Former Ukrainian parliamentary speaker Parubiy fatally shot

By

-

August 31, 2025

Ukrainian former parliamentary speaker Parubiy shot dead — Andriy Parubiy was shot dead in the Ukrainian city of Lvivon (file photo)

Shockwaves in Lviv: The Assassination of Andriy Parubiy and Ukraine’s Struggle for Security

On a bright summer morning in Lviv, the historic heart of western Ukraine, a shadow fell suddenly and irrevocably over the city known for its cobblestone streets, vibrant coffee culture, and resilient spirit. Andriy Parubiy, a towering figure in Ukrainian politics and a symbol of the country’s quest for sovereignty, was shot dead in broad daylight. The manhunt for his killer is underway, but the echo of that gunshot ripples far beyond the crime scene, stirring deep anxiety in a nation already battered by war.

The Man Behind the Headlines: A Life Marked by Courage and Defiance

Andriy Parubiy was not just a name to watch in the corridors of Kyiv’s parliament; he was a man etched into the saga of Ukraine’s fight for democracy and independence. At 54, Parubiy carried the weight of history on his shoulders. From serving as the speaker of Ukraine’s parliament between 2016 and 2019 to steering security policy during the tumultuous early months of Russia’s 2014 invasion, his was a life woven tightly into the fabric of Ukraine’s modern identity.

To locals, Parubiy was a familiar figure—someone who marched shoulder to shoulder with thousands in the cold, snow-filled streets during the Euromaidan protests of 2013-2014. Those protests were not just political demonstrations but a bold demand for Ukraine to choose its own destiny, to weave itself into the European tapestry rather than remain tethered to Russian influence. “He was one of us—a patriot who breathed life into the dream of a free Ukraine,” a Lviv resident recounted tearfully.

During the early, darkest days of the conflict that erupted in Ukraine’s east, and the sudden annexation of Crimea by Russia, Parubiy served as secretary of the National Security and Defence Council. His role then was more than administrative; it was the backbone of Ukraine’s response strategy. “His hands held the helm when the storm hit,” said a former security advisor close to the council.

The Morning of Violence: A City’s Peace Shattered

The deadly shooting took place around midday, jolting Lviv’s citizens. In a city where the hum of life usually follows the rhythm of café chatter and street musicians, the sudden violent act eerily illustrates that no place in Ukraine feels untouchable amid ongoing conflict.

According to the Prosecutor General’s office, Parubiy was ambushed and shot multiple times. He died instantly. The attacker vanished into the bustling streets, fueling fears and urgency at every level of government.

Lviv Mayor Andriy Sadovyi expressed the city’s collective anguish and alarm on Telegram: “We must find the person responsible. This is not just an attack on a man but an attack on our sense of security. In a country at war, we have no fully safe spaces.”

The National Outpouring: Voices of Mourning and Resolve

Ukraine’s leadership quickly voiced their grief and resolve. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy took to social media to confirm the grim news and promised a thorough investigation: “All necessary forces and means are engaged in the investigation and search for the killer,” he affirmed, recognizing Parubiy as “a true patriot.”

Former President Petro Poroshenko’s words cut deep, portraying the killing as a blow to the nation’s very heart: “Andriy was a great man and a true friend. That is why they take revenge—because they fear what he represented.” Poroshenko highlighted Parubiy’s role in shaping Ukraine’s armed forces, underscoring how vital the former speaker was to safeguarding the country’s sovereignty.

Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha described Parubiy as “a statesman whose efforts will forever be inscribed in the history of Ukraine’s fight for freedom.” His words reflect a broader truth: this is not just an isolated crime but a chapter in a long, painful narrative shaped by conflict.

Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko called the murder “a profound loss,” urging swift justice. “You always remained a patriot of Ukraine and made a great contribution to the formation of our state,” she said.

What Lies Beneath: War, Instability, and the Price of Independence

While investigators scramble to uncover motives and track down the assassin, the broader context is impossible to ignore. Ukraine has faced relentless pressures since the 2014 upheaval. The ongoing war in the east, the waves of political reform, the struggle to root out corruption—each thread weaves a complex, sometimes dangerous tapestry.

For Lviv, a cultural jewel and stronghold of Ukrainian identity, Parubiy’s assassination hits particularly hard. Situated far from the frontlines, the city has been a refuge for many, a place where the diaspora, students, and activists gather to cultivate a vibrant, European-oriented life. Yet, as Mayor Sadovyi’s grim words reveal, even here the shadow of conflict looms large.

This tragedy invites us to ask: How does a nation at war ensure the safety of its leaders and citizens alike? What vulnerabilities do such assassinations expose in Ukraine’s security apparatus? And beyond immediate politics, what does the targeting of figures like Parubiy signify in a global fight over ideas—between authoritarianism and democracy, east and west?

In the Wake of Loss: The Future of Ukraine’s Fight for Sovereignty

As the state mobilizes to capture Parubiy’s killer, his legacy serves as a torch passed on to others. His role in the Euromaidan movement, dedication to national defense, and unyielding commitment to Ukraine’s European integration embody the aspirations of a nation standing firm amid existential threats.

For the citizens of Lviv, and indeed all Ukrainians, this brutal act is a stark reminder of the stakes involved. It reignites the question: At what cost does freedom come? And what price must a society pay to heal its wounds yet remain steadfast in its ideals?

In quiet moments, one can almost hear Parubiy’s voice in the streets of Lviv, urging perseverance, urging unity. In a world where democracy’s light can feel fragile, his life and death rekindle a flame—a call to bear witness, to resist intimidation, and to keep dreaming of a free, sovereign Ukraine.

