Putin Announces Test of Russia’s Poseidon Nuclear-Capable Undersea Drone

October 30, 2025

Putin says Russia tested Poseidon nuclear-capable torpedo — Vladimir Putin declared the test a great success

Tea, Wounds and a New Kind of Threat: Inside Moscow’s Announcement of the “Poseidon” Test

He sat with a paper cup of tea and a pile of bandages between him and history.

On a gray Moscow afternoon, the president visited a hospital where soldiers wounded in the Ukraine war were convalescing. Cameras lingered on hands still calloused from months at the front, on a thin blanket bunched at the knees. And in the middle of this intimate scene, Vladimir Putin announced something that made the room feel suddenly larger and more dangerous: Russia had tested a weapon unlike any the world has seen—what Moscow calls the Poseidon, a nuclear-capable, autonomous torpedo.

“For the first time, we launched it from a carrier submarine and turned on the nuclear power unit,” he said, smiling with the casual matter-of-factness of a man announcing new technology rather than a device that, by some descriptions, could rewrite the map of coastal habitability. “There is nothing like this.”

What is the Poseidon?

The public domain holds little confirmed detail. What has leaked into headlines and think-tank briefings is cinematic enough to chill the imagination: an autonomous underwater vehicle, propelled by a nuclear reactor and capable—at least in Russian statements—of delivering a nuclear payload across oceans, potentially generating radioactive waves along coastlines.

“Imagine an unmanned submarine with a reactor that can keep it moving for months,” said a European naval analyst who asked not to be named. “Now imagine that it can carry a warhead designed to maximize contamination. That’s the nightmare scenario.”

Russian officials have presented the Poseidon not as a first-strike weapon in conventional terms, but as a strategic deterrent: a way to dissuade any adversary from thinking a shield could nullify Russia’s ability to retaliate. That logic echoes earlier announcements about other exotic systems—Sarmat (the intercontinental missile nicknamed “Satan II”), and Burevestnik, a nuclear-powered cruise missile Moscow claims can evade missile defenses.

Key features reportedly claimed by Moscow

Nuclear power unit enabling extended range and endurance
Autonomous guidance allowing trans-oceanic travel
Capability to carry a strategic nuclear charge

Claims, Context and Questions

Putin framed the test as a triumph, saying the Poseidon’s power “significantly exceeds” that of the Sarmat ICBM. He tied these capabilities to what he portrays as a defensive necessity—responses to missile defense developments in the United States after Washington’s early 2000s withdrawal from the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, and to NATO’s eastward expansion since the end of the Cold War.

The announcement landed like thunder on the other side of the world. Western governments and independent experts have often greeted such Kremlin declarations with skepticism, questions and, sometimes, alarm. Why? Because the technical problems of a nuclear-powered, unmanned torpedo are enormous: reactor miniaturization, reliable autonomous navigation for thousands of kilometers, and safe handling of radioactive materials at sea are not trivial. Independent verification is almost impossible without on-site access to wreckage or telemetry.

“We always have to parse what’s announced from what’s demonstrably tested,” said an American arms-control specialist. “Russia’s history of publicizing prototype programs adds to the ambiguity. Some may mature into deployable systems; some may remain as demonstrations meant to shape perceptions.”

Voices from the Ground: Fear, Pride and Weariness

Back in the hospital corridor, reactions were mixed. A young medic, tea mug still warm in her hands, said softly, “People here want their homes to be safe. Weapons talk feels distant when you’re stitching an arm. But we’re proud that our country can innovate—though I don’t understand why we must threaten with such things.”

An elderly woman in a neighboring ward, whose son had been wounded, offered a different note: “They say it protects us. But protection sounds like a promise you can’t evidence. I love Russia. I don’t want anyone’s cities to be ashes.”

On the coastlines that could theoretically be threatened by such a weapon, fishermen and port workers think in terms of livelihoods rather than geopolitics. “The sea feeds us,” said a veteran fisherman from Kaliningrad who asked that his name be withheld. “If anything poisoned it, what would my grandchildren eat?”

Environment, Ethics and the Unthinkable

Beyond immediate deterrence politics, the prospect of a nuclear-powered torpedo conjures environmental nightmares. Radioactive contamination in a marine ecosystem can persist for decades, affecting food chains and economies dependent on fishing. When the Soviet Union suffered nuclear mishaps—K-19, the Kursk—local communities paid a long-term price.

“The ocean doesn’t respect borders,” cautioned an environmental scientist. “Any radioactive plume could be carried by currents to shores far from the original event. The human, ecological and economic consequences would transcend any single nation.”

Globally, the world is already sitting on a nuclear mountain. Estimates from arms-control bodies suggest roughly 12,000–13,000 nuclear warheads remain across the nine nuclear-armed states. Many are in operationally ready arsenals. The addition of novel delivery systems doesn’t just change military calculus; it changes the moral and legal conversation about what warfare should and shouldn’t look like.

Strategic Signaling or Strategic Reality?

One thing is clear: announcements like this are as much about politics as about engineering. They serve to signal capability, resolve, and the willingness to escalate. They are bargaining chips in a world where disarmament talks have stalled, where trust between great powers is threadbare, and where technology races faster than treaties.

“We must ask ourselves: are these tests intended to be operational, or to be a form of political theater?” asked a former diplomat. “Both are dangerous. The first because of the humanitarian risks. The second because it erodes global norms and increases the chance of miscalculation.”

What Should the World Do?

There are no easy answers. Diplomacy has frayed. Arms-control mechanisms that once kept competing logics in check have been weakened or abandoned. Yet if the last century has taught anything, it is that escalation without frameworks for communication and limits only invites catastrophe.

