Under a Grey Kramatorsk Sky: Two Journalists Killed, a Community Shaken
On a crisp, ordinary morning in Kramatorsk — a city of factories, bazaars and the patient hum of trains — a blast cleaved the air and left a scar that will not heal easily. Two journalists from Ukraine’s state-backed Freedom television channel, known for broadcasting in Russian to reach families on both sides of divides, were killed while refueling their car at a petrol station. A colleague was wounded.
The names filtering through official channels and text-message chains — Olena Hubanova and Yevhen Karmazin — arrived like a second wound. They were not just bylines. They were neighbors, colleagues, storytellers who chased truth into the places where it is most dangerous. Donetsk regional governor Vadym Filashkin said the strike came from a Lancet loitering munition, an expensive, precision-like weapon usually deployed against tanks and armored convoys. To see it used where people gather — at a petrol pump, near a home-bound bus stop — adds a chilling layer of calculation to the carnage.
A war crime, an investigation, and a community’s stunned hush
“This tragedy is further evidence of Russia’s systemic war crimes against civilians,” Dmytro Lubinets, Ukraine’s human rights ombudsman, wrote on Telegram, a message that streaked across social networks and into breakfast rooms. The general prosecutor’s office announced it had opened a war crimes investigation, and released a photograph of a ruined red car and two press-marked flak jackets tumbled in the boot — the very visible badge of their profession made suddenly tender and vulnerable.
At least 20 journalists have been reported killed in the combat zone since the full-scale invasion began in February 2022, a grim tally compiled from newsroom memos and international press watchdogs. Each name on that list is a ledger entry of stories untold, faces unseen, questions unanswered.
In early October, another drone strike near Druzhkivka, south of Kramatorsk, took the life of a French photojournalist and gravely wounded a Ukrainian colleague. Last week, Russian state media reported the death of a correspondent in occupied Zaporizhzhia, struck in a separate drone attack. The pattern is stark: reporters are being targeted or swept up in increasingly lethal, impersonal methods of warfare.
What it means to report under drones
Photography and journalism in this war have become an act of ledger-bearing courage. Journalists are expected to be impartial chroniclers of human suffering, yet they operate in a landscape where airspace is contested, where technologies once reserved for battlefields — loitering munitions, small armed drones — now hover above civilian neighborhoods, markets, and filling stations. The Lancet, Filashkin said, is designed to home in on metal and armor. Yet on Monday it found a car, a petrol pump, press jackets in a boot. The contradiction is brutal.
“We used to measure danger by cell signal,” said Maksym, a local fixer who helped foreign crews get access to front lines and has moved his family out of the city. “Now we measure it by the distance to the sky. You can’t see these things until it’s too late.”
Journalists in eastern Ukraine try to layer safety into their routines: wearing press flak jackets, marking vehicles with “PRESS,” avoiding checkpoints at night, moving in pairs. Yet a photo of those jackets, stained and crumpled in the wreckage, shows how fragile those protections have become.
Lives on the margins of headlines
Walk Kramatorsk’s streets — past the bakery that scent-sells mornings to commuters, past the metalworkers’ shops whose windows glitter with oil and sparks — and you will find people who know these journalists not from television but from the small human exchanges that make a civic fabric. “Olena came to our school to film a story about how mothers were coping with two jobs,” one teacher recalled, eyes wet. “She laughed with the children. She was part of the neighborhood.”
For many here, the war is measurable more in lost routines than in maps. A favorite café closed its doors last winter. The market has fewer vendors. Trenches and checkpoints reshape where children play. The killing of reporters is therefore not only a loss to journalism; it is a loss to communal memory. Those who used to document the local life — its festivals, its funerals, its small betrayals and triumphs — are disappearing from the frame.
The global significance: drones, impunity, and the shrinking space for truth
These strikes remind us of broader, troubling trends. Drones and loitering munitions have democratized lethality: sophisticated strike capabilities are no longer limited to satellite-guided bombers. They can be controlled from afar and used with a precision that makes their deployment politically flexible and morally slippery.
When journalists are the victims, the knock-on effects ripple globally. Newsrooms become risk-averse. Investigations that might hold combatants accountable are shelved. Citizens in and beyond Ukraine lose their windows into conflict. Who will tell the granular stories — of displacement, of tests failing in hospitals, of children’s schooling interrupted — if those who listen, verify and record are silenced?
“The removal of witnesses is as old as war,” said Anna Petrovna, an independent media analyst based in Lviv. “What is new is how technology enables that removal to be mass-produced and anonymized.”
Questions to sit with
-
What protections should be non-negotiable for civilians and journalists in modern warfare?
-
How can international law and enforcement keep pace with remote, high-tech weaponry?
-
And if the chroniclers are gone, who will record the truth — and whom will the future hold accountable?
Grief, resilience, and the work ahead
People in Kramatorsk are already arranging memorials and exchanging calls, trying to reconcile the grief with a stubborn, practical resilience. “We will keep telling the stories,” said Lena, a fellow journalist who worked with Hubanova. “Not because it’s safe. Because that is how we keep the world honest.”
There are signs of systemic response: investigations opened, photographs collected, legal pathways pursued. Yet across international legal forums and human rights organizations, the refrain is familiar — pursuit of evidence, trials, and accountability can take years. In the meantime, a community stitches itself back together around the memory of two reporters who did what they could to bring truth to light.
As you read this, consider the small personal economies of war — the baristas who will now lock earlier, the teachers who will miss a visiting reporter, the children who will be deprived of stories read aloud by those who came to document ordinary life. Ask yourself: when the tools of war shrink the space for the truth, how do we, far from Kramatorsk or Druzhkivka, keep that space open?
Names have been added to a list that will, in the end, become more than a statistic. They are human. They were doing their jobs. And for the families, friends and readers left behind, their absence is immediate and intimate — as sharp as the blast that echoed under a grey sky this morning.