Conclusion: Remembering Andriy Parubiy

Andriy Parubiy’s assassination is more than a crime; it is a poignant mirror held up to a world grappling with power, identity, and justice. His story is a thread in the complex fabric of Ukraine’s ongoing struggle—a testament to the resilience of a people who refuse to surrender their dream of peace and sovereignty.

As this chilling episode unfolds, the world watches, reflecting on the fragility of peace in a region marked by conflict. In remembering Parubiy, we are reminded of the human cost behind headlines and of the enduring spirit that compels a nation to rise despite the darkness.

What do you think this tragedy reveals about the challenges facing countries caught between conflict and democracy? How might Ukraine’s path forward shape the broader conversation about security and sovereignty in an increasingly divided world? Share your thoughts below—because in stories like these, every voice matters.

Drought Reveals Ancient Burial Sites in Iraq

By

hanad

-

August 30, 2025

Ancient tombs unearthed in Iraq due to drought — 40 ancient tombs have been discovered by archaeologists

When the Waters Recede: Iraq’s Drought Unearths Ancient Secrets

There is a strange beauty in loss—how scarcity can reveal buried stories, how hardship uncovers histories long forgotten. In the drought-stricken lands of northern Iraq, a cruel climate twist has transformed crisis into revelation.

As the waters of the Mosul Dam reservoir slip to historic lows, archaeologists like Bekas Brefkany find themselves standing on the threshold of time itself. “So far, we have discovered approximately 40 tombs,” Brefkany, director of antiquities in Duhok province, tells me with steady excitement. Tombs, he estimates, that are more than 2,300 years old—silent witnesses from the Hellenistic epoch, exposed now because of a drought that spares nothing.

Unearthing from an Unlikely Place

Imagine a vast, shimmering reservoir that ought to be brimming with water at the heart of Iraq’s rugged north. Instead, the surface is receding, revealing shoreline fragments long submerged. The Khanke region, nestled near the colossal Mosul Dam, has become an unexpected archaeological theater.

The team first glimpsed tantalizing fragments in 2023. “Back then, we saw only parts of a few tombs — like shadows on the horizon,” Brefkany recalls. But this year, the reservoir’s volume fell even further, hitting “its lowest” levels in nearly a century, opening a window of opportunity no one had imagined.

Now, 40 tombs stand revealed—rock-cut chambers, silent sentinels of a time when empires clashed and mingled in the cradle of civilization. The drought—devastating as it is elsewhere—is a boon for those dedicated to unraveling Iraq’s layered past.

An Unfolding Story Written in Stone

These tombs likely date back to the Hellenistic or Hellenistic-Seleucid period, a chapter when Alexander the Great’s shadow still stretched across vast swaths of the ancient Near East. It was an era of dynamic cultural intersections, where Greek influences wove themselves into Mesopotamian traditions, creating a rich tapestry that archaeologists yearn to explore.

The team is racing against time. As water levels could rise again, these relics must be carefully excavated and relocated to the Duhok Museum for preservation and study. This delicate process balances urgency with respect for antiquity’s fragility.

“Every artifact we save feels like rescuing a voice from the silence of centuries,” says one of Brefkany’s colleagues, who has worked alongside him. “This isn’t just history; this is identity. It connects us to a world that shaped who we are.”

The Drought: A Double-Edged Sword

But what does this allure of discovery mean in the stark realities of Iraqi life today? The drought that unveiled these ancient tombs is no mere backdrop; it is a crushing reality. Iraq has endured five consecutive years of severe drought, one of the driest periods since records began in 1933.

The government reports that reservoir levels have plummeted to a mere 8% of their capacity, a statistic that echoes painfully across every village and city. Farmers watch dry fields with vacant eyes. Electricity grids strain under resource shortages. Water, the very lifeblood of Mesopotamia, has become a scarce prize.

A Koya farmer, Ahmed Rashid, confides, “We used to depend on the rivers for our crops. Now, we struggle to even collect enough water for our families. The land remembers—and mourns—its lost green.”

More Than Climate: The Politics of Water

Yet, as compelling as the climate narrative is, another layer complicates this story. Iraq’s iconic rivers, the Tigris and Euphrates, which have nurtured civilizations for millennia, are now choked not just by drought but by human hands upstream.

“Dams built across the borders by Iran and Turkey have dramatically reduced the flow to our lands,” explains Dr. Layla Hassan, a regional water management expert. “These structures disrupt the natural rhythms of rivers, intensifying shortages already worsened by climate change.”

This geopolitical dimension underscores a cruel irony: lakes and rivers whose waters have irrigated humanity’s earliest fields now dissolve into diplomatic tension, environmental crisis, and cultural upheaval.

In the Midst of Crisis, a Call to Reflection

What can we, the global audience, take from this tale of shrinking waters and emerging tombs? It is a stark reminder of the frailty that connects all human existence—how environmental degradation, political conflict, and cultural heritage form an inseparable trinity.

Could these ancient tombs whisper to us lessons about resilience? About the impermanence of empires, and the endurance of human stories etched into stone before being swallowed again by time?

Climate resilience must go hand in hand with cultural preservation, especially in vulnerable regions like Iraq.
Cross-border cooperation over shared water resources is urgent to sustain both people and heritage.
The ancient tombs reveal not only a historic era of coexistence and cultural fusion but also stress the need to honor our shared human past amid present-day challenges.

Hope Against the Current

On a dusky evening in Duhok, near the reservoir, a group of children play where water once flowed deeply. Their laughter mingles with the wind, carrying stories from the past and hopes for the future. It’s a scene that feels sobering yet hopeful—an invitation to imagine a world where ancient histories inform modern solutions.

