Catch the Beaver Moon Tonight: Stargazers Set to Spot It

November 4, 2025

Watch: 'Beaver Moon' to be visible to stargazers

Tonight’s Moon Isn’t Just Full — It’s a Moment

Look up. If the sky is clear where you are, the moon will be a little closer, a little brighter, and a touch more commanding than usual — a silver coin pinned to the night. Over the next couple of nights, including tonight through Thursday night, stargazers around the world will be treated to the year’s most dramatic supermoon, known in many North American traditions as the Beaver Moon.

“You can feel it in the way people slow down,” said Dr. Elena Morales, an astronomer at the Royal Astronomical Society. “Even in a city where the stars are few, the moon still reaches us. A supermoon is a good excuse to step outside and remember we’re all under the same sky.”

What Makes a Supermoon Special?

Technically, a supermoon happens when a full moon coincides with the moon’s perigee — the point in its elliptical orbit when it is closest to Earth. Put simply: the sun, Earth and moon line up, and the moon sits nearer us than usual.

That closeness translates into real, measurable differences. NASA and other observatories explain that a typical supermoon can appear up to about 14% larger and as much as 30% brighter than the smallest, farthest full moons. The moon won’t suddenly double in size. But when it’s near the horizon and framed by familiar foregrounds — a church spire, a stand of pines, a rooftop — that increase can feel cinematic.

Average lunar distance is roughly 384,400 kilometers. At perigee, the moon might be nearer to around 357,000 kilometers. Those numbers wobble a bit from month to month, but they’re enough to make a noticeable difference, especially through a camera lens or a good pair of binoculars.

What to Expect This Week

The full moon will be visible across multiple nights — one of the conveniences of a skywatching weekend. Observers in North America, Europe, parts of Africa and Asia can catch the moon when it climbs the evening sky, while late-night viewers in other regions will also have opportunities. Cloud cover, local weather, and light pollution will be the deciding factors.

“Even a thin veil of clouds can make the moon glow like a watercolor,” said amateur astronomer Priya Shah, who runs a neighborhood stargazing group in Toronto. “But if you want sharp detail — the maria, the craters — aim for a clear, dry night and find an elevated spot away from streetlights.”

The Story Behind the Name: Beaver Moon

Names for full moons are threaded through cultures and seasons. The “Beaver Moon” is one of those time-honored names that comes from Native American and early colonial agrarian calendars; it arrived in common parlance through sources like the Farmers’ Almanac and references to Algonquian language traditions. For many Indigenous communities, the name signaled a time when beavers were active and trappers set their final traps ahead of winter, when woodcutting, food stores and shelter had to be secured.

“These names are ecological markers,” said Dr. Naomi White, a scholar of Indigenous studies. “They connect human lives to animal cycles, weather patterns and the lived knowledge of people who have been watching the sky for generations.”

It’s a beautiful reminder: the calendar in our heads isn’t just numbers. It’s weather, migration, harvest, and ritual — a map of how communities related to the land and sky before modern timekeeping made everything abstract.

How to See — and Photograph — the Supermoon

Whether you’re a casual looker or a determined shooter, the moon is forgiving. Here are some tips drawn from photographers and skywatchers:

Find a foreground. Trees, buildings, and people give scale and soul to lunar photos.
Use a telephoto lens (200–600mm) or binoculars to make the moon’s features pop.
Stabilize: a tripod or leaning against a steady surface will reduce blur.
Camera settings: start around ISO 100–400, aperture f/8, shutter speed 1/125–1/250. The moon is bright — slower exposures will wash out detail.
Try the “moon illusion”: photograph when the moon is low on the horizon to make it feel enormous, even though it’s the same size later on.

“I always tell people: don’t only shoot for the internet’s sake,” Priya Shah said. “Try to take one picture and then just sit and look. Your eyes will appreciate the experience more than any lens.”

Light Pollution, Cultural Moments, and Quiet Reflection

There is another thread running through this small astronomical event: the steady encroachment of light pollution. Studies in recent years have estimated that a substantial majority of people on Earth now live under skies brightened by artificial light — enough that the Milky Way is invisible to much of the global population. Still, the moon’s brightness can cut through city glare and remind urban residents what a true night feels like.

For others, the moon intersects with local customs. In East Asia, autumn moon-viewing festivals have their own rituals; in Turkey and across the Muslim world, moon sightings mark important calendar moments. In fishing communities, moon phases are woven into the practical rhythms of tides and nets. The Beaver Moon carries a whisper of all those connections.

“I check the moon before I check the weather,” said Jonas Petrov, a lobsterman in coastal Maine. “Tides change, but the moon tells you something about the rhythm. Folks like me still time things by that old knowledge.”

