Former England rugby star Lewis Moody reveals motor neurone disease diagnosis

October 6, 2025

Lewis Moody diagnosed with motor neurone disease — Lewis Moody in action for England during the 2011 Rugby World Cup

A rugby warrior faces a quiet, devastating opponent

On a crisp autumn morning, I found myself thinking about a photograph that has been replayed in fans’ memories for two decades: Lewis Moody, dirt-streaked and grinning, arms around teammates, the Webb Ellis Cup shimmering in the Australian sun. It was a picture that announced triumph, grit and the kind of communal joy sport can conjure.

Today that image feels both triumphant and fragile. Lewis Moody, the uncompromising back-row who made 71 appearances for England and sealed a place in rugby folklore during the 2003 World Cup, has been diagnosed with motor neurone disease (MND). He told the BBC that he received the news two weeks ago and is still finding his feet with what it means.

“There’s something about looking the future in the face and not wanting to really process that at the minute,” Moody said. “It’s not that I don’t understand where it’s going. We understand that. But there is absolutely a reluctance to look the future in the face for now.”

Even to write those words feels intimate. This is a man who built a career on facing the future head-on — storming mauls, stealing line-outs, running through pain and giving everything to his team. Now, like thousands of others here in the UK and around the world, he has been handed a diagnosis that is stubbornly indifferent to past glories.

The man behind the jersey

Moody’s story is the kind that binds communities. Born in Swindon but forever linked to Leicester and later Bath, he made 223 appearances for Leicester Tigers, collected seven Premiership titles and two European Cups, and was a mainstay of the England side that lifted the World Cup in 2003. In the final against Australia, it was Moody who won the crucial line-out that led, moments later, to Jonny Wilkinson’s infamous drop goal — a single action stitched forever into rugby history.

“The figures, trophies and awards tell you what an incredible player Lewis was, but that is only half the story,” Andrea Pinchen, chief executive of Leicester Tigers, said in a statement that carried the quiet admiration of a club still proud of one of its sons. “As an individual, his commitment to his club along with his warmth and passion shone through, which endeared him to team-mates, staff and supporters alike.”

And yet, Moody keeps returning to an unexpected truth: he does not feel sick in the way you might imagine. “You’re given this diagnosis of MND and we’re rightly quite emotional about it, but it’s so strange because I feel like nothing’s wrong,” he told the BBC. “I don’t feel ill. I don’t feel unwell. My symptoms are very minor. I have a bit of muscle wasting in the hand and the shoulder. I’m still capable of doing anything and everything. And hopefully that will continue for as long as is possible.”

From individual struggle to communal response

Within hours of his announcement, the rugby world rallied. The Rugby Football Union released a message of solidarity: “We are all deeply saddened and distressed to learn that Lewis Moody has been diagnosed with motor neurone disease,” said Bill Sweeney, CEO of the RFU. “Our thoughts are with Lewis and his family and friends at this very difficult time as they come to terms with this diagnosis and I know the entire rugby community stands with them and will support them.”

Former teammates Geordan Murphy and Leon Lloyd wasted no time. They launched an online fundraiser to help Lewis and his family, the kind of grassroots response that, in Britain, moves faster than official aid sometimes can. The page passed £1,000 within an hour — a small figure in the grand scheme, but a loud one in moral terms: people want to act.

“We saw what happened with Doddie and Rob,” said a club volunteer in Leicester as she pinned a homemade badge to a noticeboard. “You can’t just stand by. You help where you can — money, time, a meal, a listen. It’s what communities do.”

Why this strikes a nerve

Part of the intensity of the public reaction is rooted in recent, painful history. Doddie Weir and Rob Burrow — two beloved figures in British rugby — both died after years battling motor neurone disease, Weir in 2022 and Burrow in 2023. Their struggles prompted one of the most visible fundraising and awareness campaigns sport has seen in recent memory, largely driven by Leeds Rhinos coach Kevin Sinfield, who became a household name for his marathon fundraising feats.

Theirs are not isolated cases. The MND Association (UK) estimates there are around 5,000 people living with motor neurone disease in the UK, and roughly 1,100 to 1,200 people receive a diagnosis each year. Globally, the condition — most commonly known as ALS in many countries — affects people at an incidence of roughly 1.5–2.5 per 100,000 annually, though those numbers vary by region and study.

Median survival after onset is often quoted at two to three years, though there are many exceptions. Stephen Hawking, for instance, lived for decades with a form of motor neurone disease; others decline much faster. The variability is part of why the diagnosis lands with such bewildering weight for families and patients alike.

Questions that stretch beyond sport

There are broader issues here that sit at the intersection of sport, health and societal responsibility. Are contact sports doing enough to protect their athletes? Is there a connection between repeated head injury or exposure to high-intensity physical stress and neurodegenerative disease? Researchers are investigating, and some studies suggest a raised risk among former professional athletes in certain sports, but causation is far from settled.

“We have signals in the data suggesting higher than expected rates in some groups, but the science isn’t definitive,” said a neurologist who researches MND at a major UK university. “Clarifying those links requires long-term cohort studies and biochemical insights we don’t yet fully possess. What we can and must do now is improve screening, support, and safety measures without waiting for perfect answers.”

That argument — caution without paralysis — resonates with many of the former pros I spoke to. “You play because you love it,” said a retired flanker now coaching at a school in Bath. “But you also owe it to the next generation to make it safer. That’s not bureaucracy; that’s stewardship.”

Small moments, lasting impact

Walk through Leicester on a matchday and you’ll see how a club and city keep a player’s memory alive long after retirement: chants echoing in the pubs, shirts waved in sunlight, grandparents telling grandchildren about the tackles that made crowds roar. Those cultural threads matter. They shape how people respond when one of their own is faced with something as raw as MND.

Moody’s diagnosis is a private moment made public by the nature of his life. His candor — reluctant, blunt, humane — has already sparked practical acts and quieter ones too: messages on social media, calls to old teammates, offers of help from fans who remember being hugged by him at a meet-and-greet.

He remains stubbornly defiant in small ways. “I’m still capable of doing anything and everything,” he said. “And hopefully that will continue for as long as is possible.” Those words are not denial; they are a pledge to live fully in the present, to keep being the man loved by teammates and strangers alike.

So what do we do with a story like this? We watch, we listen, and we reckon with the messy, human questions behind the headlines. We ask our sports institutions to act responsibly. We demand research funding and better care. And we, as neighbors and fans, we show up.