As the tombs are carefully packed and moved, Iraq faces an urgent reckoning: to protect not just the relics of a distant past, but the water, land, and life that define its present and future. The question remains—will the lessons etched in stone survive long enough to chart a path forward?

For now, the parched earth has given up its treasures, and in doing so, has reminded us all of the delicate dance between nature and history, between scarcity and discovery.

What story will the receding waters tell tomorrow? And how will we listen?

Ambassador reaches out to German authorities regarding protest attack

By

hanad

-

August 30, 2025

Ambassador contacts German officials over protest assault — Kitty O'Brien was struck twice in the face by a German officer during a protest in Berlin

When Protest Turns Painful: The Harrowing Story of an Irish Demonstrator in Berlin

On a chilly autumn afternoon in Berlin, the bustling streets of Rosenthaler Platz bore witness to a scene far from the usual hum of daily life. It was a protest—a passionately voiced demonstration in support of Palestine—but what unfolded there has since rippled far beyond the German capital’s borders, touching raw nerves about civil rights, police conduct, and international solidarity.

At the heart of this story is Kitty O’Brien, an Irish activist whose commitment to justice and humanity brought her to Berlin’s streets but ended with a brutal assault by police officers during the protest. This episode has stirred diplomatic channels, mobilized grassroots activists, and ignited fierce debates about the limits of peaceful assembly and state response in contemporary Europe.

The Incident: Force and Fractures on Rosenthaler Street

Captured in stark, unsettling videos coursing through social media, the visuals tell a story that words can scarcely soften. Kitty O’Brien is seen receiving two forceful punches to the face by a German officer, followed by a violent dragging from the crowd. But the physical blows tell only half the tale.

An eyewitness recalls, “It wasn’t just the punches; it was how quickly everything spiraled. Officers seemed singularly intent on suppressing her — no regard for the pain or the shock. It felt like a message, that dissent would be met with brute force, not discussion.”

Subsequent reports from Irish Bloc Berlin, the activist group Kitty is affiliated with, paint an even grimmer picture. Her right arm was violently “pulled and twisted,” resulting in a snap that sent her straight to Berlin’s renowned Charité hospital. Surgery followed. “The injury was terrible,” says a member of the group. “To see someone so committed to peace suffering this way is heartbreaking. The police showed zero empathy.”

Kitty’s Past Encounters with Berlin Police

This is not the first time Kitty O’Brien has found herself in conflict with Berlin’s law enforcement. Irish Bloc Berlin notes she had been detained twice before—once on Nakba Day protests commemorating Palestinian displacement, and another time during a demonstration outside the Irish embassy in Berlin regarding deportation orders against Irish citizens. Both incidents involved tensions over police treatment and freedom of expression.

Lydia Bigley, a queer rights activist and former Berlin resident, reflects, “Berlin has a long-standing tradition of vibrant protest culture. It’s woven into the city’s identity. But what we’re seeing now is an unsettling departure—a rising tide of repression, particularly against pro-Palestinian voices. It’s a stark shift.”

International Fallout: Dublin Demonstrations and Diplomatic Ripples

Back home in Ireland, the reaction was swift and unmistakably impassioned. Outside the German Embassy in Dublin, a quiet crowd gathered—relatives, activists, and local politicians united in outrage. Among them was Dublin City Councillor Catherine Stocker, Kitty’s aunt. Her voice was thick with emotion:

“This isn’t just about Kitty, though her injuries tell a horrific story—broken arm, nerve damage, surgery to her nose and face. It’s about a broader pattern of silencing people who stand for international law and human rights. Protesting the slaughter of civilians, including children, in Gaza, is being criminalized here in Berlin.”

The call for Irish governmental intervention is clear and resonant. Stocker emphasizes, “The Irish Government must step in. This treatment of peaceful demonstrators violates democratic principles at their core. We cannot stand by as our citizens abroad are brutalized for standing up against genocide.”

Labour TD Duncan Smith echoed this urgency: “I’ve contacted the Tánaiste to ensure our government seeks answers and accountability from their German counterparts. We need clarity, transparency, and a commitment to protect Irish citizens’ rights everywhere.”

Diplomatic Dynamics

Responding to the controversy, Ireland’s Ambassador to Germany, Maeve Collins, and senior officials have formally engaged with German authorities. Officials expressed readiness to support Kitty with consular assistance if required, reflecting a concerned but measured diplomatic stance.

On the German side, the Berlin Police acknowledged the incident, stating that the matter has been handed over to the Directorate for Police Offenses at the Berlin State Criminal Police Office for investigation. They framed their officers’ actions as compelled by resistance from the demonstrator, alleging verbal insults and physical offenses against police personnel. Yet critics argue this official narrative glosses over excessive force and dismisses the grim injuries inflicted.

Protest Policing and Public Sentiment in Berlin

Berlin police reported that roughly 100 people were asked to disperse from the so-called “unauthorized gathering.” What started as calls for peace escalated to “verbally aggressive” interactions according to police spokespeople, leading to enforced expulsion, sometimes by force. The chaotic backdrop is further complicated by the police indicating they initiated 96 criminal investigations across a range of accusations—ranging from use of unconstitutional symbols to resistance and bodily injury.

But one must ask: when does maintaining public order cross into suppressing the very freedoms that democratic societies cherish? Berlin, often celebrated as Europe’s cultural and political heart of protest, now faces scrutiny over its handling of activism, especially around the Palestine issue, a topic charged with intense global emotion and political division.

Beyond Borders: What Does This Mean for Global Protest Movements?

