Aug 28 (Jowhar)-Mareykanka ayaa beeniyay inuu wadahadalo kula jiro Somaliland, si loo lgu aqoonsado dal ahaan.
UN operation in Lebanon set to conclude in 2027
As the Sun Sets on a Half-Century Legacy: UN Peacekeepers Prepare to Exit Lebanon by 2027
Nearly five decades have passed since Irish peacekeepers first stepped onto the rugged soil of southern Lebanon, a region long fraught with tension, volatility, and the fragile promise of peace. Now, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL), the emblem of this delicate stability, is charting a course for its gradual departure—planned to conclude within the next four years. For many around the world who have followed this story, it is the closing chapter of a mission that has seen immense courage, sacrifice, and unwavering commitment to peacekeeping in one of the most challenging regions on Earth.
This week, a draft resolution, primarily brokered by France and set before the UN Security Council in New York, proposes extending UNIFIL’s mandate through 2026. It then calls for a deliberate and carefully managed drawdown throughout 2027. This approach marks a decisive shift from the more abrupt withdrawal previously sought by the United States and Israel—a move that could have had destabilizing reverberations across the region.
Peacekeeping at a Crossroads: The Stakes Behind the Resolution
For Ireland, UNIFIL has been more than just a distant UN mission; it has been a deeply ingrained part of the nation’s identity on the international stage. Since 1978, Irish soldiers have been a constant presence in southern Lebanon, often facing harsh conditions and grave risks. As Tánaiste Simon Harris poignantly reflected, “We have a very, very long and proud association with UNIFIL… today I want to pay tribute to the thousands upon thousands of Irish men and women who have served with absolute distinction, particularly the 47 who gave their lives in the cause of peace.”
Mr. Harris’s voice carries a particular weight this week. Only months ago, the prospect of an immediate cessation of the mission loomed large—a cliff edge that threatened to destabilize geopolitical balance in a region already tension-wracked. “An abrupt end would have been wholly irresponsible,” Harris warned, underscoring the caution with which the Irish government has approached the complex negotiations that have unfurled behind the scenes.
Indeed, the Irish diplomats—along with French, Austrian, Polish, and EU counterparts—have invested weeks of behind-the-scenes diplomacy, engaging with US officials, Lebanese authorities, and UN representatives to chart a path that respects both operational security and local governance ambitions.
The Challenge of Stability in Southern Lebanon
To understand the gravity of the withdrawal, one must peer into the volatile mosaic of southern Lebanon. UNIFIL’s presence has been a buffer, monitoring ceasefires and acting as a stabilizing force amid the persistent shadow of Hezbollah, Israeli military posturing, and fragile Lebanese state authority.
Since the right-wing government of Benjamin Netanyahu came to power in Israel in late 2022, there’s been mounting pressure to push UN forces out—criticism that peaked when Israeli Cabinet Minister Eli Cohen branded UNIFIL “a useless force” that had failed to curb Hezbollah’s entrenchment.
But the reality on the ground is far more complex. Hezbollah remains a powerful militia with deep social roots in Lebanon, intertwined with Iran’s regional influence. Lebanon’s government is now working on a sensitive proposal to coax these armed groups into disarmament through incentives rather than force. Simultaneously, Israel is poised to reduce its military footprint in southern Lebanon contingent on these disarmament steps.
A Fragile Peace, A Complex Dance
It is a precarious balance. The US envisions economic packages from Gulf allies, including Qatar and Saudi Arabia, to offset the socioeconomic fallout for Hezbollah’s fighters if they disarm—a bold experiment in conflict resolution that transcends military might and delves into diplomacy and economic realities.
“This isn’t just about troop numbers,” explains Dr. Layla Haddad, a Middle East analyst based in Beirut. “It’s about whether a government can extend its authority, whether militias can lay down arms voluntarily, and whether international actors can hold their nerve in an unpredictable environment.”
The Irish Peacekeepers: Guardians of Hope in a Troubled Land
For the more than 300 Irish personnel currently stationed at Camp Shamrock in southern Lebanon, their mission stands as a testament to enduring commitment. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe recently spoke about bolstering support in this final phase and looking ahead to new opportunities for Ireland’s defense forces in other UN peacekeeping roles.
“We must support our troops up to 2026 and then explore future engagements,” Donohoe said during a visit to Limerick. “The Defence Forces have a proud, professional tradition in peacekeeping. They have navigated some of the most complex and risky environments globally.”
His words remind us of the human element behind the uniforms. Irish soldiers often share stories of laughter amid adversity, friendships forged across cultures, and a steadfast resilience born of a mission larger than themselves.
A veteran soldier, speaking anonymously from Camp Shamrock, offered this reflection: “We didn’t come here for glory. We came to make sure kids could play safely, families could tend their homes without fear. It’s hard work. But it’s work that matters.”