Will you? Maybe with a donation, a conversation with someone who knows MND, or simply by reading and sharing the story of a man who helped lift a cup and is now asking for a community to lift him.

England caps: 71
British & Irish Lions caps: 5
Club appearances for Leicester Tigers: 223
Approximate number of people living with MND in the UK: ~5,000

Hundreds of climbers evacuated after blizzard hits Mount Everest

hanad

October 6, 2025

Hundreds of hikers escape from blizzard-struck Everest — The blizzard hit the mountainside on Mount Everest on Friday into Saturday

Blizzard on the Eastern Face: How a Sudden Storm Turned a Trek into a Test of Survival

They came for the silence and the thin, clean air—hundreds of people tracing the lesser-trod path to Everest’s eastern Kangshung face, drawn by an eight-day National Day holiday and the promise of alpine beauty. What they found instead was a night that tasted of iron and snow: wind that cut like a blade, tents heaving under the white weight, and a cold that slipped past gloves and down jackets to bite the bone.

By the time the valley cleared, 350 trekkers had staggered into the patchwork township of Qudang, exhausted and hushed, and rescuers had established contact with more than 200 others still making their way out, state media reported. Local officials and villagers had mobilized quickly; news agencies earlier said nearly 1,000 people had been stalled in and around the remote Karma valley at the height of the crisis.

The night the mountain closed its doors

“The snow came like someone had thrown a blanket over the world,” remembered Lhamo, a yak herder who lives in the village below the camps. “We could hear thunder on the ridge. People knocked on our doors at midnight—shivering, asking for tea.”

Trekkers who reached Qudang described a relentless freeze that began Friday evening and did not quit until Saturday night. At an average elevation of roughly 4,200 metres, Karma valley is high enough that weather swings can turn swift and unforgiving—staff reported continuous snow mixed with rain, and in places lightning and thunder that frightened even seasoned guides.

“I’ve led groups here for seven years,” said Pema, a local trekking guide. “I can’t remember October ever being like this. It was warm in the afternoons and then suddenly it was blizzard. People were wet through. We worried about hypothermia all night.”

One trekking group of 18 described huddling into a single large tent for warmth, keeping watch on the snow load outside. “We were digging snow every ten minutes,” one member said. “If the roof had collapsed, there’s no telling what would have happened.” Two men and a woman in that party suffered hypothermia when temperatures slipped below freezing despite seemingly adequate clothing; they were stabilized as the group descended.

A community that would not wait for orders

What the valley lacked in paved roads it made up for in human response. Villagers, rescue teams from nearby towns, and local officials formed chains of support, removing drifts blocking access and ferrying people to shelter. Tea was boiled, wood stoves stoked, and the staple hearth foods—warm barley tea and steamed buns—were shared among strangers until relatives could be contacted.

“We packed a thermos and some bread and headed out at night,” said Dorje, one of the volunteers. “We found people crying and hugging each other. There was fear, yes, but also this fierce kindness. Everyone wanted to help.”

Authorities suspended ticket sales and entry to the broader Everest Scenic Area late Saturday as a precaution, while teams worked in stages to shepherd groups to safety and account for guides and support staff. There has been no clear public tally yet of every local guide and yak handler involved with the stranded trekkers.

Mountain moods and the risk calculus of adventure

Karma valley is one of the more verdant approaches to Everest—a contrast to the stark, arid north face that visitors often know from postcards. Alpine forests and melt-fed streams give the place a sense of being slightly removed from the world’s bustle. That remoteness is part of its allure and part of its danger.

“People come seeking solitude, the idea of being small beneath something enormous,” said Dr. Mei Lin, a climatologist who studies mountain weather patterns. “But the Himalayas are changing. We’re seeing more erratic precipitation and shorter transition periods between seasons. Systems that used to arrive predictably in late autumn are now less tied to calendar dates.”

Scientists have warned for years that mountain regions, including the Himalayas, are warming faster than many lowland areas, which can mean more intense precipitation events and unstable snowpacks. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) assessments have highlighted rising risks to glaciers, water supplies, and mountain communities across Asia. In practical terms for trekkers, that means sudden rain turning to heavy, wet snow, and higher risk of hypothermia and avalanche conditions even during what used to be reliably dry seasons.

The human cost beyond the valley

The blizzard was not an isolated hardship. South of the Tibetan border, in Nepal, persistent heavy rains have unleashed landslides and flash floods. Since Friday, at least 47 people have been reported killed; 35 of those deaths occurred in Ilam district in Nepal’s east, authorities said. Nine people remain missing, and three were fatally struck by lightning during the stormy period.

Roads have been washed away, bridges collapsed, and entire communities were cut off as swollen rivers journeyed angrily downhill. “When the river moved the earth, it took our path to the world with it,” one farmer in Ilam told a reporter, surveying fields turned into gullies. “We are rebuilding, but the fear remains.”

What this moment asks of us

There is a human drama here—families relieved, guides exhausted, villagers whose kitchens became makeshift rescue centers—but there is also a larger conversation about how we travel, who we call upon in emergencies, and how climate shifts are altering the calculus of risk in mountain regions.

Should more permits be limited during uncertain seasons? Should trekking companies be required to carry additional emergency gear or satellite communications? How should governments balance the livelihoods that come from tourism with the safety of visitors and local communities?

“We love showing the world our mountains,” said Pema, the guide. “But we need better forecasting, more training, and shelters along the routes. We need to be prepared for weather that used to be ‘once in a decade’ but is now arriving more often.”

After the storm

For those who made it to Qudang, survival was both raw and tender: villagers offering hot tea, strangers sharing stories, hands warm around steaming cups. For others still on the route, rescue teams worked methodically, guiding groups out in stages. And for the region as a whole, the episode—a blizzard in October, heavy rains to the south—reads as a reminder that high places are not immune to global shifts.

When your path climbs into thinner air, what will you pack besides boots and camera? How will you factor in the increasing unpredictability of the planet’s weather? The mountains ask these questions now with a louder voice; the challenge is whether our answers will be sharp and swift enough.

350 trekkers reached Qudang after the blizzard; more than 200 others were contacted by rescuers.
Karma valley averages about 4,200 metres in elevation—high enough for acute exposure risks.
At least 47 people died in weather-related incidents in Nepal during the same period, including 35 in Ilam district.

The storm has passed for now, but the echoes remain—footprints in the snow, a ladle set aside in a Qudang kitchen, a guide checking his weather app with a new wariness. Mountains are timeless teachers. The question is whether we are listening.