Kitty O’Brien’s ordeal in Berlin is not merely an isolated clash between one activist and police officers. It reflects a growing global tension—a crossroad where state authority, freedom of speech, and human rights intersect and sometimes collide violently.

All around the world, people are taking to the streets, demanding justice, equality, and solidarity. From Hong Kong to Paris, from Lagos to Los Angeles, the dynamics of protest policing spark debate about how governments balance security with citizen rights.

As you read this, consider the wider implications:

How can democratic governments ensure law enforcement respects peaceful protest while maintaining public safety?
What responsibilities do foreign missions have in protecting their citizens abroad?
And perhaps most challenging, how do we as global citizens engage empathetically with conflicts half a world away, without losing the power or place of local expression?

A Call to Watch and Reflect

The story of Kitty O’Brien is a vivid reminder that protest, despite its demands for peace and justice, can be fraught with danger and sacrifice. Her voice and her injuries speak volumes about the enduring courage of activists and the urgent need for accountability where power meets vulnerability.

As the dust settles, Berlin and Dublin, Ireland and Germany, activists and officials are all grappling with the same question: What kind of society do we want? One where voices for justice are met with violence and silence, or one where dialogue flourishes even amid dissent?

For now, Kitty is recovering, her spirit undimmed by broken bones and bruised hopes. Her story is a testament to the resilience that fuels the global movement for Palestinian rights—and to the complex, often painful, realities of standing up to power.

Stay tuned, stay informed, and dare to listen to the voices that challenge us to be more humane amid tumultuous times.

Israel reports early phases of Gaza City assault in progress

By

hanad

-

August 30, 2025

Initial stages of Gaza City attack under way, says Israel — An Israeli Apache helicopter releases flares over Gaza this afternoon

Storm Over Gaza City: A City on the Brink

In the dusty outskirts of Gaza City, the hum of anxious whispers and hurried footsteps melds with the distant rumble of military engines.

This is no ordinary day in the densely populated heart of Gaza, where nearly a million souls huddle in a labyrinth of narrow streets and crowded homes. The Israeli military has announced its fierce push into Gaza City — an operation described as “operating with great force,” signaling the dawn of what could become one of the most intense and harrowing chapters in this long-standing conflict. The air hangs heavy not just with smoke and tension, but with the palpable weight of uncertainty and dread.

The Calm Before the Storm

The military’s recent communications have been laced with ominous undertones. While daily “tactical pauses” in fighting have offered scarce moments for aid to trickle into pockets of suffering, these pauses explicitly exclude Gaza City. The military describes it as a “dangerous combat zone,” a phrase that hints at the ferocity unfolding within the city’s walls.

Yet, no immediate evacuation order has been issued. Avichay Adraee, the army’s Arabic-language spokesman, carefully chose his words, remarking that evacuation was “inevitable”—a chilling admission of the looming exodus that lies ahead.

Should nearly a million people really be preparing to flee, uprooting everything in a city where families have weathered decades of hardship, conflict, and siege? The scene unfolding is nothing short of a human exodus, with families piling into vans and cars, their vehicles brimming with mattresses, chairs, and bags—symbols of hurried resilience.

Voices from the Ground

“We don’t know where to go,” says Fatima, a mother of four clutching her youngest child’s hand as they navigate the gridlocked streets. “The south is crowded already. The water is running low. But we cannot stay here. The shelling seems closer every day.”

Her sentiment echoes across Gaza City. Last week, Defence Minister Israel Katz dropped a stark ultimatum: destroy Gaza City if Hamas refuses to surrender on Israel’s terms. The gravity of those words is felt by every family contemplating flight or the impossible choice to stay.

“It’s like living under a ticking time bomb,” says Youssef, a taxi driver whose livelihood has stalled amidst the encroaching conflict. “We used to hope for peace, for stability. Now, survival is all that matters.”

The Machinery of War and Human Crisis

Behind the scenes, the machinery mobilizes. Approximately 60,000 Israeli reservists have been summoned, and military operations continue relentlessly, supporting humanitarian aid in some areas while simultaneously closing in on targets deemed terrorist strongholds.

The paradox of war—attempting to balance military objectives with fragile humanitarian relief—creates a backdrop of grim urgency. For many locals, it’s a cruel dilemma engineered by forces beyond their control.

As tanks roll along the border fences, the atmosphere grows ever more volatile. Palestinians face the sad irony of displacement within their besieged enclave, pressed between militias, tanks, and scarcity of essential resources.

Hostages, Heartbreak, and The Toll of Conflict

Amidst this turmoil comes the tragic news from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office: the body of Ilan Weiss, abducted during the brutal Hamas attack of October 7, has been recovered from Gaza. Weiss’s wife and daughter were released months ago, in a rare relief during a tenuous truce. But the family’s grief is a devastating reminder of the countless lives shattered by this conflict.

“We will neither rest nor be silent until all our hostages are home—alive or deceased,” the Prime Minister’s office declared, underscoring the resolve and heartache shared by Israelis across the nation.

Yet, the broader saga is complex and heart-rending for both sides. Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas assault, 47 remain in captivity, with roughly 20 believed to be alive. This grim fact threads the narrative through despair, hope, and the wrenching uncertainties faced by families on all sides.

Numbers That Demand Reflection

The scale of suffering cannot be overstated. Since the October 2023 Hamas incursion, which claimed 1,219 Israeli lives—predominantly civilians—the retaliatory strikes have unleashed devastating consequences for Gaza.

At least 62,966 Palestinians have perished in the conflict, most civilians, according to credible data from Gaza’s health ministry and corroborated by UN observers.
Over 40 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes on one single day recently, marking a relentless tempo of violence.

