Drone Strikes on Sudanese Kindergarten and Hospital Leave Dozens Dead

December 7, 2025

Drone strikes on Sudan kindergarten, hospital kill dozens — Sudanese women who fled El-Fasher wait to receive humanitarian aid at camp for displaced people (file image)

Bombed Playground: A Kindergarten, a Hospital — and a Country Unraveling

There are sights that refuse to leave you: a tiny shoe on scorched earth, crayons melted into the dirt, a stroller turned on its side like a blown-over toy. In Kalogi, a town in Sudan’s South Kordofan, those images are now seared into the memories of people who once woke to the call to prayer and the clatter of market life, not the whine of paramilitary drones.

On a dry Thursday, according to local officials reachable only through a fragile Starlink link, three strikes ripped through Kalogi. First the kindergarten, then the hospital, and then — mercilessly — a third strike as family members and neighbours rushed in to pull children from the rubble. The head of the local administrative unit, Essam al-Din al-Sayed, told reporters the pattern bore the mark of an attack meant to inflict maximum human suffering.

Numbers that don’t add up — and the silence that grows between them

In the fog of war, figures become battlegrounds of their own. UNICEF’s office in Sudan reported that more than 10 children between the ages of five and seven were killed. The foreign ministry aligned with the army released a much higher toll: 79 dead, including 43 children. Independent verification remains agonizingly difficult — communications are sporadic, humanitarian access is tightly restricted, and security is far from assured.

“Killing children in their school is a horrific violation of children’s rights,” said Sheldon Yett, UNICEF’s Representative for Sudan, in a statement that echoed around humanitarian circles. “All parties must stop attacks on civilians and allow unfettered access for aid.”

There is a grim arithmetic at play: since the conflict erupted in April 2023, tens of thousands have died and nearly 12 million people — roughly a quarter of Sudan’s population — have been forced from their homes. In just the past month, the United Nations says more than 40,000 people fled Kordofan alone as fighting intensified. These are not abstract statistics. They are children who no longer go to school, farmers who no longer sow, markets that lie empty at dawn.

Who attacked Kalogi — and why this region?

Local officials blamed the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), the powerful paramilitary group that has been at the centre of Sudan’s catastrophe, and its ally, the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement-North (SPLM-N) faction led by Abdelaziz al-Hilu. The RSF, which has been waging an offensive across western Sudan in recent months, seized El-Fasher in October — the army’s last big foothold in Darfur — and appears to be pushing eastward into the oil-bearing Kordofan states.

Military analysts say the RSF’s strategy is to sever the army’s defensive arc around central Sudan and to position itself to contest major cities, including Khartoum. “Control of these towns chokes off supply lines,” said one regional analyst who monitors military movements in Sudan. “It’s about logistics, but also symbolism: seize the towns and you seize legitimacy in the eyes of some locals.”

Oil, alliances, and the geopolitics of a collapsed state

Kordofan’s soil is not just sand and seed; it is economically strategic. Oil fields dot the wider region, and whoever controls transport routes and pumping stations wields leverage far beyond the town square. International mediators — the United States, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt — offered a truce plan that the RSF said it would accept in November. Yet even with diplomatic manoeuvring, there has been little on-the-ground de-escalation.

“There is no sign of de-escalation,” UN human rights chief Volker Türk warned, noting “clear preparations for intensified hostilities” that threaten an already long-suffering people. The lament is not merely about broken ceasefires. It is about a broader failure of international systems to protect civilians when formal governance collapses and irregular forces carve up territory.

At the heart of Kalogi: faces, voices, and the ragged courage of survival

Amina, who taught at the kindergarten hit in the first strike, speaks in a voice threaded with disbelief and raw grief. “They were coloring,” she says. “One little boy asked me if the planes were angels. I told him they were not. The next minute the roof came down.” She pauses, and a long silence fills the line. “We have no hospitals left that we trust.”

Dr. Mustafa — a surgeon who asked to be identified by his first name only — recounted hauling children into a tent outside a shattered hospital ward. “We had four stretchers and a bucket of antiseptic,” he said. “We worked until our hands trembled. We tried to stop the bleeding, to stop the sound of crying. What we couldn’t stop was the fear in the mothers’ eyes.”

These are the testimonies that anchor the wider geopolitical narrative in human terms. They remind us that war is not a chess game of generals, but a daily grind of survival, where civilians watch passports burn and recipes are shared to stretch a bag of grain over a family of seven.

What this means for humanitarian aid — and for the wider region

Humanitarian agencies are sounding the alarm. Blocked roads, denied visas, and insecurity make it near impossible to reach many enclaves around Sudan. Aid workers say the destruction of medical facilities and schools multiplies suffering in ways that will last for generations: untreated injuries lead to disability; missed education becomes a permanent scar.