Man Arrested After Sydney Shooting Injures 20 People

hanad

October 6, 2025

Man in custody as 20 wounded in Sydney shooting — Police in Australia say they have a man in custody in connection to the incident (File image)

Nightfall and Gunfire: A Sydney Street That Felt Like a War Zone

It was ordinary evening light in Sydney’s Inner West — the kind that slants through the plane trees and turns the brick terraces a warm ochre — until it wasn’t. In the space of a few terrifying minutes, a usually bustling strip lined with cafés, convenience stores and a corner barber became the scene of a barrage of gunfire. Neighbors crouched behind shopfronts. Drivers abandoned cars. A man later walked into a hospital with a bullet wound. Twenty people were hurt. A 60-year-old man was taken into custody after police entered a unit above a business two hours into the chaos.

“It sounded like thunder, only close,” said Tadgh, who was watching rugby on a shop TV when the first shots rang out. “Bang, bang, bang — flashes, sparks, smoke. For a moment I thought I’d been transported into a movie. Then I saw people running.”

What Happened — A Timeline

The sequence of events, according to police and witnesses, unfolded rapidly and randomly.

Early evening: routine foot traffic and vehicles on the Inner West street.
Soon after: a man allegedly began firing indiscriminately at passing vehicles — police say some of those vehicles were police cars.
Police estimate between 50 and 100 shots were discharged, an extraordinary figure for a city where such episodes are rare.
Two hours later: tactical officers entered a unit above a local business and arrested the suspect, a 60-year-old man. He was injured during the arrest and taken to hospital.

“There could have been anywhere between 50 and 100 shots that have been discharged,” New South Wales Police Acting Superintendent Stephen Parry said, his voice taut with the seriousness of the incident. “He was firing indiscriminately at passing vehicles including police vehicles. It was extremely dangerous for members of the public.”

People, Not Numbers

When statistics sit on the page they can feel detached. But twenty people wounded is not a statistic; it is a mosaic of bruised bodies and rattled nerves. One man is in serious condition after self-presenting at a hospital with a gunshot wound. Nineteen others were treated for shrapnel and shattered glass injuries, some taken to hospital and some treated at the scene.

“My sister ducked behind the deli counter,” said Leila, who runs a small grocer two doors from where officers later entered the unit. “She said there was this metallic smell and floor-to-ceiling glass vibrating. The whole street smelled like ozone. Kids who were at footy training were crying; they thought it was fireworks.”

Passersby described fragments of glass and bits of metal clinging to clothes. A commuter recounted how a tram driver kept repeating: “Stay calm, stay down.” For several nearby residents the reverberation of shots is likely to echo much longer than the physical wounds.

Why This Matters — Context and Consequences

Australia’s recent history has shaped its expectations around gun violence. The 1996 Port Arthur massacre in Tasmania — where a lone gunman killed 35 people — remains seared into the national consciousness. That atrocity prompted sweeping reforms: a national ban on automatic and certain semi-automatic firearms and a buyback program that removed tens of thousands of guns from circulation.

Those changes are credited by many public-health researchers with reducing gun-related deaths and mass shootings in Australia. Mass shootings here are comparatively rare by global standards. Yet rarity does not equal immunity.

“Policy matters, but it is not a cure-all,” said Professor Miriam Clarke, a criminologist at the University of New South Wales who studies urban violence. “Even with strict gun regulations, acts of targeted or indiscriminate violence still occur. We need a layered approach — community mental health support, policing strategies, scrutiny of illegal gun markets, and robust crisis response systems.”

Facts to Ground Us

1996 Port Arthur massacre: 35 people killed — a turning point in Australian gun policy.
National reforms: bans on certain automatic and semi-automatic weapons and a large-scale buyback program followed Port Arthur.
After the reforms, researchers have documented declines in firearm deaths and a reduction in mass-shooting incidents, although multi-factor explanations exist.

Voices from the Street

Neighbors spoke of disbelief rather than surprise. “You don’t expect this here,” murmured an elderly man who has lived on the block for decades. “You think Sydney’s safe. Then it happens in front of you and you realise how fragile that feeling is.”

A mother who had been picking up her child at a community centre described the frantic search for safety. “We hid in a storeroom with other parents,” she said. “Phones were going off, but we couldn’t post anything — you didn’t want to give away where you were. We kept whispering, ‘We’re okay. We’re okay.’”

An onlooker, a local nurse, rushed to help. “There were cuts from glass, a man with bleeding in his leg,” she recalled. “We stabilised what we could and kept people talking because shock can be worse than the injury.”

Questions That Don’t Have Easy Answers

What drives someone to spray a public street with bullets? Was this a premeditated act, or a sudden collapse into violence? How did a man allegedly acquire a weapon in a country with strict firearm controls?

Police investigations will sort the forensic facts. But the community’s questions are broader: how do we rebuild trust after an event like this? How do we prevent the spillover of trauma into cynicism and fear? And how do cities balance openness and safety — the very character that makes places like Sydney’s Inner West attractive?

Looking Beyond the Immediate

Incidents like this cast a long shadow. Local businesses shuttered for days. Parents reconsidered evening plans. The trauma ripples in ways that don’t show up on the incident tally: a child’s sudden fear of sirens, a shopkeeper’s shaken hands, the way neighbors check in on one another with renewed intensity.

Yet there are also the small, often overlooked acts of resilience. Volunteers coordinated donations for those displaced. A grassroots group organised a street meeting the next morning to talk about safety. A tea vendor set up a makeshift table and gave free drinks to first responders and neighbours. Community ties, frayed by fear, began mending almost immediately.

What This Means For the Rest of Us

Violent episodes in cities are never merely local. They force us to confront global questions about how societies protect the vulnerable, how urban life navigates risk, and how policies translate into practice. In an era of rising urban density, ageing populations and polarized politics, the ingredients for such tragedies can exist even in places with strict regulations.

So what do we do? We demand thorough investigations. We support victims. We listen to experts who recommend preventive measures beyond legislation. And perhaps most importantly, we refuse to reduce the moment to a headline and then walk away.

How would you feel if your routine street erupted into gunfire? What would you want your city to do next? These are uncomfortable questions, but they are also invitations — to town halls, to policy debates, to community care.

For Now

Police say their investigation is ongoing. The neighbourhood that hour later returned to its normal rhythms — the clink of cups, the murmur of conversation — but not untouched. There will be counselling, evidence gathering, court processes. There will also be funerals avoided and small mercies counted: people who ran, who hid, who helped.

