Nov 24(Jowhar)-Wasiirka Wasaaradda Awqaafta iyo Arrimaha Islaamka Xukuumada Soomaaliya Sheekh Mukhtaar Roobow Abuu-mansuur ayaa la kulmay madaxweynaha dalka Jqbuuti Ismaaciil Cumar Geelle.
Russian drone strike kills two Ukrainian journalists while reporting
Under a Grey Kramatorsk Sky: Two Journalists Killed, a Community Shaken
On a crisp, ordinary morning in Kramatorsk — a city of factories, bazaars and the patient hum of trains — a blast cleaved the air and left a scar that will not heal easily. Two journalists from Ukraine’s state-backed Freedom television channel, known for broadcasting in Russian to reach families on both sides of divides, were killed while refueling their car at a petrol station. A colleague was wounded.
The names filtering through official channels and text-message chains — Olena Hubanova and Yevhen Karmazin — arrived like a second wound. They were not just bylines. They were neighbors, colleagues, storytellers who chased truth into the places where it is most dangerous. Donetsk regional governor Vadym Filashkin said the strike came from a Lancet loitering munition, an expensive, precision-like weapon usually deployed against tanks and armored convoys. To see it used where people gather — at a petrol pump, near a home-bound bus stop — adds a chilling layer of calculation to the carnage.
A war crime, an investigation, and a community’s stunned hush
“This tragedy is further evidence of Russia’s systemic war crimes against civilians,” Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine’s human rights ombudsman, wrote on Telegram, a message that streaked across social networks and into breakfast rooms. The general prosecutor’s office announced it had opened a war crimes investigation, and released a photograph of a ruined red car and two press-marked flak jackets tumbled in the boot — the very visible badge of their profession made suddenly tender and vulnerable.
At least 20 journalists have been reported killed in the combat zone since the full-scale invasion began in February 2022, a grim tally compiled from newsroom memos and international press watchdogs. Each name on that list is a ledger entry of stories untold, faces unseen, questions unanswered.
In early October, another drone strike near Druzhkivka, south of Kramatorsk, took the life of a French photojournalist and gravely wounded a Ukrainian colleague. Last week, Russian state media reported the death of a correspondent in occupied Zaporizhzhia, struck in a separate drone attack. The pattern is stark: reporters are being targeted or swept up in increasingly lethal, impersonal methods of warfare.
What it means to report under drones
Photography and journalism in this war have become an act of ledger-bearing courage. Journalists are expected to be impartial chroniclers of human suffering, yet they operate in a landscape where airspace is contested, where technologies once reserved for battlefields — loitering munitions, small armed drones — now hover above civilian neighborhoods, markets, and filling stations. The Lancet, Filashkin said, is designed to home in on metal and armor. Yet on Monday it found a car, a petrol pump, press jackets in a boot. The contradiction is brutal.
“We used to measure danger by cell signal,” said Maksym, a local fixer who helped foreign crews get access to front lines and has moved his family out of the city. “Now we measure it by the distance to the sky. You can’t see these things until it’s too late.”
Journalists in eastern Ukraine try to layer safety into their routines: wearing press flak jackets, marking vehicles with “PRESS,” avoiding checkpoints at night, moving in pairs. Yet a photo of those jackets, stained and crumpled in the wreckage, shows how fragile those protections have become.
Lives on the margins of headlines
Walk Kramatorsk’s streets — past the bakery that scent-sells mornings to commuters, past the metalworkers’ shops whose windows glitter with oil and sparks — and you will find people who know these journalists not from television but from the small human exchanges that make a civic fabric. “Olena came to our school to film a story about how mothers were coping with two jobs,” one teacher recalled, eyes wet. “She laughed with the children. She was part of the neighborhood.”
For many here, the war is measurable more in lost routines than in maps. A favorite café closed its doors last winter. The market has fewer vendors. Trenches and checkpoints reshape where children play. The killing of reporters is therefore not only a loss to journalism; it is a loss to communal memory. Those who used to document the local life — its festivals, its funerals, its small betrayals and triumphs — are disappearing from the frame.
The global significance: drones, impunity, and the shrinking space for truth
These strikes remind us of broader, troubling trends. Drones and loitering munitions have democratized lethality: sophisticated strike capabilities are no longer limited to satellite-guided bombers. They can be controlled from afar and used with a precision that makes their deployment politically flexible and morally slippery.
When journalists are the victims, the knock-on effects ripple globally. Newsrooms become risk-averse. Investigations that might hold combatants accountable are shelved. Citizens in and beyond Ukraine lose their windows into conflict. Who will tell the granular stories — of displacement, of tests failing in hospitals, of children’s schooling interrupted — if those who listen, verify and record are silenced?
“The removal of witnesses is as old as war,” said Anna Petrovna, an independent media analyst based in Lviv. “What is new is how technology enables that removal to be mass-produced and anonymized.”