What Comes Next? A Moment to Reflect—and to Act
As the Security Council convenes and votes, the decision resonates far beyond diplomatic halls. It poses profound questions about the future of peacekeeping and international responsibility. Can regional governments assume full security control after decades of international oversight? What sacrifices will that transition demand? And what will happen to the locals who live under the perpetual threat of geopolitical strife?
History teaches us that peacekeeping missions do not function in a vacuum. They are not just about manning checkpoints or patrolling borders; they symbolize hope, international solidarity, and the persistent human yearning for stability in an unstable world.
Readers might pause to consider: what responsibility do we bear, as global citizens, to support peace—not just through boots on the ground, but through diplomatic vigilance, humanitarian aid, and sustained attention? How might today’s withdrawal shape tomorrow’s conflicts—or peace?
Final Thoughts: Closing One Chapter, Opening Another
As the sun sets on UNIFIL’s historic mission, we honor the tireless efforts of those who have served: soldiers, diplomats, and local civilians alike. Their stories, many of them untold, are woven into the tapestry of Lebanon’s modern history.
This transition affords an opportunity—a chance to rethink how the world approaches peacekeeping, sovereignty, and conflict resolution in a changing geopolitical landscape. Ireland’s continued commitment to serve on peace missions globally ensures that this legacy is not just an ending, but the start of new chapters in international cooperation.
In a world frequently defined by division, the story of UNIFIL stands as a testament to patience, persistence, and hope. The question remains: as UN peacekeepers prepare to pack their bags for the last time in 2027, how will the international community ensure that the fragile peace they have guarded does not unravel? And what lessons can we glean from their journey to inform peace efforts elsewhere—perhaps closer to home than we realize?
Shir ku saabsan hannaanka Maaliyadda Cimilada Qaranka oo lagu soo gabagabeeyay Muqdisho
Aug 28 (Jowhar)-Kulan Aqoon-isweydaarsiga Qaranka oo ku saabsan Tijaabada Maaliyadda Cimilada Soomaaliya iyo Hawlgelinta Sanduuqa Qaranka ee Cimilada (NCF) ayaa lagu soo gebagebeeyay Muqdisho.
Denmark calls in US ambassador regarding ‘influence’ in Greenland
The Arctic Chessboard: Greenland Caught in a Tug-of-War Between Denmark and the United States
In the shadowed expanse of the Arctic, an intriguing and complex geopolitical drama is unfolding—one that beckons us to look beyond icy landscapes and resource riches. Greenland, with its vast glaciers and strategic location, has always piqued the world’s interest. But recent revelations expose a growing undercurrent of covert maneuverings and subtle power plays, casting this semi-autonomous Danish territory into the glare of international spotlight once more.
Denmark’s foreign minister, Lars Løkke Rasmussen, recently summoned the top U.S. diplomat in Copenhagen after intelligence reports suggested that American operatives have been quietly working—some say scheming—to sway Greenland’s political trajectory. The Danish government suspects that at least three U.S. nationals linked to the Trump administration have engaged in behind-the-scenes influence campaigns designed to promote Greenland’s separation from Denmark, paving the way for eventual U.S. annexation.
A Territory in Turmoil: More Than Just Ice and Minerals
“We are aware that foreign actors continue to show an interest in Greenland and its position within the Kingdom of Denmark,” Foreign Minister Rasmussen stated soberly. “It is therefore not surprising if we experience outside attempts to influence the future of the Kingdom in the times ahead.”
This diplomatic flap is inextricably entwined with the incendiary remarks of former President Donald Trump, who publicly entertained the notion of the United States purchasing Greenland. More provocatively, at times, he has suggested that force could be a tool for securing the territory—comments that sent ripple effects of apprehension through Copenhagen, Nuuk, and beyond. Greenland, a land governed by about 57,000 indigenous Kalaallit people, now faces a wave of uncertainty about its future sovereignty.
But Greenland is not merely a frozen outpost. Beneath its ice lies a treasure trove of minerals—rare earth elements critical for the world’s technology, plus vast deposits of iron, zinc, and even uranium. And with melting Arctic ice opening new shipping routes, Greenland’s strategic value transcends simple geography; it sits at the heart of evolving global security concerns. For decades, Denmark has held sovereignty over Greenland—a legacy of centuries past. Yet Greenland’s evolving self-governance means that its political identity is perpetually balancing on a needle’s point between independence and union.
Voices from the North: What Do Greenlanders Think?
To understand the pulse of Greenlandic sentiment, it’s essential to step into the small coastal communities where tradition and lifeways intertwine with anxieties about foreign intrigue. “Greenlanders value their culture and autonomy deeply,” says Anne-Mari Petersen, a Nuuk-based community organizer. “But the talk of American interference makes people nervous. We don’t want to be pawns in a game of superpowers.”
Her thoughts echo the cautious spirit of many locals, who witnessed, in March, the turbulent visit of U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance. Protests erupted, forcing Vance to withdraw from planned events, including a traditional dog sled race celebration. This stood in stark contrast to the warm welcome French President Emmanuel Macron received just months later, when he toured Greenland’s towns and engaged openly with residents, signaling Europe’s interest through respect rather than pressure.