We might start by asking ourselves a few hard questions: Can new treaties be crafted to address autonomous and nuclear-powered systems? How do we verify tests that take place underwater, out of sight? Can coastal nations band together to insist on inspections, transparency and environmental safeguards?

For now, the hospital’s tea cups emptied and the cameras moved on. But the words linger: a test, a technological claim, a warning. People will go back to their beds, back to their boats, back to offices where diplomats redraw lines and analysts update models. And the rest of us—readers, neighbors, global citizens—are left to wonder how close we have come, quietly and quickly, to a new era where the sea itself is enlisted as a weapon.

Will we accept that future? Or will we demand different stories from our leaders—stories that prioritize stewardship over spectacle, safety over brinkmanship?

Exit polls point to centrist victory in Dutch parliamentary elections

hanad

October 30, 2025

Exit poll suggests centrists win Dutch vote — Voters cast their ballots in Rotterdam, Netherlands

Morning light on the canals: how the Dutch nudged Europe away from the brink

There is something quietly theatrical about election day in the Netherlands. Bicycles line the cobblestones like a patient audience; toddlers in clipped raincoats toddle past polling stations set up in places that could only belong to this country — a windmill, a football stadium, a zoo, the Anne Frank House. The ballots themselves are grandly unwieldy, an A3 sheet listing 27 parties that forces voters to slow down and make a decision in full view of history and habit.

On that ordinary-turned-historic morning, the exit polls landed like a splash of cold North Sea water: a small, centrist party had outpaced the loudest voice of the far right. D66, a pro-European liberal party, was projected to win 27 seats in the 150-seat lower house; Geert Wilders’s PVV — once the surprise victor of 2023 — slid back to 25, the Ipsos numbers suggested. The VVD, centre-right and steady, trailed with 23. The left-leaning Green/Labour alliance looked set to take roughly 20 seats.

What the tallies mean

Numbers are blunt instruments, but they can tell a story. In the Dutch system, 76 seats are needed for a working majority — a figure that forces parties into awkward embraces and patient negotiations. If these exit-poll figures hold, Rob Jetten, the 38-year-old leader of D66 who surged in the last days of the campaign, will be in a favoured position to try to assemble a coalition. But Favoured does not mean inevitable.

“Dutch politics is a long, slow waltz,” said Anouk Visser, a veteran political correspondent based in Amsterdam. “You can lead a poll tonight and end up negotiating with half the chamber for months. The arithmetic is clear: nobody governs alone.”

For Geert Wilders, the decline marks a sharp reversal from his 2023 breakthrough. The exit poll suggested the PVV lost roughly a dozen seats compared with that earlier surge — a pullback that underlines a hard truth of parliamentary politics: being loud enough to win votes is not the same as being acceptable enough to govern in coalition.

On the ground: voters’ quiet appetite for normality

Walk past a polling station and you hear the country’s themes sung in small refrains: “housing,” “immigration,” “stability.” Young couples complain about sky-high rents and tiny apartments; pensioners mention pensions and public safety. At the Anne Frank House, a converted polling booth, Bart — a 53-year-old baker whose flour-smudged hands signaled more life than lab coats or campaign shirts — summed it up. “I didn’t come here for fireworks,” he said, smiling. “Just to vote for someone who isn’t screaming all the time.”

A young student I met outside a university polling centre shrugged and said, “I voted for a party that talks about climate and jobs. My generation needs both.” Their ballot choices were informed not only by headlines but by waiting lists for student housing and the cost of a monthly train pass.

Those small, intimate grievances are the structural forces beneath the spectacle: a chronic housing shortage in a densely populated country where household space is measured in square metres and patience is worn thin. The immigrant debate — always combustible in Dutch politics — remained a hot button, but it was often spoken of in pragmatic tones: How do we process asylum claims? How do we house new arrivals without displacing older residents?

Violence, disinformation, and the shadow of AI

The campaign was not without ugliness. Protests around proposed asylum centres descended into clashes in several towns; police reports spoke of scuffles and a few arrests. The relatively quiet Netherlands — the country that perfected consensus politics — found itself grappling with new tools of division. Deepfakes and AI-generated images were used to smear a high-profile candidate, forcing public apologies and a fresh debate about the responsibilities of parties and platforms in an era of synthetic lies.

“You can win an argument on facts, but you can win a fight on fury,” observed Dr. Maarten van Rooijen, a researcher who studies digital misinformation in Utrecht. “AI amplifies fury by making it look real. Democracies are built on trust; if trust is replaced by believable fiction, the whole system creaks.”

Experts and outsiders weigh in

Across Europe, the election was watched as if it were a weather vane: a show of force by the far right in France, Germany and Britain had many asking whether the continent was tilting. The Dutch result — a retreat for the loudest populist voice and a modest advance for a centrist, pro-EU party — will be read in capitals from Paris to Warsaw.

“This is not a triumph for centrism as much as it is a rejection of isolationist bravado,” said Lina Eriksson, a Brussels analyst. “European voters are telling leaders they want competence and cooperation, not culture wars that chew up governing time and produce little.”

That does not guarantee policy stability. The Dutch electorate remains fragmented; parties are ideologically distant, and coalition-building will test limits of compromise. “There will be haggling,” said Anouk Visser. “There will be late-night deals and concessions. That’s how the Netherlands — and much of Europe — has historically functioned.”

Stories, not soundbites

What the exit polls cannot quantify are the human stories threaded through that A3 ballot. An elderly woman who voted at a village hall because she feared the moult of change; a Syrian family who sat nervously at a café, grateful for the quiet possibility that their children might go to school; a fisherman who said he was tired of political theatre and wanted better coastal infrastructure — these are the notes that shape policy once the coalition talks begin.