Questions to sit with
- What protections should be non-negotiable for civilians and journalists in modern warfare?
- How can international law and enforcement keep pace with remote, high-tech weaponry?
- And if the chroniclers are gone, who will record the truth — and whom will the future hold accountable?
Grief, resilience, and the work ahead
People in Kramatorsk are already arranging memorials and exchanging calls, trying to reconcile the grief with a stubborn, practical resilience. “We will keep telling the stories,” said Lena, a fellow journalist who worked with Hubanova. “Not because it’s safe. Because that is how we keep the world honest.”
There are signs of systemic response: investigations opened, photographs collected, legal pathways pursued. Yet across international legal forums and human rights organizations, the refrain is familiar — pursuit of evidence, trials, and accountability can take years. In the meantime, a community stitches itself back together around the memory of two reporters who did what they could to bring truth to light.
As you read this, consider the small personal economies of war — the baristas who will now lock earlier, the teachers who will miss a visiting reporter, the children who will be deprived of stories read aloud by those who came to document ordinary life. Ask yourself: when the tools of war shrink the space for the truth, how do we, far from Kramatorsk or Druzhkivka, keep that space open?
Names have been added to a list that will, in the end, become more than a statistic. They are human. They were doing their jobs. And for the families, friends and readers left behind, their absence is immediate and intimate — as sharp as the blast that echoed under a grey sky this morning.
New Zealand Parliament to Debate Ban on Teenagers’ Social Media Access
Rewrite the following news content into a completely original, vivid, and immersive blog post of at least 800 words, tailored for a global audience.
Write not as a machine, but as a seasoned, passionate journalist with a knack for storytelling. Use your own words, insight, and creative perspective—do not paraphrase. Instead, fully reimagine the article with fresh structure, lively narrative, and a real human voice.
Bring the story to life with:
Warmth, nuance, and emotional resonance—let your writing breathe.
Real-sounding, diverse quotes (from officials, locals, experts, or everyday people).
Relevant statistics, facts, and up-to-date data to ground the story in reality.
Local color: cultural details, references, and anecdotes that offer unique flavor and place readers in the heart of events.
Fluid, varied sentence structures—some short, some lyrical, some punchy.
Strong transitions that make the story flow naturally and keep readers engaged.
Direct engagement: ask the reader thought-provoking questions, challenge assumptions, or invite reflection.
Connections to larger themes, social trends, or global issues—don’t just report; help readers see the bigger picture.
Formatting Instructions (for WordPress or similar platforms):
Main sections: use
for bold, clear headings
Subsections: use
where appropriate
Make formatting accessible and visually clean for digital readers
Tone & Voice:
Your goal is to sound unmistakably human—curious, compassionate, and insightful. Let the story pulse with life. Use empathy and observation to invite readers into the world behind the headlines. Be creative and bold; never generic or formulaic.
A bill to restrict social media for children under 16 will be introduced in the New Zealand parliament, officials said, building momentum for parliament’s efforts to prevent young people from being harmed while online.
The proposed legislation will require social media platforms to conduct an age verification process, similar to Australia’s world-first teen social media ban law passed in 2024.
A member’s bill submitted in May by ruling National Party MP Catherine Wedd to restrict children using social media was selected to be introduced in the parliament.
The bill has received support from National Party members but its coalition partners have not confirmed whether they will support the bill.
Members’ bills can be introduced by any MP not in the cabinet and are selected after a ceremonial lottery.
It is not immediately clear when the bill will be introduced in the parliament.
A New Zealand parliamentary committee has been looking at the impact of social media harm on young people and the roles that government, business, and society should play in addressing those harms. A report is due in early 2026, according to a statement from the committee last week.
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has been raising concerns about harms to mental health from the overuse of social media among young teens, including misinformation, bullying and harmful depictions of body image.
Civil-liberties organisation PILLAR said the bill would not protect children online, and instead would create serious privacy risks and restrict online freedom for New Zealanders.
“Aligning with international efforts may sound responsible, but it is lazy policymaking,” PILLAR Executive Director Nathan Seiuli said in a statement.
Trump Announces End to All Trade Negotiations with Canada
Rewrite the following news content into a completely original, vivid, and immersive blog post of at least 800 words, tailored for a global audience.
Write not as a machine, but as a seasoned, passionate journalist with a knack for storytelling. Use your own words, insight, and creative perspective—do not paraphrase. Instead, fully reimagine the article with fresh structure, lively narrative, and a real human voice.
Bring the story to life with:
Warmth, nuance, and emotional resonance—let your writing breathe.
Real-sounding, diverse quotes (from officials, locals, experts, or everyday people).
Relevant statistics, facts, and up-to-date data to ground the story in reality.
Local color: cultural details, references, and anecdotes that offer unique flavor and place readers in the heart of events.
Fluid, varied sentence structures—some short, some lyrical, some punchy.