Why It Matters — More Than a Pretty Photo

On one level, tonight’s sky is a simple offering: a luminous companion to our brief lives on a blue planet. On another, it’s a chance to reconnect. We live in an era of constant information and often-compartmentalized time; a supermoon asks us to pause collectively. It becomes a public event you can experience without an app, a place where amateurs and astronomers meet on equal footing.

So, will you step outside tonight? Will you pull a blanket over your knees, pause a busy evening, or drag your partner out of a meeting so you can both watch the earthlight spill across the same face of the moon that sailors, farmers, and storytellers have watched for millennia?

If you do, you’ll be taking part in a quiet, ancient ritual — and you might just remember how small our everyday anxieties look beneath a brilliant, borrowed sun.

Millions of Americans Face Reduced Food Aid During Government Shutdown

hanad

November 4, 2025

Millions in US to get reduced food aid during shutdown — The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program funding, averaging around $356 a month per household, lapsed on Saturday

When the Lights Flicker: Groceries, Courts, and the Human Cost of a Shutdown

On a cold Saturday morning beneath the fluorescent hum of a supermarket in downtown Providence, a volunteer in a bright orange vest handed a trembling woman a folded flyer. The woman — two toddlers clinging to her coat — read it as if it were a weather alert. “SNAP guidance: partial payments,” the flyer said, in small print that felt shockingly large in the quiet aisle.

That folded piece of paper is where policy meets pantry. Behind the legal filings and headline-grabbing tweets, tens of millions of Americans are now recalculating how to feed their families while politicians trade ultimatums. The government shutdown — inching toward what would be the longest in U.S. history — has forced a wrench into the nation’s safety net, leaving about 42 million people who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) watching the grocery cart instead of the calendar.

How we got here — and who’s holding the checkbook

Late last week, federal judges in Rhode Island and Massachusetts told the White House to dip briefly into a $4.65 billion emergency fund to cover part of SNAP’s November bills — a stopgap amid a deeper $9 billion tab. But the Department of Agriculture, which runs SNAP, told a federal court in Rhode Island it would not make up the difference with other pots of money, meaning only roughly half of recipients’ usual benefits would be disbursed.

The arithmetic is brutal. SNAP benefits average about $356 per household each month. For many families, that figure is the difference between a full cart and a week’s worth of instant noodles. With payments lapsed, as one official put it, “people don’t ask: where will I sleep? They ask: where will my children get dinner?”

At stake beyond SNAP are related programs such as WIC — the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children — and Head Start services that wrap nutrition into early childhood support. Many local programs began shuttering or curtailing services as federal assurances faded.

Voices from the line

“I stood in line and watched people hand back cartons of milk,” said Maria Lopez, a food pantry coordinator in a working-class neighborhood outside Providence. “This is not charity theater. This is people’s lives.” Her hands, ink-stained from tracking donations, folded around a list of names and dates. “When a mother has to decide which child gets the last apple, that’s a moral emergency.”

Across town, James Carter, a 48-year-old warehouse worker, described the arithmetic facing millions: “We live paycheck to paycheck. SNAP isn’t a handout — it’s groceries. It’s the food that lets my asthma stay in check. It’s the peanut butter my kid loves. To have that rolled back halfway? That’s scary.” He said he expects delays in payment and is already rationing meals.

These are not isolated anecdotes. Nonprofits and advocates have framed lawsuits arguing that partially cutting SNAP during a shutdown violates legal and moral duties, and judges in New England temporarily forced the executive branch to reallocate emergency funds. But the administration countered that the emergency reserve was meant for natural disasters, not budget standoffs — a legal divide that now defines millions of grocery lists.

Politics on public plates

At the center of the drama is a broader bargaining chip: subsidies for health insurance under the Affordable Care Act, commonly called Obamacare. Roughly 20 million Americans rely on those premium subsidies. With a signature enrollment window looming, Democrats say they will not reopen the government without a guarantee these subsidies will continue; Republicans have said they will not negotiate until the government reopens.

President Donald Trump, in a post on Truth Social, said he had asked government lawyers to “clarify how we can legally fund SNAP as soon as possible.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told networks there’s a process to follow. Yet back in the aisles, those legal clarifications feel abstract and late.

“The letter of the law is as plain as day,” said Senator Patty Murray, the top Senate Democrat on spending, “Trump should have paid SNAP benefits all along. Just now paying the bare minimum to partially fund SNAP is not enough, and it is not acceptable.” Her words cut to a central tension: the difference between legality and humanity.

Counting the costs — and the ripple effects

42 million Americans rely on SNAP — roughly one in eight people.
SNAP funding for November is estimated to cost about $9 billion; judges ordered an emergency fund disbursement of $4.65 billion.
SNAP averages about $356 per month per household — often a modest but essential supplement to wages.

