Taliban Reports Pakistani Forces Killed 10 People in Afghanistan

12
Taliban says 10 killed in Afghanistan by Pakistani forces
A house damaged after an airstrike during cross-border clashes between Afghanistan and Pakistan, in Kabul last month (file image)

The Night the Light Went Out in Gerbzwo

It was midnight when a small, sunbaked village on the edge of Afghanistan’s Khost province became a place where time stopped. Neighbors who had known each other since childhood say they were roused by a roar and then by silence—the house of a man named Wilayat Khan gone in an instant, and with it, the lives of his children and one woman.

The numbers are stark and terrible: nine children—five boys and four girls—and a woman killed, according to the Afghan Taliban’s spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, who posted photographs of the aftermath on the social platform X. Those images are the kind that lodge in your throat: charred masonry, toys scattered like punctuation marks on the earth, and a community trying to make sense of a violence that arrived at their doorstep while they slept.

What Happened — and Where

Local accounts and the Taliban’s statement say the strike took place in the Gerbzwo district of Khost. Mujahid also reported cross-border operations in Kunar and Paktika provinces, where four civilians were injured. Pakistan’s military and foreign ministry did not respond when journalists sought comment outside business hours, and government spokespeople have not yet issued a public explanation for the attack.

These incidents come on the heels of a suicide bombing targeting Pakistani security forces in a border province, and follow another deadly blast in Islamabad earlier this month that claimed 12 lives and was claimed by the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), an insurgent group that shares ideological ties with the Afghan Taliban.

Timeline at a Glance

  • Midnight strike in Gerbzwo, Khost—family home destroyed, 10 civilians killed.
  • Raids reported in Kunar and Paktika—several civilians injured.
  • Suicide attack in Pakistan targeting security forces—unclaimed (per local media).
  • Earlier this month, a bombing in Islamabad killed 12—claimed by TTP.
  • Recent diplomatic efforts: a Doha ceasefire agreement followed by failed peace talks in Turkey over control of militant groups operating from Afghan soil.

Voices from the Ground

“We heard the blast at once. The walls shook. My neighbor’s courtyard was a hole of dust,” said Rahim, a farmer who lives six houses away from where Wilayat Khan’s family slept. “We found charred clothes, fragments of a little shoe. How do you bury a future?” His voice, in Pashto, trembled even when translated through a local fixer.

A Kabul-based doctor, who asked not to be named because of the sensitivity of treating victims in conflict zones, said, “In a matter of minutes the trauma wards fill with the same faces: children. The mortality among pediatric blast victims is desperate—because of the nature of injuries and the lack of stabilized transfer systems.”

“We cannot accept our villages becoming battlefields,” said Fatima Gul, an aid worker with an international NGO operating in eastern Afghanistan. “Civilians are meant to be protected. When houses are hit like this, entire families are erased.”

From Islamabad, a Pakistani security official speaking on condition of anonymity told a reporter, “We take operations seriously and follow strict procedures. We are reviewing the incident and will share information in due course.” The bland procedural language masks a tense reality: a disputed border, porous mountains, and militias that move like water across the ridgelines.

Why This Matters Beyond One Village

At one level, this is the story of a tragedy that will haunt a small Afghan village for generations. At another, it is a snapshot of a much bigger, more complicated problem: the enduring and dangerous spillover of militancy, mistrust, and military action across the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.

The two countries have endured decades of fraught relations, with periodic flare-ups that escalate into skirmishes or larger confrontations. The clash between Islamabad and Kabul’s security forces last October—described by both sides as the worst violence since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021—left scores dead and stoked new cycles of retaliation. Even after a temporary ceasefire was agreed in Doha, negotiations in Turkey faltered, with diplomats unable to agree on how to handle armed groups that use Afghan territory to strike at Pakistan.

And let us not forget the human arithmetic behind the headlines: the United Nations and independent monitors have documented years of suffering among Afghan civilians—displacement, shrinking humanitarian access, and waves of casualties tied to cross-border operations and local insurgencies. For families in provinces like Khost, Kunar, and Paktika, peace is not a diplomatic verb but the absence of the sound of explosions at night.

Hard Numbers, Harder Truths

Precise casualty figures in conflict zones are always contested, and independent verification can be slow. Still, patterns are clear: civilian casualties have remained stubbornly high in Afghanistan over the past decades, and cross-border tensions often precipitate spikes in deaths and displacement.

A Closer Look at the Political Puzzle

Why do talks collapse? Why does cross-border violence continue despite ceasefires? There are at least three overlapping dynamics to watch:

  • Militant networks that operate fluidly across borders and command loyalties beyond state control.
  • Mutual distrust between Islamabad and Kabul—any action is viewed through a lens of strategic suspicion.
  • Local dynamics: clan rivalries, resource disputes, and economic desperation that make border communities vulnerable to being dragged into larger conflicts.

“You can have diplomatic agreements in the capital, but in the valleys and the passes, loyalties and grievances run deep,” said Dr. Aisha Mirza, a scholar of South Asian security. “Stabilizing the border requires political solutions, not only military ones. And it requires engaging the communities who pay the price.”

What Comes Next?

For the families in Gerbzwo, the immediate needs are simple and urgent: proper burials, trauma counseling, and help to rebuild what was lost. For policymakers, the agenda is painfully familiar and stubbornly difficult: to find mechanisms that prevent militants from using Afghan soil to attack Pakistan without subjecting Afghan civilians to punitive strikes.

Will Islamabad offer transparency and an independent investigation into the strike? Will Kabul—or the de facto authorities—allow neutral monitors access to affected areas? If recent diplomatic efforts are any guide, these questions will linger unresolved while families wait for clay to be swept up, and for children who were—until an hour earlier—playing in courtyards and dreaming of schools and bicycles.

Where Do We Go from Here?

Violence like this is a mirror. It reflects the fragility of borders drawn on maps, the failures of diplomacy, and the human cost of security strategies that often prioritize short-term gains over long-term peace. As readers far from these mountains, what do we owe these villages? What does it mean to demand accountability when the mechanisms for it are broken?

Ask yourself: when headlines flicker and move on, who will tell the story of the shoes left at the edge of a crater? Who will remind the world that behind every nationalist slogan and diplomatic communique are children whose lives were small and ordinary and were extinguished in a single violent breath?

For now, the village of Gerbzwo is quieter, not by peace but by loss. The rest of the world must decide whether it will look away or press for answers, for compassion, and for policies that respect the sanctity of civilian life—no matter which side of a porous border someone sleeps on.