As Sydney assesses the aftermath, the scene on that Inner West street stands as a reminder: safety is a shared project, and vigilance without compassion is hollow. The city will heal, but the questions this night raised will reverberate, asking us all to pay attention. To care. To act.

Five killed after overnight Russian airstrike on Ukraine

hanad

October 6, 2025

Five killed in Russian overnight air attack on Ukraine — A rescue worker is seen in front of a badly damaged building in Lapaivka, Lviv region following overnight Russian attacks

Night of Fire and Noise: How One Wave of Attacks Reached From Ukraine’s Cities to European Skies

They call it a season of attrition. Outside Lviv, near the Polish border, the night sky turned into an unkind painter—streaks of orange, grey curtains of smoke, and the staccato stabs of anti-aircraft bursts. By morning, at least five people were dead, dozens wounded, and a string of regions from Zaporizhzhia to Odesa nursing fresh wounds to hospitals, homes and power lines.

“Stay inside,” Lviv mayor Andriy Sadovyi urged in a tense, breathless message as firefighters battled blazes at an industrial park. “We are doing everything to protect people.” The warning — practical and urgent — echoed through apartment stairwells, marketplaces and tram stops, a reminder that even in the west of Ukraine, hundreds of kilometers from the frontline, war can feel very close.

Scale and Reach: A High-Intensity Night

President Volodymyr Zelensky called the barrage “unforgiving,” saying Russian forces fired more than 50 missiles and nearly 500 drones. Kyiv’s leadership and international analysts described the operation as both kinetic and psychological — aiming to knock out energy infrastructure and deepen civilian hardship as winter approaches.

In Zaporizhzhia, Governor Ivan Fedorov reported one person killed and nine wounded, and estimated damage left more than 73,000 customers without electricity. Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko, blunt and unyielding, labeled it “another deliberate act of terror against civilians,” writing that Moscow appears intent on targeting homes, schools and energy facilities.

Beyond Lviv and Zaporizhzhia, authorities reported damage across Ivano-Frankivsk, Vinnytsia, Chernihiv, Kherson, Kharkiv and Odesa — a geographic sweep that underlines how modern conflict reaches into the arteries of daily life: power stations, regional hospitals, industrial parks and neighborhoods where children sleep.

On the Ground: The Human Echoes of an Overnight Assault

“I woke to the alarm, then the lights went out,” said Oleksandr, 58, a baker in central Lviv who asked that his surname be withheld. “We lit candles, checked the radio. You develop small rituals to cope—coffee, a prayer, then checking on neighbors.”

Mariia, a teacher who lives near the industrial park that caught fire, described a surreal combination of mundanity and terror. “Yesterday I was rehearsing a lesson plan. Tonight the school windows shook. My cat hid for hours.” She said the city smelled of smoke the next morning; ash dotted the playgrounds where children had been days earlier.

These are the granular, human images that can get lost in the numbers — yet they are no less real. How do cities stitch themselves back together when electricity, heat and the trust that the next night will be quieter have been taken away?

Statistics That Matter

Reported missiles: more than 50
Reported drones: nearly 500
Confirmed deaths: at least 5
Zaporizhzhia power outages: more than 73,000 customers
Regions reporting infrastructure damage: Lviv, Zaporizhzhia, Ivano-Frankivsk, Vinnytsia, Chernihiv, Kherson, Kharkiv, Odesa

Numbers are blunt instruments. They help us measure the scale but not the texture: the frightened elderly in a candlelit stairwell, the hospital staff improvising triage as machines hiccup without consistent power, the volunteer crews who pull an all-nighter to keep warming centers open.

Ripples Beyond Ukraine: NATO, Poland and a European Sky on Edge

The violence didn’t stop at Ukraine’s borders. Early this morning, Polish authorities said they scrambled aircraft to “ensure air safety,” raising their operational posture. Poland’s operational command reported allied jets patroling the airspace while ground-based air defenses and radar systems were set to the highest state of readiness.

Eastern-flank NATO members, already on edge after earlier drone incursions over Poland and chaotic disruptions to European aviation in cities like Copenhagen and Munich, watched closely. “There is a pattern in how air operations are expanding beyond battle zones,” said Dr. Tomasz Nowak, a Warsaw-based security analyst. “That increases the risk of miscalculation. It also forces NATO to think defensively for its eastern approaches in a way it hadn’t before 2014.”

These are not merely tactical skirmishes; they are strategic tests — of resolve, of air defense networks, of how allied nations manage civilian safety amid cross-border risk. They also force questions about escalation thresholds: at what point do incursions provoke a response that changes the game entirely?

A Strange Side-Story: Balloons Over Lithuania and the Business of Smuggling

As jets and drones dominated the headlines, a peculiar and persistent challenge surfaced over the Baltic states: weather balloons repurposed for smuggling. Lithuanian authorities closed Vilnius airport for several hours after reports of a series of balloons drifting toward the runway. Local officials said more than 20 balloons — used to transport counterfeit cigarettes from Belarus — had disrupted operations, affecting roughly 30 flights.

Darius Buta, a representative of Lithuania’s national crisis management centre, said around 25 balloons violated Lithuanian airspace, including two near the airport, and that 11 had been recovered by morning. “Smugglers have adapted their methods,” he noted. “We recorded 966 such balloon incursions last year and 544 this year.”

Why does this matter? Illegal trade in tobacco is not a fringe nuisance; it pulls at the fabric of border control and public safety. Each balloon is a small delivery, but hundreds add up to a significant shadow economy that funds criminal networks and can be used as a low-cost vector for more malicious payloads.

What This Night Tells Us

There are immediate impulses here: to diagnose the military tactics, to count the outages, to tally the dead. But the deeper questions linger and widen. How do societies preserve warmth and dignity in the face of infrastructure attacks aimed at winter vulnerability? How do neighbors on NATO’s eastern edge balance risk and reassurance when the sky itself becomes an arena? And when smuggling balloons clutter airspaces, how do countries thread public safety with measured force?

“We must not let fear become policy,” said Kateryna Hryniuk, director of a Kyiv humanitarian NGO. “But we must prepare — for colder nights, for more power cuts, for longer lines at pharmacies. Resilience becomes our political will.”

Those who lived through the night are already thinking in practical terms: stocking up on warm clothing, checking generators, mapping the oldest residents who need help. In living rooms and municipal crisis centers alike, people are converting sorrow into plans.