As you read from wherever you are — Tokyo, Lagos, São Paulo — ask yourself: how do we temper the allure of simple, loud answers to complex, slow problems? When a society is anxious about housing, jobs and identity, what is the right mix of compassion, competence and firmness?

In the coming weeks, Dutch politicians will negotiate, trim, and stitch together a government that can command a narrow majority. It will be messy and restrained in turns. But for now, beneath flat skies and windmill blades, the Dutch electorate chose a summit of sanity over a summit of spectacle. That, in itself, is something to watch and to learn from.

What to watch next

Coalition talks: expect weeks or months of negotiations involving multiple parties to reach 76 seats.
Policy priorities: housing reform and immigration systems will dominate the agenda.
Disinformation safeguards: lawmakers will face pressure to regulate AI-driven political tools.

Democracy is an imperfect engine, noisy and oftentimes slow. But on this damp Dutch day, millions of votes whispered a preference for steadiness and cooperation — a reminder that, even when extremists make headlines, the quiet choices of ordinary people can steer the ship. Will Europe listen? Time will tell.

Jamaica reports first fatalities as Hurricane Melissa batters island

hanad

October 30, 2025

First deaths from Hurricane Melissa reported in Jamaica — Map showing Tropical Cyclone Melissa's location as of 29 October, 3.00 am GMT/Irish time

When the sea turned loud: Hurricane Melissa’s wake across the Caribbean

The morning after, the Caribbean looked as if someone had tried to scrub it clean with a savage hand: roofs peeled back like tin can lids, coconut palms flattened into tangled green brooms, streets that were once pulsing with market life transformed into rivers that swallowed cars and memories alike.

From Kingston to Santiago de Cuba, from the hills of southern Haiti to the low-lying cays of the Bahamas, people were left standing amid the wreckage asking the same quiet question: how did this happen so fast?

A violent spin across familiar seas

Hurricane Melissa roared across the Caribbean with sustained winds reaching roughly 195 kilometres per hour (about 121 mph), according to the US National Hurricane Center. For Jamaica, that translated into a storm that, by some measures, matched the ferocity of storms not seen since 1935.

It did not move like a quick visitor. Melissa crawled, lingered and punished — a slow, grinding test of roofs, infrastructure and nerves. That slowness is not incidental. Warmer seas — the very oceans that make this region a tourism magnet — are pouring extra energy into hurricanes, amplifying winds and, crucially, rainfall. The result: deeper floods, higher surges, more landslides.

Numbers that don’t tell the whole story

Official tallies are still being reconciled, but the figures are grim: at least 30 people dead or missing in Haiti, with civil defence reporting at least 20 dead in the south — among them 10 children — and 10 missing. Jamaica confirmed four deaths after floodwaters washed victims ashore in St Elizabeth, and dozens of homes have been destroyed across the island.

Roughly 25,000 people sought refuge in emergency shelters in Jamaica, and the island’s tourism sector — bustling only months ago — suddenly found itself balancing hospitality and humanitarian need, with about 25,000 tourists still in-country as the storm passed.

On the ground: voices from the islands

“We woke up to the sound of the roof being torn away,” said Lisa Sangster, a 30-year-old communications specialist from Kingston, her voice raw on a call. “My sister described water rising past her knees in minutes. We saved what we could — our medications, a few photos. Everything else is gone.”

In rural Saint Elizabeth, local government minister Desmond McKenzie painted a picture of communities underwater. “It has been a devastating event,” he said. “Several hospitals have been damaged; roads are impassable. Recovery will take time.”

“We are safe and trying to stay calm,” said Lionnis Francos, a rheumatologist stranded in El Cobre, Cuba, after floodwaters and a landslide blocked the road. “Rescuers reached out but couldn’t get across. They asked us to remain put until they can clear a path.”

In Port-au-Prince and the southern departments of Haiti, where deforested slopes and fragile drainage amplify nature’s cruelty, people spoke of sudden flash floods ripping through settlements. Emmanuel Pierre, head of Haiti’s civil defence, confirmed dozens of fatalities and appealed for fast, practical help.

Everyday compassion in a crisis

“A neighbour carried my son on his shoulder like a hero,” recalled Mathue Tapper, 31, from Kingston. “We are lucky in the city, but the people out west—out by the coast—are facing the worst of it. It hurts to watch.”

How governments and aid groups are responding

Relief efforts are already mobilizing. The United Nations announced plans for an airlift of some 2,000 relief kits from a regional hub in Barbados once flights resume. The Jamaican Red Cross was distributing drinking water and hygiene supplies even as communications remained patchy and electrical grids failed.

“We have rescue and response teams heading to affected areas along with critical lifesaving supplies,” said a US State Department statement, noting coordination with regional partners. The Vatican offered prayers. The UN appealed for calm and cooperation as damage assessments continue.

Estimated shelters occupied in Jamaica: ~25,000 people
Relief modules ready for airlift from Barbados: ~2,000 kits
Reported dead or missing in Haiti: ~30
Reported deaths in Jamaica: 4

Cuba: battered during a bitter time

Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel described “extensive damage” on an island already grappling with its worst economic crisis in decades. In eastern provinces, streets flooded, homes collapsed, and prompt community action — neighbours ferrying the elderly, locals salvaging heirlooms — made the difference between life and deeper loss.

State media reported rescue teams struggling to reach at least 17 people trapped by a landslide and floodwaters. Electricity and communications outages hampered external support, a reminder that phones and satellites cannot replace relief workers on the ground.