European Allies Step In
Denmark, mindful of Greenland’s significance, has reached out to European partners to balance American ambitions. France’s President Macron’s visit wasn’t just symbolic; it was a strategic insertion of European goodwill amid a growing Arctic contest.
“Europe wishes to stand alongside Greenland as a partner, not a conqueror,” notes Dr. Ingrid Holm, a Nordic geopolitical analyst at the University of Copenhagen. “Greenland’s future should be shaped by its people, with external actors playing constructive, transparent roles.”
Shadow Wars: Influence Campaigns and Intelligence
Denmark’s security service, PET, has openly warned that Greenland has become a target for various influence operations. The tactics? Exploiting both real and fabricated divisions within Greenlandic society, emphasizing disagreements over the territory’s ties to Denmark, and promoting narratives favorable to external interests, chiefly those of the U.S. The intelligence community regards these efforts as subtle psychological and political maneuvering rather than overt military interventions.
“The Arctic is no longer an isolated frozen expanse,” says PET spokesperson Niels Jensen. “It has become the stage for a new kind of contest where information—sometimes misinformation—is wielded as a weapon.”
The Broader Picture: Why Should You Care?
At first glance, Greenland might seem a remote and distant concern—far from the daily lives of global citizens. But beneath the surface, this saga encapsulates a profound question of how rising powers negotiate influence in a fractured post-Cold War world. The meaning of sovereignty, the rights of indigenous peoples, global security priorities, environmental concerns, and the race for scarce resources all coalesce here.
As the Arctic warms at more than twice the global average rate, the doors to this once-inaccessible region are swinging open. This invites new strategic considerations from superpowers while spotlighting the sovereignty and welfare of indigenous populations who have stewarded these lands for millennia.
How should powerful nations respect the autonomous choices of smaller communities? When does ‘interest’ become interference? And importantly, what role does transparency play in ensuring future peace and collaboration?
Looking Ahead: The Path Forward for Greenland
Meanwhile, the United States is poised to appoint Ken Howery, co-founder of PayPal, as its ambassador to Denmark, signaling continued American diplomatic engagement. For now, the embassy in Copenhagen is headed by Chargé d’affaires Mark Stroh.
As the delicate dance between Copenhagen, Nuuk, Washington, and European capitals continues, Greenland remains at the center—not merely a passive prize but a living homeland. It is a place where global ambitions intersect with personal histories, where ancient ice meets modern intrigue.
So, readers, as you turn your eyes to the northern horizon, let this story be a reminder: in a world increasingly connected yet fraught with tension, even the most remote places pulse with politics, dreams, and the indomitable will of people who call them home. How will Greenland’s story unfold? Perhaps that answer lies not in the hands of distant powers but in listening deeply to the voices echoing across the Arctic winds.
More than 100,000 homes lose electricity following attack in Ukraine
Under the Shadow of War: Ukraine’s Energy Lifeline Severed as Russia Strikes with Chilling Precision
In the quiet hours before dawn, when cities slumber and families prepare for the coming day, the hum of power plants and the glow of streetlamps are seen as constants—an invisible pulse of modern life. But in Ukraine, these lifelines have become targets under a relentless assault that threatens not only infrastructure but the very spirit of resilience.
Last night, Russian forces unleashed a devastating wave of drone strikes and missile attacks across six Ukrainian regions, leaving over 100,000 households in darkness. The energy ministry’s somber announcement revealed that critical gas transport infrastructure in the Poltava region was “significantly damaged,” while the Kharkiv, Zaporizhzhia, and Donetsk regions also sustained heavy blows. As temperatures begin to dip, these attacks strike at the heart of Ukraine’s heating supply, imperiling millions.
The Human Toll Behind the Blackout
But these attacks are more than just numbers or strategic targets—they are deeply personal tragedies. An elderly woman, 81 years old, lost her life in the overnight strike on the capital of Kherson region—an innocent caught in the cruel calculus of war. Two workers were killed at a farm there, their livelihoods and futures shattered amidst the rubble and fall of shells. This is the human cost that often escapes headlines but resounds loudly in the hearts of families and communities.
“It is not just infrastructure we are losing,” says Natalia Berezhnaya, a volunteer aid worker in Poltava. “It’s hope, warmth, safety—the things that make a house a home.”
Why Destroy Infrastructure Before Winter?
The timing of these strikes speaks volumes. Ukraine’s energy ministry accused Russia of a “deliberate policy of destroying Ukraine’s civilian infrastructure on the eve of the heating season.” The stakes couldn’t be higher. With winter approaching — and Ukraine already grappling with gas shortages after a 40% production drop earlier this year due to previous missile attacks — these new hits threaten to plunge millions into cold, dark homes.
“Heating is not a luxury here; it’s survival,” explains Vitaliy Shevchenko, an energy analyst based in Kyiv. “Every damaged pipeline or power station risks freezing entire towns. The psychological warfare is as brutal as the physical. It’s a message: endure, or break.”