“Once a school is bombed, children stop learning — and the social fabric frays,” said a humanitarian coordinator who has worked in Sudan for nearly a decade. “You don’t just rebuild walls. You try to rebuild trust.”

Nearly 12 million people internally displaced or forced to flee since April 2023 (UN estimates)
More than 40,000 people fled Kordofan in the past month alone (UN)
Tens of thousands killed since the conflict began (various humanitarian sources)

Beyond Kalogi: a warning from history

When violence repeatedly strikes schools and hospitals, it is not accidental. Targeting civilian infrastructure has become a hallmark of some modern conflicts. It is strategic cruelty: break the social institutions and you break the community. The international community’s attempts at mediation, fragile and halting, face the harder task of not just stopping guns but restoring institutions.

Is that even possible when entire cities have been reshaped by displacement and trauma? How do you reconstruct a classroom where a child died clutching a math book? These are questions that transcend Kalogi and speak to conflicts from Syria to Ethiopia, from Yemen to parts of the Sahel.

What we can watch for — and what we must demand

Keep an eye on three things: humanitarian access (are aid convoys allowed in?), independent verification (can reporters and watchdogs enter to confirm claims?), and the care of survivors (are hospitals resupplied, are children offered psychosocial support?). If these fail, then the numbers we are seeing today will be the quiet prelude to a deeper collapse of social life in affected regions.

We are watching lives being unmade in real time. The question for readers — and for the world — is whether we will let these events pass as distant tragedies or whether we will demand stronger protections for civilians, better mediation, and swift aid corridors so that no child dies alone under a sky once known for its morning call to prayer and the tender chaos of playground laughter.

In Kalogi, neighbors gather to bury the dead, to barter for disinfectant and to sort through what remains. They are telling the same story told across war zones: in rubble, small acts of compassion persist. As one local elder put it between sips of sweet tea, “We are broken, yes. But our hands still reach out to each other.” What will our hands reach out to do?

US lays out plan to redirect Europe’s trajectory

hanad

December 7, 2025

US sets out stall for correcting 'Europe's trajectory' — According to US President Trump's National Security Strategy, the main problem to be addressed by the US in Europe is 'civilisational erasure'

The New American Playbook for Europe: A Cultural Compass or a Cold Strategic Compass?

On a gray morning in Dublin, a bartender wipes a glass and shrugs at the headline on his phone: “U.S. Unveils New Security Strategy — Europe in the Crosshairs.” Around him, the pub smells of peat and wet coats, and patrons debate politics the way people breathe — without thinking, until a crisis requires the lungs to work harder.

This latest American strategy — which landed in policy circles like a thunderclap — does something different from the last several decades of U.S. foreign policy. It speaks less of hardware and alliances and more of histories, families, cultural inheritance and national character. It frames Europe’s most urgent vulnerabilities as cultural rather than merely military or economic. That shift has ripples, and they extend far beyond Brussels and Washington: into kitchen tables, university lecture halls, border checkpoints and voting booths.

What’s in the Document — and Why It Feels Different

The paper reads like part geopolitical roadmap and part civics sermon. Instead of a string of military deployments and trade initiatives, it foregrounds themes like identity, demographic trends and “cultural resilience.” It urges the United States to nudge — and sometimes pressure — European nations to “reclaim” a particular sense of themselves, to reverse migration flows, and to shore up what the authors call national “character.”

“This is not a minor course correction — it’s a reorientation of the terms we use,” said a senior analyst at a Washington-based strategy institute. “Foreign policy used to default to alliances and economics. This one defaults to civilization and culture.”

For many readers, the language is jarring. It carries with it echoes of debates that have roiled Europe’s politics for a decade: populist calls to restore national pride, anxieties about migration and identity, and the rise of political movements that insist culture must be central to statecraft. For others, it appears as an American attempt to shore up fragile allies and to preempt geopolitical shifts.

Scenes from the Continent: How Ordinary People See It

In central Warsaw, a baker named Anna K. glances up from the oven: “We want peace, and we want to care for our neighborhood,” she says. “But we don’t want strangers deciding how we remember our past.” Her words cut to the heart of the document’s proposal — that memory and tradition are strategic assets.

Siobhán Murphy, a history teacher in Galway, worries about external influence in domestic debates. “There’s a taste of patronizing paternalism,” she said. “If Washington starts telling Dublin which parts of its history to love, that’s worrying.”

Meanwhile, a Brussels policy aide, speaking on condition of anonymity, described an unusual combination of gratitude and unease in European capitals: “We welcome support against coercive forces, but we bristle at cultural prescriptions.”