Those stats are stark on paper. In neighborhoods, they translate into shorter meals, cut vitamins, pulled-back job training in Head Start classrooms, and the quiet shame some feel when balancing the grocery needs of a spouse, a toddler, and an elderly parent. They also feed a broader conversation circling many democracies right now: what happens when governance grinds to a halt and safety nets take hits as a result?

A human question made political

Will a partial payment suffice? Some local officials argue that even halting benefits for days would impose harms that cascade into healthcare systems, schools, and local charities. “You can’t heal kids of hunger with paperwork,” said Dr. Hannah Lee, a public health professor who studies food insecurity. “Nutrition in early childhood literally shapes brain architecture. An interruption may have effects that last long after the shutdown ends.”

Advocates point to synchrony: food insecurity correlates with higher emergency room use, worse chronic disease control, and greater school absenteeism. And in regions where the cost of living is high, even $356 a month barely offsets spiraling grocery bills. In such places, a 50 percent cut can tip a household into crisis within a week.

What this moment asks of us

As you read this, ask yourself: what does a country look like when a single vote can determine whether a child eats next week? When a judge’s ruling moves faster than elected leaders? These are blunt questions, but they speak to a deeper civic question: how we prioritize public welfare amid political brinksmanship.

There are no simple answers. Some argue for clearer legal authorities to prevent exactly this kind of stalemate; others call for political courage to decouple essential services from budget fights. On the ground, the fix is being improvised: churches, food banks, and community groups are stepping in where federal processes sputter.

“We don’t want to be the safety net of last resort,” Maria Lopez said, folding another flyer into an envelope. “But when the system pauses, we will feed what we can. Still, it’s not enough to rely on goodwill.” Her voice had the tired cadence of decades of service honesty — and the quiet firm belief that people deserve better than temporary charity.

Looking forward

The courts have ordered temporary relief; the White House has said it will find a lawful path. Yet the shadow of delay remains. For millions, the question is not legal theory but whether there will be cereal in the cupboard. For leaders, the question is whether political calculus will give way to practical compassion.

Until then, grocery aisles, food pantries, and kitchen tables will tell the real story — not of budgets and rulings alone, but of what a nation chooses to protect when the lights flicker and a family stares down an empty pantry.

Deadly mountain storms and avalanche kill nine people in Nepal

hanad

November 4, 2025

Mountain storms and avalanche kill nine people in Nepal — According to the Himalayan Database, an expedition archive, at least 1,093 people have died on peaks since 1950 (file pic)

When the Mountains Turn: Snow, Silence and the Cost of Climbing in Nepal

The Himalayas have a way of making you feel both small and incandescently alive. One minute their ridges are gilded in gold at dawn; the next they rearrange lives with the casual cruelty of weather. Over the past few days that ancient, indifferent grandeur has swallowed nine people — climbers from Italy, France, Germany and Nepali guides — in two separate tragedies that have left communities from Kathmandu to remote mountain villages reeling.

It began with a storm that seemed to come out of nowhere, or perhaps out of a season that is itself changing. Cyclone Montha, a low-pressure system that dumped unusual volumes of rain and snow, hammered much of Nepal last week. Trails were cut, trekkers stranded, and on the slopes the consequences proved fatal.

Yalung Ri: A base camp buried

At the base camp of Yalung Ri — a 5,630-metre peak that stands near the high border with Tibet — an avalanche detached and thundered down the slope into a group of 12 people, officials say. Seven were killed: three Italians, two Nepali climbers, a German and a French national. “I have seen all seven bodies,” said Phurba Tenjing Sherpa of Dreamers Destination, the company that organised the expedition for part of the group. His voice, cracked and raw with exhaustion, carried the factual bluntness of a man who has spent his life in the company of mountains.

Rescuers managed to save the rest. Two French climbers and two Nepali companions were flown to Kathmandu for urgent care, arriving at Era Hospital as daylight took on a brittle clarity after the storm. “We owe our lives to the pilots,” one survivor said later — a simple sentence that felt enormous.

Panbari: Lost on Camp 1

Earlier, in western Nepal, two Italian mountaineers — named by Italy’s foreign ministry as Alessandro Caputo and Stefano Farronato — were confirmed dead after being cut off by heavy snowfall while at Camp 1 of Panbari, a 6,887-metre peak. Local authorities reported that the pair had been out of contact since Friday; the confirmation arrived the following morning. “Their deaths were confirmed this morning by local authorities,” the ministry said in a brief statement. They had been caught in relentless snowfall at roughly 5,000 metres above sea level.

Numbers That Don’t Capture the Pain

Statistics attempt to translate tragedy into context, but they can feel sterile next to grieving families. Still, the record matters. The Himalayan Database — a long-standing archive of climbers and expeditions — notes that since 1950 at least 1,093 people have died on Himalayan peaks. Avalanches account for almost a third of those fatalities, a grim reminder that falling ice and snow remain the mountain’s most indiscriminate killers.