These staggering numbers are not mere statistics—they pulse with the stories of mothers, fathers, children, and neighbors caught in the zone where geopolitics and human suffering intersect.

A City’s Future Hanging by a Thread

What will become of Gaza City? As the military offensive accelerates, what choices do its residents have when evacuation is constrained by borders, blockades, and limited aid?

This is more than a military confrontation or political chess game. It is a profound human tragedy unfolding in a city vibrant with history, culture, and the indomitable spirit of its people.

In Gaza’s narrow alleyways, old men gather to recount stories of resilience, children play amidst the ruins, and families huddle under dim lights to share meals —glimpses of life persisting in the face of darkness.

For anyone watching from afar, it demands empathy and urgency. How do we reconcile the need for security with the right to life and dignity? How do we honor the memories of those lost, while striving to prevent further bloodshed?

Global Reflections and the Path Forward

The Gaza offensive is a microcosm of a wider, simmering crisis in the Middle East—a region long marked by competing narratives and deep-seated grievances. Yet here we find universal themes that resonate beyond borders:

The human cost of protracted conflict: Entire communities fragment, generations bear trauma, and hope flickers precariously.
The challenge of humanitarian aid amid warfare: Corridors of relief are fraught and frequently obstructed, leaving millions vulnerable.
The daunting role of leadership: Choices made in political and military cabins reverberate through the lives of innocents.

As global citizens, what role do we play in witnessing, advocating, or demanding peace? Can voices of reason and compassion rise above the cacophony of war?

If you find your heart heavy reading these lines, join the countless others who believe in a different possibility: that one day, cities like Gaza can flourish—not as battlegrounds, but as places of hope and renewal.

For now, the story continues—raw and unfolding under the shadowed skies of Gaza City.

Three die in fire amid protest in Indonesia

By

hanad

-

August 30, 2025

Three killed in blaze during protest in Indonesia — The building of Makassar City Regional House of Representatives is set on fire during a protest in Makassar, Indonesia

A Fiery Outcry: Indonesia’s Protests Ignite Tragedy and National Reckoning

On a turbulent Friday in Indonesia, a wave of protest swept across the archipelago—from the bustling streets of Jakarta to the vibrant city of Makassar—turning demonstrators’ anger into flames and heartbreak. What began as outrage over the death of a motorcycle taxi driver hit by a police vehicle escalated into some of the most devastating violence the country has seen in recent memory, leaving at least three people dead in a burnt-out council building in eastern Indonesia’s Makassar.

This is a story not only about tragedy and violence but about the simmering tensions beneath Indonesia’s surface—between a government grappling with complex challenges and ordinary citizens who feel unheard, marginalized, and powerless. It is a raw, human drama unfolding in the streets, a reflection of broader global themes around inequality, justice, and governance.

The Spark: A Tragic Death

It all began with a simple, heart-wrenching video that quickly clutched the nation’s collective heart: the moment a motorcycle taxi driver—locally beloved as a “gig” worker, part of Indonesia’s sprawling informal economy—was struck by a police tactical vehicle during earlier protests about wages and perceived extravagance among lawmakers.

Affan Kuniawan, only in his twenties, had been the breadwinner for his family, ferrying customers through the dizzying maze of Jakarta’s streets. His untimely death last week served as a profound symbol: a young man caught between economic struggles and an increasingly assertive state apparatus. “He wasn’t just a rider; he was the backbone of many families,” said Budi Santoso, a fellow motorcycle driver from Jakarta, his voice heavy with mourning.

What followed was a nationwide outcry—protests ignited across cities including Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Bandung, Semarang, Surabaya, and Medan. Whatever grievances had been simmering now boiled over with blistering intensity.

Makassar’s Tragedy: Flames in the Council Chambers

Makassar, in South Sulawesi, has always been a vibrant city—a melting pot of cultures sitting at the crossroads of tradition and modernity. But on this volatile day, the city was transformed into a battleground. Outside the provincial and city council buildings, protests erupted into violent chaos. Rocks flew, Molotov cocktails shattered the evening calm, and soon, both council buildings were engulfed in flames.

Rahmat Mappatoba, secretary of the Makassar city council, conveyed somber news to the press. “They were trapped in the burning building,” he stated grimly. “Two were staff members, and one was a civil servant. Two died on the scene, and one passed away in the hospital.” The fire, sparked by protesters storming the office—an unprecedented breach—had taken three innocent lives.

These were not faceless victims; these were individuals embedded in the city’s fabric, employees just doing their work when chaos broke loose. “I knew one of the victims,” shared Lina Hasan, a local shopkeeper. “He was always kind, cheerful. To see this happen—it’s unimaginable.”

Photos from the scene showed towering flames engulfing the council buildings as local firefighters battled through the night to control the blaze. At least four others were injured and hospitalized.

Jakarta and Beyond: The Nationwide Uproar

Meanwhile, in Jakarta, the capital’s atmosphere was thick with tension. Hundreds gathered outside the headquarters of Brimob—the elite Mobile Brigade Corps, Indonesia’s paramilitary police unit. Known for its hardline tactics, the unit faced fierce public ire. Demonstrators hurled firecrackers and tried to force their way inside, resulting in police firing tear gas to disperse the crowd. Chaos reigned.

“We want justice!” shouted Rini Setiawati, a university student among the protesters. “Affan didn’t deserve to die like that. For years, we’ve witnessed corruption and inequality grow—I’m here to say no more.”

The police confirmed that seven officers had been detained for questioning over the incident, signaling official acknowledgment of gross misconduct. President Prabowo Subianto, in office for less than a year, found himself in the eye of this storm. This was the largest protest yet under his leadership, forcing him to urge calm, launch an investigation, and visit Affan’s family personally. “Our government must learn from this painful moment,” he said in a televised address. “No one is above the law.”

