Renowned primatologist and conservationist Jane Goodall dies at 91

October 2, 2025

Wildlife advocate Jane Goodall dies at age of 91 — Jane Goodall pictured with a chimpanzee in 2004 in Magdeburg, Germany

A Life That Listened: Remembering Jane Goodall

When the Jane Goodall Institute posted the short, solemn note that the primatologist had died “of natural causes” at 91, it felt like a falling branch in a very old forest — sudden, echoing, and full of memory. For many people around the world, Goodall was not only a scientist; she was the person who taught a generation to care about other creatures and to see ourselves reflected in them.

Her trajectory reads like an adventure novel. Born in London in 1934 and raised on the windswept shores of Bournemouth, she was a girl whose father gave her a stuffed gorilla and a stack of books — Tarzan, Dr. Dolittle — and those gifts set a compass needle that would never waver. Unable to afford university, she worked as a secretary and then for a film company, saving every penny until she could take a boat to East Africa in 1957. The rest, as the saying goes, was history — and a kind of revelation.

From Bournemouth to Gombe: An Encounter That Reordered Science

In Tanzania, near the magical blue rim of Lake Tanganyika, Goodall met Louis and Mary Leakey, whose encouragement steered her into a field largely closed to women and even more closed to amateurs. At Gombe Stream, she sat and watched. She named the chimpanzees — David Greybeard, Flo, Fifi — and recorded what she saw: tenderness between mothers and infants, rivalry, cleverness, grief, and something that made the scientific world reconsider a foundational idea.

“We have found that after all there isn’t a sharp line dividing humans from the rest of the animal kingdom,” she said in a 2002 TED Talk. The watershed moment came when she observed chimpanzees using twigs to fish for termites — a primitive tool. It was a simple action with seismic implications. “Now we must redefine tool, redefine man, or accept chimpanzees as humans,” Louis Leakey famously said after those discoveries.

Her notebooks — once simple pencil sketches and daily observations — became a mirror held up to the human condition. She showed the world that animals were not automatons but individuals with personalities. That choice to name animals, to speak of their grief and joy, was controversial to some colleagues at the time. To many outside the ivory tower, it was revolutionary and humane.

What Gombe Taught Us

Gombe was more than a research site; it was an intimate theatre where big truths were played out in the mud and canopy. Chimpanzees hunted and ate meat. Groups fought brutal, coordinated raids — behavior that forced scientists to rethink the origins of warfare and cooperation. Goodall’s ethnographic attention, combined with patient observation, produced data and metaphors that moved science and the public simultaneously.

“She taught us to look carefully and to listen,” said an old Gombe field assistant in a recent interview. “She listened to the forest and then taught everyone else how to listen.”

From Field Notes to the World Stage

When National Geographic began to follow her work, the chimps of Gombe became household characters. Her accounts — vivid, humane, unflinching — turned readers and viewers into witnesses. David Greybeard, with his silver streak, became as famous as any movie star, and Goodall’s films, books, and public appearances made science intimate and accessible.

But storytelling was never enough for her. By the late 1970s, Goodall had shifted from pure observation to action. She found that studying chimpanzees in isolation was a form of vanity if their forests were being cut down and their communities impoverished. In 1977 she founded the Jane Goodall Institute to protect the chimps and support local conservation and development.

Roots & Shoots, a youth-led action program she launched later, became one of her proudest legacies — a blueprint for how to turn compassion into organized civic action. “The children are the hope,” she would often say. “If you want to change the world, start with the young.”

A Life Spanning Bookshelves and Airplanes

Goodall wrote more than 30 books for adults and children, blending the intimacy of field impressions with ethical urgency. She traveled with astonishing regularity — sometimes 300 days a year — speaking in schools, addressing world leaders, and reminding audiences that the health of chimpanzees and of human communities were entangled.

“She had this uncanny ability to make you feel that you were part of something larger,” said a Roots & Shoots volunteer in Nairobi. “You weren’t just learning facts — you were being invited to belong.”

When Science Met Advocacy: A Turning Point

Goodall’s shift into global advocacy coincided with a worsening reality: forests were falling, and the future of many species — including our closest relatives — looked fragile. Today, wild chimpanzee populations are estimated to number well under 300,000 across Africa, with several subspecies classified as endangered or critically endangered. Forest loss continues at alarming rates — roughly 10 million hectares a year according to several global monitoring projects — and climate change now presses on every habitat she loved.

“She was never content to observe cruelty and look away,” said a conservation scientist based in Dar es Salaam. “Her message became: there’s a window to act — and it’s closing.”

Goodall’s framing moved conversations beyond species preservation to include human livelihoods, health, and justice. Her institute’s work blended reforestation and habitat protection with community education, sustainable agriculture, and advocacy — a holistic approach increasingly recognized as essential in conservation science.

Legacy, Honors, and the Human Stories

Throughout her life she was recognized with honors — named a Dame, lauded in scientific circles, and, more recently, awarded high civilian distinctions. Yet the thing that mattered most to many people was not the medals but the way she spoke to them: quietly insistently, with a hope that felt less like a naive optimism and more like a responsibility.

She married twice — first to wildlife cameraman Hugo van Lawick, with whom she had a son nicknamed “Grub,” and later to Derek Bryceson — and experienced private joys and sorrows beneath a life lived largely in public. “She didn’t live to be famous,” a longtime friend said. “She lived because she couldn’t not do the work she loved.”

Why Her Story Matters Now

Jane Goodall’s life presses on us a question: what do we owe to the living world and to each other? In an era of climate disruption, population pressures, and biodiversity loss, her answer — somewhere between science and sermon — was practical and moral: protect habitats, empower local people, and teach the next generation to act.

Her legacy is visible in reforested hills, in schoolchildren pulling plastic from rivers, in policies nudged toward conservation, and in the ordinary compassion of people who learned to look up from screens and notice the other lives around them.

So what will you do with the lesson she offered? Will you sign up to plant a tree, to support community conservation, to teach a child that animals have personalities? Or will you let her quiet, steady voice be another page in history?

Closing

Jane Goodall listened for a lifetime — to chimpanzees, to the forests, to the slow language of ecosystems. Her death marks the end of a chapter, but the book she opened is still being written. In the rustle of leaves at Gombe, in a classroom full of curious children, in seedlings pushed into dry soil, her work continues. The question is whether we will read it closely enough to answer the call.