Put another way, roughly 350 lives have been lost to avalanches in seven decades of Himalayan climbing. Each number hides a story: novice trekkers who underestimated the season, seasoned alpinists who trusted a forecast, Sherpa guides who shouldered disproportionate risk to ferry ropes and oxygen canisters for clients.

Voices from the ridge — what people are saying

“We come for the mountain, not to fight it,” said Lobsang Gurung, a retiree from Solu who now ferries supplies to climbing teams. “When the weather is angry, there is nothing to do but wait and pray.”

Dr. Mira Acharya, a Kathmandu-based meteorologist, pointed to shifting patterns. “We are seeing storms in windows that climbers considered predictable,” she explained. “Warmer air can carry more moisture; when that moisture hits high, cold air, it falls as snow — and sometimes in one heavy burst rather than in steady accumulation. It complicates forecasting and raises avalanches risk.”

On the ground, rescue teams and hospital staff speak in tones that mix fatigue with resolute duty. “Helicopters are real heroes, but they can’t fly in every condition,” said Senior Police Officer Gyan Kumar Mahato of Dolakha district. “When the storm shuts down everything, the only options are patience, prayer and hard, slow digging.”

Local Color: The Lives Behind the Lifts

To understand the Himalayas is to understand a landscape threaded with prayer flags, tea houses with steaming masala and yak caravans that move like slow, stubborn weather. Villages cluster in highland shadows, each household linked in some way to trekking seasons. For some, guiding and portering are livelihoods; for others, the presence of foreign climbers has become an economic lifeline.

“My niece saved for her wedding with money from guides,” a woman from Dolakha, Sunita Tamang, told me over a steaming cup of butter tea. “If the season is gone, how will they marry? The mountains give and the mountains take.”

That double-edged relationship — a source of pride, identity and income — makes tragedies like these resonate beyond the immediate families. Guesthouses are quieter, yak drivers worry about loads, and the Sherpa community counts not only the dead but the costs to mental health and long-term security.

What This Means for Adventure and Policy

These deaths arrive at a fraught intersection: climate change, growing adventure tourism, and limited rescue capacity. Autumn, the season when many of these climbs were attempted, is the second busiest time for expeditions in Nepal. The days are shorter and colder than spring, but the skies can be clearer — until they aren’t. As extremes become more erratic, climbers and operators must adapt.

Emergency logistics remain a challenge: helicopters, high-altitude medevacs and trained mountain rescuers are finite resources.
Climate scientists warn that shifting weather windows increase unpredictability, complicating climb planning and risk assessments.
The human cost is disproportionate for local guides: Nepali climbers and Sherpas continue to face the greatest exposure to hazards while often seeing the smallest share of gains.

“This is not just a mountaineering problem,” said Dr. Arun Singh, an expert in mountain livelihoods. “It’s about how communities that depend on risky tourism can be protected. Insurance, better weather infrastructure, stricter permitting during off-windows — there are policy levers, but they require political will and international cooperation.”

What Should We Take Away?

When I stood below a ridge yesterday, the prayer flags snapped in a cold wind that smelled faintly of wood smoke and earth. The mountains were indifferent, but the people who live in their shadow are not. They grieve, they ration hope, they pull survivors from the snow and wrap them in warm blankets.

So what do we ask of those who continue to go? Are we entitled to test ourselves against such raw nature when local communities shoulder so much of the risk? How do we balance human aspiration with the responsibility to protect the people whose lives intertwine with these peaks?

Climbing will always be a negotiation with danger. But as weather grows less predictable and global attention on the Himalayas intensifies, perhaps the conversation can shift: toward safer practices, fairer compensation for Nepali workers, and better early-warning systems that might save lives. If the mountains teach anything, it is humility. We ignore that lesson at our peril.

For now, helicopters rise and fall against the serrated skyline, stretchered forms move through hospital corridors, and families begin the long, private work of grieving. The counts will be updated, investigations opened, and mountaineering forums will buzz with analysis. But under it all, in the villages and tea houses and base camps, lives have been altered in ways numbers cannot fully capture.

What would you do if the mountain you loved asked too high a price?

Trump vows to slash New York City funding if Mamdani wins

hanad

November 4, 2025

Trump threatens to restrict NYC funding if Mamdani wins — Polls suggest Zohran Mamdani has a clear lead in the mayoral race

The City on Edge: A Mayor’s Race, a President’s Warning, and a Moment that Feels Bigger Than New York

Walk the avenues of New York City these days and you can feel the election the way you feel the subway rumble beneath your feet: a low, constant vibration that makes even the unlikeliest things — a deli owner pausing mid-slice, a schoolteacher lingering outside a classroom — sound charged. Tomorrow the city will choose a mayor, and more than municipal policy is at stake. The campaign has become a vortex where local concerns—rent, transit, public safety—meet national theater: former President Donald Trump, using his Truth Social megaphone, has threatened to cut federal funding if progressive Democrat Zohran Mamdani wins.