Beyond the Immediate: What Lies Beneath?

But these events are not isolated. They reveal deeper fractures in Indonesian society. While the country boasts one of Southeast Asia’s largest and fastest-growing economies, its income disparity remains striking. According to the World Bank, Indonesia’s Gini coefficient stood at 38.2 in 2023, reflecting ongoing inequality despite rapid development.

The motorcycle taxi drivers—widely known as “ojek” riders—are emblematic of the informal sector’s millions, struggling daily amid rising costs and scant social protections. Their low wages contrast sharply with the perceived extravagance of lawmakers criticized for wasteful spending, fueling anger and resentment.

Prabowo’s administration, promising swift economic growth through ambitious populist policies—including a billion-dollar free meal program—has also been forced to implement budget cuts elsewhere, stoking public dissatisfaction. Could these protests be a simmering cry against systemic economic and political disenfranchisement? The answer feels painfully clear.

A Catalyst for Reflection and Change

This outbreak of violence and grief beckons us to ask: How does a nation reconcile rapid modernization with social equity? How do governments balance order and freedom, authority and accountability? Indonesia’s saga echoes worldwide challenges: rising youth unemployment, the precarious gig economy, and demands for police reform.

For the thousands who took to the streets, the flames consuming Makassar’s council building mark more than property damage—they symbolize a rupture of trust. But amid the smoke and sorrow, there is hope. Prominent activist Diah Puspita urges resilience: “We need to channel our pain into dialogue, into reform. The people’s voices can be powerful without violence.”

As this story unfolds, what remains is a nation wrestling with itself—a country striving to find equilibrium between its aspirations and realities. And for the rest of us listening from afar, Indonesia’s crisis offers a vital lesson in empathy and vigilance. How do we, globally, ensure that progress doesn’t trample those most vulnerable?

In the Wake of Fire

The ashes of Makassar’s council building still smolder, a stark reminder of a day when protest became tragedy. But beyond the physical destruction lies a call—a call to look harder at the narratives behind the headlines, to hold power accountable, and to rekindle the promise of justice.

Indonesia stands at a crossroads—will it heed the lessons of loss to build a fairer society, or will history repeat with further strife? As readers, we must watch attentively and ask ourselves: what cost are we willing to pay for progress? And who gets left behind along the way?

Soomaaliya iyo Jabuuti oo Kala Saxiixday Heshiisyo Is-Afgarad ah

By

aden

-

August 30, 2025

Aug 30 (Jowhar)-Wasiirka Arrimaha Dibadda iyo Iskaashiga Caalamiga ah ee Soomaaliya, Mudane Cabdisalaam Cabdi Cali.

Continue

Madaxweyne Xasan oo u hanbalyeeyay hoggaanka cusub ee maamulka Waqooyi bari

By

aden

-

August 30, 2025

Aug 30 (Jowhar)-Madaxweynaha Jamhuuriyadda Federaalka Soomaaliya Mudane Xasan Sheekh Maxamuud ayaa hambalyo u diray Madaxweyne Cabdulqaadir Axmed Aw-cali iyo Madaxweyne Kuxigeen Cabdirishiid Yuusuf Jibriil oo loo doortay hoggaaminta Dowlad-goboleedka Waqooyi Bari Soomaaliya.

Continue

Did Israel intentionally target journalists who were killed in Gaza this week?

By

hanad

-

August 30, 2025

Journalists killed in Gaza deliberately targeted - doctor — Five journalists were killed in Gaza yesterday (bottom left) Hussam Al-Masri and Mohammed Salama, (top left) Ahmed Abu Aziz and Moaz Abu Taha, (far right) Mariam Abu Dagga

When a Hospital Became a Battlefield: The Tragic Toll on Gaza’s Journalists

On an ordinary Monday morning in Gaza, time stood still for a moment—before shattering into chaos. At around 10:08 a.m. local time, Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, a place of healing and hope, suddenly turned into a scene of devastation. The Israeli military launched strikes on the hospital’s exterior staircase, killing twenty people, including five journalists whose brave lenses had been capturing the war-torn reality of Gaza for the world to see.

The loss has sent ripples not only through the local community but across global newsrooms and human rights circles. It demands we pause and confront the harsh, uncomfortable truths about war, journalism, and the fragility of truth in conflict zones. How do you reconcile the sanctity of a hospital with the violence that stains it? And what does this strike mean when the victims include those who dare to expose the brutal truths?

The Scene of the Tragedy: Through the Eyes of the Witnesses

Hussam al-Masri was a Reuters cameraman positioned on the hospital’s exterior staircase, capturing images that would otherwise remain unseen. His footage cut out abruptly when the first missile struck, a haunting moment immortalized in the chilling silence left behind. Seconds later, as colleagues and rescuers carried his lifeless body down the very same stairs, a second strike hit the spot, enveloping the air in dust and despair.

Another Reuters contractor, Hatem Omar, captured this horror from above until the blasts rocked his world, his video feed obscured by thick dust and debris. Even Egyptian station Alghad TV streamed footage live, showing the sudden turn from quiet reportage to frantic survival. Witnesses described the stairwell—once a vantage point for journalists due to its reliable internet signal and panoramic view of Gaza—as a “lifeline,” now reduced to rubble and smoke.

“This was our only window to the world,” said Abdelrahman Alkahlout, a journalist who had depended on the Nasser Medical Complex to transmit his reports. “Today, that window was deliberately shut. Not just to silence us, but to silence Gaza.”