Taliban imposes internet blackout, leaving millions of Afghans cut off

hanad

October 2, 2025

Taliban's internet shut down leaves Afghans stranded — The Taliban has not explained the connectivity blackout

When the Wires Went Silent: Life, Flight and Fracture in Kabul

On an autumn morning at Hamid Karzai International Airport, a young man stood clutching a paper ticket as if it were a passport back to normalcy. He stared at the departure board — a black rectangle, inscrutable and mute. Around him, faces hardened into the same puzzled expression: pilots, passengers, prayerful relatives, and a handful of exhausted airline workers. No one knew whether the flights would lift off; the internet had simply been turned off.

That blackout — ordered by Afghanistan’s de facto authorities — rippled across the city and the country with a force far beyond the loss of Wi‑Fi. By one count from Flightradar24, at least 14 flights scheduled for Kabul that day were cancelled outright, with dozens more listed as “unknown.” For people already living on a knife-edge, it was another layer of uncertainty stacked atop years of upheaval.

The immediate fallout: airports, banks, aid and conversation cut short

When connectivity evaporates, the modern world frays quickly. Banks could not authorise transactions. ATMs emptied faster and then stopped working. Aid agencies that track food distribution, beneficiary lists and the movements of staff were hamstrung. Local businesses — from the tea shops behind the airport to the small trading houses in downtown Kabul — were forced to close their shutters.

“It felt like someone pulled a plug on the city,” said Farida, a teacher who had been trying to book a ticket to visit her parents in Herat. “We use mobile banking for everything now. Today, even small kindnesses are trapped behind silence.”

The United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan warned that the shutdown risks “inflicting significant harm on the Afghan people, including by threatening economic stability and exacerbating one of the world’s worst humanitarian crises.” UN human rights bodies described the blackout as an “extremely serious human rights violation,” citing its outsized impact on women and girls who are already excluded from many aspects of public life.

How a few keystrokes affect whole communities

At a municipal post office, clerks thumbed through envelopes and stamped forms while muttering about bank verifications they could not complete. “We have mail, but no money to process it,” said one postmaster, tapping the top of a stack of parcels. “The systems we rely on — for fees, for identity checks — are all connected to networks that are gone.”

Kam Air, an Afghan carrier, reported running just a single flight since the blackout. Mohammad Bashir, a company representative, told local media that airlines must share flight plans and information with destination airports electronically — an impossible task with the national networks shut down. “We need to get people home,” he said. “But airplanes don’t fly on goodwill alone; they need data.”

Voices from the streets: small stories, large consequences

Walk through Kabul’s bazaars and you will hear economic data refracted into everyday worries: a fruit-seller fretting over transfers from wholesalers, a seamstress unable to receive payment for a wedding dress, a student unable to submit an essay. These are the small calamities that add up. “When there was internet, we never realized how important it was,” a bank teller told me, wiping his hands on his work shirt. “Now every balance is a worry.”

In the homes of many Kabul residents, family ties stretch across borders — cousins in Pakistan, in Europe, in the United States. Those ties are kept intact by messaging apps and social media. Without them, anxiety accumulates. “I couldn’t call my sister to tell her my mother was sick,” said Khalid, a trader. “Imagine carrying that alone.”

Where the blackout hits hardest

Air travel: at least 14 Kabul flights cancelled; dozens listed as “unknown” according to Flightradar24.
Banking: transactions, online authorisations and ATM services disrupted — hampering salaries, vendor payments and individual withdrawals.
Humanitarian assistance: data-dependent aid delivery and coordination compromised at a moment when needs are surging.
Freedom of expression: information flows curtailed, disproportionately affecting women, journalists and civil society networks.

Why would communications be cut?

The authorities have given scant explanation. In recent weeks, officials had spoken about moral concerns — publicly expressed alarm over online content — and had intermittently restricted fiber-optic links in certain provinces. But a nationwide phone-and-internet blackout is an escalation few expected. For many observers, information control is a tool as old as power itself: silence as governance.

“When you control the message, you control the response,” said Dr. Laila Rahimi, a political analyst based in the region. “Cutting communications isn’t only about preventing specific actions; it’s about shaping the landscape of risk, fear and mobility. For people who already have limited freedom, this is another way to curtail agency.”

Not just an Afghan problem: the global implications

Think for a moment about how fragile global networks can be. When one country is disconnected, international airlines shuffle schedules, aid agencies reroute supplies, and remittance flows — a lifeline for many families — wobble. Afghanistan is not an isolated case; authoritarian playbooks increasingly use digital blackouts to blunt dissent and control populations. From North Africa to South Asia, the world has seen how quick, targeted cutoffs can reshape politics and livelihoods.

And yet, the human cost is never merely theoretical. In Afghanistan, nine in ten people already depend on humanitarian assistance in some measure — a figure repeated in UN and aid agency reporting for years. In that context, disruptions to communication are not an inconvenience; they are life-threatening constraints on the delivery of food, medicine, and protection.

What might happen next?

There are a few pathways forward. The authorities could restore services, perhaps after implementing tighter controls or new regulations. The international community could pressure for reconnection, or aid agencies might turn to low-tech solutions — radio broadcasts, paper lists, in-person coordination — to bridge gaps. But each choice has costs, trade-offs, and ethical choices embedded within it.

“We need to balance security concerns with human rights,” said an aid coordinator who asked not to be named for safety reasons. “Cutting phones may quiet a city for a weekend, but it also cuts off the wounded, the elderly, the women who rely on hotlines, and the migrants trying to reach families. The poorest pay the price.”

Questions to sit with

As you read this from wherever you are — a café in Accra, a living room in London, a dorm in Delhi — consider how much of your day depends on invisible networks. How would your work, your family, your safety change if those lines were taken away? Who gets to decide when to silence a country? And perhaps most importantly: who speaks for those now muted?

Kabul’s airport may one day resume normal operations. Flights may be reinstated and phones may buzz again. But the blackout has already done more than cancel flights: it has reminded a weary world that control over information is control over life. In the waiting rooms and the marketplaces, people are recalibrating, grieving the conveniences lost and preparing for a future where connection is no longer a right but a conditional commodity.

“We are not just numbers in a system,” said an elderly woman watching planes taxi under a sun-dimmed sky. “We are families, names, stories. Turn it back on. Let us breathe.”