“It would be a complete and total economic and social disaster should Mamdani win,” Trump posted, a declaration that landed like a thunderclap across Queens stoops and Manhattan townhouses alike. He warned that federal support would be “highly unlikely” beyond the legal minimum, and urged voters to rally behind Andrew Cuomo — the former governor who, after losing to Mamdani in the Democratic primary, is now charging forward as an independent.

For a city that craves stability but thrives on reinvention, that threat has the air of a pressure test. What happens when federal patronage — money for housing, transit, security — becomes a bargaining chip in a fight about ideology and experience?

On the Ground: Voices from Bodegas to Borough Halls

“You don’t play with my rent money,” says Rosa Martinez, who has run a small bodega in Jackson Heights for 23 years, wiping her palms on an apron inked with last month’s receipts. “We need someone who can keep the lights on in the neighborhood. This talk of withholding funds scares people who don’t even follow politics.”

Across town, a 54-year-old MTA bus driver, Luis Hernandez, shrugs and says: “Fare-free buses sound nice — depends how you pay for them. I just want buses that arrive on time.”

These voices matter because they translate abstract threats into tangible fears: will shelters have beds? Will the city get disaster aid after a storm? Will school buildings be fixed? Federal funding touches everything from lead paint abatement to summer youth programs, and when the specter of withdrawal looms, even the most routine services begin to feel precarious.

Policy on Paper — and the Questions It Raises

Zohran Mamdani, 34, has captured attention with a bold, progressive platform. He proposes taxing the city’s wealthiest, raising the corporate tax rate, freezing rent increases for rent-stabilized units, expanding publicly subsidized housing, and piloting fare-free buses across the city.

“Mamdani represents a new generation of leaders who see the cracks in our system and want to seal them,” said Dr. Laila Rahman, an urban policy researcher at a Brooklyn think tank. “But every progressive policy requires a financing plan. The conversation about funding is crucial.”

Not everyone is convinced. “Experience matters,” one longtime public school principal told me over coffee in a cafeteria near City Hall. “The ideas are exciting, but you have to be able to steer the ship when there’s a storm.” That line of thinking helps explain why Andrew Cuomo — who served as governor of New York State — is now being framed by some voters as the safe, experienced alternative, despite the controversies that dogged his tenure.

The Nationalizing of a Local Race

Presidential involvement in city elections is not new, but the tenor is striking. Trump’s blunt warning turns a municipal contest into a referendum on federal access and partisan loyalty. It forces voters to consider whether municipal governance should be treated as a partisan risk assessment: electing a mayor the White House disfavors could, the implication goes, mean real financial consequences.

“This is about power, not policy,” says Marcus Ellison, a veteran political strategist who has worked campaigns across the country. “When national actors try to influence local outcomes by dangling or threatening funds, it changes how municipal leaders must approach governance. They have to be able to negotiate with four different layers of government and survive political crosswinds.”

For many New Yorkers, the national spotlight is both flattering and exhausting. The city is a global brand — a center of finance, culture, and ideas — but it is also a place where people live paycheck to paycheck, where a rent increase can mean the difference between staying and moving out of the only home you’ve known.

When Obama Calls

Adding another layer to these dynamics, former President Barack Obama reportedly called Mamdani this weekend to offer his support and to be a “sounding board” should Mamdani win. The conversation — confirmed by Mamdani’s campaign — was short but symbolic.

“It felt like getting a nod from someone who knows what the job’s pressures are,” Mamdani said in a campaign statement. “President Obama and I spoke about bringing new kinds of politics to this city.”

That outreach highlights a broader pattern: established national Democrats are trying to shepherd the party into a post-2016, post-pandemic era where progressive energy must be squared with electability concerns. The question for voters is stark: do they want sweeping transformation in city policy now, or a more cautious course that prioritizes short-term stability?

Big Ideas, Bigger Stakes

New York’s challenges are not unique. Cities around the world wrestle with income inequality, unaffordable housing, aging infrastructure, and a public trust chafed by perceived corruption or incompetence. The outcome of this race could serve as a test case for how progressive municipal governance can be funded, implemented, and defended in an era of polarized national politics.

Population scale: New York is home to roughly 8.5 million people — a scale that magnifies policy impacts.
Housing crunch: Tens of thousands of households face severe housing cost burdens every year, pushing debates about rent policy and subsidized housing to the forefront.
Transit and mobility: Public transit is the city’s circulatory system; proposals like fare-free buses are as transformative as they are logistically complex.