Numbers That Tell a Story of Endurance and Despair
Since March 2025 alone, Ukrainian energy facilities have endured nearly 2,900 attacks, according to official data. This staggering figure reveals not just a pattern, but a campaign aimed at crippling one of the most vital sectors underpinning Ukraine’s daily life and defense.
Yet, amid this onslaught, the resilience of Ukraine’s defenders is nothing short of heroic. The Ukrainian Air Force reported downing 74 of the 95 drones launched overnight—a testament to their vigilance. Still, 21 drones managed to strike nine locations across the country, painting a stark picture of the challenges ahead.
The Wider European and Global Impact
The ripple effects of Ukraine’s crisis extend far beyond its borders. Across Europe, energy security conversations have been transformed, with nations scrambling to shore up supplies and reevaluate dependencies. The attacks set against the backdrop of diplomatic efforts—including recent attempts by global figures such as US President Donald Trump to broker peace—underscore how fragile and complex the situation remains.
“Energy infrastructure isn’t just pipes and wires,” says Dr. Anja Müller, a European security expert. “It’s about food on tables, warmth in homes, running hospitals. The repercussions echo across global energy markets and refugee flows.”
Voices from the Ground: Life in the Dark
In the northern city of Sumy, darkness blanketed neighborhoods after power lines failed. Serhii Kryvosheienko, head of the city’s military administration, paints a vivid image of the strain on utilities: “Every water utility facility is running on emergency backups. Hospitals are illuminated by generators, our people feel the cold creeping in.”
On the streets, locals share their fears and hopes. Olena, a mother of three, shares her worries: “Winter is coming, and with it, the cold. How do we keep our children safe without power? It feels like the war is in every breath we take.”
What Does This Tell Us About War in the 21st Century?
These attacks challenge traditional notions of warfare. They are reminders that modern conflicts are fought not only with guns and bombs but with strategies that cut deep into the fabric of civilian life. Infrastructure—once considered neutral or off-limits—becomes a vulnerable and deliberate target. What does this say about our collective responsibility to protect peace and the essential rights of those caught in conflict?
For global citizens, it’s an invitation to look closely at the indirect victims of war—the night without light, the winter without warmth, the lives continually disrupted by sounds of drones overhead. How do we, as a world community, respond to unseen battles fought in homes far from frontlines?
Looking Ahead: Resilience Amid Ruins
As Ukraine braces for colder days, communities find strength in unity. Volunteers repair power lines; neighbors share generators and blankets. The harsh reality is clear—these attacks are designed to erode Ukraine’s will.
Yet, amid the destruction, stories of courage bloom. “We will power through,” says Vitaliy, a volunteer electrician, tightening wires deep into the night. “Our work is small but vital—an act of defiance against the darkness.”
The resilience of Ukraine’s people is that pulsing heart that no missile, drone, or power cut can silence. For those watching and listening far away, it serves as a stark, beautiful reminder: in the face of destruction, the human spirit endures.
So as you read this, perhaps in a warm room lit softly by steady electricity, ask yourself—what would it be like to live in the dark, waiting for warmth? And how do we stand with those for whom this is the harrowing reality?
RW Xamsa “Soomaaliya waxay rabtaa in ay noqoto xarun muhiim ah oo isku xirta Afrika, Carabta iyo Aasiya”
Aug 28 (Jowhar)-Ra’iisul Wasaaraha Xukuumadda Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya, Mudane Xamsa Cabdi Barre, oo khudbad taariikhi ah ka jeediyay furitaanka Bandhigga 7aad ee Carabta iyo Shiinaha (China-Arab States Expo) ee lagu qabtay magaalada Yinchuan, ayaa soo bandhigay horumarka iyo fursadaha dalkeenna ka jira.
Every UNSC member except the US calls Gaza famine a man-made crisis
Gaza’s Famine: A Man-Made Catastrophe Unfolding Before Our Eyes
Imagine waking each day with a gnawing emptiness, not just in your stomach but in your heart—knowing that every morsel denied to you, every aid convoy turned away, is not a result of nature’s cruel hand but of human decisions made kilometers away. This is the grim reality facing the people of Gaza today, a besieged strip of land where famine isn’t an unfortunate consequence of war—it’s a deliberate strategy.
The United Nations Security Council recently witnessed a crossroads where 14 of its members stood united, demanding an immediate ceasefire and the lifting of all restrictions to allow life-saving aid into Gaza. The glaring exception? The United States, which abstained, highlighting deep divisions in international responses to this humanitarian nightmare.
Starvation as a Weapon—A Forbidden Weapon
On the ground, the reality in Gaza is harrowing. The Integrated Food Security Phase Classification (IPC), a global monitor of hunger, declared this month that Gaza is enduring a famine that is unequivocally “entirely man-made.” Volker Turk, the UN’s human rights chief, left no room for doubt: this famine is the direct outcome of policies enforced by the Israeli government.