64-year-old man executed in Florida for 1990 Miami killings

hanad

October 1, 2025

Man, 64, executed in Florida for 1990 Miami murders — There have been 34 executions in the US this year and Florida has carried out the most (file image)

Nightfall in Florida: A Small Town, a Long Shadow, and the 34th Execution of the Year

The fluorescent glare of a prison perimeter light seemed harsh against the humid Florida air as the state carried out its latest execution near Jacksonville last night. At 6:13pm local time, officials said, a 64-year-old man, convicted of a pair of murders committed more than three decades ago, was put to death by lethal injection — the 34th such sentence carried out in the United States this year.

The name on the record is Victor Jones. The case reads like shorthand for the intersecting tragedies that haunt capital punishment debates: a young man who began work for a couple, a robbery that turned lethal, a desperate struggle in which both victim and attacker inflicted fatal wounds. Jacob and Matilda Nestor — ages 67 and 66, respectively — were killed in 1990, according to court files. The elder Nestor, by some accounts, managed to fire a shot that struck Jones before he succumbed to his own wounds.

A neighborhood remembers

In the days after the execution, neighbors and former colleagues exchanged memories and grievances the way communities do when something raw and old is reopened.

“They were the kind of people who left their door unlocked,” said one nearby resident, who asked to remain unnamed. “You don’t forget that. You don’t forget the sound of the sirens either.” His voice had the measured cadence of someone trying to hold grief at bay with fact: names, dates, sequence. “It’s been thirty years. But these things come back. You could feel it even now.”

Another neighbor, Rosa Nunez, recalled the Nestors with a humble warmth many used to describe the couple. “They were small-business people — proud, tired, early risers. He’d talk about the crew, she loved the plants out front,” she said. “When you hear about someone being put to death, it doesn’t erase what happened. It just brings everything to the surface.”

Contested minds, contested histories

Jones’s case reached the Florida Supreme Court last week after his legal team argued that he was intellectually disabled and had been abused in a reform school as a teenager — claims that, if accepted, might have precluded execution under U.S. Supreme Court precedent. The court declined to stay the sentence.

“Claims about intellectual disability and a history of institutional abuse are not mere procedural footnotes,” a defense lawyer familiar with death-penalty litigation told me. “They go to the heart of culpability and humane treatment.” He spoke on background to explain the complexities defense attorneys face when bringing scientific and historical evidence into courtrooms decades after a crime.

Experts in juvenile justice and developmental psychology say these issues are common in capital cases that stretch back many years. “We now understand cognitive impairment and the long-term harms of abusive reform schools in ways we didn’t in 1990,” said Dr. Lena King, a forensic psychologist. “But the legal system often moves slowly. That lag can mean the difference between life and death.”

Where this fits in the national picture

What happened in Florida is not isolated. This year’s tally of executions — 34 — is the highest the United States has seen since 2014, when 35 people were executed. Florida has been the most active state this year with 13 executions, followed by Texas (5), South Carolina (4) and Alabama (4), according to official tallies.

The methods used tell a story of both continuity and experimentation. Lethal injection remains the predominant method — 28 of this year’s executions were carried out that way — but states have also turned to older or newer alternatives: two executions by firing squad and four by nitrogen hypoxia, a method that forces a prisoner to inhale nearly pure nitrogen and suffocates them without the presence of oxygen. Nitrogen hypoxia has drawn condemnation from international human-rights experts.

“To subject someone to asphyxiation by nitrogen is to adopt a method the U.N. has called cruel and inhumane,” said Marcus Reed, director of a national anti-death-penalty coalition. “This trend shows that, when faced with litigation and shortages of drugs for lethal injection, states will seek other ways — but ethical constraints still apply.”

Maps of morality: laws and paroles of conscience

The legal landscape across the fifty states is a patchwork. Twenty-three states have abolished capital punishment outright. Three large states — California, Oregon and Pennsylvania — maintain moratoriums on executions, a pause often put in place by governors or by court rulings. Across state lines, public attitudes vary dramatically, shaped by politics, crime rates, and local histories of racial and economic inequality.

One striking piece of context: in Washington, D.C., and much of Western Europe, capital punishment is a historical relic. In parts of the U.S., it remains an active instrument of the criminal-justice system. That dissonance raises questions about what kinds of societies continue to sanction state killing, and why.

Voices on both sides

Supporters of capital punishment often point to a desire for justice and closure. “It’s not about revenge,” said a family member of one slain victim in a different case, who insisted on anonymity. “It’s about knowing the person who took our loved one pays the price. We want safety for others.”

Opponents counter with concerns about fairness, error and humanity. “We have executed innocent people before,” said a former public defender who now teaches criminal-law ethics. “We also disproportionately prosecute and sentence people of color and the poor to death. These are not abstract concerns — they are systemic problems.”

What do we make of all this?

As you read these words, consider the human contours behind the statistics: the couple who built a business and were killed in their sixties; the young man with a scarred past who was still fighting to have his mental capacity and history of abuse weighed in the balance; the neighbors who had to reconcile grief with the pageantry of an execution.

Are executions a measure of justice, or a ritual that lets society declare closure while leaving deeper wounds untouched? Do new methods of execution make the process more humane, or do they simply paper over an ethical rupture? And importantly, how should a democratic society account for decades of scientific progress about the brain, trauma and culpability when retroactively deciding matters of life and death?

These questions are not theoretical. They are the kind neighbors, lawyers and advocates continue to wrestle with at kitchen tables and in courtrooms across the country. They shape policy and they shape lives.

Where do we go from here?

In a nation that is increasingly divided over the death penalty, cases like Jones’s force a reckoning: with the machinery that decides who lives and who dies, with the uneven application of justice, and with the human stories that statistics too easily flatten.

As reforms, moratoriums and legal challenges continue to ripple across statehouses and Supreme Court chambers, one thing is clear: the debate is not going away. It moves with the slow, patient grind of the law — and with the abrupt, painful jolts of human grief. Will policy follow conscience, or will political currents keep the status quo in place? That, perhaps, is the question that will define this chapter of American justice.

Accused pleads not guilty to murder of Irish national in London

hanad

October 1, 2025

Man pleads not guilty to murder of Irish man in London — John Mackey died after he was attacked while walking home in London in May last year

A quiet walk home that became a city’s sorrow

On an ordinary evening in north London, an 87-year-old man stepped out with a paper tucked under his arm and a bag of dinner from the kebab shop he’d always patronised. He was heading toward the small flat that had been his anchor for decades — a steady home in an ever-changing city — when that routine was shattered.