Numbers That Ground the Conversation

Statistics make the stakes tangible. Europe is aging: the median age across the European Union is roughly in the early 40s and the fertility rate sits well below the replacement mark (the EU average hovers near 1.5 children per woman). Populations are shifting as migration reshapes cities and regions. At the same time, the transatlantic economy remains a giant: trade and investment flows between the United States and Europe represent significant portions of global commerce, and Europe still houses many of the world’s leading research institutions and cultural landmarks.

These demographic and economic facts are precisely why the strategy sees cultural and population trends as strategic concerns. The argument goes: if identity shifts, then political preferences, alliances and defence commitments might too.

Policy Priorities — A Shortlist with Big Consequences

Here are the main policy thrusts the paper advances — summarized from the document’s core arguments and the discussions it has provoked:

Encourage European nations to strengthen national identity and cultural institutions as a bulwark against outside influence.
Support policies that slow or reverse certain migration trends, described in the document as a matter of demographic and strategic risk.
Push Europe to assume greater responsibility for its own defense and reduce dependence on external guarantees.
Promote commercial and cultural ties with nations in Central, Eastern and Southern Europe to build aligned blocs.
Deter further expansion of alliance structures where expansion could draw the United States into conflicts peripheral to core American interests.

Why This Matters: The Geopolitical Stakes

At first glance, this may seem like an intra-European argument amplified by American diplomats. But the document carefully links cultural trajectories to geopolitical outcomes: which way a country leans nationally could determine whether it views the U.S. as a partner or as an alien actor, whether it sees Russia or China as the primary threat, and whether it will commit to collective defense.

“We have to treat culture as infrastructure,” a European political scientist told me. “Infrastructure decays slowly but collapses quickly if neglected.” That metaphor explains why the strategy is pressing for proactive policies — cultural investments, education and media support — not just tanks and tariffs.

Critics, Allies, and the Risk of Misreading Intent

Not everyone accepts the premise. Civil society groups warn that framing migration as a civilizational threat fuels exclusion and xenophobia. Human rights advocates note that demographic change is a global phenomenon tied to economics and family policy more than to conspiracies. “If a strategy prescribes who counts as ‘European’,” said an NGO director in Berlin, “it’s skating on thin ice toward discrimination.”

Conversely, leaders of nationalist parties in several European countries have greeted the strategy with optimism, seeing validation of arguments they have long made: that nations should prioritize cultural cohesion and protect borders.

Where This Fits in a Bigger Picture

Ask yourself: what is the role of foreign policy? Is it to secure strategic advantage in a world of great-power rivalry, or to export particular ideas about what constitutes a nation? The answer is both — and therein lies the tension. After decades of debates about globalization, free trade and multilateral institutions, this document pivots the conversation back toward nationhood and cultural continuity.

That pivot is not confined to Europe. The strategy folds other regions into its logic: a renewed focus on the Americas’ sphere of influence, a tougher stance on China’s economic reach in Asia, and a shift in Africa toward investment rather than ideological reform. But it is Europe — with its dense history, powerful institutions and transatlantic ties — where the strategy’s cultural arguments feel most combustible.

Final Thought: A Continent Between History and Strategy

Standing in a museum in Paris last week, watching children sketch soldiers and saints, I couldn’t help but think about the strange alchemy of history and policy. Nations are made of stories as much as they are of arsenals. The new American strategy treats those stories as strategic assets to cultivate or defend.

That raises a question for readers everywhere: do we want geopolitics to be about material interests alone, or are our histories and identities legitimate objects of international strategy? The answer will shape not only diplomatic cables in Washington, but kitchens in Dublin, schools in Warsaw, and neighborhoods across Europe for decades to come.

Greek coastguard finds 17 migrants dead aboard boat off Crete

hanad

December 7, 2025

17 found dead in migrant vessel off Crete - coastguard — The Greek coastguard said two survivors are in a critical condition in hospital (stock image)

Nightmare at Sea: Seventeen Lives Found Aboard a Drifting Vessel Off Crete

There is a particular hush that falls over a harbour when something terrible has been found at sea — a quiet that asks the wind for answers and the waves for mercy. On a chill morning this past Saturday, that silence was broken 26 nautical miles southwest of Crete, where rescuers discovered a partially deflated vessel adrift with seventeen men dead inside and two survivors clinging to the thin edge between life and death.

A Turkish cargo ship first spotted the boat and raised the alarm. Within hours, two Greek coastguard vessels, a Frontex patrol ship, a Frontex aircraft and a Super Puma helicopter descended on the scene. But for a group of young men — many, local officials say, apparently in their twenties — the intervention came too late.