“Using starvation as a tool of war is explicitly banned under international humanitarian law,” stressed Liana Hassan, an aid worker who has witnessed the crisis firsthand. “Yet here we are, watching people slowly die because access to food, fuel, and medicine is being withheld.”
The Security Council’s growing chorus implores for an immediate, unconditional, and permanent ceasefire. Their joint statement is a clarion call for the release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups and an emphatic demand for Israel to immediately end all restrictions on aid deliveries.
From Dublin to London, the urgency resonates. Ireland’s Mission to the UN reiterates its “strong support” for these measures. Meanwhile, Britain’s UN ambassador Barbara Woodward delivered a firm demand to Israel: “Lift your restrictions now. Let food, medical supplies, and fuel reach those in desperate need. Blockades and sieges must end.”
The Battle for Gaza City: Tanks, Bombs, and Displacement
On the darkest edges of Gaza City, the nightmare deepens. Israeli tanks, advancing overnight into the Ebad-Alrahman neighborhood on the city’s northern rim, have razed homes and shattered lives. The thunder of artillery left residents scrambling for safety, escaping into the maze of Gaza’s labyrinthine streets.
“The explosions were getting louder and louder,” recalls Saad Abed, a sixty-year-old former construction worker sheltering about a kilometer from the frontline. “Suddenly, people came running into our area with panic in their eyes—they were being chased by tanks.”
Nearer to Jabalia, a bustling refugee center, Hamad al-Karawi recounts a chilling order delivered by drone: evacuate immediately or face the consequences. “We scattered onto the streets, homeless in a place with nowhere to go,” he says.
Gaza’s civil defense agency reports that at least 24 people lost their lives today alone in a relentless chain of airstrikes and gunfire. Half of Gaza’s two million inhabitants cram into Gaza City, often the last refuge amid ruins. Israel has warned civilians they must evacuate south, but religious leaders insist many will stay put.
“Leaving Gaza City isn’t an option—it’s a death sentence,” said Father Elias, a Greek Orthodox priest. Along with nuns and clergy, he has vowed to stay, tending to those who seek sanctuary in churches and compound shelters. “Our duty is to stand with our people in their darkest hour.”
The Human Toll and the War’s Deadly Legacy
Since October 2023, Gaza’s health ministry tallies over 62,000 Palestinian lives lost, a figure the United Nations has verified as credible despite politicized narratives. The war erupted on October 7 when Hamas-led militants launched a fierce attack inside Israel, killing 1,200 people and seizing 251 hostages, figures from Israeli sources indicate.
The retaliation was swift and crushing. Israeli forces intensified airstrikes and imposed a suffocating blockade, triggering one of the gravest humanitarian crises of our time— Gaza crippled, displaced by the millions, and left to grapple with profound loss.
Among the casualties—devastatingly—are those who succumb not directly to violence but to starvation. Ten more deaths linked to malnutrition were confirmed recently, raising the death toll from hunger-induced causes to 313, including 119 children. Each number is a heartbreaking story, a child’s life cut short by deprivation engineered by blockade and conflict.
Behind Closed Doors: Trump, Kushner, Blair, and the Elusive Quest for Resolution
Thousands of miles away, in the polished halls of Washington, the war’s fate is being debated by figures of monumental influence. Former President Donald Trump convened a high-level meeting featuring his son-in-law Jared Kushner—once a key Middle East envoy—and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
A senior White House official described this gathering as a “policy meeting,” yet the stakes could not be higher. The agenda spans the full spectrum of the Gaza crisis: escalating aid deliveries, the hostage situation, and post-war reconstruction plans.
“We’re developing a comprehensive plan for the post-conflict period,” stated Steve Witkoff, the US special envoy, in a recent Fox News interview. “It’s robust, well-meaning, and reflects humanitarian motives.” But for Gazans starved, bombed, and displaced, plans on paper might feel distant from the rubble beneath their feet.
Trump had vowed during his last campaign to swiftly end the war. Yet seven months into his second term, peace remains elusive. A fragile ceasefire from early 2024 shattered in March when Israeli strikes claimed hundreds of Palestinian lives, unraveling months of tenuous calm.
Images of starving Palestinian children have shocked the conscience of the world, fueling a surge of criticism against Israeli policies from activists, humanitarians, and countries alike. Yet, diplomatically, the path remains fraught with complexity—a tangled web of historical grievances, security concerns, and geopolitical chess.
What Can We Do? A Moment to Reflect
Standing at this juncture, we as global citizens must confront uncomfortable truths. What does it say about our world when famine can be engineered, when hunger is wielded as a weapon? How do we reconcile the noble ideals of international law with the harsh realities on the ground?
As you read this, remember the streets of Gaza City—once vibrant marketplaces, neighborhoods where families celebrated weddings and birthdays—now echo with the sounds of explosions and fear. The question isn’t just who wins or loses a battle but how humanity can prevail.