John Mackey, born in Callan in County Kilkenny, Ireland, had spent more than half his life in London after moving there at 19. He kept his ties to Ireland alive with visits and phone calls, but most mornings and evenings were lived out in the neighbourhood he loved: stopping by the Co-op for essentials and the same kebab counter for a warm meal.

On 6 May 2025 he never made it all the way home. Two days after sustaining head injuries in an attack as he walked from the shops, Mr Mackey died in hospital.

The accused, the court, and what lies ahead

This week, the case moved into the London courts. Fifty-eight-year-old Peter Augustine appeared by video link at the Old Bailey, formally charged with one count of murder and one count of robbery.

“He pleaded not guilty,” a court official confirmed after the brief hearing. The judge also heard that no psychiatric defence would be raised — a detail that shapes both how the defence will be framed and how the family, community, and public conversation will proceed.

A trial has been scheduled to begin on 3 November. Until then, the questions swirl: what happened in those few minutes on a north London street? Why target an elderly man on his way home? And what will justice look like for a family torn between grief and memory?

Key timeline

6 May 2025 — Mr Mackey attacked while walking from a Co-op and a nearby kebab shop.
8 May 2025 — He dies in hospital from head injuries.
Month later — He is buried back in Callan, Co Kilkenny, amid family and friends.
Recent hearing — Defendant appears at the Old Bailey; not guilty plea entered and no psychiatric defence to be used. Trial set for 3 November 2025.

Voices from the street and across the sea

In the days after the attack, strangers and neighbours tried to stitch together what had happened with memory and lament. “He always nodded to everyone,” said Mary O’Connor, who runs a small florist two doors down from the Co-op. “If he bought a paper he’d stand a while and chat. He was part of the fabric of our morning.”

At the kebab counter, the owner, Ahmed, still keeps a seat propped against the wall where Mr Mackey would rest his shopping. “We argued about football,” Ahmed laughed softly, then grew quiet. “He loved his Kerry team. He would say, ‘I’m not bothered about much, just give me my tea and the match.’ He was a gentleman.”

The family’s voice has been steadier and more private. A daughter, speaking on behalf of relatives, described him this way: “Dad was simple in the best sense — kind, tidy, a man of routine. He would never ask for trouble. We’re just left with how much we miss him.”

What the legal detail means

The decision not to pursue a psychiatric defence matters. “Legally, that removes one of the main avenues by which a defence might seek to explain or excuse behaviour on grounds of mental disorder,” explained Caroline Reed, a criminal barrister familiar with Old Bailey practice. “It means the defence is likely to contest the facts, or raise other legal defences, rather than arguing lack of criminal responsibility.”

That will put the spotlight squarely on evidence: witness accounts, CCTV, and forensic analysis. For a family that wants answers, the trial will be their reckoning.

Roots, ritual, and the long Irish thread in London

Mr Mackey’s funeral in Callan last June was a homeward ceremony — a sleepy Irish town folding one of its own back into the landscape. “We lost a man who kept two worlds: the hum of London and the green of Kilkenny,” said Father Declan, who presided at the service. “There was a crowd; the older ones remembered when he left for work as a young man. The young ones learned a little about migration and memory.”

The story of Mr Mackey is also a story about the Irish diaspora: the steady migration of young people to cities like London, and the quiet lives they build there — lives often unremarked until tragedy forces a spotlight. Across Britain, generations who once left Ireland for work now find themselves elderly and, in some cases, vulnerable.

Safety, ageing, and urban life

The attack on Mr Mackey brings into relief larger questions about the safety of older people in cities. Ageing populations are increasing across the UK and Europe, and with that come real concerns about loneliness, mobility, and exposure. Community groups and charities have been sounding the alarm for years: older adults are often targeted in opportunistic robberies, and their injuries can be catastrophic.

“Urban planning and policing need to think about the everyday places people rely on — shops, bus stops, well-lit routes home,” noted Dr. Lillian Perez, a sociologist who studies ageing and urban spaces. “It’s not just about arrests after the fact; it’s about designing cities that protect dignity and independence.”

How do we grieve and respond?

There’s a delicate choreography to public grief after a crime like this. On the one hand, there is the private pain of a family who buried their father in the gentle rains of an Irish summer. On the other, a neighbourhood and a city attempt to make sense of violence interrupting a simple human rhythm — the walk from shop to home.

Neighbours lit candles. A notice on the Co-op window thanked the community for its condolences. “We put flowers where he used to buy his paper,” Mary said, her voice tight. “It’s the little things that keep a life real.”

Questions for readers and the wider society

What does it mean to protect the most vulnerable among us in big cities? How should criminal justice balance accountability with understanding? And perhaps most quietly: how can communities keep the rituals of daily life — buying a newspaper, sharing a nod — safe and sacred?

As we wait for November’s trial, the answers will be argued in court. But the larger conversation — about care for elders, migration and memory, and how we make public spaces safe — belongs to all of us. Will we learn? Will we change the small things that make daily life livable? That is, in the end, part of what this loss demands.

Until a verdict is reached, John Mackey will be remembered in the patchwork of a neighbourhood: in a kebab shop chair, in the rustle of a newspaper, in the memory of a man who quietly stitched two countries into his life. “He was a real gentleman,” a relative said simply. “That’s how we’ll keep him.”

New York apartment building suffers partial structural collapse

hanad

October 1, 2025

New York apartment building partially collapses — A view of the partial collapse of an apartment building at 205 Alexander Avenue in Bronx, New York

When a Corner of Home Turns to Dust: Morning Collapse at the Mitchel Houses

The sun had barely found its way over the South Bronx when an ordinary morning unraveled into a cloud of dust and stunned silence.

At about 8:10 a.m., on a crisp October day, one corner of a 20‑storey NYCHA high‑rise in Mott Haven — part of the sprawling Mitchel Houses complex — crumbled, leaving a jagged vertical gap from the ground floor to the roof and a scatter of bricks and twisted metal where families minutes earlier had been living their routines.

The city’s fire department said it was responding to a report of a gas explosion that blew out an incinerator shaft, though officials stressed that there were no immediate reports of injuries and that no residential units were directly affected.