What rescuers found

“We found the vessel taking on water and deflated on both sides,” a coastguard spokeswoman told reporters. “Seventeen people were already deceased when we arrived. Two survivors were in critical condition and taken straight to hospital.” She added that coroners would carry out autopsies to establish the precise causes of death, but that dehydration and exposure were being considered.

The survivors, according to officials, described a cramped boat, violent weather and a shortage of food and water. “There was no shelter, no way to cover ourselves,” one survivor later told medical staff, his hands still shaking. “We tried to balance, but the wind and waves took everything.” Their faces were hidden from cameras; in the hospital corridor a nurse muttered, “They look exhausted beyond what words can tell.”

Faces and voices from a Cretan port

In Ierapetra, the small port town that would receive the news, the story landed like a stone tossed into a still pond. “They were all young men,” Manolis Frangoulis, the mayor of Ierapetra, told gathered reporters. “This is not a statistic for us. These were sons, brothers. When you see how they died — crowded into a deflated rubber boat — you feel helpless.”

On the quay, fishermen in oilskin jackets and weather-cracked faces pulled nets but watched the authorities’ boats with the same quiet horror as everyone else. “We sail these seas every day,” said Yannis, a fisherman who asked that his surname not be used. “Once the weather turns, you know how it can punish you. But you don’t expect to find youth turned to silence like that.” He spat, as is the habit among the old salt, and folded his thick hands. “It could be any of our boys,” he said.

Local tavernas — the blue-and-white facades, the smell of grilled fish and lemon — were subdued. Where late-afternoon laughter typically bounces across the harbor, there were now whispered questions: where were they headed, who had arranged the crossing, what will happen next?

Routes, risks and the human calculus

For many migrants, Crete has become the gateway to the European Union. In recent months, more people crossing from Libya have targeted the island as an entry point. According to the UN refugee agency UNHCR, more than 16,770 asylum seekers have arrived in Crete since the start of the year, a surge that tracks the shifting patterns of smugglers and the logic of risk that drives desperate people toward shorter sea legs and cheaper — and often deadly — vessels.

“Smugglers constantly recalibrate,” explained Dr. Elena Petrou, a migration researcher based in Athens. “When routes become more policed, or when sea conditions change, smugglers shift departure points and target different landing spots. Crete’s geography — remote stretches of coastline and a long, porous sea frontier — makes it both attractive and tragic as a pathway.”

It is easy to talk about numbers and routes until you meet the people making the crossings. The young men found off Crete were among tens of thousands this year alone who have chosen, or been forced, onto these rubber boats — each passenger carrying a complex mix of hope, fear and calculation.

Blaming the sea, or the system?

Weather clearly played a role in this case, rescuers said, but weather is only one of a constellation of factors that produce tragedies at sea. Austerity and conflict in origin countries, closed legal pathways to asylum, and the ruthless economics of smuggling create a market where overloaded dinghies and unseaworthy vessels are the norm.

“If we are to prevent more bodies washing up at our shores, we need both immediate rescue capacity and long-term political will,” said Maria Kanelopoulou, director of a Mediterranean relief NGO. “That means more search-and-rescue resources, safer legal routes for asylum, and international pressure to dismantle trafficking networks. Otherwise, the sea will keep delivering us tragedies like this.”

Frontex’s presence in the region — aircraft and vessels among them — is meant to bolster border control and search-and-rescue capacity. Yet agencies and governments wrestle with an uncomfortable duality: stronger controls can deter crossings but can also push migrants into even riskier channels. Who, then, bears responsibility when a boat drifts and harvesting lives?

Questions that won’t go away

What happens to those who die at sea — beyond the formalities of autopsies and paperwork? Which nations will examine the push factors behind these departures? And how many more early-morning alarms will sound before meaningful policy change reduces the human cost?

“Every time I hear of bodies at sea, I ask myself if we have learned anything at all from past tragedies,” said Anna, a teacher from Heraklion who volunteers with an integration group. “We rush to retrieve, we hold memorials, and then the headlines move on. But people don’t stop fleeing just because we’re tired of their stories.”

Beyond the headlines: a shared responsibility

The faces of the dead are likely to remain as anonymous names in coroner reports: young men, described as such by local officials. Yet their anonymity underscores a more profound issue — the ways in which global systems render certain lives expendable in the pursuit of borders and deterrence.

The sea where they perished is both boundary and bridge. It separates states and connects continents. It is indifferent to human law and yet often where international commitments come most sharply into focus. Will the discovery off Crete be another episode in a grim, recurring pattern — or a catalyst for change?

As the island returns to its ordinary rhythms — fishermen hauling nets, children playing near the harbor, restaurants filling for the evening — the questions linger like a salty fog. What will we do with these questions? Will we answer them with policy, compassion, and durable alternatives to perilous crossings, or with the quiet resignation of those who have watched too many tragedies unfold?

