has reopened conversations about opportunity, policing and marginalization in the suburbs that ring Paris.

“You can’t look at an arrest and pretend the social question isn’t there,” said Malik, a community organiser in Aubervilliers. “We have talented people blocked by lack of work. That doesn’t excuse crime. But it does explain why some take desperate shortcuts.”

Investigative reach and wider questions

Investigators are keeping multiple hypotheses on the table. While they are confident in identifying the four alleged perpetrators, prosecutors have not ruled out the involvement of backers or recipients waiting outside the immediate circle of the heist. Importantly, they have said there is no evidence of complicity from within the museum itself.

Art theft sits at the intersection of crime, culture and economics. Interpol and cultural heritage watchdogs have long warned that stolen art and antiques feed international networks of buyers who operate in legal grey zones. Recovering these pieces depends as much on police work as on diplomacy and international coordination.

Why this matters beyond Paris

There are lessons here for museums everywhere. Security budgets, visitor experience, and the ethical stewardship of cultural objects are not just operational concerns; they’re civic responsibilities. The Louvre is a global symbol — it welcomed nearly 9.6 million visitors in 2019, the last full pre-pandemic year — and an audacious theft at such an institution ripples outward, shaking confidence in urban public spaces and the systems that protect them.

“We must balance openness with vigilance,” said an art security consultant who has worked with several European institutions. “Museums exist to share culture, not to turn into fortresses. But this case is a reminder: the systems that protect that openness need constant re-evaluation.”

What comes next

As France continues its investigation, questions remain. Where are the missing jewels? Were they intended for resale to private collectors, hidden caches, or perhaps for demolition into raw gems? Will the arrests lead to more recoveries or merely to more leads?

For now, the Louvre remains open, its galleries humming with visitors who come for art and leave with stories. Perhaps some will walk past the display that was breached and feel the hush of history a little more keenly.

What would you do if you stood before those vitrines now — admire, mourn, or demand change? The theft forces not only a police response, but a cultural reckoning: how we value the past and how we protect it for the future.

There will be time for courtrooms and forensics and long investigative nights. But in the meantime, the city keeps moving. The pyramid continues to shine at night, tourists still queue with their cameras, and somewhere, maybe even in a back room of a Parisian café, someone is weighing a crushed crown against the hum of the city and wondering whether history can ever really be stolen for good.

Caribbean reels after Hurricane Melissa as islands begin damage assessments

hanad

October 30, 2025

Devastated Caribbean assesses Hurricane Melissa damage — An aerial view shows destroyed buildings following the passage of Hurricane Melissa in Black River, St Elizabeth, Jamaica

After the Eye: Walking the Wet, Wind-Scoured Streets Where Melissa Left Her Mark

By the time dawn peeled back the clouds over Santiago de Cuba, the world felt smaller—flattened into ruined roofs, tangle of telephone wires, and the slow, stubborn business of putting lives back together.

A farmer I met on a mud-churned lane held a shaking bundle of damp fur. “I found him under the mango tree,” he said, cradling a mud-caked dog as if it were an offering. “There’s nothing left of the shed. But he’s alive.” The dog whimpered; the man looked as if he had been carrying a week’s worth of grief in his chest.

Hurricane Melissa did not merely arrive. It announced itself with a kind of brutal certainty—storm surge, shrieking gusts and sheets of rain that turned streets into rivers. In many places the storm’s roar has subsided, but the work of counting losses, restoring power, and searching for missing kin has only just begun.

Numbers That Tell a Story

Across the Caribbean, the official counts are sobering: at least 24 confirmed deaths in Haiti, and large swathes of Jamaica and Cuba have been left in ruins. Cuban authorities say roughly 735,000 people were moved out of harm’s way—an enormous, logistically complex evacuation centered in the eastern provinces of Santiago de Cuba, Holguín and Guantánamo.

Meteorologists placed Melissa as one of the most intense storms to reach land in the region in recent memory. As the system barreled northeast, the US National Hurricane Center forecast maximum sustained winds near 165 kilometers per hour as it approached Bermuda. For many islanders, those numbers are not abstractions—they are ceilings on what a roof might endure and thresholds between a building that stands and one that does not.

Where the Damage Is Concentrated

Haiti: 24 confirmed fatalities; heavy inland flooding and collapsed homes in coastal and low-lying areas.
Cuba: Extensive roof loss, snapped trees and widespread communications outages in the east; major evacuations undertaken.
Jamaica: Severe infrastructural damage in parts of western parishes; roads and bridges disrupted.
Bahamas: Flooding expected to ease in coming hours, according to regional forecasts.