Such firsthand accounts confront the official explanation offered by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who categorized the event as a “tragic mishap.” The Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) insisted the strike was not aimed at journalists but at a Hamas camera stationed nearby. Yet the footage and on-the-ground testimonies paint a starkly different picture—one that calls into question the so-called “mistake.”

Journalists Under Fire: A Dangerous Duty

The five journalists killed—Hussam al-Masri (Reuters contractor), Mariam Abu Dagga and Moath Abu Taha (freelancers affiliated with AP and Reuters), Ahmed Abu Aziz (freelance), and Mohammad Salama (Al Jazeera cameraman)—were not accidental casualties. They were professionals bearing witness, chronicling the war’s bloody toll when Israel has effectively barred foreign journalists from entering Gaza for nearly two years.

The role of local and freelance journalists in such contexts cannot be overstated. They are the eyes and ears for the global audience, risking everything to pierce the veil of silence and propaganda. Reuters and the Associated Press issued a joint statement demanding clarity and accountability, emphasizing the essential nature of the journalists’ work. They wrote:

“These journalists were present in their professional capacity, doing critical work bearing witness. Their work is especially vital in light of Israel’s nearly two-year ban on foreign journalists entering Gaza.”

The international community’s response has been one of sorrow, outrage, and calls for investigation. But beyond condemnation, there lies a profound question: in modern warfare, where the battlefield extends to the realms of media and perception, how can we protect those who document the truth?

The Anatomy of a Strike: Questions Without Answers

What makes this event even more harrowing is the apparent calculated nature of the strikes. The first hit Hussam al-Masri’s position. The second followed minutes later, hitting the exact location where his body was being carried. Why, if the target was “terrorists,” would the forces delay nearly ten minutes, allowing them ample time to flee? Why choose a hospital stairwell—well recognized as a media hotspot and secure broadcasting site—for such an assault?

Omar Hatem’s videos, alongside social media reels capturing two separate missile impacts, leave little doubt that this was more than collateral damage. The human toll included five journalists, but the strike claimed the lives of other civilians too. It’s a grim reminder that in war zones, distinctions between combatant and non-combatant often blur tragically.

The Broader Context: Media, War, and Power

Gaza’s media landscape is constrained, to say the least. With Israeli restrictions on foreign press access, local journalists bear the double burden of risk and responsibility. They are storytellers with pen and camera, often operating under immense pressure and threat. This makes the deliberate or reckless targeting of media points not just a local tragedy, but a blow against free speech and global awareness.

Look beyond Gaza, and similar patterns emerge around the world—from Ukraine to Syria—a global battlefield where the control of narrative often becomes as fierce as the control of territory.

Are attacks like these part of a troubling new war doctrine where silence is weaponized, and information flow controlled with ruthless precision? It’s a question that demands our attention.

The Faces Behind the Headlines: Remembering the Fallen

Hussam al-Masri, a Reuters contractor, whose camera froze mid-story—a testament to the fragility of life amid conflict.
Mariam Abu Dagga, a freelance visual journalist weaving light through darkness, working with AP and Reuters.
Moath Abu Taha, another freelancer contributing quietly powerful images to AP and Reuters, tragically cut short.
Ahmed Abu Aziz, a freelance journalist who risked everything to deliver unvarnished truth.
Mohammad Salama, Al Jazeera’s cameraman in Gaza, striving to tell stories the world must hear.

Their loss is deeply personal to many in Gaza where journalists work not for glory but from conviction. Local reporter Sara Abu Ali told me, “They were not just colleagues; they were the thread connecting Gaza to the outside world. Their death is a blow to us all.”

Reflecting on the Cost of Truth

As you read these words, I invite you to ponder—what is the cost of a free press in conflict zones today? How do we reconcile the strategic calculations of nations with the humans caught in the line of fire? And, critically, how do we honor those who risk their lives not with empty phrases but with real protections, accountability, and steadfast support?

The strike on Nasser Hospital was not just a tragic event; it is a profound symbol of the complex, dangerous dance between war, media, and morality. It demands vigilance from governments, courage from journalists, and thoughtful attention from the global citizenry.

We owe it to those lost—to Hussam, Mariam, Moath, Ahmed, Mohammad—and those who continue, to ensure their voices are not silenced, their stories not erased.

War may shatter buildings, but the power of truth, captured by courageous reporters, refuses to be broken.

Firdhiye oo loo doortay madaxweynaha maamulka Waqooyi Bari

By

aden

-

August 30, 2025

Aug 30 (Jowhar)-Mudane Cabdiqaadir Aw-Cali Firdhiye ayaa noqday madaxweynaha Shanta sano soo socota ee maamulka Waqooyi Bari, kadib markii doorashada wareegga labaad uu isaga baxay musharrixii la tartami lahaa ee Cabdirisaaq Khaliif.

Continue

US appellate court rules Trump’s worldwide tariffs unlawful

By

hanad

-

August 30, 2025

US appeals court finds Trump's global tariffs illegal — The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit affirmed a lower court's finding that Donald Trump had exceeded his authority using emergency economic powers to impose wide-ranging duties

The Tumultuous Saga of Trump’s Tariffs: A Legal Battle with Global Ripples

When President Donald Trump unleashed his sweeping tariffs, the world’s economic landscape shifted beneath its feet. What began as a bold gambit to “put America First” quickly morphed into a tangled web of trade wars, legal battles, and diplomatic tensions echoing far beyond Washington, D.C.

And now, a seismic court ruling threatens to turn the tide once again. On a crisp morning this past week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed down a 7-4 decision declaring many of Trump’s tariffs legally flawed. Yet in a twist befitting the drama of this story, the tariffs remain in place—for the time being.