First images: dust, air conditioners and a shocked neighborhood

Cellphone videos shared by neighbors captured the moment: a pall of dust billowing over the block, apartment windows shuttered with particulate streaking across the frame, and air conditioners strewn like toppled trophies among the rubble — evidence of the force that ripped them from window frames.

“I came out with my coffee and there was dust everywhere,” said Maria Torres, 52, who lives two buildings down and watched parts of the façade rain onto the sidewalk. “I thought it was a truck at first. Then I saw the whole corner was gone. I keep thinking about kids and the old people. It could have been worse.”

Mayor Eric Adams, who said he had been briefed on the emergency, urged people to steer clear of the area. “We are getting a full assessment from first responders and will continue to provide updates,” he wrote on X. “Please avoid the area for your safety.”

Responders, rubble and an unfolding inquiry

Within minutes, FDNY engines, NYPD officers, city building inspectors and crews from Con Edison converged on the scene. Police established a safety perimeter and firefighters began a methodical sweep to ensure the building was stable and that no apartments had been compromised behind the visibly collapsed exterior.

“Upon arrival, officers observed a partial building collapse and immediately began coordinating with fire and building department units,” an NYPD spokesman said. “We are assisting with evacuations as necessary and securing the area.”

The New York City Housing Authority, which manages the Mitchel Houses, said an investigation was under way to determine the cause and the full extent of the damage beyond the reported exterior damage to what the agency described as an incinerator chimney.

“We are focused on making sure residents are safe and that any immediate needs are met,” a NYCHA spokesperson said. “We will work closely with the city, Con Edison and our inspectors to assess structural integrity and next steps.”

History buried in the shaft: what an incinerator meant

To many younger New Yorkers the word “incinerator shaft” might sound antiquated, but these vertical chutes — once used to burn trash inside apartment buildings — are part of the bones of older public housing stock.

Incinerators were common in mid‑century public housing; over time they were largely replaced by trash compactors and modernized chutes. Still, many buildings retain the original shafts, which can be vulnerable if damaged or if utility leaks interact with embedded old systems.

“This is a vivid example of how legacy systems and aging infrastructure can intersect with everyday life,” said Dr. Leila Hernandez, an urban infrastructure scholar. “When a system installed decades ago faces modern stressors — deferred maintenance, shifting temperatures, increased energy loads — the risks compound.”

Half a million voices in aging buildings

The Mitchel Houses are part of a public housing portfolio that is among the nation’s largest. Roughly half a million New Yorkers live across developments run by NYCHA; many of those buildings date back to the 1940s through the 1960s.

For decades residents have catalogued persistent problems — leaking roofs, mold, rodent infestations, and intermittent heat and hot‑water outages. In 2019 a federal monitor was appointed to address those chronic issues; when his five‑year term concluded in 2024, monitor Bart Schwartz warned that the overarching problem remained the “poor physical state of NYCHA’s buildings.”

Advocates and agency documents have long pointed to a massive repair backlog. “The capital needs are vast,” said Jamal Reed, director of a Bronx tenant advocacy group. “Estimates from various audits place that backlog in the tens of billions of dollars — money that has to be found if we want to prevent scenes like this.”

Many residents echoed Reed’s sentiment with weary familiarity. “You learn to live with the noise, the leak, the mold,” said Arturo Jimenez, 67. “But when a wall falls away, you realize living with danger is not the same as living with home.”

Beyond the block: cities, inequality and infrastructure

This collapse is not just a local incident. It is a flashpoint in a much larger American story about aging urban infrastructure, strained municipal budgets and who bears the risk when systems fail.

Municipal housing authorities across the United States are grappling with similar dilemmas — roofs, boilers and façades that were never designed for a century of continuous occupancy, modern energy usage, or the added strain of extreme weather events that climate experts warn will become more frequent.

“Infrastructure is a social policy,” Dr. Hernandez said. “If you let a subset of the population live in deteriorating buildings while other neighborhoods get new investments, you are embedding inequality into the city’s physical fabric.”

Local business owners on the block spoke about the immediate economic shock: a small bodega shuttered for the morning, delivery drivers rerouted and a lunchtime crowd diverted. “You worry not just for safety but for what this does to our rents, our customers, our lives,” said Rosa Delgado, who runs a hair salon two doors down.

Questions that now hang in the air

Residents want answers. How did an incinerator shaft come to collapse? Could a gas leak have been detected sooner? What inspections were performed, and who is accountable for deferred repairs?

City agencies and utility crews said they would piece together a timeline and forensic analysis in the days ahead. Con Edison representatives at the scene said they were working with investigators to determine whether a gas leak contributed to the events.

“Safety is our priority,” a Con Edison spokesperson said. “We are cooperating fully with local authorities and will share any findings relevant to our systems.”

What this moment asks of us

When the dust settles, when emergency tape is removed and the scaffolding goes up, this neighborhood will still be home to thousands of people whose lives are threaded through the same streets, stoops and corner stores as before. But this collapse is a reminder — visceral and public — that city stewardship matters.

How much do we value the safety of public housing residents? How quickly will funds be mobilized to repair and retrofit ailing buildings? And how will cities balance immediate emergency response with long‑term investment in structural resilience?

As you read this from wherever you are, consider the concrete forms your own city takes — the invisible systems humming underfoot, the pipes and shafts and boilers that rarely make headlines until they fail. Who is watching them? Who pays when they do?

“We need more than promises,” said Jamal Reed. “We need a plan and the money to execute it — not next year, not in five years, but now.”

The investigation is ongoing. For families on that block in Mott Haven, and for the thousands who live in older public housing across the city, the waiting will be measured in inspections, insurance claims and, for now, the slow, careful work of making their homes whole again.

U.S. Government Shutdown Begins Amid Funding Bill Deadlock

hanad

October 1, 2025

US govt begins shutdown amid standoff over funding bill — The last government shutdown came in 2018 and lasted for 35 days

Midnight at the Capitol: When the Lights Go Out on Washington

It was past midnight when the last light in Room S-xxx flicked off and federal employees trickled out into a wet, cold night. A janitor paused at the doorway, broom in hand, and looked back at the cavernous hallway lined with flags and portraits of men and women who had once embodied a steadier sense of national purpose.

“You get this uncanny hush,” he said, voice low. “Like the building is holding its breath.”

That breath held on as Washington slipped into its 15th government shutdown since 1981 — a fissure torn open by partisan rancor and an unresolved fight over funding a government that, by some tallies, consumes roughly $7 trillion annually. At stake, this time, is roughly $1.7 trillion earmarked for government agencies — about a quarter of that total — and the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of people who keep the country running.