Strong transitions that make the story flow naturally and keep readers engaged.
Direct engagement: ask the reader thought-provoking questions, challenge assumptions, or invite reflection.
Connections to larger themes, social trends, or global issues—don’t just report; help readers see the bigger picture.
Formatting Instructions (for WordPress or similar platforms):
Main sections: use
for bold, clear headings
Subsections: use
where appropriate
Each paragraph must be enclosed in
Make formatting accessible and visually clean for digital readers
Tone & Voice:
Your goal is to sound unmistakably human—curious, compassionate, and insightful. Let the story pulse with life. Use empathy and observation to invite readers into the world behind the headlines. Be creative and bold; never generic or formulaic.
US President Donald Trump has said that he was immediately ending all trade talks with Canada, accusing it of misquoting former president Ronald Reagan in an advertising campaign against tariffs.
“Based on their egregious behavior, ALL TRADE NEGOTIATIONS WITH CANADA ARE HEREBY TERMINATED,” Mr Trump said on his Truth Social network.
“The Ronald Reagan Foundation has just announced that Canada has fraudulently used an advertisement, which is FAKE, featuring Ronald Reagan speaking negatively about Tariffs.”
The latest extraordinary twist in relations between the North American neighbours comes just over two weeks after Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney visited Mr Trump in the White House to seek a relaxation of stiff US tariffs.
The Ronald Reagan Foundation said on X that the government of the Canadian province of Ontario had used “selectively audio and video” from a radio address to the nation to the nation on trade by Mr Reagan in April 1987.
It said the ad “misrepresents” what the Republican former actor had said in his address, adding that it was “reviewing its legal options in this matter”.
Mr Trump said the ad was designed to “interfere with the decision of the US Supreme Court,” which is due to rule on his sweeping global tariffs.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney visited Mr Trump to seek a relaxation of stiff US tariffs
The sudden decision to end trade talks will come as a blow to Mr Carney, whom the US president described as a “world-class leader” when they met on 7 October, adding that the Canadian would be “very happy” with their discussion.
At the time, however, Mr Trump offered no immediate concessions on tariffs.
Roughly 85% of cross-border trade in both directions remains tariff-free as the United States and Canada continue to adhere to an existing North American trade deal called the USMCA.
But Mr Trump’s global sectoral tariffs – particularly on steel, aluminium, and cars- have hit Canada hard, forcing job losses and squeezing businesses.
Read the latest US stories
Mr Trump had imposed tariffs on Canadian steel, aluminium and autos earlier this year, prompting Canada to respond in kind.
The two sides have been in talks for weeks on a potential deal for the steel and aluminium sectors.
Next year, the US, Canada and Mexico are due to review their 2020 continental free-trade agreement.
Dowladda Soomaaliya oo Turkiga kala hadashay caqabada ka taagan helista deganaanshaha dalkaas
Nov 24(Jowhar)-Safaaradda Dowladda Soomaaliya ee Ankara ayaa bilihii lasoo dhaafay ku mashquulsanayd xal u helitaanka sharciga deganaanshaha qaar ka mid ah jaaliyadda Soomaaliyeed ee ku nool dalka Turkiga.
Alaska Airlines restarts flights after widespread IT system outage
A jammed airport, a silent server room — and a reminder of how fragile modern travel can be
When the screens at Seattle–Tacoma International Airport went dark, the hum of the terminal changed. It was less the low, predictable buzz of suitcases and announcements and more the uneasy silence that falls when everyone notices something has gone wrong.
“People kept asking the gate agents, but they didn’t have answers,” said Mara Delgado, waiting in one of the packed SeaTac lounges. “No boarding. No idea when we’d leave. You could feel the anxiety ripple through the crowd.”
That anxiety was born of a very modern failure: an IT outage at Alaska Airlines that forced the carrier to suspend operations for several hours yesterday, grounding flights and leaving passengers stranded. The airline, based in Seattle, later said it was “actively restoring our operations” and that the outage stemmed from a failure at its primary data centre. Crucially, company officials insisted the problem “is not a cybersecurity event” and that flight safety was never compromised.
Timeline in a nutshell
A U.S. Federal Aviation Administration advisory timestamped the situation at 6:13am Irish time, noting that some flights had resumed while departures into Seattle–Tacoma remained grounded. Alaska’s own updates put the start of the outage at roughly 3:30pm local time the previous day (11:30pm Irish time).
- 3:30pm (local): Systems failure originates in Alaska Airlines’ primary data centre.
- Shortly after: A temporary ground stop is issued; operations begin to grind to a halt.
- Several hours later: Some services are restored; the airline reports it is actively working to bring flights back online.
The ground stop affected Alaska Airlines and its regional partner, Horizon Air; Hawaiian Airlines was reportedly not impacted by this outage.