Why the Caribbean suffers so sharply

There are natural explanations — hurricanes are seasonal actors here — and human ones. Decades of development on vulnerable coastlines, weakened ecosystems, and, in places like Haiti, rampant deforestation, have left communities with fewer defenses against water and wind.

“Human-caused climate change is making all of the worst aspects of Hurricane Melissa even worse,” said climate scientist Daniel Gilford. “Warmer sea-surface temperatures increase the potential energy available to storms; slower-moving systems drop more rain.” The IPCC and regional climatologists have been sounding the alarm that, while the frequency of very intense hurricanes may vary, their destructive potential is rising.

Beyond the headlines: culture, resilience, inequality

Walk a street in Kingston or Havana now and you’ll see the same resilient choreography: neighbours opening doors for each other, volunteers ferrying generator fuel, church halls becoming clinics. But you’ll also see the stark inequalities — the beachfront resort with a security detail and the informal settlement two blocks away trying to bail water with buckets.

Tourism dollars can prop up an economy in good times, but in a storm they can leave nations juggling two goals: protect visitors and protect citizens. That tension plays out in airports, hotels, and shelter lines.

What comes next?

Assessments will take days; rebuilding, months to years. There will be needs that money alone cannot fix: grief, trauma, the daily fear every rainy season now carries. And there will be policy choices — invest in reforestation and robust drainage, upgrade hospitals and communication networks, rethink where we build new homes.

Will the lessons from Melissa stick? Will governments and international partners use this as a call to action to strengthen early warning systems and community resilience? Or will these scenes fade into news cycles until the next storm arrives?

How you can help — and why it matters

If you are moved to act, reputable relief organizations are coordinating immediate needs: clean water, shelter, medical supplies and cash transfers to families. Donations that empower local groups and buy locally sourced supplies often get aid moving fastest.

And as a global community, we must ask bigger questions: how do we confront the warming planet we share, and how do we make sure the most vulnerable aren’t always left to pay the bill?

Melissa will move on, as hurricanes do. The work that remains — of healing, rebuilding, and reimagining a safer, fairer Caribbean — will last long after the headlines. Will we be ready?

Ukraine Reports Russian Strike Damaged Children’s Hospital, Officials Confirm

hanad

October 29, 2025

Ukraine says children's hospital hit in Russian attack — A view of the aftermath of a Russian strike on a children's hospital in the Dnipro district of Kherson (Credit: Kherson Regional Military Administration)

The Morning After: When a Hospital Becomes a Battlefield

They arrived at the children’s hospital not as caretakers but as witnesses: a paramedic with dust in her hair, a volunteer carrying sandwiches, a stunned grandmother clutching a toy that had survived the blast. In Kherson, sunlight caught on shards of glass like a scatter of tiny, merciless stars — windows blown inward, stretchers upturned, medical instruments lying where their users had been pulled away.

“The enemy opened fire on a children’s hospital in Kherson,” said Ukraine’s ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets, his voice tight with the sort of anger that has become routine in this war. “Nine people were wounded — among them four children and three medical workers.”

Video and photographs released by city officials show a scene that reads as a contradiction: the gentle trappings of pediatric care — stickers on walls, a chart with a child’s name — interrupted by chaos. Bloodstains darken the floor beneath a toppled IV stand. A nurse’s badge lies half-buried in plaster dust.

“I have cared for children through measles and broken bones, but never in a room that smelled like smoke and fear,” said a pediatric nurse at the hospital who asked to remain anonymous. “We are supposed to be a place of safety. Today, that is gone.”

Kherson’s Quiet Warfront

Kherson is not a distant front. The city, briefly under Russian control in 2022, now sits on the uneasy edge of a divided landscape — the Dnipro river carving a line between neighborhoods and front lines. From the river’s banks, residents watch drones and shells arc across the sky. From the hospital windows they watch for ambulances that may never arrive in time.

This attack is one more in a pattern that has exhausted the vocabulary of outrage. Russia denies targeting civilians, saying it aims only at military infrastructure; Ukrainian officials and independent observers counter that medical facilities and civilian infrastructure have been repeatedly struck. “Targeting medical institutions and civilian infrastructure is not warfare — it’s purely terrorism and a grave violation of international humanitarian law,” Ukraine’s Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko said, summing up a sentiment felt by many across the country.

Power Outages, Winter Worries: Odesa Feels the Shock

As Kherson tended its wounds, a different part of southern Ukraine went dark. Russian strikes on the Odesa region’s energy infrastructure left roughly 27,000 households without power, the Ukrainian energy company DTEK reported. “The damage is significant. Repairs will take time,” the company said, bracing residents for disruptions that could last beyond simple, replaceable fixtures.

Odesa has been through this before. Previous campaigns of strikes on energy lines and substations have plunged millions into darkness during the cold months, turning kitchens into stoves and neighborhoods into living rooms without heat. Each outage is not only an inconvenience; it is a threat multiplier, especially as winter closes in.

“You can’t take a child’s temperature with frozen fingers. A premature baby in an incubator is suddenly a life-or-death calculation,” said an energy-sector analyst in Kyiv, speaking on condition of anonymity. “This is strategic targeting with humanitarian consequences.”

Small Numbers, Big Consequences

Numbers in these moments are heavy with meaning. Nine wounded at a hospital feels like a headline — but the human arithmetic continues in quieter ways: a class of children left without a school nurse, a grandmother who must fetch coal and water, a pharmacy that runs out of pediatric analgesics.