For the families who will now wait for autopsy reports and for names to be confirmed, headlines are cold comfort. For the rest of us, the challenge is simple and unnerving: to look, to remember, and to decide whether the next time a boat drifts in the Mediterranean we will be better prepared — not just to rescue, but to prevent.

Sarkozy to Publish Prison Diary Detailing His Time Behind Bars

hanad

December 7, 2025

Sarkozy to release diary from time spent in prison — Former French president Nicolas Sarkozy was released from prison last month pending an appeal

Locked Behind Glass: Nicolas Sarkozy’s Short, Grey Stay and a Book That Wants to Explain It

Imagine a room the size of a small studio apartment where time is measured not in calendars but in the scraping of a tray at mealtimes and the slow, stubborn blink of a fluorescent light. That was the stage set in October for one of contemporary France’s most improbable scenes: a former president, 70 years old, learning how the world looks from the other side of a barred window.

Nicolas Sarkozy’s three-week imprisonment — brief, intense, and public — has become more than a legal footnote. It is now the spine of a 216-page memoir that he has titled Diary of a Prisoner, due on December 10. The book, portions of which have already made their way into French newsrooms, offers a close-up of a man who once strode across international summits and presidential palaces, reduced for a handful of days to the elemental rhythms of incarceration: food, light, silence, prayer.

From Élysée to La Santé

Sarkozy, who led France from 2007 to 2012, was convicted over allegations that his 2007 campaign benefited from funds channelled by Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi. The court handed him a five-year sentence. He served 20 days behind the walls of La Santé, the notorious Parisian prison that has housed names and secrets since the 19th century, before being released under restrictions after judicial reassurances that he posed no flight risk.

“La Santé is a place that makes everyone smaller,” a former prison nurse told me, speaking anonymously — partly out of habit, partly out of caution. “You enter a cell and your titles fall away. Not everyone survives that humbling.”

The prison experience was hardly cinematic in the cinematic sense. Sarkozy writes of a life reduced to sharp, mundane details: a diet of dairy, cereal bars, bottled water and occasional sweets; a daily confinement of twenty-three hours; the company of two security officers who shadowed him more as duty than as camaraderie. Days, he says, were “grey” — a word he returns to often — as if the color of the walls had seeped into his perception of everything.

Prayer, Reflection, and a Small Plywood Table

One image in the memoir feels strangely intimate: after watching a football match on television, he knelt to pray. That detail is raw because it is unexpectedly human. There is no pomp in the gesture, no audience. It’s a private appeal — a ritual grasping for meaning in a place where meaning is rationed.

“It was like learning a language I thought I had left behind,” Sarkozy writes in passages that read as notes from a man trying to translate public power into private endurance. He claims to have written most of the book by hand, at a tiny plywood table, a ballpoint pen scratching daily into pages that would later stitch together his account of isolation and introspection.

“There is a false glamour to the notion that power shields you from ordinary pain,” a political sociologist in Paris told me. “Prison exposes the fragility of institutions and, by extension, the people who once wielded them. When a leader goes to jail, the country watches more than the courtroom; it watches itself.”

Voices from the Street and the Cell

Outside the stone facades of neighborhoods near the prison, conversation took the shape of rumor, curiosity, and a strange mixture of schadenfreude and melancholy. A boulanger on a corner near Montparnasse poured croissants and offered a short verdict: “It’s good for democracy — everyone should feel the law, even the powerful.”

A middle-aged woman sipping coffee at a nearby café was less sanguine. “He’s a man with years of public weight. Prison is a spectacle. But I worry about the politics this will feed — those who use these moments to score points.”

Inside La Santé, inmates are a disparate chorus whose voices rarely reach newspapers. One of them, a man serving time for a non-political offense, said calmly, “I don’t care about his name. When you’re here, everyone has the same light. You eat when they tell you to, you sleep when they say it’s night. Titles mean nothing.”

What This Means for French Politics

That conversation ripples beyond caricatures and gossip. Sarkozy remains, despite legal troubles, a significant figure on France’s right. He still has sway over opinion-makers and party structures; his voice is not one that simply fades. The memoir — a personal justification, a moral ledger, or an attempt at historical framing depending on who you ask — will likely be read as a bid to shape that legacy.

“This book is politics of a particular kind,” said a veteran political commentator. “It is a narrative correction. He is saying: here is what happened to me, and here is what it means about justice and the country I served.”

The case itself is not finished. An appeal is set to open in March. For many, the legal process is as consequential as the prison stay. For others, the very image of a former head of state behind bars will be the enduring picture — a symbol of accountability, or of how the right can be wounded and yet remain influential.