What can readers far from these skies do? Support verified humanitarian organizations, follow reputable news sources, and resist the flattening pull of panic. Ask your local leaders what contingency plans exist for energy and refugee flows. Hold governments accountable — both for protecting civilians and for seeking paths back from the brink.

War, like weather, reshapes the landscape. But unlike weather, it is man-made and thus can be stopped. The coming weeks will tell whether these nights become a new pattern, or whether international pressure, preparedness and solidarity can blunt the intent behind the attacks and keep communities—so resilient, so ordinary—safe enough to sleep.

Hamas and Israeli negotiators expected in Egypt for Gaza talks

hanad

October 6, 2025

Trump says Israel has agreed to withdrawal line from Gaza — A view of destruction following an Israeli attack on Gaza City yesterday

On the Eve of Two Years: A Desert Resort Becomes Ground Zero for a Fragile Hope

Sharm El-Sheikh is not where one usually imagines the calculus of war will be rewritten. The Egyptian resort, famous for coral reefs and conference halls that once hosted vacationing delegations, now hums with armored cars, tinted-window SUVs and the murmured urgency of negotiators who brought with them not bouquets, but lists—of names, of conditions, of lives counted and recounted.

For the delegations arriving in the Sinai this week—envoys from Hamas, Israel and the United States—the mood is a brittle mix of weary resolve and brittle optimism. The meeting coincides with the eve of the second anniversary of the October 7, 2023 attack that ignited a conflict that has scarred Gaza, reshaped Israeli domestic politics, and refocused global diplomacy. “We are here because the human ledger must be balanced,” said an Egyptian foreign ministry official who asked not to be named, speaking in a hallway lined with potted palms. “Negotiations will be hard. But we cannot let the calendar turn without trying.”

A roadmap on a tightrope

The catalyst for the talks is a plan circulated by former US President Donald Trump that promises a phased pathway out of war: an immediate halt to major hostilities tied to a hostage-prisoner exchange, followed by a phased Israeli withdrawal from parts of Gaza and an international, technocratic transitional authority tasked with administering the territory in the interim.

According to the framework being discussed, the first phase would demand the release of hostages—both living and deceased—within 72 hours of an agreed ceasefire. In return, Israel would free hundreds of Palestinian detainees, including those serving life sentences, and thousands of those arrested during the conflict. The hard numbers being talked about are stark and cold: Palestinian militants seized 251 hostages on October 7; of those, 47 remain in Gaza, with Israeli authorities reporting that 25 are already dead. The deal on the table would see Israel release roughly 250 prisoners serving life terms, and more than 1,700 detainees taken from Gaza during the war.

“This is a rescue operation for the living, and a reckoning for the dead,” said Miriam Cohen, a Jerusalem-based activist who has worked for years on families’ cases. “But numbers don’t fully capture the grief. Each person is a name, a face, a story.”

Voices in the room—and beyond

Hamas’s chief negotiator, Khalil al-Hayya, led his delegation into Egypt with a statement that, according to the group, stressed a readiness “to reach an agreement to end the war and immediately begin the prisoner exchange process in accordance with the field conditions.” In a private corridor interview, a senior Hamas official told a reporter the group was “very keen to secure the release of Palestinians from Israeli jails as a reciprocal gesture.”

Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking to reporters before the delegation departed, said he hoped hostages could be freed within days. “Every Israeli heart aches for those taken in October,” he said, his voice taut. “We are prepared to make painful compromises for their return.”

Meanwhile, former US President Trump urged negotiators to “move fast,” posting on his social platform that the discussions were “proceeding rapidly” and that the first phase should be completed this week. He has dispatched two of his confidants—real estate figure Steve Witkoff and his former adviser Jared Kushner—to help steer the last-mile talks.

Not everyone is buying the momentum. On the morning before the talks convened, Senator Marco Rubio urged Israel to halt strikes in Gaza ahead of negotiations. “You can’t release hostages in the middle of bombardment,” he said, a sentiment echoed by diplomats who fear that active military operations will undermine the fragile trust needed for an exchange.

The human ledger: stories that anchor diplomacy

Outside the negotiation rooms, the human landscape is unmistakable. In Gaza City, where a pall of dust and the smell of diesel hangs in the air, families mark anniversaries by making lists—names of the missing, names of the dead, names of those who still wait. “I have been waiting for my son’s name to appear on a list that means he is coming home,” said Fatima al-Saleh, 42, her hands curled around a photograph. “For two years my life has been a calendar of prayers.”

Across the border, in a modest apartment in central Israel, David Levy, 58, keeps a shrine of postcards, a map with pins and the memory of a granddaughter taken on October 7. “We don’t need promises. We need people,” he said. “Let them come back. That’s the only thing that will stop the nights from being unbearable.”

Practicalities and poison pills

The devil, as always, is in the details. Hamas has historically been adamant about keeping its military wings and influence intact—disarmament is a red line. The Trump proposal stipulates that Hamas and other factions would have no formal role in post-war governance of Gaza, which would instead be led by a technocratic body overseen by a transitional authority that, controversially, lists high-profile international figures among its potential leaders.

“No one wants to sign on to an agreement that simply freezes one type of violence and incubates another,” said Dr. Leila Mansour, a Middle East analyst at the International Peace Institute. “Reconstruction, governance, security guarantees—these must be addressed in tandem. Otherwise, ceasefires become merely pauses between wars.”

Critics also point out the political oddities: a former US president architecting a plan that envisions himself or his associates shepherding Gaza’s post-war future raises questions about impartiality and long-term viability. “Who builds the institutions? Who ensures accountability?” asked Mansour. “These are not administrative quibbles. They determine whether Gaza will be rebuilt as a place of dignity—or as a controlled zone of dependency.”

Numbers on paper, lives in the balance

Hostages seized on October 7, 2023: 251
Hostages reportedly still in Gaza: 47 (Israeli military reported 25 of these as dead)
Palestinian prisoners expected to be released by Israel under the proposal: ~250 with life sentences, plus 1,700+ detainees from Gaza
Reported deaths from one day of Israeli strikes prior to talks: at least 20 across Gaza, per Gaza civil defence

These statistics feel both clinical and catastrophic. They are meant to be the scaffolding of a deal, but they are also the tally of grief, and the basis of bargaining chips that govern whether a child returns to a waiting mother.

What comes after the contract

If a deal holds, the plan envisions an initial exchange followed by a phased Israeli withdrawal and an international effort to rebuild Gaza. Yet the proposal’s insistence that Hamas not play a role in civilian governance clashes with Gaza’s social reality: the group has entrenched political and social networks after years of rule. Trying to surgically remove those networks without a viable alternative risks leaving a vacuum—one that could be filled by criminality, foreign proxies, or renewed armed struggle.