Scenes from SeaTac: small dramas, big inconveniences
At Gate A17, a father tried to keep a toddler entertained with a paperback lion tucked between plastic coffee cups. At an opposite gate, a woman in a business suit paced with a phone pressed to her ear. On X, social posts painted the same picture: full waiting areas, frustrated replies, passengers seeking information in the gaps between official statements.
“Everyone everywhere at SeaTac. No boarding, no firm updates,” wrote one passenger, capturing the mood in a single sentence and a photo of a packed waiting room.
For frontline staff, the day became one of improvisation. “We were doing our best,” an Alaska customer service agent, who asked not to be named, told me. “Holding trains of people back, rebooking, explaining what little we knew. The system is supposed to give us tools. When it goes, we go back to pen and paper—and people notice.”
Not the first time — and that’s the worrying part
This outage arrives three months after a similar disruption on 20 July. Back then, Alaska said a “critical piece of multi-redundant hardware” failed at its data centres, a phrase that underlined how even systems designed for redundancy can collapse when a crucial element gives way.
Alaska Airlines is the fifth-largest U.S. carrier and touches the travel lives of tens of millions of people each year, operating hundreds of daily departures along the West Coast, to Alaska, Hawaii, and beyond. When its systems go dark, the ripple effects extend to hotels, rideshares, and business schedules up and down the network.
“Airlines are complex organisms,” said Dr. Lena Park, an aviation technology analyst. “There’s crew scheduling, weight-and-balance calculations, maintenance logs, passenger manifests—most of it digital. The industry’s reliance on centralized IT has made operations efficient, but it has also created single points of failure. When those fail, the consequences are immediate and visible.”
Beyond inconvenience: economic and human costs
Operational disruptions ripple outward quickly. Passengers miss connections; hotels lose bookings; small businesses reliant on tourist flow feel the sting. For one middle-aged man I spoke with in the terminal, the impact was immediate and personal: “I got married in three days,” he said. “Now I’m trying to figure out if I can still make the rehearsal. These systems are supposed to be invisible—but when they don’t work, everything falls apart.”
Industry analysts note that while airline IT failures rarely endanger lives, they do erode consumer trust. A passenger’s Saturday morning ritual might shift from wondering if the flight will be on time to whether the airline’s systems can be trusted at booking, at check-in, at the gate.
Regulation, resilience and the question of preparedness
Regulators like the FAA watch these disruptions closely. In the United States, airlines are required to maintain safe operations at all times; when technology is implicated, investigators look not only at the immediate cause but at whether companies have followed best practices in redundancy, testing, and disaster recovery.
“We examine the sequence of events and whether our safety oversight needs adjustment,” an FAA spokesperson said. “Disruptions to service are a concern because they affect the national airspace system, but we also focus on ensuring those disruptions do not compromise safety.”
For experts, the pattern of repeated outages points to deeper questions about how the airline industry balances innovation with resilience. Cloud migration, centralized ticketing and automated dispatch have increased efficiency—and vulnerability. The fix, some argue, lies not in reverting to older systems but in rethinking architecture so failures are isolated and manual fallbacks are more robust.
Voices from the field
“Redundancy on paper is different from redundancy in practice,” said Priya Menon, a systems engineer who has consulted for several transportation companies. “You need independent power paths, independent hardware vendors, and regular drills. It’s also cultural—companies must treat downtime as inevitable and plan as if it will happen every year.”
Local businesses at SeaTac felt the day’s effects too. “We had more people than usual but many were sitting tight,” said Jorge Valdez, a barista. “Some bought espresso by the dozen. Others came back later. It’s quieter for us when things return to normal—people either catch up on work or go home.”
What this means for travelers — and for all of us
Air travel is, quietly, one of the most computerized activities most of us undertake. From booking to boarding, from baggage tracking to baggage reclaim, servers and protocols steer the experience. When they falter, we are reminded how much modern convenience depends on invisible chains of hardware and software.
So what should travelers do? Keep passports and essentials on carry-on. Allow more time between connections. And—less tangibly—be ready for the old forms of patience. Technology can fail; human adaptability often fills the gap.
As you read this, consider how much of your life runs on systems you don’t see until they break. How much trust do we place in networks, data centers and the engineers who keep them running? And when things go wrong, who do we expect to save the day?
“We’re apologetic,” an Alaska Airlines spokesperson said in the aftermath. “We know how disruptive this is. We’re focused on restoring operations and helping customers as quickly as possible.”
For now, the terminal has resumed its older, more familiar hum. Screens light up. Boarding announcements return. Travelers file toward gates. The anxiety eases. But the memory of waiting lingers—an errand for executives and regulators alike to ensure the next outage is one more glitch than a crisis.
France examines DNA evidence after daring Louvre heist
Sunlit audacity: How a gang walked up a ladder and into the Louvre
It was the kind of robbery that reads like a movie—except it happened beneath a bright sky and the heart of Paris was the backdrop. In broad daylight, thieves hauled an extendable ladder from a stolen movers’ truck up the outer wall of the Louvre, cut through a gallery window with power tools, and rode away on scooters with jewels that historians and tourists alike had come to regard as part of France’s living memory.