What’s Closing — and Who’s Feeling It

By dawn, agencies began posting notices: selective closures to “non-essential” services, delays in research, pauses in public programs, and the specter of withheld pay for active-duty service members. Officials warned that some 750,000 federal workers could be furloughed, that each day without an agreement could cost the economy roughly $400 million, and that a closely watched September jobs report would be held back, obscuring a key gauge of the U.S. economy.

At Reagan National Airport a line snaked out from the TSA checkpoint. An airline gate agent, Samira, tossed a weary smile toward passengers piled with carry-ons.

“We’re doing everything we can,” she said. “But everything takes longer when machines are slowed, when back-office processing is paused. People are nervous—this is about more than missed pay. It’s grandparents who booked trips, scientists waiting on grant disbursements, and troops who want to know if they’ll see their checks.”

The human math

Estimated furloughed workers: 750,000
Projected daily cost to the economy: ~$400 million
Government operations funding at issue: $1.7 trillion
U.S. national debt referenced in reporting: $37.5 trillion

These are not just numbers on a ledger. They are paychecks delayed, meals deferred, and research projects paused mid-experiment. They are park rangers who may close trails midseason and federal grant administrators who cannot get checks out the door.

A Political Standoff That Smells Like History

The shutdown unfolded after the Senate rejected a stopgap spending bill that would have kept the lights on until late November. Democrats opposed the short-term measure because it lacked an extension of health subsidies that millions depend on — benefits set to expire at year’s end. Republicans insisted the health matter must be handled separately.

“We tried to offer a bridge,” a Senate aide told me, returning my call late last night. “But bridges are only useful if both sides want to cross.”

That stalemate is sharpened by rules that require 60 votes in the Senate to pass spending legislation. With Republicans holding the majority, they still needed support from at least seven Democrats to clear the procedural threshold — a tall order in an era of intensified polarization.

Some administration officials have signaled a willingness to use the shutdown strategically. “Less bipartisan” appropriations and threats of permanent layoffs have been floated by budget officials, even as the White House warned that a sustained impasse could justify “irreversible” cuts to federal programs.

Markets murmur while the public waits

Financial markets reacted with the nervousness you would expect. Futures dipped, gold ticked up to new highs as investors fled for perceived safety, and the dollar wobbled near a one-week low. Wall Street traders described the scene as a hedge against uncertainty — a costly sentiment translated into numbers that will, in turn, shape retirement accounts and mortgage rates.

Voices from the Fractures

Inside the Senate cloister, lawmakers traded blame like currency. “They want to bully us,” a senior Democratic leader said, jaw set. “We will not be bullied.”

Across the aisle, a Senate Republican countered: “This bill had no riders. It was a clean solution. We’re not the ones making this personal — politics has simply found a new temperature.”

Outside the Capitol, the faces I met carried the debate into more intimate terrain. Maria, 57, had worked for the Social Security Administration for 28 years. She worried about the clients who couldn’t get answers the way they used to.

“This isn’t a game for the people calling my office,” she said. “These are small businesses, veterans, folks trying to file their paperwork. We become the wall between them and chaos when funding stops.”

A National Park Service ranger at Shenandoah — who asked to be identified only as Jay — painted a quieter picture of loss. “This place hums because people can do their jobs,” he told me while shaking a steaming cup of coffee. “When those jobs stop, trails close. Field work shuts down. And you can’t just pick it up where you left off once funding comes back.”

Beyond the Headlines: What This Means Worldwide

Government shutdowns are not purely domestic dramas. They ripple outward: delayed economic data muddies markets abroad, suspended scientific work interrupts global collaborations, and a weakened domestic capacity to respond to crises can strain international partnerships.

When American researchers cannot access federal labs or grants are put on hold, collaborative projects from climate modeling to epidemiology are slowed. When the U.S. posture abroad appears distracted, allies and adversaries alike take note.

“We’re in an era where governance stability is as important as economic metrics,” said Dr. Laila Hernandez, a political scientist at a major university. “A shutdown signals to the world that internal conflicts can interrupt essential functions — that has consequences for diplomacy, trade, and global resilience.”

What else is at stake?

Continuity of defense and national security operations (pay, morale)
Scientific research and public health surveillance
Air travel logistics and airport services
Social safety nets and health subsidy programs

Is There a Way Back?

There are procedural pathways — short-term continuing resolutions, targeted bills, or an across-the-board compromise — but political leaders must be willing to walk them. That willingness depends not just on policy terms but on pressures from constituents, donors, and party activists who are more mobilized and less forgiving than in previous eras.

“Politics is changing,” Professor Robert Pape, who studies political violence, warned. “Leaders on both sides face intense pressure from rank-and-file supporters. Each concession risks alienating them. That makes compromise harder — and the consequences, for ordinary people, more severe.”

So here’s a question for you, the reader: when the mechanics of government become bargaining chips, who gets left holding the pieces? Who pays attention to the national security clerk whose overtime is sliced away, or the researcher whose grant deadline lapses, or the low-income family scrambling to keep benefits?

Late-Night Reflections

Back at the Capitol, the janitor finished his sweep and closed the heavy door. The building seemed smaller in the night air, less a temple of governance than a reminder that systems require constant tending.

“We talk a lot about who wins and who loses in politics,” he said quietly. “But think about the people who never get talked about — the people who keep this place running so the rest of us can sleep.”

That image — of systems and people, fragile and indispensable — is the quiet center of any shutdown. The longer the stand-off stretches, the more the toll will be measured not only in dollars and polls but in trust: the slow erosion of confidence that a nation’s institutions can meet the needs of its people.

Will the parties find a way back to the table? Will the pause become a dent or a rupture? The answers will shape not only the next paycheck but the story we tell, collectively, about what government is for. And perhaps that is the question worth staying awake for.

Ibiza schools shut as torrential downpours trigger widespread flooding

hanad

October 1, 2025

Schools closed on Ibiza as torrential rain causes floods — Emergency services on the islands sent a mass telephone alert to residents urging them to avoid travel and outdoor activities

When the Sea Came Visiting: How a Mediterranean Storm Turned Ibiza’s Streets Into Rivers

There is a peculiar hush that falls over a holiday island when the weather turns from sultry to savage. On Ibiza and neighboring Formentera, that hush was punctured by sirens and the thump of rain on corrugated awnings — an urgent, insistent drumbeat telling people to stay inside.