Voices From the Rubble

“We woke to the sound of trees falling,” said María, a shopkeeper near El Cobre, wiping the streaks of salt and rain from her forehead. “You try to save what you can—photos, paperwork, one tin of food. But you look at your neighbors and you know they lost more.”

“Everything is gone,” Christopher Hacker, a grower from Seaford Town in Jamaica, told me, standing among the husks of banana plants. “We planted for a year; one night took it. How do you explain that to your children?”

Felicia—who asked that her last name not be used—sat on the threshold of a collapsed block home and laughed once, a small, heartbreaking sound. “We were already scraping by,” she said. “Now we wake up and we have to learn how to breathe again.” Her comment echoed a sentiment being voiced by countless people across the battered coastline: survival after Melissa will not be only about rebuilding walls, but rebuilding lives.

Communications and Aid: A Race Against Time

Downed power lines and disrupted mobile networks have made it difficult to get a full picture of the destruction. In many places, roads are impassable. Emergency responders and humanitarian agencies describe a patchwork of accessible towns and entirely cut-off communities.

The United States has said its teams are in contact with governments across the region—Jamaica, Haiti, the Dominican Republic, the Bahamas—and US officials signaled they were preparing rescue and response assets. Notably, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the US stands ready to provide humanitarian assistance to Cuba as well, despite longstanding political tensions.

The United Kingdom announced an immediate package of £2.5 million in emergency funding and a plan to operate limited charter flights to help British nationals evacuate.

International Response—Fast but Complex

US: Rescue and response teams being positioned; diplomatic offers extended to regional partners.
UK: £2.5 million in emergency funds and charter flights for nationals.
UN agencies: Teams coordinating assessments, with early appeals expected to scale up as damage reports solidify.

Climate, Attribution, and the New Normal

Behind the immediate anguish is a longer, colder arithmetic: storms of Melissa’s strength are becoming more frequent and more ferocious as a result of human-caused warming. A recent attribution study from Imperial College London suggested that Melissa was roughly four times more likely because of climate change—a stark reminder that the climate crisis is not theoretical for those living on low-lying islands and coastal plains; it is present, tracking from the sea into their homes.

“This is a brutal reminder,” said Simon Stiell, Executive Secretary of UN Climate Change, “that we need urgent and accelerated climate action at scale. Every storm like Melissa is another test of our collective ability to protect the most vulnerable.”

Scientific data show sea surface temperatures across the tropical Atlantic have been above the 20th-century average for several consecutive seasons, fueling storms with more energy. NOAA has also noted that Melissa’s landfall matched some of the most intense historical events tracked in the modern record, tying a 1935 benchmark for intensity at impact in some areas.

How People Are Coping—And What Comes Next

In neighborhoods where power is out and stores are shuttered, makeshift relief efforts are taking shape. Local volunteers are distributing water and canned food from borrowed trucks; church halls have become shelters; small fishing boats have been repurposed to shuttle supplies where roads have failed.

“People here always help one another,” said Pastor Ricardo, who organized a supply run in a flooded district. “We share what little we have because the government cannot reach everyone at once. It’s how we survive storms and other things life throws our way.”

But the short-term goodwill cannot replace infrastructure: rebuilding roofs and restoring phone towers will require money—a lot of it—and political will. The eastern provinces of Cuba are already grappling with an economic crunch that predates Melissa, and Haiti’s rainy-season floods have amplified vulnerabilities that were already acute.

Questions to Carry With You

How do island nations, often contributing the least to global emissions, repeatedly absorb the worst costs of climate disruption? What does justice look like in an era when storms amplified by warming are increasingly routine? And for individuals on the ground who have lost livelihoods and loved ones, how do international promises translate into rapid, tangible support?

As Melissa shifts toward the north and weaker seas, leaving Bermuda to brace but the Caribbean to reckon with the aftermath, these questions will not evaporate. The people I spoke to want to mourn, and then to plan. They want to rebuild—but they also want to know who will help them do it this time, and next time, and the time after that.

For now, they sweep up the debris, huddle under salvaged tarps, and coax life back from the wreckage. It’s intimate work—slower and quieter than headlines, but ultimately the truest measure of resilience.

1...131415...138 Page 14 of 138