How the city negotiates its future will inform similar debates internationally — from London to São Paulo — about how to marry robust social programs with fiscal responsibility.

So What Will You Do?

If you’re reading this from within the five boroughs, tomorrow’s choice is yours to make — as it is for the millions of voices that collectively breathe life into the metropolis. If you’re elsewhere, consider this: what does it mean when a national leader suggests withholding the lifeblood a city needs? How should local democracy respond when funding becomes political leverage?

“Voting is about the kind of city we want to live in,” said Aisha Clarke, a community organizer in the Bronx, as she taped campaign flyers onto a lamppost. “It’s about whether we’re willing to bet on change or cling to what’s familiar because it feels safer.”

Tomorrow, New Yorkers will choose. And when the ballots are counted, the ripple effects will travel far beyond municipal boundaries — not only shaping how a city is run, but also how democracy itself functions under pressure from both local urgency and national politics.

Worker Killed as Historic Medieval Tower Partially Collapses in Rome

hanad

November 4, 2025

Worker dies after medieval tower partly collapses in Rome — Rescuers evacuated the worker who was trapped in the medieval tower 'Torre dei Conti'

Dust over the Forum: a medieval tower collapses, a worker dies, and Rome holds its breath

The sky above the Fori Imperiali—usually clear enough to read the stones’ weathered faces—turned the color of chalk the day the Torre dei Conti came down. A white plume rose like a ghost from the windows of the 13th-century tower, drifting across a broad avenue where tourists and Romans often wander shoulder to shoulder. What looked at first like a cloud of ordinary construction dust became the scene of a human tragedy.

Emergency crews pulled a worker from beneath falling masonry late in the afternoon. He was rushed to hospital in critical condition and, according to local media reports and city officials, did not survive. Another man, pulled free almost immediately, was taken to hospital with serious head injuries. Two other workers suffered minor wounds and refused treatment on site. No firefighters were hurt.

What unfolded: a timeline of the collapse

The day’s events were unnervingly precise.

Around 11:30am local time, part of the Torre dei Conti—29 metres tall and perched along the Via dei Fori Imperiali—first shed masonry to the street below.
Roughly 90 minutes later, while firefighters were operating aerial ladders at the scene, a second collapse occurred. Clouds of dust poured from the tower’s upper windows, and video shared widely on social media captured falling stone and the abrupt scramble of crews and onlookers.
Rescue teams worked for hours. One worker was trapped under rubble and later recovered, but in grave condition; another was removed quickly with serious head trauma. The construction site has been seized as authorities opened an investigation into the causes, Italian daily Corriere della Sera reported.

Voices from the street

“It sounded like a thunderclap. Then the dust—everything was just white,” said Maria Rossi, who runs a small café near Piazza Venezia and watched the scene unfold from behind her counter. “I told my customers to get down. We all thought it was another earthquake at first.”

“We rescued a man late yesterday and he was in very serious condition,” Rome police chief Lamberto Giannini told reporters, his voice steady, the weight of the rescue evident in his face. “The construction site has been secured. We must find out what happened.”

Rome’s mayor, Roberto Gualtieri, visited the scene and spoke briefly with emergency crews and journalists. “This is a deep wound in the heart of the city,” he said. “Our priority is to support the families and ensure a thorough investigation. We also owe it to Rome’s heritage to understand whether more lives could have been protected.”

A tower with a thousand years of stories

The Torre dei Conti is more than a pile of stones; it is a living fragment of Rome’s layered history. Built in the early 13th century by relatives of Pope Innocent III, it once rose higher than it does today—reduced over centuries after earthquakes in the 14th and 17th centuries and adapted for new uses. For a time it housed municipal offices, and in recent decades it stood silent, an austere sentinel beside the traffic and tourists of modern Rome.

It was scheduled to be reborn: a four-year restoration project, partly funded by the European Union, was converting the tower into a museum and conference space. The work was intended to finish next year and, because of the EU-funded program, the area immediately around the works had been closed to pedestrians.

“Restoring these monuments is never only about aesthetics,” said Dr. Elena Marchetti, an archaeologist who has worked on conservation projects around Rome. “The tower is a palimpsest—every change a layer of history. But that very complexity makes interventions delicate. You’re doing surgery on an organism that’s been living for eight hundred years.”

The wider stakes: heritage preservation, safety, and funding

What happened at the Torre dei Conti is not simply a local tragedy; it raises wider questions that cities across the globe wrestle with. How do we preserve fragile, centuries-old structures while keeping workers and the public safe? Who bears responsibility when restoration becomes risky—contractors, municipal authorities, or funders?