Wounded in Kherson hospital attack: 9 (including 4 children and 3 medical workers)
Households without power in Odesa region after strikes: ~27,000
Frontline geography: Dnipro river forms a de facto divide through southern Ukraine

Return Fire, Cross-border Echoes

War is never a single, isolated thing. Kyiv says it continues a campaign of retaliatory strikes; Moscow reported its own claims. In Russia’s Belgorod region, Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov reported that a drone strike had killed at least one person and wounded three in the border village of Shebekino. Meanwhile, Russia’s defence ministry claimed its forces had taken the village of Vyshneve in Dnipropetrovsk region — assertions Kyiv contests and outside observers often scrutinize.

“Every act becomes an argument for the next,” said an independent security expert in Lviv. “You have kinetic escalation, then political framing, then humanitarian fallout. The spiral is mechanical.”

What It Means When Hospitals Are Targets

Why does a hit on a children’s hospital feel different from other acts of war? Because hospitals are meant to be sanctuaries, physical embodiments of a social compact: even in conflict, we protect the most vulnerable. When that compact is broken, it ripples outward — eroding trust, forcing displacement, and straining the capacity of a health system already stretched thin.

Humanitarian law — the Geneva Conventions and their protocols — is explicit about the protection of medical facilities and personnel. Yet, in contemporary conflicts around the world, from the Middle East to Africa, attacks on hospitals have become tragically frequent. The international community has mechanisms for condemnation and, at times, accountability, but enforcement is often slow and politically fraught.

So we are left with a question that sits uncomfortably in the throat: what does it mean for the world to watch a hospital die in the public eye? Does condemnation suffice when lives hang in the balance?

A Human Ledger

In Kherson, people keep a different sort of ledger. They count neighbors who returned after evacuation orders, lovers who carry each other’s groceries across checkpoints, volunteers who load ambulances with blankets. A woman who runs a small bakery near the river handed over a carton of buns to hospital staff as if to say: we are still here.

“You bake, I stretch my hands — and we hold the line together,” she shrugged, flour still under her nails. “For our children, we try.”

Beyond the Headlines: What Can the Global Community Do?

There are no easy answers. Pressure from diplomats and sanctions from governments have a role, as do investigations into potential war crimes. Humanitarian organizations are the first responders in moral and practical terms. But the bleeding edge of this conflict exposes a larger global trend: the weaponization of civilian infrastructure and the erosion of shared norms that once made hospitals untouchable.

As readers around the world, what responsibility do you carry? How do we translate sympathy into sustained attention, into policies that protect civilians and penalize breaches of international law? Can aid be routed more quickly? Can blackouts be mitigated with international support for grid repair? These are technical questions with moral implications.

Closing: The Small Acts That Keep a City Alive

Back at the Kherson children’s hospital, a young doctor wiped a cuff of blood from her sleeve and straightened the bedsheet. “We will reopen the pediatric ward tomorrow if we have to,” she said, glancing at a list of injured children. “We will clean the walls, paint new stars, and try to make a hospital again.”

In the shadow of missiles and power cuts, people still make choices that bind them to each other: collecting water, sharing a heater, refusing to let fear define their day. Those small acts — they are stitches in a fabric that, like any city, can be torn, but also mended. For now, the world watches. For now, a hospital that was hit is still a hospital, because the people inside refuse to let it be anything else.

Powerful storm batters Jamaica, inflicting damage at unprecedented levels

hanad

October 29, 2025

Storm devastates Jamaica at 'levels never seen before'

When the Rain Wouldn’t Stop: Haiti’s New Flood Toll and a Nation’s Old Wounds

The number sits cold and stark: at least 20 people dead after torrential rains from a recent hurricane ripped through southern Haiti, slamming rivers into towns and turning roads into ribbons of mud. It’s a headline that travels quickly across the globe — brief, brutal — but it barely captures the soaked lives, the overturned homes, the days-long wait for help, and the quiet fear settling in the mouths of people who have already lost so much.

“We thought the worst was behind us,” said Mireille Jean, a mother of three who huddled with neighbors on the concrete floor of a church in Les Cayes, wiping silt from her hands. “But the water keeps coming back in memory. It keeps coming in the night.”

On the Ground: Small Towns, Big Losses

Walk through any of the affected communities and the scene is at once intimate and terrible: mattresses stiff with dried mud, children in damp clothing, chickens wandering where a courtyard used to be. In Jérémie, locals used ropes and makeshift rafts to ferry the elderly out of houses that had been underwater for hours. In some coastal hamlets, fishing boats—lifelines for families—were smashed against reefs and docks or washed miles inland.

“We lost our boat, our nets, and our last savings,” said Alain Toussaint, a fisherman, his voice low and hoarse. “How do we feed our children now?”

Local emergency coordinators say roads that link villages to hospitals and supply depots are frequently impassable, complicating rescues and supplies. One civil protection worker told me, “When a river jumps its banks here, the map we depend on becomes a myth.”

Not Just Water: The Anatomy of a Disaster

Haiti is no stranger to storms. But the violence of this flooding laid bare a confluence of factors that turn an intense rain event into catastrophe: steep, denuded hillsides; homes built in floodplains because there’s literally nowhere else to go; precarious infrastructure; and a chronic shortage of robust early-warning systems.

Only a sliver of Haiti’s original forest remains—estimates vary, but many experts place forest cover at well under 5% of the island’s original canopy—meaning soils are less able to absorb rainfall and landslides become likelier. Add eroded slopes and unregulated construction, and you have the slow-motion setup for fast-moving water.

Climate scientists have been warning that warming oceans produce more moisture and can intensify the heaviest storms. “The physics is simple,” said Dr. Samira Bello, a climatologist familiar with Caribbean weather trends. “Warmer air holds more water vapor. When that vapor condenses, the rainfall can be off the charts. But vulnerability is the multiplier. Where social and environmental fragility exist, the storm does not need to be extraordinary to be devastating.”