Beyond One Man: Justice, Power, and the Public Imagination

There are broader questions here that tug at current global debates. What does it mean when leaders are held to account? How do democracies balance the spectacle of justice with fair trial rights? And what does a short, tightly policed period of incarceration do to the psyche of a man who once negotiated with presidents and prime ministers?

Consider these facts: France’s incarceration rate hovers around a hundred prisoners per 100,000 people — lower than places like the United States but still a reminder of the many lives shaped by confinement. Prisons in France, from the oldest maison centrale to urban jails like La Santé, are crowded with stories that rarely make headlines. When a public figure passes through those corridors, ordinary narratives and extraordinary ones collide.

“People want to see justice served, but they also want it to be just,” a criminal defense lawyer told me. “The law is not a tool for spectacle, and courts must resist the pressure to perform for the gallery.”

Closing Questions

As you read about these weeks of grey and prayer and plywood tables, what do you imagine justice should look like? Should a former president be treated with ordinary penal discipline or protected from it? And what responsibility does the media carry in shaping how we feel about such scenes — do we observe soberly, or do we turn it into theater?

Sarkozy’s Diary of a Prisoner is at once a personal chronicle and a public provocation. Whether it will soften critics, shore up supporters, or simply add another chapter to the long story of power and consequence in France remains to be seen. For now, the image lingers: a man who once reshaped the nation’s public square sitting in a narrow cell, pen in hand, trying to make sense of the small, grey hours.

Six arrested after attack on Irish UNIFIL troops in southern Lebanon

hanad

December 6, 2025

Six arrests after attack on Irish UNIFIL peacekeepers — United Nations peacekeepers patrol with Lebanese army forces in vehicles of UNIFIL near the border with Israel in southern Lebanon

Gunfire on a Quiet Road: What One Evening in South Lebanon Reveals About a Fragile Peace

On a dusky Thursday, as the purple light slid down the hills of southern Lebanon, a routine UN patrol became the latest reminder that calm here is always provisional.

Around 6pm, near the village of Bint Jbeil — a place where olive trees slope toward the Litani River and the Israeli border feels uncomfortably close — six men on three mopeds rode up to a UNIFIL vehicle and opened fire. No one was hurt; one peacekeeper’s words would later be echoed by many in the area: “We felt the bang, the roar, and the weight of what could have been.”

What Happened

Details emerged quickly and, for once, with clarity. UNIFIL reported that about three shots were fired into the rear of an armoured patrol vehicle. The Irish contingent, part of the 127th Infantry Battalion serving with UNIFIL, said their personnel were exposed to “small arms fire” but that all soldiers were “well and accounted for.” The unit executed immediate action drills and returned to Camp Shamrock without casualties.

By the next day Lebanese army intelligence announced it had arrested six suspects believed to be involved. “We will not tolerate attacks on UNIFIL,” an army statement said, underlining the official line that Lebanon sees the mission as vital to stability south of the Litani.

Voices from the Ground

A shopkeeper in Bint Jbeil, wiping dust from a glass display of sweets, summed up local unease: “You hear guns, you get used to the sound, but you never get used to the feeling it brings. Tonight it could have been anyone.”

An Irish soldier, speaking quietly but insistently about training and routine, told a different part of the story: “We train for these moments. We didn’t panic. That discipline saves lives. But it also reminds you why we’re here — because some people think everyone’s day should include violence.”

An analyst in Beirut, who studies UN peacekeeping missions, added perspective: “This incident is small in the scale of battle, but symbolically huge. Attacks on peacekeepers undermine the last neutral spaces in a region marked by proxy conflict and mistrust.”

UNIFIL and Ireland: A Long-running Commitment

UNIFIL — the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon — has been a fixture in this landscape since 1978. Its role has shifted with each flare-up of hostilities, but its core mission has remained: act as a buffer between Lebanese and Israeli forces, monitor the cessation of hostilities, and help stabilize the area.

For Ireland, this mission is particularly resonant. UNIFIL is the longest-running overseas peacekeeping commitment for the Irish Defence Forces, and Irish troops have become a familiar presence in southern Lebanon’s dusty towns and scenic valleys. “We take our role seriously,” a Defence Forces spokesperson said. “Óglaigh na hÉireann deeply condemns any acts of violence against UN personnel.” They also pledged to assist Lebanese authorities with investigations.

Why This Matters

This is not merely a local skirmish. The attack lands against a backdrop of a fragile November 2024 ceasefire that had sought to halt more than a year of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah. The truce, drafted to see Israeli forces withdraw and Hezbollah disarm, has stumbled from the outset. Hezbollah has resisted disarmament, Israel has accused it of rebuilding capabilities, and the two sides continue to exchange fire and recriminations.