“Conservation is under-resourced across Europe,” noted Paolo Benetti, a structural engineer who consults on historic buildings. “Historic masonry behaves in unpredictable ways, especially after centuries of earthquakes, pollution and vibration from traffic. Add the pressure of fixed schedules and budgets, and corners can be cut—sometimes with fatal consequences.”

Italy, with its dense concentration of historic sites—its city center inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site since 1980—faces this balancing act constantly. The country’s monuments draw millions of visitors annually and are central to local economies, yet they also require sustained investment: careful scaffolding, slow-moving conservation techniques, monitoring systems that detect shifts in stone and mortar.

Questions that linger

Officials have seized the construction site as they investigate. Authorities will want to know whether the collapse was caused by structural weakness, human error, a lapse in safety protocols, or some combination thereof. They will examine contracts, the sequence of work, and adherence to regulations.

“We need a full inquiry,” said a city official involved in overseeing cultural projects. “If there were failings, they must be identified and corrected so no family suffers like this again.”

Will this tragedy change how Rome approaches restoration projects? It must, many experts say. More frequent structural monitoring, clearer safety protocols for workers, and a willingness to slow down projects when risk is detected are among the measures being discussed. There is also talk of better transparency about restoration work in historically sensitive areas.

In the shadow of the Colosseum

Standing midway along the Via dei Fori Imperiali, the Torre dei Conti has always been in the shadow of the Colosseum’s colossal silhouette. The two are part of the same urban tapestry—ruins braided with modern life: scooters weaving a careful path between museum buses, vendors selling gelato, tourists photographing every column.

“You see these stones and you think they’ll last forever,” Maria the café owner said, stirring sugar into a cup and looking down the avenue at the tower. “But they are old. They need care. And men and women who work on them need to come home at night.”

As an investigation unfolds, Rome will have to reckon with grief, with accountability, and with how it chooses to steward its past. It will be a test of municipal will and of the systems that fund and manage cultural heritage across Europe.

What can we learn—and what will we do?

When you visit a historic center, do you think about the people who keep it standing? Would you expect the same safety standards for a restoration in a small village as in a capital city? This event asks us all to consider the invisible labor behind our monuments—and how society values that labor.

At the base of the tower, police tape flutters in the Roman breeze. Workers gather in small clusters, some shaking their heads, others talking in low voices about what went wrong. Above them the stones keep their silence.

Rome has lost a worker; a family mourns. The city will seek answers, and the world will watch one of its oldest urban centers grapple with the cost of preserving a past that, when it crumbles, can crush the present.

Israel Verifies Returned Remains Are Those of Hostages

hanad

November 4, 2025

Israel confirms remains handed over belong to hostages — Hamas handed over the remains of three Israeli hostages yesterday via the Red Cross

The Quiet That Isn’t

There was a quiet in the morning that sounded louder than any explosion — the hush that follows a delivery no family ever wants to receive. Outside a modest apartment in central Israel, neighbors gathered like reluctant witnesses as soldiers came and went with a small box in tow. Inside, a mother clutched a faded photograph and tried to steady her breath. “We were told they were coming back,” she whispered. “But not like this.”

Israeli authorities have confirmed that three sets of remains handed over through the Red Cross belong to hostages seized during the 7 October attack last year: Captain Omer Neutra, 21; Corporal Oz Daniel, 19; and Colonel Assaf Hamami, 40 — the highest-ranking officer among those killed. Officials say the handover was carried out as part of a fragile ceasefire arrangement mediated by international actors and facilitated by humanitarian organizations.

From Tunnels to Tables: The Mechanics of a Troubled Truce

The remains were delivered to Israeli representatives yesterday, after Hamas’s armed wing said they had been found “along the route of one of the tunnels in the southern Gaza Strip.” The International Committee of the Red Cross oversaw the transfer — a somber choreography of flags, paperwork, and grief.

“We completed standard identification procedures and informed the families,” an Israeli military spokesperson told reporters. “This is a painful but necessary step toward closure for these households.”

For families, confirmation brings no neat end. “I have his uniform folded on my bed,” said Miriam Levi, a neighbor of one of the soldiers, wiping her face with the back of her hand. “We dress him each morning in our minds. Now we will have to change that ritual.”

How the exchange unfolded

When the truce took effect on 10 October, it briefly transformed the landscape: troops pulled back from some urban positions, aid convoys entered more readily, and hundreds of thousands of displaced Palestinians cautiously returned to view the skeletons of homes left behind. In exchange for 20 living hostages released by Hamas, Israel freed nearly 2,000 Palestinian prisoners and wartime detainees — a swap that acknowledged, but did not erase, the cost of the conflict.

Violence in the Interstices

Still, this is not a peace. The ceasefire has been punctured by lethal incidents on both sides. Hamas-run health authorities in Gaza say three Palestinians were killed by Israeli fire near Rafah — an area that remains under varying degrees of Israeli control — after soldiers identified people crossing a yellow line demarcating occupied zones.