Numbers That Tell a Story

At least 20 fatalities have been confirmed so far by local authorities; dozens more have been reported missing or are unaccounted for. Thousands of people have been displaced, sleeping in makeshift shelters or crowded into public buildings. Hospitals report surge admissions for hypothermia, trauma from collapses, and gastrointestinal illnesses linked to contaminated water.

Haiti’s population is about 11.6 million people, concentrated in both dense urban areas and scattered rural communities, many of which lack reliable infrastructure. Poverty rates remain high, and public services are stretched thin — a reality that turns weather events into social crises.

Immediate Needs

Clean water and water purification supplies to prevent waterborne disease outbreaks
Emergency shelter materials and blankets for families sleeping in the open
Food assistance and cash support so families can repair and replace lost assets
Medical teams and supplies to treat injuries and prevent the spread of infections
Clearing of roads and restoration of communications networks to reach isolated communities

Voices in the Flood

Across the makeshift camps, you hear a mix of anger, fatigue, and stubborn hope. “This rain is not only water,” said Father Jean-Baptiste, who is coordinating a small relief effort from his parish hall. “It is history. It returns old wounds and makes them fresh.”

And then there are the quiet practical pleas: for a truck to bring drinking water; for a roof to keep the next storm out. “We need jobs, real drainage, places for our children to play that are not flood zones,” said Nadège Laurent, a community organizer. “Aid helps today. Resilience is what will keep us safe tomorrow.”

Why This Matters Beyond Haiti

When a hurricane barrels into Haiti and leaves death and displacement behind, it is the culmination of global and local factors: global heating that fuels extreme weather; economic systems that leave some nations with fragile infrastructure; local governance challenges born of decades of political upheaval and underinvestment. In short, tragedies like this are local in impact but global in causation.

What happens in Haiti matters to the international community not just because of humanitarian obligation, but because the same patterns repeat in places from Mozambique to Puerto Rico. Investment in adaptation and resilient infrastructure can reduce the human cost of storms. Early-warning systems, reforestation, and planned relocation away from the most exposed floodplains are not silver bullets—but they are tangible, difficult, necessary work.

Moving Forward: Aid, Accountability, and Reconstruction

International NGOs are mobilizing, national authorities are pleading for logistics support, and communities continue to improvise. Yet aid alone cannot rebuild what is essentially a system that has been eroded over decades. “We need sustained funding, but we also need local leadership and good governance,” said Sophie Martel, a humanitarian coordinator with long experience in the Caribbean. “Too often, responses are episodic. The flood recedes, coffins are lowered, and the world’s attention moves on. But the conditions that allowed the deaths remain.”

There are small but meaningful successes: community groups teaching flood-resistant building techniques, reforestation projects gaining traction in some areas, and local radio stations broadcasting weather alerts in Creole. These efforts whisper a more hopeful future—one in which Haitians have more control over their environment and destinies.

What Can Readers Do?

That question matters. It’s easy to feel far away and helpless. But there are concrete ways to respond:

Donate to reputable relief organizations that have an on-the-ground presence and transparent funding practices.
Support advocacy for climate finance mechanisms that prioritize adaptation for vulnerable countries.
Learn about and amplify Haitian-led initiatives focused on resilience and recovery.

And perhaps most importantly: insist that the conversations about climate responsibility include the nations that bear the brunt of warming they did little to cause. Ask your elected leaders how they plan to back global actions with money, technology, and long-term support.

Leaving the Water Behind

In the days after the storm, community leaders pace through wet streets, tallying losses and measuring what can be salvaged. A boy ducks under a makeshift tarpaulin and stares at the sky — as if it might stop raining just by being looked at hard enough. Around him, people begin to plan, to clear, to rebuild, to argue about priorities in a voice that is equal parts tired and resolute.

Haiti’s toll is counted in numbers for a moment, and then in the texture of daily life that must be put back together. Twenty lives lost is a number that should make us all uncomfortable — a prompt to ask how global systems can be changed so that fewer nations pay such an outsized price when the weather turns wild.

How will we respond when the next storm comes? Will we answer with the same short attention and short funding cycles? Or will this be a turning point toward deeper solidarity and smarter investment? The people in Haiti — and the planet — deserve the latter.

China Confirms Xi and Trump Will Meet in South Korea Tomorrow

hanad

October 29, 2025

China says Xi, Trump to meet in South Korea tomorrow — The meeting will take place on the sidelines of a summit of Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, which is taking place in the city of Gyeongju

A Meeting on the Edge of History: Xi and Trump Land in Gyeongju

The ancient stones of Gyeongju—pagodas, royal tomb mounds and the quiet reach of the Sea of Japan—never expected to play host to a 21st-century drama. Yet here they are: a warren of motorcades, bulletproof glass, translators’ booths and a choreography of handshakes that could reshape economies, alliances and a volatile peninsula.

On the sidelines of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit, China’s president and the United States’ president are scheduled to sit across a table tomorrow. It’s the kind of meeting that pundits live for and ordinary people watch with equal parts curiosity and suspicion. Will it produce a breakthrough or merely another line in the ledger of history?

What’s on the Table

The headlines will say “trade,” “tariffs” and “fentanyl,” and they won’t be wrong. Washington has long linked commercial tensions to broader geopolitical strain: tariffs imposed since 2018 still hang over hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods, while American authorities press China to clamp down on precursors and supply chains that feed a deadly flow of synthetic opioids.

“This isn’t just about levies and lists,” said Hana Park, a Seoul-based analyst at an economic think tank, over a steaming bowl of juk in a nearby guesthouse. “It’s about trust. Trade is the visible scoreboard, but what both sides really test is whether they can rely on one another when it matters.”