“Reconstruction without political reconciliation is like building a house on sand,” said Jamal Hassan, a Gaza-based engineer who has overseen post-conflict repair projects. “You can rebuild walls, but you cannot rebuild trust with concrete alone.”

Why this moment matters—globally

What unfolds in Sharm El-Sheikh will ripple far beyond the Sinai. A successful exchange could offer a template for rapid de-escalation in a region littered with protracted conflicts; a failure could harden positions, deepen suffering and further entrench a cycle of revenge diplomacy. The talks also underscore a broader trend: personalized diplomacy led by senior political figures and unconventional envoys, sometimes outside established multilateral channels.

So ask yourself: what kind of peace do we want to see? One stitched together by expedient deals that paper over deeper divisions, or one built slowly on justice, accountability and the recognition of human dignity for both Israelis and Palestinians?

For now, the rooms in Sharm El-Sheikh remain closed to the press. Negotiators step out into fleeting sunlight to call relatives, to smoke a cigarette, to fold their hands and pray. They carry with them not just proposals but the weight of family photographs, of memories of schoolyards emptied, of the kind of grief that refuses to be numbered.

Whether the paper exchanged this week will become a bridge—or merely a piece of paper to be burned in the next round of fighting—depends on choices no single diplomat can make. It depends on whether the world is willing to sustain attention beyond headlines and whether societies, in Gaza and Israel alike, are willing to envision a future in which the ledger of loss finally begins to balance toward life.

Georgian prime minister pledges sweeping crackdown after allegedly foiled coup

hanad

October 6, 2025

Georgia PM vows sweeping crackdown after 'foiled coup' — Protesters burn barricades as they clash with police during an opposition rally on the day of local elections in central Tbilisi yesterday

A City on Edge: Tbilisi’s Square Became a Mirror

The air in Tbilisi on election day tasted metallic — not from the coffee or the sulfur baths, but from tear gas. It clung to clothes, to the crisp autumn sky, and to the conversations that had been building for a year. For a country that once read its future in the rhythms of church bells and polyphonic songs, the sound that cut through Freedom Square was the shouted cadence of protest and counter-accusation.

Georgia’s municipal elections were supposed to be routine: local ballots, local officials. Instead they arrived as a referendum on the state of the nation — and on whether a struggling democracy can survive a winter of political repression, media raids and mass arrests.

What Unfolded on Election Day

By midday, tens of thousands had converged on Freedom Square after opposition leaders called for a “last-chance” protest to “save Georgian democracy.” Flags snapped in the breeze. Vendors sold warming cups of chai and toasted bread. Children, pulled along by parents, watched adults chant and wave placards.

As the day darkened, a splinter of the crowd surged toward the presidential palace. Police met them with water cannon and, later, clouds of tear gas. Videos shared across social platforms showed lines of uniformed riot officers forming human barricades, while others captured the stunned faces of medics treating the coughing and the dazed.

“We came because there’s no other place to go,” said Eka, a 42-year-old teacher whose voice trembled between anger and fear. “If you lose the right to speak, what are you left with?”

Official Narrative: Coup Attempt and Weapons Cache

The government framed the day as an “attempted coup.” Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze told reporters that organizers had tried to violently seize the palace and that “no one will go unpunished.” The interior ministry said five protest leaders were arrested and face up to nine years in prison. The State Security Service (SSS) reported finding a cache of firearms, ammunition and explosives in a forest near Tbilisi, alleging the weapons were intended for “subversive acts” on election day — and that they were procured on the instructions of a Georgian man fighting with Ukrainian forces.

“We uncovered a real plan to destabilize the country,” a senior security official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said. “This was not spontaneous. It involved material preparations.”

Critics, however, smell a different scent: opportunity. “Labeling protests as coups has become a familiar playbook,” said Maia Arveladze, a civil rights lawyer in Tbilisi. “It justifies draconian responses and criminalizes dissent.”

Arrests, Health, and a Vanishing Public Sphere

Among those detained was Paata Burchuladze, a world-renowned opera singer turned activist, who had read a declaration on the podium calling the government “illegitimate” and urging power back to the people. Local reporting said Burchuladze, 70, was detained while in the intensive care unit of a Tbilisi hospital where he had been treated for a heart attack — a detail that deepened public unease.

Rights groups say roughly 60 people — including politicians, journalists and activists — have been jailed over the past year. Georgian Dream, in power since 2012, swept municipal council majorities and claimed landslide mayoral wins across the country, the central election commission reported. Most major opposition parties boycotted the vote, arguing it was neither free nor fair.

“The hollowing out of institutions is not just a Georgian story,” noted Thomas Keller, a democracy specialist with a Europe-focused think tank. “We’re seeing an unsettling global pattern: elected parties consolidate power, weaken checks and balances, and then use security rhetoric to silence rivals.”

Numbers That Matter

Population: roughly 4 million people live in Georgia.
Government in power: Georgian Dream since 2012.
Survey snapshot: one recent poll by the Institute of Social Studies and Analysis put Georgian Dream’s approval at about 36% versus 54% for opposition groups.
Detentions over the past year: rights groups estimate around 60 people jailed.

Voices from the Square

The human stories are the ones that linger. An elderly woman named Nino clasped a faded Orthodox rosary and said she feared for the future of her grandchildren. “We used to sing at family gatherings,” she said quietly. “Now our children whisper.”

Opposition activists called it a moment of moral clarity. “People are not asking for chaos,” said Giorgi, a 29-year-old IT worker. “We’re asking for the basics — transparent institutions, independent courts, a free press.”

But in the villages and small towns where Georgian Dream’s message about “stability” resonates, a different calculus prevails. “We don’t want war,” said Luka, a farmer outside Zugdidi. “We have seen what unrest brings. We vote for jobs and peace, not slogans.” Analysts say that message, amplified by targeted disinformation, helps explain the party’s grip in rural areas.

Where Georgia Stands in the World

This is not just a national drama. Georgia’s rocky relationship with Brussels — its path to EU membership effectively frozen after last year’s disputed parliamentary vote — makes the stakes geopolitical. Accusations that foreign intelligence services are behind unrest have been hurled by the government. Western diplomats have warned against crackdowns and urged reforms. Russia watches closely from across the borders and the Black Sea, its influence still a shadow over Georgian politics.