The Legal Reckoning: Authority Questioned, Tariffs Suspended—but Not Yet Defeated

At the heart of the case lies a question that might sound dry but is anything but: Did President Trump have the legal authority to impose sweeping tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)? This law grants the president emergency powers, but as the court has now clarified, these powers don’t explicitly include slapping tariffs on nearly every major trading partner.

“The statute bestows significant authority on the President to undertake a number of actions in response to a declared national emergency,” the court wrote, “but none of these actions explicitly include the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax.”

This ruling affirmed an earlier judgment by the U.S. Court of International Trade, which had initially blocked those tariffs in May due to their questionable legal grounding. However, the appeals court decided to keep the tariffs alive, at least until mid-October, to give Trump time to take his case to the Supreme Court.

Trump’s reaction was immediate, standing firm on his Truth Social platform: “The appeals court incorrectly said that our Tariffs should be removed, but they know the United States of America will win in the end.” He vowed to fight on “with the help of the United States Supreme Court.”

Why does this matter beyond the courtroom?

Because these tariffs have reverberated far beyond American shores. They have upended trade agreements, disrupted global supply chains, and raised billions of dollars in additional costs for importers and consumers. The question of whether these funds should be refunded hangs over U.S. businesses and trading partners alike.

And as the world watches, many wonder: What will happen if the Supreme Court sides against Trump? Will American companies and consumers be free from these extra costs, or will this spark a diplomatic backlash, with retaliatory tariffs spiraling once more into a new economic confrontation?

A Closer Look at the Tariffs: Scope and Consequences

Since January, Trump’s administration didn’t merely stick to the traditional playbook. Instead, it invoked IEEPA in creative, wide-ranging ways to impose “reciprocal” tariffs on nearly every trading partner, setting a baseline duty of 10%. Certain countries faced steeper levies—Europe, China, Canada, Mexico—all grappled with increased barriers.

It wasn’t just trade disputes in isolation. Tariffs were also used as weapons targeting the flow of lethal opioids into the United States, which policymakers linked especially to Mexico and China. Thus, economics became intertwined with complex health and security concerns.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent expressed deep concerns about the legal challenge. They warned that invalidating the tariffs could destabilize U.S. global leadership, damage ongoing negotiations, and cause harmful diplomatic embarrassment—language that underscores the high stakes involved.

Voices from the Ground: Trade, Trust, and Turmoil

While courts wrestle with legal intricacies, ordinary Americans and global citizens bear the practical brunt of trade upheaval. Jane Liu, a small-business owner in Seattle specializing in electronic parts imports, shared her frustrations: “These tariffs didn’t just increase prices. They made planning a nightmare. Now, with this ruling, the uncertainty is even worse. Will I get refunds if they’re ruled illegal? No one seems to have answers yet.”

Across the Atlantic, European manufacturers are equally uneasy. Olivier Martel, an automotive executive based near Lyon, described the tariffs as a “diplomatic embarrassment” that chills cooperation. “We’ve spent years building partnerships with American firms, only to see trust broken by this back-and-forth.”

Economists emphasize the disruption too. Dr. Amara Shah, professor of international trade law at London School of Economics, elaborated, “The Trump tariffs represent a fundamental shift in how trade is conducted—emergency economic powers wielded as a blunt instrument rather than through negotiated tariffs or agreements. This ruling could herald a return to more traditional, negotiated trade relations.”

Wider Reflections: What Does This Tell Us About Global Trade, Power, and Democracy?

Stepping back, one wonders: What is the balance between swift executive action and legal oversight? When does the need for decisive economic policy cross into overreach?

Trump’s tariffs reveal persistent tensions global economies face between protectionism and open markets, sovereignty and interdependence. They echo a global trend of rising nationalist policies pushing against decades of globalization, which have lifted hundreds of millions out of poverty but also generated dislocation and resentment.

Moreover, the legal battle raises profound questions about the mechanisms of democratic accountability. How much power should a single branch, a single leader, wield in directing the nation’s economic fate? In a world where supply chains stretch across continents, can the “emergency” label justify wide-reaching tariffs that affect millions downstream?

Looking Forward: What Should We Watch For?

The Supreme Court’s stance—will it uphold the appeals court decision or restore broader presidential authority?
The response of trading partners—will prolonged uncertainty lead to renegotiations, retaliations, or renewed economic cooperation?
The impact on businesses and consumers—how will American industries adapt if tariffs are rescinded, refunded, or kept indefinitely?
The precedent this sets for future administrations—will emergency powers see expanded use or tighter restraint?

Here’s a question for you, the reader: In a globally connected world, should emergency powers allow such comprehensive economic measures? Or does this kind of executive authority erode the very foundations of international cooperation and domestic rule of law?

Conclusion: The Tale of Tariffs Is Far From Over

The story of Trump’s tariffs is more than legal niceties or economic statistics. It’s a story about power, unpredictability, and the complex dance of nations trying to protect their interests while navigating an intertwined global system.

For all the numbers tossed around—the billions collected, the percentages levied—the human factor remains paramount. Business owners like Jane Liu, executives like Olivier Martel, government officials balancing diplomacy and national priorities—they are all caught up in this unfolding drama.

And as the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision approaches, the world holds its breath, waiting to see whether this chapter becomes a cautionary tale or a pivot point toward recalibrated trade diplomacy. Either way, the echoes of this saga will ripple far beyond America’s borders.

So, what do you think? Is the age of unilateral tariffs over? Or might we see similar plays in the future, where presidents wield emergency powers in economic battles? The next act is yet to unfold—stay tuned.