Behind closed doors, officials say the agenda stretches beyond customs duties. Climate cooperation, technology restrictions, and maritime security are almost certainly part of the conversation. Outside the halls, ordinary Gyeongju residents are trying to read the tea leaves.

Numbers that Matter

The U.S. and China trade in goods and services amounts to hundreds of billions of dollars each year; their economic relationship is woven through global supply chains that touch everything from smartphones to ship engines. And on the human-cost side of the ledger: U.S. health authorities have reported more than 100,000 overdose deaths in a year in recent recent years, much of the surge driven by fentanyl and its analogues—facts that give weight to Washington’s urgency in raising the issue.

Voices from the Ground

Outside the summit compound, market vendors adjusted their tarpaulins, watched the flags go up and offered a kind of patient skepticism. “We see leaders come and go,” said Mr. Kim, who sells dried persimmons near the Bulguksa temple. “If a meeting gives people work, good. If it only makes news, not so good.”

A taxi driver in nearby Pohang, eyes bright with the blunt pragmatism of someone who makes his living by the hour, summed up what many feel: “I don’t care about the speeches. I want cheaper parts for my car,” he said, laughing. “But sure—less tension makes business easier.”

Even so, residents are not naïve. A young postgraduate student, Minji, paused between study sessions to say, “One handshake won’t undo years of mistrust. But maybe it starts a different kind of conversation.”

Diplomacy’s Complicated Neighbour: North Korea

Mountains and a heavily fortified demilitarised zone separate the joy of Gyeongju’s heritage sites from the raw geopolitical stakes of the peninsula. That tension made a cameo in the summit drama: President Trump had hoped to secure an ad hoc meeting with North Korea’s leader, a reprise of the theatrical encounters of the past. It didn’t materialize.

“We tried to arrange timing,” Trump told reporters, keeping his characteristic bluntness. “I know Kim Jong Un. I’d like to meet.”

Pyongyang, for its part, did not publicly respond to the invitation. Earlier, the regime tested cruise missiles off its western coast in a message to what state media called its “enemies,” a reminder that diplomacy and saber-rattling often run in parallel.

To many observers, the arms tests are less a surprise than a constant variable. “North Korea uses strategic signaling to keep leverage, domestically and internationally,” said Dr. Elena Marquez, a Korea specialist at a London university. “Their characterization of a nuclear program as ‘irreversible’ changed the stakes years ago.”

Echoes of Panmunjom

It isn’t a blank slate. The memory of three summit meetings between Trump and Kim—most famously the impromptu handshake at Panmunjom where an American president briefly set foot on North Korean soil—still lingers. Those meetings produced photo opportunities, high drama, and ultimately an impasse over denuclearisation and sanctions relief. The fault lines from that failed bargain are still visible today.

Why Gyeongju Matters Beyond the Handshake

The setting is no accident. Gyeongju is an understated reminder that geopolitics sits atop layers of history. The city was once the capital of the Silla kingdom, a place where diplomacy, culture and trade mingled to create an extraordinary civilization. There’s a poetic symmetry to world leaders arriving in a town whose identity was forged by centuries of exchange.

But the practical implications are immediate. A thaw—or a worsening—between Beijing and Washington affects supply chains, global markets and regional alliances. It shifts strategies in capitals from Canberra to Ankara, from Tokyo to Toronto. A modest concession in tariff policy might lower costs for manufacturers; conversely, a breakdown could raise prices and accelerate companies’ plans to diversify production away from China.

What to Watch for Tomorrow

Expect terse public statements about goodwill and “in-depth” discussions. Expect no immediate miracle. Expect signaling—photos, a planned walk, short handshakes—that media outlets will parse for hours. And for those who live in border towns, ports, and factory towns across the Pacific, the outcome will be less about images than about downstream decisions: pricing, hiring, investment.

So ask yourself: what do you want diplomacy to deliver? Is it fewer headlines and more predictability? Stronger enforcement against flows of lethal drugs? A framework that makes technology competition less chaotic? There’s no single answer, but how the Xi–Trump encounter unfolds will tell us something about the direction the world’s two biggest powers are headed.

A Fragile Moment, A Global Ripple

When the leaders sit down, at least one thing will be clear: global affairs are rarely tidy. They are messy, human, full of trade-offs. But gestures matter—especially when the balance between conflict and cooperation can be narrowed by a conversation.

“Diplomacy is like pottery,” said an elder tour guide who paused beneath a ginkgo tree near the royal tumuli. “You cannot rush it; you must shape it gently. Sometimes it cracks. Sometimes it becomes something beautiful.”

Tomorrow’s meeting will not settle everything. But in a world of fast-moving crises and entrenched rivalries, even a small step can set a new rhythm. Watch closely. The ripples will be felt far beyond the ancient stones of Gyeongju.

Storm Melissa Strikes Cuba Just Hours After Ravaging Jamaica

hanad

October 29, 2025

Melissa hits Cuba hours after devastating Jamaica — The Rio Cobre bursts its banks near St Catherine in Jamaica

After the Eye: Jamaica, Cuba and the Wake of Hurricane Melissa

The morning after felt like a country holding its breath. In Kingston, the air was heavy with the scent of salt, soaked plywood and gasoline. Streets that yesterday thrummed with radio DJs and roadside markets were littered with corrugated tin and palm fronds. Mango trees lay broken like discarded umbrellas. Houses that had stood for generations now gaped, their insides exposed to a gray sky.