“Georgia sits at a crossroads — geographically and politically,” said Ana Pereira, an EU diplomat. “If democratic backsliding continues, it will be more than a regional issue. It will be a blow to the European project of stabilizing its neighborhood.”

Questions for the Reader

What do you make of a government that promises “stability” at the cost of dissent? Can European integration be a carrot if the road narrows with each protest? And when does the rhetoric of security become a pretext for silencing opposition?

Looking Forward

For now, Tbilisi breathes uneasily. The municipal ballots have been tallied, but the contest — over narrative, legitimacy, and the future orientation of the country — is far from settled. As Georgia wrestles with the choices before it, citizens, exiles, and onlookers abroad will be watching to see whether institutions hold or whether fear becomes the new normal.

“We are not asking for perfection,” Eka the teacher said, fingers still stained with the ink voters dip in their ballots. “We are asking for the right to try.”

In the coming months, expect legal battles, more protests, and an international chorus calling for restraint. But whether that chorus will be loud enough to reshape the domestic calculus remains a question only time — and the people of Georgia — can answer.

Trump Administration Labels Major U.S. Cities as War Zones

hanad

October 6, 2025

Trump administration declares US cities war zones — Federal Agents watch as demonstrators protest in Chicago as federal agents were investigating a shooting

When Soldiers Step Off the Bus: Chicago, Courts, and the Tension of a Nation

They arrived under a gray, indifferent sky — rows of National Guard Humvees cutting a path through neighborhoods where children jump rope and storefronts still hawk tamales and fried chicken. For some residents, the sight of uniforms on the curb read like protection; for others, it felt like escalation. Either way, it was a visual puncture point in an unfolding argument over what a city is allowed to be and who gets to decide.

Late one evening, three hundred National Guard soldiers were authorized to deploy to Chicago. The move was billed by some in Washington as an urgent response to crime and unrest. Elected leaders in the city — from the mayor’s office to the governor’s mansion — publicly opposed the deployment. The clash that followed was less about troop numbers than about competing visions of authority: local control versus federal muscle, civic nuance versus headline-ready certainty.

On the streets

On the South Side, a hardware store owner named Maria Alvarez wiped her hands on a rag and looked down the block where uniformed personnel milled. “I’m not against anyone helping keep folks safe,” she told me, voice steady. “But I don’t want my neighborhood to feel like a battlefield. We have block clubs, we have caretakers. We sit at church meetings and decide how to protect each other.”

Across town, an alderman who asked to speak off the record said bluntly: “This is politics in uniform. They’re showing force to score points, not to build community.”

These sentiments are not merely feelings; they are embedded in an uneasy civic calculus. A CBS poll released around the same time found 42% of Americans favored deploying National Guard troops to cities, while 58% opposed it — a nation divided on whether the presence of soldiers reduces danger or amplifies fear. Behind those percentages are people like Ms. Alvarez and the alderman, wrestling with the larger question: does safety come from boots on the ground or stronger local institutions?

Voices from the capital

From Washington, administration officials framed the deployments as decisive action. “We are coming in to restore order,” one senior official told a cable outlet, insisting that some cities had become “war zones.” In return, city and state leaders accused the federal government of theatrical brinkmanship — a way to create chaos that then justifies greater intervention.

“They want to create the war zone, so they can send in even more troops,” said a statement released by the governor’s office. “Our communities deserve policies that actually reduce gun violence and provide support — not spectacle.”

In another theater of this national drama, a federal judge in Oregon issued a temporary injunction blocking a similar deployment, writing that the president’s determination was “untethered to the facts” and reminding the country, in blunt terms, that constitutional law remains the framework for conflict resolution on American soil.

Constitutional questions, constitutional consequences

Judge rulings, public opinion polls, and the rhetoric on television screens all point to a wider debate: how far does executive power extend when it comes to domestic deployments? Courts have been asked to balance government claims of emergency authority against civil liberties, and that balance is seldom neutral.

“This is not only a legal question. It’s a social one,” said Dr. Hannah Brooks, a constitutional scholar at a Midwest university. “History teaches us that once force becomes the default, civic remedies atrophy. People stop investing in local institutions because they assume someone else will show up with a uniform.”

Her warning is not merely academic. The Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement have expanded roles in recent months, with federal agents conducting raids, sometimes arriving in unmarked vehicles and plainclothes. Those operations have provoked protests, legal challenges, and, in at least one tragic instance, deadly force.

Names, grief, and the human ledger

In a traffic stop that left neighborhoods stunned, Department of Homeland Security personnel said an officer — they claimed — was dragged by a vehicle and that the driver, identified by officials as 38-year-old Silverio Villegas Gozalez, was shot and killed. Family members and activists demanded answers; an attorney for the family called for an independent investigation. “We need truth, not talking points,” one community organizer told me. “A life was lost. That is real.”

These incidents are not abstract. They ripple through neighborhoods. Barbershops and bodegas become forums for grief and rumor. Children ask why the police or the soldiers are here. Church pews fill with people searching for both practical safety and spiritual solace.

What the numbers and neighborhoods tell us

Chicago is a vast, complicated mosaic — home to close to 2.7 million people and to neighborhood economies and cultures that do not fit tidy national narratives. Violence and public-safety challenges exist, but so do resilient community structures: block clubs, mutual aid networks, faith-based outreach, trauma-informed services. The debate over federal troops risks flattening those textures.

“If you want to reduce violence, you invest in summer jobs, mental-health access, and community-based mediators,” said a former police chief who now runs a violence-prevention nonprofit. “If you drop soldiers into neighborhoods without working with local stakeholders, you may change the optics but not the outcomes.”

Those solutions — messy, slow, human — rarely make cable news. Armor and uniforms do.

Questions for the reader — and the country

So what do we, as a nation, want our cities to be? Places where federal power is a last resort, where local democracy has latitude to try solutions that are unglamorous but effective? Or places where displays of force become the shorthand for leadership?

Ask yourself: does the presence of troops make you feel safer in your neighborhood, or more estranged from the institutions meant to protect you? When officials speak of “order,” whose order are they invoking? And finally, what would meaningful safety look like where you live?

Where this is headed

The standoff between federal action and local resistance is not limited to Chicago or to a single administration. It is threaded through America’s recent debates on immigration, policing, and the balance of power between Washington and the states. Policy choices now — court decisions, local investments, policing reforms — will shape both immediate life on the ground and the broader story of American democracy.