“I woke to the sound of water hitting the shutters like fists,” said Javier Morales, who runs a small beachfront bar near Figueretas. “We’re used to strong storms, but this felt different — as if the sky had decided to empty everything at once.”

On the ground, the images were stark: palm trees bending under sheets of mud-coloured water, pedestrians splashing through ankle-deep torrents along promenades usually dotted with sunbeds and late-night revelers, and cars staggering forward as if through treacle. A mass telephone alert — an automated shrill that many islanders recognized from last year’s emergencies — urged everyone to avoid travel, stay away from streams and basements, and shelter from the rain that national forecasters said had come in a relentless, “very slow” pack.

Measures and Memories: Schools, Beaches, and Emergency Deployments

Regional authorities moved quickly. Beaches were closed. Classes were suspended — students in Ibiza and Formentera were told to remain at school “until further notice” to avoid hazardous journeys. The Balearic government logged 132 incidents on Ibiza alone: flooded ground floors, blocked roads, fallen trees and urban debris, and the looming threat of rivers breaking their banks.

Spain’s army emergencies unit was mobilized, with reinforcements arriving from Mallorca and the mainland. Emergency teams waded the streets and assessed the structural risks to homes and businesses. Small boats that usually bobbed lazily in marinas were lashed down; dumpsters floated like sad islands until crews could secure them.

“Our priority is people,” said a local emergency coordinator who asked not to be named. “Property can be replaced. A life cannot. We are focused on rescue and making sure that everyone who needs help can communicate that need.”

How Heavy Was the Rain?

Meteorologists from AEMET, Spain’s national weather agency, quantified the deluge: up to 200 litres of rain per square metre in parts of Ibiza, a staggering amount when you imagine two hundred one-litre bottles poured over every square metre of land. The slow-moving nature of the storm compounded its damage — heavy showers sitting over the same area for hours, unable to move on.

That intensity prompted AEMET to issue its highest red alert for the Balearic islands before downgrading to orange as conditions began to ease. The earlier red alert had forced schools to close across the eastern Valencia region too — a painful echo of the devastating floods there 11 months earlier, which claimed the lives of more than 200 people and left deep scars in coastal communities.

Voices from the Islands

“You could feel the island holding its breath,” said Maria López, a teacher in Sant Antoni. “We kept the children here because the roads were impassable; buses couldn’t run safely. We turned the gym into a waiting area and made coffee. The teachers joked, nervously, about becoming the island’s temporary guardians.”

Fishermen, who read the sea like a book, spoke in shorter, harder sentences. “The Mediterranean is not the peaceful aunt it used to be,” muttered Paco, a local with callused hands and a face browned by wind. “The sea warms and it forgets how to be gentle.”

Climate Change: The Bigger Picture

There are no neat, single-cause answers when it comes to storms. But scientists are increasingly clear that a warming world is reshaping how — and how often — extreme weather occurs. As the atmosphere warms, it can hold more moisture. As the oceans warm, they feed storms with extra energy.

“We’re seeing rainfall events becoming more intense and more clustered,” said Dr. Ana Ruiz, an oceanographer and climate researcher based in Barcelona. “The Mediterranean Sea has warmed significantly in recent decades — faster than the global average in some measures — and the ocean has soaked up about 90% of the excess heat generated by human activities since the industrial era. That’s not abstract data; that’s the source of storms packing unprecedented punch.”

For island economies dependent on tourism, the implications are acute. Short-term disruptions mean lost business; longer-term shifts in seasonal weather patterns threaten livelihoods and the cultural rhythms that have defined these places for generations.

Local Color Amid the Crisis

Even in the grey of the storm, there was familiar island life on display — the neighborly sharing of umbrellas, fishermen helping to lift a stranded car out of churned mud, and a pastry shop owner handing out warm croissants to exhausted emergency crews.

Formentera’s quiet coves, usually postcard-perfect, grew brooding under sheets of rain. Beach umbrellas lay flattened like discarded hats. The crisis brought neighbours out into communal spaces — street corners and sheltered plazas — where stories were exchanged and practical help organized.

132 incidents reported on Ibiza (flooding, fallen trees, urban damage)
Up to 200 litres of rain per square metre in hardest-hit areas
Red alert briefly issued by AEMET, later downgraded to orange
More than 200 deaths in last year’s Valencia floods, a stark warning
Oceans have absorbed roughly 90% of excess heat from human activity since the industrial age

What Can We Learn — and Do?

These storms are a reminder that the costs of climate change are not distant or abstract; they arrive on our doorsteps in the form of flooded streets, closed schools, and nights spent waiting for news. But they also reveal resilience — the networks of neighbors who step up, the teachers who turn gyms into shelters, and the first responders who risk their lives.

What should we be asking policymakers? What are communities doing to adapt? How can tourists and residents alike better prepare? These aren’t rhetorical questions. They go to planning, infrastructure investment, early-warning systems, and land-use policies that no longer treat extreme weather as an exotic anomaly.

“We need investment in drainage, in resilient buildings, in nature-based solutions — restoring dunes, wetlands, and slow pathways for water,” Dr. Ruiz said. “Every euro spent on adaptation now will save much more in future recovery costs.”

Practical Steps for Locals and Visitors

Sign up for local emergency alerts and heed official advice.
Avoid travel during red and orange alerts; stay away from streams and basements.
Support local businesses affected by closures when the rain stops.
Push for long-term planning: better drainage, stronger building codes, and nature-based flood defenses.

Leaving the Island — and Taking a Lesson Home

When the sun finally edged through the clouds and salt-caked streets began to dry, the conversation on the islands shifted from immediate cleanup to reflection. How did a place so accustomed to the rhythms of sea and sun find itself at the mercy of such ferocity?

“We aren’t victims of weather,” Javier, the bar owner, said quietly as he swept mud from the threshold of his closed cafe. “We are part of a changing climate. The question is whether we will become architects of our own safety, or wait for the next storm to tell us what to do.”

These Mediterranean islands are a microcosm of a global story: communities adapting in real time, weather events that once would have been rare becoming more frequent, and the urgent need to act locally while thinking globally. What will we choose — denial, delay, or a long, determined pivot toward resilience?