And because peacekeeping missions rely on perception — of neutrality, of safety — even a single fired round can ripple outward. When peacekeepers are threatened, their mandate becomes harder to enact; when they are safe, they can act as honest brokers and monitors. Put simply: when UNIFIL works, it reduces the chances of a small incident boiling into a wider conflagration.

Local Color, Local Costs

Walk the streets of villages like Bint Jbeil and you’ll see the textures that make this region so human: a woman bargaining over lemons; children racing through alleys while goats nibble at a sack of grain; a shop radio swapping between Arabic ballads and the dry cadence of a news bulletin. It’s a place where daily life and geopolitics brush together, almost constantly.

For residents, security is not an abstract policy brief — it’s the difference between a shop staying open or a family sleeping in another town. “We want peace so we can plant and harvest,” said an elderly farmer who tended a small grove of olive trees. “Not a peace you read about in papers, but the kind that lets my grandchildren run in the field without worrying about a siren.”

Broader Tendrils: Why the Region Remains Perilous

Beyond the immediate facts — six suspects arrested, no injuries, an Irish battalion unscathed — this incident speaks to deeper currents. The south is a mosaic of competing loyalties: local militia networks, the national Lebanese Army, UN peacekeepers, Israeli defense forces, and proxy relationships with regional powers. Any one misstep can be amplified.

Consider the larger trends: urbanization of conflict, where fighters hide among civilians; the use of small, mobile weapons platforms like mopeds; and the political vacuum that sometimes allows armed groups to act with impunity. These are not unique to Lebanon — they are part of a global pattern where asymmetrical warfare and political fragmentation create gray zones that challenge classical peacekeeping models.

Questions to Ponder

What happens when peacekeepers — designed to be neutral buffers — become targets?
How can international missions adapt to conflicts that are increasingly localized and decentralized?
And how should the world weigh sovereignty, regional influence, and the safety of civilian populations?

What Comes Next

For now, the patrol returned to Camp Shamrock. The Lebanese army has said it will cooperate with investigators and has tried to demonstrate that it can enforce security. UNIFIL and the Irish contingent emphasized the continuation of their duties. “We will keep patrolling,” said an Irish commander. “We will keep trying to hold the space in the middle where things don’t explode.”

But each shot fired at a peacekeeper is a small erosion of faith — faith in treaties, in monitors, in the institutions meant to keep the worst at bay. Peace is not just a signed paper; it’s the confidence that no one will shoot when you are between two armed camps.

So, as you read this from wherever you are — a city apartment, a provincial town, a campus — ask yourself: what does it mean to protect peace in a place where peace is most fragile? And what price are we willing to accept for the neutral hands that try to hold it together?

The patrol’s vehicle bears a scar now — a few bullet holes and a file in an intelligence log. For the people who live around the Litani, and for the Irish soldiers who patrol its roads, the encounter will be another story to tell: of luck, of training, of the precariousness of calm. For the rest of the world, it should be a reminder that peacekeeping is both human work and global responsibility, requiring vigilance, resources, and, above all, political will.

Explained: What Australia’s new social media ban means for users

hanad

December 6, 2025

Watch: Australia's new social media ban explained

A new digital curfew: Australia prepares to turn off the lights for under‑16s

On a humid summer morning in suburban Sydney, 15‑year‑old Maya thumbed through a half‑asleep feed of videos while her brother packed a cricket bag. “It’s the first thing I check,” she said, voice still woolly from sleep. “It’s how I know what’s happening with my friends.”

In four days’ time — on 10 December — Australia is poised to do something no other nation has attempted at scale: ban children under 16 from using mainstream social‑media platforms. The government frames the move as an act of protection. “We cannot outsource our kids’ safety to algorithms and anonymous strangers,” Communications Minister David R., told reporters. “This policy is about rebuilding a safer, childhood space.”

The decision follows a government‑commissioned study showing that 96% of Australian children aged 10–15 had used social media, and that roughly 70% had encountered harmful content at some point. Those figures, stark in the sterile language of policy papers, take on a different tone when you hear them in a classroom or at a beachside café.

How it’s supposed to work — and what that really means

At the heart of the new rules are three levers: platform obligations, age verification, and enforcement. Large apps will be required to block access to accounts for users under 16, or to obtain verified parental consent. Companies face heavy fines for non‑compliance and will be expected to report regularly to the eSafety Commissioner.

Practically, this will mean app stores and social networks introducing age gates that are more than a “How old are you?” checkbox. Expect requests for government ID, digital identity checks, or third‑party verification services. Telcos might also be roped in to flag underage accounts, and payment providers could be asked to confirm parental consent.