Back on the street, community leaders were already convening meetings, not to watch the uniforms but to plan summer enrichment programs and to coordinate patrols of vacant lots. “We don’t need photo ops,” said Pastor Marcus Reid during a neighborhood gathering. “We need long-term commitments. We need people who will be here when the cameras leave.”

The soldiers may leave. The laws may shift again. But the daily work of making safe, healthy neighborhoods — the subtle, sustained labor of neighbors looking after neighbors — goes on. For anyone watching from afar, the question remains: will we support that labor, or will we prefer spectacles that promise quick answers and deliver very little in return?

Syria names members of inaugural parliament following Assad’s rule

hanad

October 6, 2025

Syria selects members of first post-Assad parliament — Members of electoral committees count ballots at a polling station during Syria's first parliamentary elections since the fall of Bashar al-Assad's government

In the hush of a great library, a nation casts a curious ballot

The National Library in Damascus — once the Assad National Library, its marble facade a familiar silhouette against the old city skyline — felt like a living, breathing archive of a past that the country is still arguing over.

On a late afternoon in the capital, local committee members wound through its corridors, some carrying the dust of their towns on their shoes, others with the nervous polish of newcomers to public life. The air smelled of old paper, strong coffee and the faint metallic tang of ballots. A woman in a headscarf paused beneath a high arched window and laughed nervously to a friend. “We grew up with elections on television,” she said. “Now we have them in person and they feel like a rehearsal.”

What happened — in plain terms

In a process that critics call deeply flawed, local committee members across much of government-held Syria cast ballots to populate a transitional assembly meant to steer the country until a permanent constitution and full elections are held.

The numbers are stark and instructive: some 6,000 people took part in the selection; more than 1,500 candidates stood for office, but only around 14 percent were women; the assembly will have 210 seats, with a renewable 30-month mandate. Of those seats, the interim leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa, will directly appoint 70. Another two-thirds will be selected by the local committees — themselves appointed by an electoral commission formed on Mr. Sharaa’s watch. Thirty-two seats remain empty for now, representing the Kurdish northeast and southern Sweida province, regions outside Damascus’s immediate control.

The official line

From the steps of the National Library, Mr. Sharaa acknowledged the imperfections of the process. “It is true that the electoral process is incomplete,” he told those gathered, “but it is a moderate process appropriate for our current circumstances.” He reiterated a key justification given by the authorities: direct nationwide elections are impracticable while millions of Syrians lack documentation, with large numbers displaced internally or living as refugees abroad.

Hala al-Qudsi, 36, a member of Damascus’s electoral committee who is herself a candidate, framed the moment differently. “The next parliament faces enormous responsibilities — signing deals, ratifying accords, shaping foreign policy,” she said. “This is not a trivial handover; it will lead Syria into a new phase.” Her voice carried the urgency of someone balancing hope with caution.

Voices from the cafés and the neighborhoods

Outside, in a shaded café near Bab Touma, men played backgammon and sipped sweet tea. Louay al-Arfi, 77, a retired civil servant with a lifetime of ballots behind him, watched the proceedings with a wary loyalty. “I support the authorities and I will defend them,” he said. “But these aren’t real elections. It’s a necessity now, perhaps. But we want direct elections after — real choice, not appointments by a few men in offices.”

In Sweida, the Druze-majority province that endured sectarian bloodshed over the summer, many are watching from the sidelines. Burhan Azzam, a 48-year-old activist, called the process a hollowing out of political life. “They have ended political life in many ways,” he said. “How can you call it democratic when basic rules of participation are not respected?”

In the Kurdish northeast, the absence of representation is palpable. “Elections could have been a new political start,” said Nishan Ismail, a schoolteacher from the region. “But the marginalisation of whole communities shows that standards of political participation are not being upheld.” Negotiations to integrate Kurdish civil and military structures into a central framework have stalled, and for many Kurds the empty seats are proof of a process that skips parts of the country.

Critics: a process engineered for control

Human rights groups and exile organizations have been blunt. A coalition of more than a dozen groups warned that the selection mechanism allows Mr. Sharaa to “effectively shape a parliamentary majority composed of individuals he selected or ensured loyalty from.” “You can call the process what you like,” Bassam Alahmad, executive director of Syrians for Truth and Justice, told me over a brittle phone connection from abroad, “but not elections.”

There is also concern about representation. Ethnic and religious minorities — Kurds, Druze, Christians, and others — feel squeezed out. The first Jewish candidate since the 1940s, Syrian-American Henry Hamra, has stood for a seat, a symbolic nod toward pluralism, but critics say tokenism is not the same as power-sharing.

Who gets to decide?

At the heart of the dispute is a simple, stubborn question: in a transition from conflict to something like stability, who writes the rules? The interim constitution announced in March gives the incoming parliament legislative authority until a permanent constitution is adopted. But when the people who designed the selection system also pick its selectors, legitimacy becomes a matter of perspective.

“In transitions after civil wars, the temptation is always to prioritise order over inclusion,” explained Leila Mansour, a scholar of transitional governance. “What that often produces is a government that can pass laws and sign agreements — but not a government that many people feel represents them.”

Local color and a larger lesson

Walk through the old city and you notice the small signs of normalcy: vendors polishing copper trays, children chasing pigeons beneath the Umayyad Mosque, an old woman threading beads at a window. These details are reminders that state structures — however imperfect — sit atop lives people continue to live. But political processes that leave whole communities out risk translating peace into simmering grievance.

So what do we make of this moment? Is it a pragmatic pause — a staged compromise until the day when millions can finally vote freely — or the first step toward a managed, limited pluralism? The answer depends on whether the interim authorities can deliver not just stability, but trustworthy institutions that make people feel seen.

Questions for readers — and leaders

As you read this from wherever you are — a Mediterranean café, a commuter train, a quiet living room — ask yourself: when nations rebuild after conflict, should speed be prized over inclusiveness? Or does legitimacy require waiting, however painfully, until more voices can be heard?

Syria’s story is not just an isolated drama; it is a case study in the global challenge of rebuilding institutions after prolonged violence. The choices made now — who sits in those 210 seats, how the empty ones are filled, whether sceptics are invited in or shut out — will echo for years. For the people queuing at the National Library, and for millions watching from exile and displacement, those echoes are not abstractions. They are a question of identity, safety and hope.

For now, the counting is underway. The hall is lit with the low buzz of lamps and anxious conversation. Outside, Damascus keeps breathing, waiting to see whether this new parliament will be a step toward genuine pluralism — or simply another roof under which the old politics restate themselves in new terms.

1...192021...117 Page 20 of 117