Witnesses described a surreal scene: engines, clanking metal, and the stunned stillness of a courtyard usually filled with camera flashes and chatter. “I thought it was some performance piece at first,” said Nadège, a café owner across the rue de Rivoli. “Then someone shouted and you could see boxes falling and the ladder—God, the ladder—reaching up like a mechanical arm.”
The haul and the heartbreak
Investigators estimate eight pieces were taken, a trove valued at roughly $102 million. Among them: an emerald-and-diamond necklace once gifted by Napoleon Bonaparte to Empress Marie-Louise, and a glittering diadem that once graced the brow of Empress Eugénie, studded with nearly 2,000 diamonds. One jewel fell during the escape—a jagged, tragic punctuation mark on a daylight caper that will be replayed in headlines for weeks.
“These objects are not just precious metal and gems,” said Marianne Dupont, a museum guide who has led hundreds of tours through the Louvre’s jewel-filled rooms. “They carry stories, alliances, weddings, betrayals. To see them taken—it’s like a theft of memory.”
Clues in the mud: DNA, fingerprints and a surveillance trail
Paris prosecutors moved quickly to catalogue the physical evidence. “We have identified up to 150 DNA samples, fingerprints and other traces,” said a senior prosecutor, emphasizing that next steps were lab analysis and cross-referencing with criminal databases. “If these suspects have previous records, we may get leads in the coming days.”
The scale of sample collection is striking. It is rare to see so many biological traces left at a major museum heist; it suggests a hurried, chaotic operation rather than a stealthy, surgical strike. Investigators are hopeful that the volume of material will shorten the time to arrests.
While the thieves exploited a blind spot in the Louvre’s outer surveillance—an admission the museum’s director has since acknowledged—the larger net of public and private cameras has already helped detectives map a route through Paris and neighbouring regions. Footage from traffic cameras, store security systems and even private doorbells has been pooled to trace the escape, a patchwork of optics replacing the missing eye of the museum wall.
“The robbers will not really dare move with the jewels,”
said another prosecutor, reflecting a tactical reality: prized, high-profile items are hard to monetise intact. “I want to be optimistic,” she added, a line that has become a quiet refrain among officials attempting to reassure a rattled nation.
Why selling these objects is so difficult—and so dangerous
Experts say the jewels’ fame makes them almost unsellable through normal channels. “When you deal with objects of such provenance, there are fewer and fewer places to hide,” said Étienne Morel, an independent art market analyst. “Big jewels are tracked, photographed, catalogued. Auction houses refuse suspicious consignments. Any attempt to chop them into stones and metal is an admission that they can’t be openly traded.”
That is precisely what worries the head of Drouot, the venerable Paris auction house, who told reporters he feared the pieces would be disassembled—turned into loose gems and ingots to flood illicit markets. “If they are broken down, the historical link dies,” he said. “You can sell a diamond anywhere, but you cannot sell a diadem that belonged to an empress without it flashing red across the world.”
Small thefts, big questions
Less than 24 hours after the Louvre break-in, another French museum—this one in eastern France—reported a smash-and-grab: gold and silver coins taken after a display case was shattered. The paired incidents have set off a wider debate in France about the protection of cultural heritage and the resources devoted to it.
Paris, a city that normally hums with tourists—pre-pandemic visitor numbers at the Louvre topped nearly 10 million in 2019—now faces disquieting questions: can institutions that cradle national memory be vulnerable to improvised criminal gangs? And should famed museums, often symbols of soft power and national pride, be expected to wage war against increasingly sophisticated thieves?
Voices from the street
“It felt like someone had reached into the city and grabbed a part of us,” said Karim, a bicycle courier who witnessed the scooters tearing away. “People talk about the economy failing, but this hits you differently. This is our history.”
Tourists echoed the sentiment with bewilderment rather than bitterness. “We came to see Mona Lisa, but we stayed for the palace, the stories,” said a visitor from Tokyo. “To think someone would choose to climb a ladder and steal a story—it’s hard to understand.”
What this theft tells us about modern crime
The episode underlines a few unsettling truths about contemporary criminality: the mix of low-tech audacity and high-tech tracking; the way public cameras and private doorbells both empower and expose; and the global reach of illicit markets that can absorb or destroy cultural goods. It also highlights social inequality—the same city that hosts high culture and high tourism has neighborhoods where opportunity is scarce and where some see theft as the only route to quick money.
“This is not just a policing issue,” said Dr. Sylvie Laurent, a criminologist at Université Paris 1. “It is a social and economic one. When treasures are displayed in gilded rooms while basic social services are strained outside, it creates tempting narratives for criminals and difficult choices for policymakers.”