“It has been a very difficult early morning,” Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel wrote on social media as Melissa battered Cuba’s southern coast, urging people to stay sheltered while officials counted losses. The scene in Jamaica was no less stark. Prime Minister Andrew Holness warned of damaged hospitals, flooded parishes and a long road to recovery: “There will be a lot of work to do,” he told an international broadcaster, reflecting the grim reality on the ground.

The Facts: A Storm of Uncommon Ferocity

Meteorologists say Melissa was not an ordinary hurricane. At its fiercest over Jamaica, Melissa packed sustained winds estimated as high as 297 km/h, a velocity that places it among the most intense Atlantic storms on record. An analysis of NOAA data found that the storm matched the atmospheric pressure recorded in the notorious 1935 Labor Day Hurricane—about 892 millibars—making Melissa one of a tiny number of storms to reach such depths of pressure.

The Miami-based National Hurricane Center (NHC) reported Melissa weakened to a still-dangerous Category 3 as it moved into Cuban territory, but the imprint left in Jamaica—especially in parishes such as St Elizabeth—was immediate and devastating. Officials said more than 500,000 residents were without power and entire coastal districts were “underwater.”

AccuWeather ranked Melissa as the third most intense hurricane observed in the Caribbean in modern records, behind Wilma (2005) and Gilbert (1988). The World Meteorological Organization issued a stark warning of storm surges up to 4 meters, a reality that in low-lying coastal zones quickly becomes lethal.

Numbers that Matter

Estimated evacuations in eastern Cuba: ~735,000 people
People ordered to move to higher ground in Cuba: ~500,000
Jamaicans reported without power in some areas: >500,000
Tourists in Jamaica at the time: ~25,000
UN-organized airlift planned: 2,000 relief kits from Barbados
Initial storm-related deaths reported across the region before Jamaica hit: 7 (3 in Jamaica, 3 in Haiti, 1 in the Dominican Republic)

On the Ground: Stories from Streets and Shelters

“Parts of our roof were blown off and other parts caved in and the entire house was flooded,” said Lisa Sangster, a Kingston resident whose courtyard now served as a sort of informal receiving station for neighbors. “Outside structures like our outdoor kitchen, dog kennel and farm animal pens were also gone, destroyed.”

In St Elizabeth, often called Jamaica’s breadbasket, farms lay submerged, sugarcane bent like reeds. “We plant to feed the island,” said Desmond McKenzie, a local MP who described the parish as “underwater.” “The damage to Saint Elizabeth is extensive. It’s going to affect food supply and livelihoods for months if not years.”

At an emergency shelter in Santiago de Cuba, volunteers handed out roasted breadfruit, bottles of water and makeshift blankets. There, an elderly woman named Ana clutched a photograph of her grandchildren and said, “We have faced storms before, but the noise of this one felt like the sea wanted to come in and take us.” These are the small human details that don’t make the early, stark headlines: the way neighbors pull tarpaulins over a ruined roof, the hush at once-boisterous rum shops, the decision to leave a family cat behind because there wasn’t room in the evacuation truck.

Why This Storm Feels Different

Climate scientists are blunt: storms like Melissa are becoming more frequent, more intense and—crucially—slower moving. A hurricane that creeps, dumps more rain and prolongs battering winds over the same piece of land. The result is catastrophic flooding, landslides in the highlands and the collapse of fragile infrastructure.

“Human-caused climate change is making all the worst aspects of Hurricane Melissa even worse,” said climate scientist Daniel Gilford. “Warmer seas feed greater energy into these storms. They hold more moisture, travel slower, and strike with a violence our communities are increasingly ill-equipped to absorb.”

Caribbean leaders have, for years, implored wealthy, high-emitting nations for more than momentary aid: for climate finance, for debt relief, for the kind of long-term investment that helps islands rebuild stronger and adapt for the future. After Melissa, those calls will only grow louder.

Questions We Should Be Asking

How can small island states build resilient infrastructure when budgets are squeezed and storms become costlier?
Are tourism-dependent economies sufficiently protected when the very weather that brings visitors can also dismantle livelihoods overnight?
What does “reparations” look like in practical terms—grants, technology transfer, debt swaps for resilience projects?

Immediate Response and the Long Road Ahead

Relief efforts are mobilizing. The Jamaican Red Cross was distributing water and hygiene kits even as roads remained impassable in many places. The United Nations announced plans for an airlift of relief kits once flights could resume, and other international partners have promised aid to Cuba, Haiti and the Dominican Republic.

But aid is only the first step. Rebuilding will require coordinated planning, heavy investment in resilient housing, restoration of power grids and a transformation in how these nations manage land and coastal development. “We need resources not just to patch roofs, but to fundamentally rethink our infrastructure,” said Dr. Marisol Reyes, a Caribbean disaster risk expert. “Otherwise, storm after storm will simply wash away whatever we reconstruct.”

What You Can Do—And What This Means for the Planet

Watching images of Melissa’s aftermath, it’s natural to feel helpless. Yet there are concrete ways to respond. Donate to credible relief organizations operating locally. Support policy efforts aimed at climate justice. Remember that climate events in distant places are not isolated tragedies; they are signals of a warming planet that touches agriculture, migration and global supply chains everywhere.

How do you imagine your community holding up if a similar storm came? What would you prioritize—shelter, power, food security? The answers matter, because resilience isn’t just built by governments; it’s built by neighborhoods, families and the everyday decisions we make about preparedness and solidarity.

In the weeks to come, the true toll of Melissa will become clearer—how many roofs were lost, how many small businesses will never reopen, how many school terms will be disrupted. For now, the Caribbean mourns and starts the work of holding itself together: neighbors handing out hot food, volunteers clearing debris, governments tallying damage and the world watching—and, one hopes, learning.

1...414243...164 Page 42 of 164