We can raise our voices, demand transparent aid corridors, support organizations delivering relief, and hold our leaders accountable. The famine in Gaza is not a distant headline but a human tragedy demanding urgent action.
In Closing: Humanity on the Line
The crisis in Gaza is a testament to the heartbreak of war’s shadow—a man-made famine unfolding where hope once blossomed. For those trapped in the crossfire, survival is framed by the cruel calculus of politics and power.
Will the international community rise to meet this moral challenge? Can diplomacy break the siege and allow life to return to Gaza’s streets? And, crucially, can empathy triumph over enmity?
For Gaza’s two million souls, the answer is not just a matter of politics—it is a matter of life or death. And for all of us, watching and reading from afar, it is a call to remember our shared humanity, to stand in solidarity, and to never accept starvation as a weapon in any war.
Madasha Samata-bixinta oo si kulul uga hadlay xarriga nabadoon Xuseen Xaadoole
Aug 28 (Jowhar)- Madasha Samatabixinta ayaa si adag u cambaareysay xarigga loo geystay Nabaddoon Xuseen Maxamed Maxamuud Xaadoole oo ciidanka booliska xalaywateen isagoo ku sugnaa hoygiisa.
UN Peacekeeping Operation in Lebanon Scheduled to Conclude in 2027
Countdown to Departure: The Unfolding Story of UN Peacekeepers in Lebanon
For nearly half a century, the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) has stood as a sentinel on the fragile frontier between Lebanon and Israel, a symbol of international resolve—and a lifeline in a region that has seen too much turbulence. But now, after decades of presence, the storied peacekeeping mission faces an inevitable sunset, with plans underway to wrap up operations by the end of 2027. This moment is more than just a calendar date; it marks the closing of a chapter woven with complex politics, delicate diplomacy, and the steady footsteps of Irish troops who have called southern Lebanon their temporary home.
The Stakes at Play: Diplomacy in Motion
Imagine a room in New York’s United Nations Security Council, where representatives grapple with delicate resolutions that carry the weight of nations and dreams of peace. The latest draft—a French-brokered resolution—is poised to extend UNIFIL’s mandate one last time before initiating a carefully planned, year-long withdrawal. By December 31, 2026, UNIFIL’s active operations would cease, followed by a methodical drawdown through 2027, all in close coordination with Lebanon’s government. The goal? To hand over full responsibility for security in southern Lebanon to the Lebanese authorities themselves.
The French blueprint emerges after intense negotiations involving Ireland, Austria, Poland, and France pushing back against pressures from the United States and Israel. The U.S., backed by the Israeli government, has been calling for a swift exit—arguing that UNIFIL has outlived its usefulness. But is this a fair assessment? And what does a sudden withdrawal really mean for the people on the ground?
Voices of Concern and Hope
Simon Harris, Ireland’s Tánaiste and a key figure in these discussions, paints a vivid picture of the stakes. “UNIFIL isn’t merely a military presence,” he explained in a recent interview, his voice underscored with the gravity this issue demands. “It embodies stability for a volatile region. Abruptly ending the mission risks unraveling delicate progress—progress the local communities and international stakeholders alike have painstakingly built.”
Harris’ months-long diplomatic dance has seen him engage French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot, Austrian Chancellor Beate Meinl-Reisinger, and counterparts in Italy, the United States, and Lebanon. Each conversation layered with urgency and a shared desire to sidestep chaos. From Camp Shamrock, the Irish UNIFIL base in southern Lebanon—home to over 300 Irish soldiers—there’s a palpable connection to the land, the people, and the precarious peace that persists. Irish diplomats in Washington and New York have also worked tirelessly to forge channels of mutual understanding, their efforts a testament to a global community committed to cautious transition over hasty retreat.
The Complex Tapestry of Regional Politics
History teaches us that peace in Lebanon is shadowed by powerful undercurrents: the grisly legacy of the civil war, the rise of Hezbollah, Israeli security concerns, and broader regional rivalries fuel an ongoing narrative of tension and fragile ceasefire. Since Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing government took power in Israel at the close of 2022, criticism of UNIFIL has intensified. Israeli Cabinet Minister Eli Cohen’s stark assessment last year branded the peacekeepers “a useless force,” accusing them of failing to prevent Hezbollah’s military entrenchment.
This scathing viewpoint contrasts sharply with experiences on the ground, where UNIFIL soldiers maintain patrols, monitor borders, and liaise with communities to prevent escalation. Yet, these criticisms have real diplomatic weight, influencing debates over the future mission and the timing of withdrawal.
The Hezbollah Dilemma
No discussion is complete without confronting the shadow of Hezbollah, Iran-backed and deeply embedded in Lebanese politics and society. Under a new, U.S.-facilitated arrangement, the Lebanese government will soon unveil a plan aimed at persuading militias like Hezbollah to disarm—not through force, but via dialogue and incentives.