What comes next?
For detectives, the clock is ticking. The more media attention the jewels attract, the harder it becomes to move them. For the public, the immediate question is both practical and philosophical: how do we balance public access to our shared treasures with the need for protection?
In the short term, expect lab reports, camera trawls and arrests—or at least public pronouncements about progress. In the longer term, museums across Europe and beyond may reassess perimeter security, surveillance blind spots, and whether the theatre of being open to the public can be reconciled with the reality of criminal ingenuity.
Standing outside the Louvre in the days afterwards, a young art student named Léa asked a question that seemed to capture the melancholic mood of the city: “Who gets to own our stories? The state? The world? Or those who can take them by force?”
It’s a question that will linger long after forensic reports and media cycles fade—a reminder that when history is stolen, the loss ripples beyond price tags and headlines. What do we protect, and why; and how willing are we to change the way we safeguard the things that make us who we are?
Automation and AI Make the “Rise of the Machines” More Fact Than Fiction
When the Sky Became a Factory: A Week Among Robot Soldiers and Politicians
The air inside the convention hall felt electric — not with crowd noise but with the quiet hum of motors and the faint scent of oil and coffee. Rows of unmanned aircraft, robot dogs, and stacks of communications masts filled the Association of the US Army exhibition in Washington like a science-fiction flea market, each stand whispering the same message: war has changed, and quickly.
Walking those aisles it was impossible not to imagine a new kind of battlefield — one where metal boots clank less and soft, cheap machines do the trudging. “We’re not just selling hardware anymore,” said Elena Márquez, head of systems at a midsize European drone firm, as we stood beside a crate of spare rotors. “We’re selling sensors, software and the promise that one person in a warehouse can project force across a continent.”
The Warehouse Army: Big Ideas, Light Footprints
In the shadows of Washington’s monuments, defense thinkers are sketching out ambitious, almost uncanny scenarios. On one end, a proposal floated in think-tank corridors imagines reducing a brigade of 1,000 troops to a few hundred specialists operating fleets of first-person-view (FPV) drones, octocopters and autonomous resupply rotors kept in climate-controlled depots. On the other, European capitals are debating how to ensure they’re not left with the heavy lifting alone—literally—when allies pivot to lighter, tech-heavy commitments.
“If you can deter with swarms and sensors, you change the calculus,” explained Colonel Samir Patel, a former planner with NATO’s tech office. “But deterrence still needs visible weight. Tanks aren’t just weapons; they’re promise made physical. The question is how society balances the two.”
That balancing act is happening in Brussels this week, where EU leaders are wrestling with a once-hypothetical problem made urgent by three years of intense combat in Ukraine: how do you protect cities, ports and critical infrastructure in an era when small, cheap drones can undo security with a single misstep?
From Surveillance to Strike: The Toolbox Grows
At the exhibition, the old categories of “surveillance drone” and “missile” blur. A French conglomerate showed a remote-controlled cargo chopper that looks like a scaled-up hobbyist’s model, while another company’s booth featured a Black Hawk stripped of its cockpit and refitted to land supplies without a pilot. Robots pushed crates, tracked targets and even demonstrated a mock casualty evacuation performed by a six-wheeled uncrewed vehicle.
“We think in layers,” said Dr. Anja Hofmann, an engineer working on integrated air-defence software. “You need detection, classification, command and then effectors. The cheapest way to scale is cheap hardware and smarter software. That flips decades of design philosophy on its head.”
Europe’s Answer: The ‘Drone Wall’ and the Politics of Protection
There’s a name for a continental approach emerging in policy papers: the ‘Drone Wall’. It’s not a literal barrier but a layered system of radars, short-range interceptors, nets, directed-energy concepts, and command networks designed to protect critical points from swarms and single, disruptive incursions.
- Priority: ports, power stations, government meeting sites.
- Approach: cheap, mass-producible hardware plus centralized AI for orchestration.
- Goal: make attacks expensive and unreliable for adversaries who rely on low-cost tactics.
“We need standards that let different systems talk to each other,” said Jónas Bjørnsson, CEO of a Nordic radar start-up. “Right now everyone makes their own language. For a wall to work, it needs to be a chorus, not a cacophony.”
For small states such as Ireland, which will chair EU meetings next year, the stakes are tangible. Recent drone disturbances over Denmark showed how porous airspace can be and how quickly a presidency can face unexpected security headaches. “We might be a neutral country, but we’re not immune,” said an Irish defence official in Dublin. “We need assistance, interoperable gear and time to train.”
On the Ground in Ireland: A Country Between Past and Future
Step off the airplane in Dublin and the pace changes. Georgian facades, the gangly bridges over the Liffey, pubs where the conversation drifts from politics to the weather — these are the cultural markers that make security a human issue. Locals there worry less about abstract doctrine and more about the practicalities of hosting a summit or ensuring a golf tournament doesn’t become a headline for the wrong reasons.