As you read this, consider the last storm that caught you off guard. What did you learn? What would you change if the sky opened again? The islands are waiting for answers, and not just from meteorologists or ministers, but from all of us.

Trump warns Hamas has 3–4 days to answer proposed deal

hanad

October 1, 2025

Trump: Hamas has three or four days to respond to deal — Israeli army missiles strike the high-rise 'Mekka Tower' in Gaza City's Rimal neighbourhood

A White House Ultimatum, a Region on Edge: Three or Four Days to Decide Gaza’s Future

There is a particular theater to diplomacy when the cameras are rolling and the stakes are bodily high. Standing at the lectern in the West Wing, US President Donald Trump offered what sounded like a fuse—short, brittle, and possibly scorched already.

“We’re going to do about three or four days,” he told reporters, a curt timeline for a decision that could reshape the lives of millions in Gaza and Israel. “We’re just waiting for Hamas, and Hamas is either going to be doing it or not. And if it’s not, it’s going to be a very sad end.”

Those words landed like thunder in capitals from Cairo to Ankara, Doha to Jerusalem. They also landed in the living rooms of Gazans who sleep in broken buildings and Israelis living with the trauma of kidnappings and rocket sirens. The message was blunt: accept a 20-point ceasefire plan put forward at the White House or face the consequences with US-backed Israeli action.

What’s in the Plan?

The plan, released publicly by the White House, is ambitious and punitive in equal measure.

Immediate ceasefire and staged Israeli withdrawal from Gaza, contingent on Hamas compliance.
A hostage exchange: hostages held by Hamas for Palestinian prisoners held by Israel.
Demilitarisation of Gaza and a handover of authority to an international transitional body, with security initially guaranteed by Israel and then transferred to an international peacekeeping force.
Hamas disarmament, disbanding of its rule, safe passage for leaders, and amnesty offers for fighters who renounce violence.

In short, it is a plan designed to break Hamas’s military and political power and to place Gaza under a form of international trusteeship—at least for a period. The document speaks of reconstruction funds, with Gulf Arab states reportedly prepared to spend billions on rebuilding Gaza for the people who remain, and hints at a distant path toward Palestinian statehood.

Diplomacy on Fast-Forward: Qatar, Turkey, Egypt

Whether any of this is feasible depends on the one party conspicuously absent from the White House stage: Hamas. Qatar publicly said it would convene talks with Hamas negotiators and Turkey to study the plan.

“The negotiating delegation promised to study it responsibly,” Majed al-Ansari, a spokesman for Qatar’s foreign ministry, told journalists. “There will also be another meeting today, also attended by the Turkish side, with the negotiating delegation.”

Qatar and Egypt, which have acted as intermediaries for years, reportedly shared the 20-point text with Hamas. Officials briefed on the discussions describe a cautious response: a pledge to review the plan in good faith, even as scepticism runs deep on the ground.

Voices from the Ground

In Gaza City, amid streets turned to rubble, a mother named Aisha told me over a cracked tea cup, “They ask us to choose peace, but peace sounds like a contract signed without our ink.” Her brother, a former civil servant, added, “We want the children to live. But how do you trust a guarantee when your home is Shell-1?”

Across the border in southern Israel, a father whose daughter was taken in the October 7 attack spoke with a rawness that pierced the jargon: “I want my daughter back alive. No plan that does not deliver that is a plan.” He said he supported measures that ensure security but feared that promises without verifiable guarantees would be a repeat of past disappointments.

Netanyahu’s Conditional Backing

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stood at the White House beside President Trump and endorsed the plan—on his terms. He was explicit about one non-negotiable: no Palestinian state, at least not under the language he accepts.

“Not at all, and it is not written in the agreement. One thing was made clear: We will strongly oppose a Palestinian state,” Netanyahu posted overnight on his Telegram channel, stressing instead that Israeli forces would “remain in most of the Gaza Strip” until security conditions are met.

“We will recover all our hostages, alive and well,” he added, a promise designed to reassure Israelis traumatized by the October 7 assault that killed 1,219 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally from Israeli official figures.

International Chorus: Tentative Welcome, Cautious Optimism

The plan won a mixed reception globally. A joint statement from Egypt, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, the UAE, Turkey, Indonesia and Pakistan welcomed the proposal. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen tweeted a call for the parties to “seize this opportunity” and offered EU support for humanitarian relief and reconstruction.

Irelands’ leaders added their voices, urging an immediate ceasefire and the release of hostages. “The suffering in Gaza is unconscionable,” the Taoiseach said, calling for a pragmatic, long-term approach to peace and governance.

The Human Cost Remains Unbearable

If the math of diplomacy feels remote, the numbers on the ground are not. The Gaza war—triggered by Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attack—has left the strip in ruins. Official tallies paint a grim picture: the Israeli offensive has killed 66,055 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to figures from Gaza’s health ministry. Buildings once full of life are reduced to skeletons of concrete; markets are punctuated by closed shutters and the scent of dust and diesel.

Humanitarian agencies warn that the cessation of hostilities must be accompanied by immediate, sustained aid. Food insecurity, collapsing healthcare, and the spread of disease are not policy talking-points—they are immediate threats to survival for families living amid wreckage.

A Fragile Road Ahead: Questions That Won’t Go Away

This plan raises profound questions—tactical and moral. Can a disarmament be verified? Who will hold power during the transition, and how will ordinary Gazans be represented? What guarantees exist that promised reconstruction will not become another story of pledges unfulfilled?

And then there is the question every neighbor and passerby must ask: can peace be imposed from the top down, or must it be painstakingly negotiated from the ground up? Can exile or amnesty for leaders provide a durable closure—or merely a reset button that will be pressed again?

Where Do We Go From Here?

In the days that followed the White House unveiling, mediators circulated the text, Hamas said it would study it, and the clock started—three or four days, the president had said. The world watched.

For ordinary people in Gaza and for families in Israel who count missing relatives by name, the timeframe feels like both a blessing and a threat. A ceasefire would bring immediate relief, but the terms of a lasting peace will be written in the slow, messy language of trust-building: reparations, reconstruction, security guarantees, governance, and ultimately the right of people to choose their future.

What would you accept to ensure your neighbor’s children could sleep through the night? Would you turn over your guns if you could be certain your family would not again be terrorized? These are not abstract questions; they are the questions of our time. The world may be watching a diplomatic sprint. But true peace—if it is to be real—will be a marathon.

1...262728...118 Page 27 of 118