Hezbollah’s resistance to this strategy is vocal. Deputy Secretary-General Naim Qassem openly challenges the idea that disarmament could happen simultaneously with an Israeli military withdrawal, fearing imbalance and insecurity. Yet, Israel insists its own pullback hinges firmly on Hezbollah laying down its weapons, a standoff echoing the geopolitical deadlock that has long defined the border.
A Vision for the Future: Economic Incentives and Regional Cooperation
In a bid to soften the borders of conflict with hope, the U.S. has brokered a vision that includes an economic investment package fed by Gulf states such as Qatar and Saudi Arabia. Could prosperity become the new weapon of peace? Gulf-backed financial aid aims to replace militia incomes, easing fighters away from arms and toward livelihoods—something measurably groundbreaking in a region where economic despair often fuels violence.
Consider this snippet of context: Lebanon is enduring a profound economic crisis, with over half its population below the poverty line and a currency that has lost nearly 90% of its value since 2019. If economic recovery and stability can be woven into the fabric of security arrangements, could this multi-layered approach finally make a difference?
Keys to Lasting Peace
- Strengthened Lebanese government capacity to provide security
- Constructive engagement between Israel and Lebanon on military withdrawal
- Peaceful disarmament strategies for Hezbollah and other militias
- Robust economic investments addressing root causes of conflict
- Ongoing international support for a careful and coordinated UN exit
What Lies Beyond 2027?
For the soldiers at Camp Shamrock, for Lebanese villagers in border towns, and for policymakers in capitals thousands of miles away, 2027 promises a bittersweet ending. It’s a farewell to an era, a dust unsettled after decades of vigilant peacekeeping. But it also raises urgent questions—what becomes of peace without the visible presence of international monitors? Can Lebanon’s government truly fill the void? And what lessons might this withdrawal offer to UN peace missions worldwide?
One Lebanese schoolteacher from Tyre confided during a recent visit: “UNIFIL soldiers have been part of our community more than strangers. They bring a calm that’s hard to describe but impossible to ignore.” Such personal testimonies remind us that peacekeeping is as much about human connection as about mandates and resolutions.
As you reflect on this unfolding story, ask yourself: in a world brimming with conflicts both old and new, how do we balance international intervention with national sovereignty? And how can the global community ensure that peacekeepers help weave durable tapestries of security, rather than temporary patches?
The withdrawal of UNIFIL is not just a bureaucratic decision; it’s a pivotal moment steeped in history, human dreams, and the relentless push toward a future free from fear. Whether the world watches as a peaceful handover or as a precautionary tale will depend on the courage, wisdom, and compassion of all involved—from the halls of the UN to the hills of southern Lebanon.
Let us keep an eye on this story—not just for Lebanon’s sake, but for the lessons it offers on the true meaning of peace in our fragile, interconnected world.
Watch: SpaceX’s Starship launches initial prototype satellites
Starship’s Moment: SpaceX’s Giant Leap Towards Mars and the Moon
There’s something breathtaking about watching a 123-meter tall rocket, gleaming under the Texas sky, rise slowly—then suddenly—thunderously—as if tearing at the seams of the atmosphere itself. On a cool evening in South Texas, SpaceX’s Starship embarked on its tenth test flight, a mission that felt more like a statement, a promise etched in fire and steel. This wasn’t just another rocket test. It was a milestone, a breakthrough after a grueling string of setbacks that had left many wondering whether this audacious dream of routine spaceflight was possible.
At 7:30 p.m. local time, the Starship, strapped atop its super-heavy booster, roared to life at SpaceX’s sprawling Starbase facility near Boca Chica. Just three minutes later, like a sentinel released from a mechanical cage, Starship separated from its behemoth booster over the Texan expanse, carving a trajectory into orbit that would test the very soul of the rocket’s design.
The Dance of Dummy Satellites and Test Tiles
About thirty minutes into its celestial journey, Starship unveiled its cargo: eight mock Starlink satellites, a first for a rocket that until now had only lifted emptiness. The satellites weren’t real—no blinking panels or internet beams—but they represented something far greater: a crucial simulation of SpaceX’s vision to streamline satellite deployment, scaling up the constellation that now offers internet to remote corners of the globe.
“Deploying these mock satellites is a huge leap,” said Dr. Amina Patel, an aerospace engineer and satellite communication specialist. “It’s their first real test towards making internet available everywhere—a technology that could bridge digital divides worldwide.”
Eight hush-puppy-sized cuboids drifting out into the void may sound like a small step, but it signifies a powerful stride for Elon Musk’s ambitions. The Starlink satellite network, launched so far by the workhorse Falcon 9, relies on thousands of satellites orbiting Earth to beam internet down to underserved regions. Starship promises to upend that by launching — someday — hundreds of satellites at once, rewriting the rules of space logistics.
Fire, Fury, and the Heat Shield Challenge
Yet perhaps the most intense part of the flight was not the ascent, but the fiery plunge back through Earth’s atmosphere. Spacecraft returning from orbit face brutal friction and scorching heat—enough to melt or shatter unprepared surfaces. Historically, every shuttle, capsule, or probe needed their heat shields patched, replaced, or overhauled after each mission, pushing costs skyward.