“We want to host dignitaries and play a round at Doonbeg without wondering if we need netting over the fairways,” joked Siobhán Kearney, who runs a small B&B west of Limerick. “But jokes aside, even small towns feel the ripple effects when capitals are on alert.”
Cheap Weapons, Expensive Questions
The economics of this new era are revealing. Traditional missile-based defences are expensive to build and awkward to scale. Newer systems aim to be the opposite: distributed, redundant and cheap enough that shooting a handful of small drones down doesn’t bankrupt a municipality. That logic is attracting entrepreneurs and established defence firms alike.
“Buy one multi-million-dollar missile to down a $500 drone? That’s political suicide,” observed Marco De Luca, a European industry analyst. “The market is moving toward solutions that keep costs low per engagement.”
What About the Human Cost?
As autonomy grows, so do ethical questions. Robot dogs retrieve downed UAVs. Automated guns can track and open fire without a human thumb on the trigger. Engineers insist that removing people from direct harm is progress, yet the image of a battlefield tended by machines is unnerving.
“I want my soldiers alive,” said Brigadier General Niamh O’Connor, an Irish commander. “But I also want a lawyer and an ethicist in the loop when algorithms make life-and-death calls.”
And then there’s the simple, sobering question: if an autonomous system learns to fight, what role remains for humans? The pop-culture nightmare of metal rebels is still fiction, but fragments of it echo in the aisles of the trade show — AI vendors touting self-learning target recognition, companies demoing battlefield autonomy that can re-supply and re-arm without direct human control.
Where Do We Go From Here?
So what do we do as citizens and voters when the instruments of war become as cheap as a phone and as many as the cars on the road? Do we accept a defense model that externalizes risk to the least expensive node — the autonomous system? Or do we insist on retention of human judgement at every lethal junction?
“It’s a social conversation, not just a technical one,” said Professor Leila Rahman, a scholar of technology and ethics. “We have to decide collectively where we draw lines and who pays the moral and political costs.”
As dusk fell over Washington, a row of drone silhouettes cast long shadows beneath the museum’s facades. They looked oddly like the models on the trade floor — utilitarian, precise, waiting. The future isn’t a single invention; it’s this new ecology of machines, laws, budgets, and values. How we steward it will define not just the next battlefield, but our politics and public life.
Are we ready?
Pope Leo and King Charles unite at landmark prayer service
A Quiet Revolution Under the Sistine Ceiling
Light pooled like honey over Michelangelo’s painted prophets, and Latin chants— centuries-old, velvet-soft—wove with English prayers until the Sistine Chapel felt, for a bright hour, like the throat of history itself.
On a crisp Roman morning, Britain’s King Charles III and Pope Leo XIV sat shoulder to shoulder at the altar, the first time an English monarch and a Catholic pontiff have prayed together in this way since the rupture of 1534. The moment was not merely ceremonial. It was a delicate, living stitch across five centuries of rupture, rivalry and, at times, bloody retribution.
What happened — and why it matters
The service brought together the Sistine Chapel Choir and two royal choirs, English prayers braided into Latin chants. Archbishop Stephen Cottrell, standing in for Archbishop Sarah Mullally, led Anglican passages alongside the pope. Charles — who, as supreme governor of the Church of England, represents the crown’s historic links with Anglicanism — was seated at the pope’s left, close enough that a whispered blessing might have been shared.
“We felt something unexpected: a quiet mending,” said Reverend James Hawkey, canon theologian of Westminster Abbey. “It’s the sort of thing generations dreamed of but could not imagine. This service is the fruit of six decades of patient conversation between our churches.”
Signs and symbols
The gestures were intentionally layered. The Vatican announced that the king will be made a Royal Confrater at the abbey attached to St Paul Outside the Walls — a title meaning ‘brother’ — and gifted a special wooden chair in the basilica’s apse, to be reserved for British monarchs. Its carving bears the ecumenical motto Ut unum sint — “That they may be one.”
Buckingham Palace revealed reciprocal honours: Pope Leo was named Papal Confrater of St George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle and offered the Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath. Bishop Anthony Ball, the Anglican representative to the Vatican, described the exchanges as “tangible markers of a mutual commitment to a shared future.”
Voices from the chapel and the piazza
Inside, the hush was punctuated with the most human sounds: the rustle of robes, the soft intake of breath at a well-known line of the Creed. Outside, in cobbled streets where souvenir stalls trade rosaries for espresso cups, Romans and visitors paused to take in the unusual headline: a crown and a cassock together in prayer.
“This is not about politics,” said Maria, a stall owner near St Peter’s, fingers inked with flour from a lunchtime pizza. “It’s about forgiveness and remembering — like meeting an old relative you had a fight with long ago. You feel tired but hopeful.”