“They were advancing toward troops and posed an immediate threat,” an Israeli military statement said, explaining the strike. Medics on the ground reported that one of the dead was a woman; names of the others have not been released.

Gaza’s health ministry reports that since the truce came into effect, at least 239 Palestinians have been killed by strikes, nearly half of them during a single day of intense retaliation last week. Israel, for its part, says three soldiers have been killed in the same period and that numerous fighters have been targeted. Such numbers — whether issued by one side or another — are a shorthand for a hardship that statistics alone cannot capture.

Bodies, Bargains, and the Burden of Ruins

One of the most wrenching elements of the deal has been the exchange of remains. Hamas has said it is trying to recover bodies from under mountains of rubble — a slow, dangerous process that requires heavy machinery and trained personnel. “Many of the deceased are buried beneath collapsed buildings,” a Hamas official told a visiting mediator. “We need equipment and access to do this properly.”

Israel has accused Hamas of delay; Hamas counters that the retrieval is complicated and hazardous. So far, of 28 deceased captives that Hamas says it has in its custody, it has returned 20 — including 18 Israelis, one Thai national, and one Nepali — according to statements by Israeli officials. Gaza’s health ministry, meanwhile, said it received 45 bodies of Palestinians whose remains had been held by Israel, bringing the total number of Palestinian bodies returned to Gaza to 270.

What this means for families

“Closure is not only about the coffin,” said Dr. Hila Ben-David, a psychologist who has worked with bereaved families. “It’s about the right to mourn, to perform rituals, to tell stories. When that process is interrupted, trauma becomes permanent.”

Families on both sides described an agonizing mix of relief and renewed pain. “We’re grateful to get him back,” one father said, holding a worn prayer book. “But does that fill the silence at the table?”

Gaza’s Wounded Mind

Beyond deaths and returns lies another crisis: the long, diffuse wreckage of mental health. Gaza’s population of roughly 2.3 million — already living under years of blockade and repeated conflict — is now coping with what local specialists describe as “a volcano” of psychological distress.

Abdallah al-Jamal, the head of the Gaza City Mental Health Hospital, said his team has been overwhelmed since the truce: “When the fighting eased, it was as if everyone who had been holding back their pain finally came in. The stigma about seeking help has faded because the need is so large.”

The hospital itself is damaged; staff work out of makeshift clinics and share rooms, stripping consultations of privacy. More than 100 patients are seen daily under these conditions, with children showing classic signs of trauma — night terrors, bed-wetting, an inability to concentrate — and adults reporting insomnia, panic attacks, and hopelessness.

“I don’t recognize my son,” said Amal, a mother of three from central Gaza. “He collects branches for cooking and hides when he hears a car. He used to run in the street. Now he only runs from shadows.”

What are we to do with this sorrow?

As global audiences scroll past headlines, it’s tempting to compress people into numbers: hostages released, prisoners freed, bodies exchanged. But these metrics obscure the lived realities that make up a conflict: the father who will never teach his son to drive; the child who dreams of water and finds only dust; the volunteer who sorts clothing in a tented camp and keeps a list of names to remind herself that each item belongs to a person.

Is there a path forward that honors both accountability and dignity? Can reconstruction coexist with justice? These are not easy questions to answer, but they are necessary. Humanitarian access, forensic teams to recover bodies, sustained mental health funding, and avenues for genuine political dialogue are all parts of a longer, messier solution.

Scenes You Won’t See on the Six O’Clock News

Walk through Rafah or the eastern neighborhoods of Gaza City at dusk and you might see children darting between half-walls to reach a puddle of water. You might smell bread baking on an open fire because there is no electricity for ovens. You will hear someone telling a story about a neighbor who used to play the oud in the evenings, laughter now a fragile thing shared in passing.

“People keep small rituals going — a cup of tea, a radio station, a story about the last harvest,” said Samar Haddad, a community organizer. “They are not surrendering hope; they are making space for it.”

Closing

Grief, exchange, and a still-fragile truce have left families in a peculiar, painful limbo. There is no single narrative that can contain what is happening here. Instead, there are a thousand small stories: a neighbor weeping in a doorway, a soldier’s uniform folded neatly on a bed, a child collecting twigs to boil water. Each one asks us, in its own way, how much attention we are willing to pay, and what we are prepared to do with what we learn.

When the dust settles — when it settles, will it be on rubble or on rebuilt homes? Will the returned bodies become the end of a cycle, or a reminder of unfinished work? Those who live here do not want pity; they want action. They want the tools to find and bury their dead, the support to heal their minds, and the political will to prevent a replay.

What would you want, if it were your family at the center of this story?

1...383940...168 Page 39 of 168