Starship’s engineers have designed a new breed of hexagonal heat shield tiles—a shimmering tessellation meant not only to survive the inferno but to be reused again and again. Elon Musk has called this “the single biggest engineering challenge” for the rocket’s reusability.
“If we crack that, it changes everything,” mused Jackie Romero, a space technology analyst. “Imagine a rocket that can go up, come down, and fly again within days, not months. The economics of space change dramatically.”
In this test, as Starship carved a supersonic arc over the Indian Ocean, these tiles weathered the intense heat. It was a white-knuckle moment watched by engineers and enthusiasts alike: would the shield hold or crumble?
Touchdown, Tumble, and Triumph
After orbiting for some time, the rocket began its descent. Guided by onboard engines, it targeted a controlled splashdown west of Australia. For a heartbeat, it appeared to defy gravity’s chaotic grip—braking, dipping, and then settling vertically as if ready to pioneer ocean landings.
But domination of space is never simple. Seconds after contact, Starship toppled and exploded into a magnificent fireball—dramatic closure, but expected. The rocket’s flight termination system, a safeguard designed to prevent errant missions from wandering off course, had done its job. SpaceX’s test-to-failure approach once again showed its merit: learn, adapt, and push closer to flawless flight.
NASA and the Artemis Connection: Starship’s Lunar Destiny
“This is more than a test flight,” said NASA Acting Administrator Sean Duffy in a congratulatory message. “Flight 10’s success paves the way for the Starship Human Landing System that will bring American astronauts back to the Moon on Artemis III.”
Artemis III, NASA’s ambitious mission aiming for a crewed Moon landing by 2027, plans to use Starship as the lunar lander—his rocket sailing not just into Earth orbit but to the very surface of our closest celestial neighbor.
Of course, the clock is tight and the hurdles are high. Observers caution that Artemis III could be delayed, citing the complex engineering soon to be tested including in-space refueling and guided landings on a tenuous, rugged lunar landscape.
“Landing humans safely on the Moon’s unforgiving surface is a dance of precision and resilience,” said lunar geologist Mei Huang. “The stakes couldn’t be higher—not just for NASA, but for humanity’s vision of becoming an interplanetary species.”
A Thriving Rocket Town: Starbase’s Rise
Behind the rocket’s thunderous ascent lies a hub of human ambition and community. SpaceX’s Starbase, once a quiet patch of Texas coastline, now buzzes with the energy of thousands of engineers, designers, and dreamers. The town itself recently incorporated, fueled largely by the SpaceX workforce who have made this frontier an improbable new home.
With revenues projected by Musk to hit $15.5 billion this year, the company’s rapid prototype production and testing cycle at Starbase reflects not only engineering prowess but an industrial revolution in how rockets are built and flown.
The Broader View: Why Starship Matters to the World
Why should we care about Starship’s fiery ascents and occasional pyrotechnic finales? Because it’s about more than just rockets—it’s about rewriting human potential.
- Creating inexpensive, reusable orbital vehicles could democratize space access.
- Deploying internet satellites en masse could close digital divides, connecting remote villages from Siberia to sub-Saharan Africa.
- Paving the way to Moon bases and Mars colonies feeds our species’ innate urge to explore and expand.
In the flames of SpaceX’s latest Starship flight, there’s a mirror held up to our own aspirations and fears.
Will humanity finally dismantle the barriers to deep space travel, or will challenges keep pushing these dreams to the horizon? As you read this, somewhere in Texas, a team tirelessly refines tiles, tests engines, and plans the next shot. And somewhere, maybe you’re gazing up at the stars, wondering—which worlds will we call home in the decades ahead?
The journey to the moon, to Mars, and beyond has never been so vivid, so raw, or so close.
SpaceX’s Starship isn’t just a rocket: it’s a dare—to humans everywhere—to dream larger, fly farther, and ascend together.
Did US Strike on Venezuelan Boat Amount to High-Seas Murder?
A morning in the Caribbean that didn't feel like news until it was blood
The sea off Venezuela wakes slow and silver, fishermen humming boleros...
Tens of Thousands Protest in London as Officers Are Attacked
Whitehall at a Crossroads: Flags, Flares and the Fraying Threads of Public Life
On a late-summer afternoon in central London, Whitehall felt less like the...
Israeli strikes in Gaza kill 32 people, including 12 children
A City under a Gray Sky: Gaza City's Latest Night of Loss
There are nights that carve themselves into the memory of a city—nights that...
Did US strike on Venezuelan vessel constitute murder on the high seas?
The Morning the Caribbean Stilled
There are mornings when the sea off Venezuela wakes like a living thing—lamps blinking, nets bobbing, the smell of fried...
Togo calls in EU envoy to address detained Irish national’s case
When Diplomacy Turns Volatile: Togo, an EU Resolution, and a Man at the Centre of a Storm
In the warm dusk outside Lomé’s Grand Market,...