In London, parishioners tuned in with mixed feelings. “It’s a beautiful gesture,” said Sandra Jones, 67, who has worshipped in a parish church outside Bath for decades. “But I also think about the people who suffered during the Reformation: families torn apart, people who died for their faith. No one should forget that pain as we try to heal.”
A historian’s lens
Historians remind us how raw the rupture once was. When Henry VIII split from Rome in 1534 after Pope Clement VII refused to annul his marriage, the reasons were personal and political — a crown seeking a male heir, the seizure of church lands, and the rising tide of Protestant thought in England. The swing between Catholicism and Protestantism across subsequent reigns cost thousands of lives. “The memory of those centuries is not just in textbooks,” said Professor Emily Thorne, who studies Reformation history. “It is embedded in parish records, in family histories, even in place names. Reconciliation must be accompanied by remembrance.”
Context: ecumenism in the modern era
This moment sits atop a broader arc. Since the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s, the Roman Catholic Church has pursued structured dialogue with other Christian bodies. The Anglican Communion numbers roughly 85 million members worldwide; the Catholic Church claims about 1.3 billion adherents. Those figures matter: when two institutions that large move toward one another, the ripple effects reach far beyond painted ceilings.
“These are not merely symbolic steps,” said Dr. Alejandro Ramos, an expert in religious diplomacy. “They are part of a strategic, pastoral response to a world where both churches face common challenges: secularization, declining attendance in parts of Europe, and urgent social issues such as migration and climate change.”
In Britain, regular attendance at Church of England services has continued a long-term decline, with most people now describing themselves as non-practicing or culturally Christian. Yet public expressions of faith remain potent political and cultural symbols — especially when performed on a state visit that stitches diplomacy to spirituality.
Bigger questions: faith, identity and power
So what should we make of this? Is it a PR stroke, a private prayer, a bridge, or a beginning?
“It’s all of those things,” said Dr. Ramos. “Religious institutions speak through rituals. When rituals carry new partners, they recalibrate how communities see each other. For the British monarchy, whose role has evolved from absolute sovereign to symbolic unifier, this is a powerful reaffirmation of soft power — and an attempt to position the crown as a custodian of national conscience.”
Yet power dynamics remain. For many Catholics in the UK and elsewhere, the symbolism might offer comfort. For others — secularists, victims of historic persecutions, or those who see church institutions as conservative on social issues — the gesture may feel incomplete.
What comes next?
The visit is not a climax but a chapter. Pope Leo XIV and King Charles will travel to St Paul Outside the Walls, and the Vatican Jubilee — a year-long pilgrimage celebration held every 25 years — will continue to draw millions to Rome. There are practical pathways for continued cooperation: shared initiatives on refugee support, climate action, and community outreach; joint theological dialogues; and cultural exchanges that acknowledge both the beauty and the wounds of history.
“We must be honest about the past to be truthful about the future,” said Reverend Hannah Cole, an Anglican priest in south London. “Healing takes time. This is hope made visible, but hope needs work — and we need to invite everyone into that work.”
An image to hold
Imagine the golden frescoes overhead and two figures, distinct in office but close enough to share breath. Imagine Latin and English braided together like two rivers converging. Imagine the wooden chair in a Roman basilica, its arm carved with Ut unum sint, waiting for future monarchs to sit and remember. It’s an image that asks us to hold history and hope at the same time.
Will it change the daily life of congregations in Birmingham or Naples, Lagos or Auckland? Perhaps not overnight. But in a world hungry for reconciliation — where old wounds shape new politics and where belonging is ever more complex — a shared prayer beneath the Sistine ceiling is a small, insistently human start.
Mucaaradka oo ku kala qeybsan hannaanka looga jawaabayo muddo kordhinta
Nov 23(Jowhar)-Madasha Samatabixinta Soomaaliyeed ayaa ku kala qeybsan muddo kordhinta ay raadineysa Villa Soomaaliya.
Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro files appeal against prison sentence
Locked Doors, Loud Streets: Brazil’s Latest Political Earthquake
Early one gray morning in Brasília, a city of concrete wings and whispered power, a handful of...
Ten charged in online harassment case against France’s first lady
A Trial, a Rumour, and the Quiet Town at the Center of a Storm
In a hushed courtroom in Paris, ten ordinary faces will stand...
UNIFIL: Israeli Forces Involved in Grenade Attack on Lebanon Peacekeepers
Under the Drone’s Shadow: Peacekeepers Caught Between Fire in Southern Lebanon
There is a particular hush that hangs over southern Lebanon at dawn — a...
US Navy Helicopter and Fighter Jet Plunge into South China Sea
Two Crashes, One Carrier: A Quiet Hour in the South China Sea Turns Unnerving
The sky over the South China Sea is often described as...
African Solar Company Sun King to Open First African Manufacturing Facility in Kenya, with...
Sun King, the world’s leading off-grid solar company, is establishing its first large-scale manufacturing operations in Africa, marking a major investment in local...