“Age verification at scale is not trivial,” said Dr. Aisha Mendes, a cyber‑security specialist at the University of Melbourne. “You’re balancing accuracy with privacy, and any system that asks families for ID opens a host of data‑security and equity problems.”

Voices from the street: parents, teens, teachers

In the inner suburbs of Melbourne, a single mother, Tanya, said she welcomes the move. “My 12‑year‑old was getting sucked into comparison and bullying. If this gives us breathing space, I’m all for it,” she said. “But the government needs to support parents — digital literacy classes, real support, not just a headline.”

Not everyone shares that view. “They’re treating screens like candy — you can just take it away,” sighed Liam, 17, who leads a youth theatre group in Brisbane. “For queer kids, for kids in remote areas, social platforms are lifelines. Where do we send them when they’re 14 and have no local community?”

Teachers report both relief and alarm. “I’ve seen students bullied through closed groups and pressured into dangerous challenges,” said Sarah Nguyen, a high school wellbeing coordinator. “But remote learning and school projects also rely on digital tools. Blanket bans risk cutting off legitimate educational uses.”

Experts sound the cautionary notes

Psychologists point to a complex evidence base linking heavy social‑media use with anxiety, disrupted sleep, and body image concerns among adolescents. “There’s real harm,” said Professor Mark O’Connell, a child psychiatry specialist. “But the solution cannot be a blunt prohibition without investment in mental‑health services and prevention programs.”

Digital‑rights advocates warn of unintended consequences. “When you push activity out of regulated platforms, you push it into encrypted apps, VPNs, or underground servers,” said Priya Raman, director at RightsNet. “Young people are resourceful. They’ll find workarounds, and regulators will be chasing shadows while created more surveillance by design.”

Practical questions the law still must answer

How will the ban affect users who are 15 but care for younger siblings? What about migrant families where children act as interpreters or community liaisons online? What safeguards are there when an app asks for a driver’s licence or passport to prove a child’s age?

Here are the most pressing operational problems regulators will have to address:

Age verification: Can systems be both secure and privacy‑preserving?
Equality: Will disadvantaged or remote youth lose access to support networks?
Enforcement: What penalties and monitoring tools will be used against global tech firms?
Borders and workarounds: How will families using VPNs or overseas app stores be monitored?

Beyond the headlines: cultural texture and local reality

This is a country where childhood summers smell of sunscreen and eucalyptus, and where teenagers trade memes between surf lessons. The announcement has filtered differently through Australia’s urban cafes and its outback towns. In a small coastal community in Far North Queensland, an Aboriginal youth worker, Janelle, worries about cultural consequences. “Our young people use social media to keep kinship ties across long distances,” she said. “You can’t stop that with a policy that doesn’t understand communities.”

In Sydney’s inner west, a grandmother named Mavis told me over flat white coffee that before phones, kids played cricket until dusk. “But we didn’t have predators on the other side of the screen. This is a hard problem,” she said, fingers clasped around the cup.

The global dimension: who else is watching?

Australia’s move is not happening in a vacuum. Ireland has been examining similar restrictions, and platforms such as TikTok have announced they will comply with local laws where required. Tech firms are navigating a patchwork of rules from the EU’s Digital Services Act to national protections for children.

“This is the beginning of a new era in internet governance,” said Dr. Elena Korsakov, a policy researcher at the Global Digital Institute. “Nations are no longer content to leave platform harms to corporate policy. They’re setting red lines. The question is whether this redrawing of the internet will protect children, or simply relocate risk.”

What to watch for on 10 December — and after

Expect lawsuits from tech companies, a scramble among verification providers, and heated debate in the courts and playgrounds alike. Watch for:

Implementation details: who will verify age and how?
Early exemptions or carve‑outs for educational or health services
Data‑privacy implications of large‑scale ID checks
Evidence emerging about whether the measure reduces harm or drives kids elsewhere

Where do we go from here?

There are no easy answers. We can imagine a future where children grow up without being tracked into habits that erode sleep and self‑worth. We can also imagine a future where a ban isolates the most vulnerable.

So I ask you: should the state be the digital nanny, or should it equip parents and communities with the tools to guide children safely through an online world? Is the trade‑off between protection and liberty worth the risks of surveillance, exclusion and fragmented community?

Whichever path Australia takes in the coming days, the decision will be watched around the world. Other nations will measure the policy’s outcomes — the reduction in reports of abuse, the data‑privacy fallout, the legal challenges — and decide whether to follow suit.

For now, Maya says she’ll lose more than a feed: “It’s how I show my art, how I keep in touch when I’m on stage.” Her brother packs the cricket bag, checks his phone anyway, and pockets it like so many teenagers doing the same thing across a sunburnt nation on the cusp of a new digital experiment.

1...414243...211 Page 42 of 211